Join the community!

Login, register or Connect to comment.

Columns & Analysis

Stop the turbines

Published on Sunday, Sep 27, 2009 at 1:01 am | Last updated on Sunday, Sep 27, 2009 at 1:01 am 5 Comments

"You begin to feel like you're being used," a long-time Maine Audubon supporter and state legislator told me about the wind power movement in Maine. "There seems to be no real benefit to the people or communities of Maine."

What? We are being used? No benefit to the people of Maine? Won't wind power decrease carbon dioxide emissions and fossil fuel use, increase employment, while sending millions of dollars to the state government in taxes?

Nope. Nope. Nope. And, well, nope. Here's why: Not one of those high-minded objectives has been achieved by installation of over 35,000 wind-turbines in Europe.

Why do we think it will work any better here?

For Maine, wind turbines are imported from other states and countries, financed by shadowy hedge funds and private equity firms, and buoyed by national debt financing. If turbine farms were solely privately funded projects, they wouldn't be so bad.

Instead, they are built on the backs of the taxpayers, to benefit wealthy corporate interests.

There are four subsidies for the wind power industry: 1. direct grants (of which already $1 billion has been awarded this year alone); tax credits (30 percent to developers when the wind farm is 'turned on'); a subsidy of 13 cents per kilowatt-hour produced from federal government in the form of direct cash payments and carbon offsets; and 'First in line' status for every kilowatt-hour produced.

The immense subsidies more than offset any public financial benefit from their existence. So turbines offer the prospect of receiving little or no return, while destroying scenery and killing tens of thousands of migratory birds. To me, this sounds like corruption.

Why is the combined power of environmental groups, lobbyists and financiers coming to bear on the citizens of Maine without so much as a "by your leave?"

Money. Lots of it.

I want to prosper just like the next guy, but not on the backs of the workers and teachers, or our children and grandchildren. Getting rich from subsidies given away by politicians to save us from "climate change" or to create "energy independence" just doesn't seem honest to me.

Former governor Angus King has been involved in this from the beginning. His company, Independence Wind, has received a permit to install 22 turbines in Roxbury. King has said he wants to leave a "legacy to the people of Maine" in the form of dozens of wind turbines and farms.

Opponents are saying that King's company stands to generate almost $100 million from this project alone. Yet given the subsidies, this and other wind farms will contribute little or nothing to the revenues of the communities in which they are placed, or the depleted coffers of the state of Maine.

All the benefits are mitigated by the giveaways.

The only tangible benefit, Independence Energy's offer of subsidized electricity to residents of Roxbury, amounts to nothing more than a bribe.
Why should Mainers pay for the electricity produced by wind farms at all? We should get it for free, and the state should get royalties from wind farms.After all, we are paying through our taxes and the additional debt issued by the federal government to pay the subsidies to these projects.

Why should we pay twice?

Worse, a report was filed in August with the Ocean Energy Task Force, a state committee that advised the Legislature and governor on offshore projects like wind, on the subject of instituting lease fees and royalties to site offshore wind projects, but our elected officials, bureaucrats, and environmental groups seem keen on giving away this potential revenue.

Other states do not. Why should Maine?

Too many questions still linger on wind power. No wonder people in Maine are questioning motives of wind power advocates, including environmental groups who now support it, after years of opposition. Even prominent Maine ornithologists are willing to accept the slaughter of tens or hundreds of thousands of birds to spare us climate change.

Is the premise behind wind power development even valid?

The sky will not fall. The seas will not rise to strike the unfaithful. Neither will the earth crumble beneath the feet of the unbelievers, nor, for that matter, the believers, if we do not build windmills.

Maine, and every state in the Northeast, should put a moratorium on granting new permits until the details of wind power are worked out.

J. Dwight is a SEC registered investment advisor and an advisory board member of the Maine Heritage Policy Center. He lives in Wilton. E-mail jdwight@gwi.net.

In order to make comments, you must verify your account.

In order to comment on SunJournal.com, you must use your real name and include the town in which you live in your profile. A member of our staff will call you to verify this information. To join in, fill out your user profile completely and check the box "please verify my status." We'll get back to you within one business day to verify your account.

Login or create an account here.

Our policy prohibits comments that are:

  • Defamatory, abusive, obscene, racist, or otherwise hateful
  • Excessively foul and/or vulgar
  • Inappropriately sexual
  • Baseless personal attacks or otherwise threatening
  • Contain illegal material, or material that infringes on the rights of others
  • Commercial postings attempting to sell a product/item
If you violate this policy, your comment will be removed and your account may be banned.

Advertisement

Displaying comments, from newest to oldest

Berssweef's picture

OK Mr. Wright's what's your

OK Mr. Wright's what's your solution? Smaller SUV's no doubt.

Normc's picture

Industrial Turbines 400'

Industrial Turbines 400' tall whirling in the sky will be like putting an electric mixer in a fish bowl. The DEPs answer as to how we will know the effects these monster machines will have on the Eagles, Loons oops no never mind the Loon they forgot to include them in the study so I guess they dont count. "Post construction mortality rates" That is correct, that is the answer from the Department of Enviromental Protection. Dont you just feel safe and protected? Has anyone calculated the ammont of herbicide needed to spray the 150' wide corridor for the transmission lines? We cant have any vegitation growing there. Lets run a wide swath so we can get that electricity to Mass. and beyond. All to line the pockets of a few.
God help us all.

mad dad's picture

I would like to see

I would like to see photographic evidence of the thousands of birds killed by turbines. I also question as to whether some sort of property taxes would be paid to the communities where they were located. Some people do not object to the turbines even if they can be seen on a daily basis. Few are located within view of someone's house. I don't object to them, but would prefer the state develop offshore natural gas. The natural gas could be used to run electrical power plants, heat all kinds of buildings, and even used in motor vehicles. Natural gas burns cleaner than fuel oil, gasoline and deisel fuel. I have been told by an eyewitness that visited Alaska there are natural gas fields that have gas wells already drilled and capped. There is supposedly enough gas there to supply most of the power needs of the USA for eighty (80) years. Why aren't we using this gas? Is it the oil companies or our government keeping this gas from being used? Canada is going to import natural gas, store it, and then sell it to the US. We should develop our own supply. If Alaska can deal with the people in the gas and oil industry, why can't Maine?

Steve Thurston's picture
verified

Baldacci should introduce

Baldacci should introduce emergency legislation to rename Maine from "Vacation Land" to "Industrial Waste Land". 2700 megawatts of land based wind turbines by the year 2020 will require 1800 1.5 MW turbines, the most popular model in use in Maine, made by GE, owner of NBC, CNBC, MSNBC (notice all the subliminal messages showing slowly spinning turbines in wide open grasslands on those channels?). Do you think GE might have a lobbyist or two in Washington? How about 150?

Roxbury is the tip of the iceberg. There are 50 wind projects the size of Roxbury on the wind industry's drawing boards. There will not be a horizon from Buckfield to Quebec that is not dominated by monstrous arm waving machines.

As Mr. Dwight says, our grandchildren are footing the bill for this unprecedented assault on Maine's landscape. If only the money being used to subsidize wind power in Maine were instead spent on Conservation and Efficiency programs. Each household in Maine would be eligible for $14,000 in incentives for insulation, new windows, a 95% efficient gas boiler to replace the 60% efficient oil fired dinosaur in most basements. The savings in foreign oil for home heating could easily reach 50% with such simple, cost effective improvements.

Instead, we are destroying Maine with thousands of wind turbines, hundreds of miles of 35' wide roads blasted across fragile mountain ecosystems, and hundreds of miles of new transmission corridors to remote turbine projects. When the goal of 2700 MW is reached the combined total of the electricity from all these turbines will only generate about 4% of the daily demand of the New England grid, not when the grid needs it, and often times replacing existing renewable electricity already in place. So much for saving the planet.

Is there any doubt about where Baldacci sees his next job? His former chief of staff and former head of the PUC Kurt Adams is now VP at First Wind. I bet he will put in a good word for his former boss.

Advertisement

Stay informed — Get the news delivered for free in your inbox.

I'm interested in ...