Armstrong's comeback: real deal or whim?
MONACO (AP) — This is what retirement ultimately might look like for Lance Armstrong: reminiscing about his Tour de France exploits to an audience of suits and evening dresses who paid $1,000 a plate to hear him and mingling with a couple of princes.
No wonder Armstrong got back into cycling. He isn't quite ready to go gentle into the good night of cocktail engagements and perhaps - only he knows - a life in politics. He's not yet finished with his bike.
So Armstrong - a rebel with a cause - rolled up in denim jeans and an open-collared black shirt to a fundraiser for his cancer foundation in Monaco on Thursday night, less than 48 hours before he embarks on the most hotly anticipated comeback to the most storied race in cycling.
Monaco's Prince Albert II, a Jordanian prince and princess and the other 100 or so guests were dressed and perfumed to the nines. Armstrong apologized, telling them that in packing for the Tour he omitted a tie.
"This is what you get," he said.
Before cutting out early to bank sleep for the hard roads ahead, skipping the lobster salad and roasted medallions of lamb, Armstrong did at least partly answer the burning question: What brought you back? Why, in the shadow of the casino that helped make Monaco both famous and wealthy, would you risk your Tour legacy by racing again at the possibly overripe age of 37?
Over the next three weeks, in a most unforgiving physical test, there is a genuine possibility that rivals 10 years his junior or more could reduce the once unbeatable Armstrong to an also-ran. The record of seven consecutive Tour wins that he built from 1999 to 2005, on the ashes of his own battle against cancer, could become an edifice to the rider Armstrong once was but no longer is.
Or, less likely, the 37-year-old Texan could win again. What a story that would be.
Either way, Armstrong figures, this is a gamble he's already won. Measured in donations, pledges and support for the foundation which bears his name, Armstrong's decision to return to cycling is already paying off. It brought him those guests to the fundraiser, where an Armstrong-autographed Tour yellow jersey, a signed wheel and other items auctioned for $53,000. His campaign against cancer is going global. Despite the recession, sales of Livestrong merchandise have hit new highs and donations to the foundation rose by 6 percent in the first quarter of 2009.
"Some people from the sporting side said this is about sport, this is about him wanting to win an eighth Tour, this is about him wanting to be on TV again, this is about him missing the spotlight. That's not it at all," Armstrong told his invitees.
"I have to say that I think we have already won," he declared. "I have my own ideas and my own ambition, of course, but if we roll in third or fourth, I will unequivocally say that this has been a success."
That Armstrong and the Tour now need each other again is one of the biggest paradoxes of his comeback. In 2005, their relationship seemed over.
Armstrong quit railing against the "cynics and the skeptics" who refused to believe that a cancer-survivor could be so dominant without taking banned drugs.
Those who run the Tour suggested he wouldn't be missed. Many in cycling looked forward to a supposedly new and doubt-free era.
How misplaced those hopes proved.
After three subsequent Tours tarnished by doping scandals, even some of Armstrong's rivals now see his return as good publicity.
"He has a lot of courage to do that," said Bjarne Riis, who runs the Saxo Bank team. "We all have to thank him a lot for coming back."
Racing again can't erase the doping questions that hang over Armstrong's exploits. The battle between those who believe in and those who doubt Armstrong has been fought to a standstill.
This time, Armstrong's entourage has leaned on cycling's powers for him to be tested as often as possible, preferably every three days. Armstrong has publicized the tests - about 34 by his count - in Twitter postings. He told cycling author John Wilcockson that one reason he's back is to silence the skeptics, so his four kids don't grow up "reading all these things about me and doping."
Make no mistake, Armstrong will win this race if he can. He's shed some 25 pounds, looks like his wiry former self and as if he's enjoying the riding and being back with the boys in the peleton.
"Those of us who knew him well knew that 'retire' is not a word that is in his vocabulary," said Doug Ulman, president of the Armstrong foundation.
Claiming success with his cancer campaign before the race has even begun gives Armstrong an out should his aging legs be unable to match his on-bike ambitions. Losing won't matter so much as long as he helps teammate Alberto Contador, the 2007 champion, win again. Selfless dedication is a prized virtue in cycling and Armstrong could win fans by sacrificing himself for the Spaniard should he prove the stronger of the two. Armstrong has already laid ground for that possibility.
As always, he's got his bases covered.
In order to comment on SunJournal.com, you must use your real name and include the town in which you live in your profile. A member of our staff will call you
to verify this information. To join in, fill out your user profile completely and check the box "please verify my status." We'll get back to you within
one business day to verify your account.
Why doesn't all the members of the legislation take cuts on their payroll and their insurance coverage and see if they can manage. I'm already fighting DHS because of a mistake they made and because of their mistake my income tax refund is in jeopardy. I've already lost my maine state refund. This is wrong. DHS takes money from people who are on the system because of the mistake DHS made. That's not right. Why should the people be punished for a mistake that wasn't their fault. Stop spending other people's money. I work as much as I can so That my 8 yr old can go to school and have food, a roof what I make versus my rent and bills barely lets me have any money left over for dr visits, car repairs or basic household necessities, toothpaste, toilet paper etc.... Why don't they take it back from the people who defrauded DHS. I have mainecare but I don't have dental. Maine care only pays $8.00 for eyeglasses and they break all the time because they are cheap. The only way I can get mainecare to pay for a dentist is if I break a tooth or need one pulled. I can't just go to the dentist to fill a cavitiy or to have my teeth cleaned. That isn't fair. The legislature is supposed to be helping those citizens that are having a hard time. Instead of going on those fancy vacations, buying that new car why don't some of you Take your bonuses and put it back into the system. If I could afford to live like that I would give up my bonuses. It's about caring, oh wait the only thing the legislature cares about is what in their pockets and who they can screw next.!!! I'm all for rules and regulations but it needs to apply to everyone. Starting with the lawmakers.
One gentleman asked for published, peer-reviewed information on wind power. He was told, correctly, that such information can be hard to get, although there is of course published work showing serious effects on bird and bat populations. However, one source does come to mind: the US Energy Information Administration. They publish information about how much money we spend as taxpayers to support various forms of energy, and it can be quite interesting. For instance, natural gas gets $0.25 per MWh; coal gets $0.44. The owners of industrial wind turbines get $23.37/MWh.
Does that answer anyone's questions about why Angus King et al are working so hard to get in on this racket?
If the SJ thinks that windpower is a valuable part of the mix, and that subsidies are important, perhaps the answer is to have a level playing field here. And incidentally, according to the head of ISO-New England, wind turbines are so spread out over the landscape as to require a massive investment in transmission lines with an estimated cost of $19-25 Billion.... we would be paying for that, of course, on our electric bills. And paying again in terms of lost tourism revenue.
Another item that has come up here is the usual accusation about anti-windpower people just being a bunch of NIMBYs. Well, I can't speak for others but I sure hope I'm one! Love, charity, and caring for one's neighborhood are virtues that begin at home, and then hopefully go out to encompass more and more of the world and its people. I think it's high time people quit using this as an insult-- it's like sneering at someone for loving his mother.
However there is a kind of NIMBY that deserves the perjorative use of the term, and that is one who supports an activity as long as it's in someone else's backyard, not his. Thinking of the Natural Resources Council of Maine here... I'm not a member any more!
I've read a lot of words from Maine people who are fighting industrial wind, but have never heard one say it was fine as long as somebody else had to suffer, not them. So please, if you want to use the term make sure you use it wisely.
I'm relieved to hear that she is okay but didn't the city make this a one lane street now? It used to be two but since they did some road work, it is now lined as one lane. And did the 'passing' car stop to help or did they continue driving off, knowing full and well that they were in the wrong?? Charges need to be filed. This could've cost this poor woman her life or even who knows what else harm it could've caused!
In order to make comments, you must verify your account.
In order to comment on SunJournal.com, you must use your real name and include the town in which you live in your profile. A member of our staff will call you to verify this information. To join in, fill out your user profile completely and check the box "please verify my status." We'll get back to you within one business day to verify your account.
Login or create an account here.
Our policy prohibits comments that are:
- Defamatory, abusive, obscene, racist, or otherwise hateful
- Excessively foul and/or vulgar
- Inappropriately sexual
- Baseless personal attacks or otherwise threatening
- Contain illegal material, or material that infringes on the rights of others
- Commercial postings attempting to sell a product/item
If you violate this policy, your comment will be removed and your account may be banned.