WASHINGTON - Sen. Olympia Snowe, responding to President Barack Obama's health care speech Wednesday night, said she still opposes the so-called public option.
Snowe, a senior member of the Senate Finance Committee, and one of the bipartisan group of six committee members called the Gang of Six -- including Committee Chairman Baucus and Ranking Member Grassley -- that is working to draft a health care reform bill, released the following statement this evening following President Obama's address to Congress: "I appreciate that President Obama shared many of the details of his vision for health reform at this pivotal and historic moment, and signaled a willingness to work across party lines," Snowe said. "At the same time, as I continue to oppose the inclusion of a public option in any package, I would have preferred that the issue were taken off the table as I have urged the President - given that any bill with a public option will not pass the Senate and this divisive subject is unnecessarily delaying our ability to reach common ground.
"The fact is, all Senate Republicans as well as some Democrats do not support the public option, which has also been generating concern across the country about a government takeover of health care that distracts from the legitimate necessity of providing more accessible and affordable health care for all Americans. I am, however, encouraged the President recognized that we cannot leave this imperative to chance - and acknowledged the safety net plan I have proposed is a ‘constructive' idea ‘worth exploring.' Such a fallback plan would be offered if, after we have implemented landmark insurance market reforms, private insurers fail to deliver the affordable coverage Americans require.
Snowe continued, "I am pleased that many of the other elements he discussed dovetail with those we continue to work on in the bipartisan Gang of Six - that, first and foremost, we maintain the sanctity of the doctor-patient relationship and choice in selecting physicians; that those who are satisfied with their coverage today can keep it tomorrow by building on and strengthening our employer-based system; that plans will be affordable for those currently with and without coverage; and that insurance companies cannot deny coverage to any American.
"As the president also noted, it is essential that we reverse the skyrocketing costs of health care - including common sense initiatives related to medical malpractice - and to make certain that health reform does not add to the deficit. I was particularly pleased to hear the President's proposal will require additional spending cuts if projected savings aren't realized - as it is vital we maintain budget neutrality as fundamental to any final package - particularly given the current and projected levels of federal deficits. Moving forward, I will continue my work within the Gang of Six to produce a consensus bill that will curb spiraling health care costs and ensure the health security of all Americans."




It seems like our current
It seems like our current president is going to keep pushing the people until they either roll over or it turns into another revolution.
Are you and your family prepared for whatever is going to happen? If not, you better get ready just in case.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Senator Snowe, it is time
Senator Snowe, it is time for you to get onboard with the public option. You are wrong. It is time to stand up and admit it. We want the public option. Please be brave and vote for the residents of Maine.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Snowe is also paid 734.000
Snowe is also paid 734.000 for the insurance lobbest. So to me any one that take money from them also has a hidden agenda
Love her but maybe it also time that all the so call old guard is removed from office. 20 + years make a corrup congress and to me 2-3 turm is long enough.
what say you?
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Just today I heard a story
Just today I heard a story about a woman who was denied workman's compensation (through a private insurer). She is unable to work or to handle most daily chores. Another instance of insurance companies maximizing profits over the care of insured people.
While any reform will better than the system we have now, it seems to me that both Snowe and Collins are caught in their conservative ideology. Both talk about budgets yet neither hesitated to vote for funding the Iraq war. Are we so much safer now. One trillion dollars squandered!!
Ultimately we need to move towards the one-payer system where the insurance premium (paid via tax) is indexed on income. Think of it this way: every time a person pays an insurance premium s/he is paying a defacto tax. The problem of course is that the lower your income the more disproportionately expensive the tax is. In any civilized country payment for health care needs to be indexed on income.
Government pays for education, for libraries, for road construction, for prison systems. Why not pay for health care?
While most Americans think we have a fantastic system of providing health care, it is quite limited. The woman I mentioned in the first paragraph is finding that out. Many countries in the world have a lower infant mortality rate, longer life expectancy, generally healthier citizens. I know that my family and friends in Canada are dumbfounded at the American loyalty to a system that does not work. I am always so impressed with how Canadians don't put off going to the doctor for fear of spending money uselessly. They go knowing they are covered and many find problems early and treat them accordingly. The American press does much coverage of Canadians who come down for medical reasons (what Canadians call "American heroic medicine"), but I have never met a Canadian who would prefer the American system to the Canadian.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Susan2, Your delusions are
Susan2,
Your delusions are getting the best of you although I do understand that you are just parrotting the views of your masters. Acorn has nothing to do with Obama. Obama has nothing to do with Acorn. Acorn is not setting up Prostitution but should be appauled if they do.
Grouping Communists, Fascists, and Socialists together means you just don't understand politics.
Jon Albrecht Dixfield
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.anothor deluginal democrat,
anothor deluginal democrat, see when the all got on the boat , good ship lolipop they all forgot to bring the orr
So now they have a lot of hot air going in all direction. Typical Democrat.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Olympia good job. Please
Olympia good job. Please stick to your down home Maine common sense and principles and we all will be better off when the dust falls from this.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Check out
Check out biggovernment.com!!!!
Snowe made the article with undercover videos (2 - 10 minute ones) of ACORN setting up PROSTITUTION!!!!
Let's see Obama get ACORN out of this one!
ACORN equals corruption!
Obama equals ACORN!
OBAMA equals CORRUPTION!!
Communists, Facists, and Socialists have invaded the Whitehouse and none of the Liberal News Stations or Print will talk about it???
Only watch Fox news from 5pm to 11 to GET THE TRUE NEWS!!!!
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.You mean it's only fake news
You mean it's only fake news from 11pm to 5 pm? Just 18 hours a day of "fair and balanced"?
______________________
Winston Churchill
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.No public option means no
No public option means no health care reform. This bill becomes the insurance industry's license to steal and kill its customers. Anyone who supports this is misinformed or benefits from a system where the insurance companies loot the economy and prevent care for their customers.
Jon Albrecht Dixfield
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.I don't know why, that this
I don't know why, that this administration has to go and re invent the wheel. On this health care. Why don't they regulate the indudtry and police that part of the industry Instead . As we all know goverment cannot manage any thing that has to do with money. If they were in the corporate world they would be into recerver ship, a long time ago.
Look at Meda care, post office, Look at the cash for clunker program. And did you also know if you took them up on a cash for clunke and received $4500 on a rebate You will know be tax on that as imcome. Lord give and the mighty IRS will take it back.
Like i said before the wheel is already invented, All it needs is to be tweek
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.I have sent this to
I have sent this to everybody in my address book. You will have to copy it and paste it in your browser address line.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G44NCvNDLfc&feature=player_embedded
All you college kids that made the big difference in our last presidential election should definately watch this video. He's talking directly to you. He's talking about your future.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Getting rid of the public
Getting rid of the public option is only the first step. The left has already mentioned adding triggers to the bill that would cause the public option to be implemented even if the bill is passed without specific "public option" language. The entire bill is useless, and should be scrapped. It is not about health care, the health care in this country is still the best in the world. It is about power and control. If it wasn't, why would it become mandatory? Why would the armed force of the federal government be needed to force everyone to purchase health insurance? This bill is a farce and cannot be paid for using the rhetoric of the liar-in-chief. If they truly wanted to 'reform' health CARE, they would go about entirely differently. Tort reform would be actually passed instead of bantered about during election cycles. True choice and competition would be allowed by allowing insurance to be sold across state lines like every other type of insurance is already. Less government interference in the whole process. Especially from Snowe, Collins and the rest of the idiot six.
"In the history of the nation, there has never been a political party so ridiculous as today's Democrats. It's as if all the brain-damaged people in America got together and formed a voting bloc." Ann Coulter
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Gil, I seriously believe we
Gil, I seriously believe we subsidize the rest of the developed nations national health care systems with our military expenditure. Even in peace time (Clinton 1997) we spent close to 300 bil, compared to the UK's 14 bil during wartime 2004. If we were to be complete shut ins, like we should be, and let everybody fend for themselves, then maybe we could afford such a health care system (or more importantly on ways to get energy from other means, not our enemies). Now back to those 2004 wartime numbers, the US spent well over 600 billion dollars. In 2008 we spent nearly half of the entire worlds miltiary budget (711 bil). I'm for military spending, but if Regan were in office on 9/11, he would of got his facts straight and within a week Afghanistan would be growing mushrooms, well, one big one anyway. I'm a Pat Buchanan Conservative, and other countries need to start defending themselves. They too reap the benefits indirectly of a stabilzed middle east by not shelling out an additional 10 pounds a litre in gas. Also, would Iran take threats serously from the Netherlands in regards to their nuclear program....I highly doubt it. Oh, and the next Tsunami that hits, T.S., we need to obviously take care of our own first.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.I WHOLE HEARTEDLY AGREE!
I WHOLE HEARTEDLY AGREE!
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.