RUMFORD — To better inform residents about federally-proposed changes in the town's Flood Plain Management Ordinance, an official with the Maine State Planning Office will be answering questions starting at 6 p.m. Thursday, July 2, in the conference room of the municipal building.
"It gives the public a chance to ask questions and look at maps," Town Manager Carlo Puiia said Tuesday afternoon. "These people work with this all the time."
The regularly scheduled Board of Selectmen meeting will follow upstairs in the auditorium at 7 p.m.
At 5 p.m. Monday, July 6, a Federal Emergency Management Agency official will field questions about the proposed changes during a public hearing in the municipal building, Puiia said.
That will be followed at 7 p.m. by a special town meeting to discuss possible adoption of the proposed ordinance, Puiia said. Voting will be by secret ballot.
At the June 18 selectmen's meeting, Puiia said Rumford should adopt the Flood Plain Management Ordinance because residents who require flood insurance would not qualify for it if the town doesn't approve it.
Additionally, he told selectmen that Rumford wouldn't qualify for any FEMA money for flooding disasters if the ordinance isn't passed.
Puiia said Tuesday that torrential downpours from two thunder and lightning storms Saturday afternoon and evening that destroyed roads and a bridge accentuates the need to approve the new changes.
"High Street took pretty heavy damage from it," Puiia said. "A couple of large sinkholes formed and at one, it crushed a sewer line."
"There was quite a bit of erosion under the roads," he added.
Several other roads in town that are maintained by the state and Thurston's Bridge on South Rumford Road will be handled by the Maine Department of Transportation.
"A DOT representative contacted me about Thurston's Bridge and said their engineers are working on a plan now to provide it with a wider platform and a better design," Puiia said.
Replacing the bridge alone is expected to cost $500,000.
By Wednesday, Rumford Public Works crews had repaired damage from the two sinkholes on High Street, and graded the dirt and gravel fill flat. It has yet to be paved, however.
Other agenda topics to be discussed at Thursday night's selectmen's meeting include the fire building-construction grant, announcement of the winner of Rumford's Citizen of the Year Award, and appointments to boards and committees.
Additional items include an update on Maine's Project Canopy grant, approving a hawker's and peddler's license for Laurie's Greenhouse, and a request from the Boy Scouts of America for a donation.
An executive session is also scheduled for discussion of a union contract matter with Puiia, the police and fire chiefs, Public Works superintendent and town attorney.
tkarkos@sunjournal.com
Frank DiConzo photo
Collapsed pavement from Saturday's torrential rains and flash flooding revealed one of two sinkholes on High Street in Rumford. The damage was repaired by Wednesday, but not yet paved.
In order to comment on SunJournal.com, you must use your real name and include the town in which you live in your profile. A member of our staff will call you
to verify this information. To join in, fill out your user profile completely and check the box "please verify my status." We'll get back to you within
one business day to verify your account.
Hey, I throw in 11% that doesn't override the rest of the comment. 11% is huge. That's why I talked about what they have recently done to improve it.
But you reaction is based not on the numbers, but on your assumptions. "Government is overreaching" that's an assumption or better yet your bias. "they are outside their span of control". Again a bias or at best an assumption. Have you tested their "span of control". Do you really know its breath? Based on these two untested and untestable assumptions you reach the conclusion that waste and fraud will continue or get worse." "ObamaCare is simply opens the door to more opportunity" Again a conclusion with no support at all.
You have to know the capabilities of Federal systems and be able to test them to make the judgements you are. When Medicare was implemented Federal "span of control" was very low. A top of the line computer system used tape for I/O. The legislation gave them 6-12 months to implement new features/programs. Current computer systems are thousands of time more productive. Project development techniques are orders of magnitude better. And the Affordable Care Act staged implementation over a number of years. True these systems process millions of transactions per day and thats a real task for any operation. But they have the tools to do it today that they didn't have in the 1960's. The "span of control" today is huge. A medicare for everyone program is very doable. Minimimzing errors is very doable. Checking and preventing deliberate fraud is very doable today (credit card fraud detection is orders of magnitude better than just a few years ago). The Affordable Care Act provides te opportunity to greatly reduce real fraud. Nothing will reduce error too much.
I'm so glad the first post was from someone who pays attention. Financially sound banks, which did nothing wrong, were forced to take the money too even though they didn't need it. That way the Obama Administration would later be able to say that they had to do this to avert a crisis. After all, look how many banks got that taxpayer funded bank bailout money. A person would have to be blind not to see that well timed lie coming.
Like the commenting on purging DHHS from the budget while neglecting spousal and child abuse. Seems to me liking it to keep it silent and in the family.
In order to make comments, you must verify your account.
In order to comment on SunJournal.com, you must use your real name and include the town in which you live in your profile. A member of our staff will call you to verify this information. To join in, fill out your user profile completely and check the box "please verify my status." We'll get back to you within one business day to verify your account.
Login or create an account here.
Our policy prohibits comments that are:
- Defamatory, abusive, obscene, racist, or otherwise hateful
- Excessively foul and/or vulgar
- Inappropriately sexual
- Baseless personal attacks or otherwise threatening
- Contain illegal material, or material that infringes on the rights of others
- Commercial postings attempting to sell a product/item
If you violate this policy, your comment will be removed and your account may be banned.