Maine marriage campaign probe gets OK

AUGUSTA, Maine (AP) — Maine's campaign oversight board overruled a staff recommendation Thursday and authorized an investigation into fundraising by groups supporting the campaign to repeal the state's gay marriage law in a Nov. 3 referendum.

The Commission on Governmental Ethics and Election Practices voted 3-2 after some members said there was sufficient evidence to warrant a closer look at finance reporting by the National Organization for Marriage, a major contributor to Stand for Marriage Maine.

The latter group is leading the people's veto campaign to repeal Maine's legislatively enacted law recognizing same-sex marriages. Maine's law, which was signed in May by Gov. John Baldacci, and the challenge forced by a petition drive have drawn national attention.

In the case before the ethics commission Thursday, Californians Against Hate founder Fred Karger complained that the Princeton, N.J.-based National Organization for Marriage is circumventing Maine law by not reporting the names of donors whose money is spent by the Maine campaign.

Karger's whose group was formed to identify major donors in last year's Proposition 8 campaign in California, in which voters overturned that state's same-sex marriage law. Karger said NOM's finances "have always been clouded in mystery."

"They're trying to shield their donors," Karger said Thursday. "An investigation is the only way to the truth."

NOM attorney Barry Bostrom said the organization's policy is to collect donations not targeted for specific campaigns so donors will not have to fear business boycotts, property damage and other forms of harassment by same-sex marriage activists.

Bostrom said NOM complies with state campaign financing laws in all states in which it's active.

Brian Brown, NOM executive director, dismissed Karger's complaint as "nothing more than an attempt to harass and intimidate those of us who believe in the core truth that marriage is between one man and one woman."

Thirty states have voter-approved gay marriage bans in their constitutions, and federal law bars federal recognition of gay unions.

Six states have passed laws or have been ordered by the courts to allow same-sex marriage, but the people's veto fight has focused national attention on Maine.

"I do believe Maine is now the No. 1 fight throughout the country," said Brown. "Of course it's critical."

While the state ethics commission has authorized an investigation into whether violations of Maine's finance reporting law occurred, it did not issue a deadline for a finding, either before the Nov. 3 election or after it.

The commission staff had concluded there was not enough evidence to justify an investigation.

Stay informed — Get the news delivered for free in your inbox.

I'm interested in ...

In order to make comments, you must verify your account.

In order to comment on SunJournal.com, you must use your real name and include the town in which you live in your profile. A member of our staff will call you to verify this information. To join in, fill out your user profile completely and check the box "please verify my status." We'll get back to you within one business day to verify your account.

Login or create an account here.

Our policy prohibits comments that are:

  • Defamatory, abusive, obscene, racist, or otherwise hateful
  • Excessively foul and/or vulgar
  • Inappropriately sexual
  • Baseless personal attacks or otherwise threatening
  • Contain illegal material, or material that infringes on the rights of others
  • Commercial postings attempting to sell a product/item
If you violate this policy, your comment will be removed and your account may be banned.

Advertisement

Displaying comments, from newest to oldest

Virgil Sampson's picture

let them do what they want

let them do what they want BUT DON"T CALL IT A MARRIAGE ---- THEY CANNOT FULL FILL THE BASIC REQUIREMENTS OF MARRIAGE. AND LETS QUIT MINORITY RULE.

kitterykid's picture
verified

It doesn't matter that they

It doesn't matter that they are taking the money and producing commercials that lie.
They have and should have to report where every nickel and dime came from, and fromwho!

gramma gardiner's picture

gramasgardinerI think gays

gramasgardinerI think gays and Lesbians ave every right to marry. Since they cannot have children, DHS will not have the hassel of this family getting TANF ,because te father is no longer in the home. It is better for the gays and lesbians to be together and be happy than for them to be married to the opposite sex, end up divorcing abd the children suffering.
There was a comment saying the people for same sex marriage were trying to say things against their opponets, like boycott businesses. Well they di the something to those who are for it. They claimed same sex marriage would be taught in school. First of that kind of a ciriculum would have to ave a parent permission and would likely be taught to jr, HIgh and high school studenets in a sex education class. The parents would get to see what was being taught, before the students taught. So there have people in everything you vote on pro and con and people try to ruin it for each other. I hope the marriage bills goes through,

gramma gardiner's picture

gramasgardinerI think gays

gramasgardinerI think gays and Lesbians ave every right to marry. Since they cannot have children, DHS will not have the hassel of this family getting TANF ,because te father is no longer in the home. It is better for the gays and lesbians to be together and be happy than for them to be married to the opposite sex, end up divorcing abd the children suffering.
There was a comment saying the people for same sex marriage were trying to say things against their opponets, like boycott businesses. Well they di the something to those who are for it. They claimed same sex marriage would be taught in school. First of that kind of a ciriculum would have to ave a parent permission and would likely be taught to jr, HIgh and high school studenets in a sex education class. The parents would get to see what was being taught, before the students taught. So there have people in everything you vote on pro and con and people try to ruin it for each other. I hope the marriage bills goes through,

Licia Kuenning's picture
verified

It is worth remembering that

It is worth remembering that no organization or person has any official status whatsoever as speaking for any segment of the voting public on the Question 1 issue. There was never an election held by Maine conservatives electing Marc Mutty to speak for them, nor an election by the liberals electing Jesse Connolly to speak for them. These much-quoted individuals chiefly excel in their ability to get their names in the media--and I guess our friends in the media know better than I how they manage to do that. We didn't choose them, and I couldn't care less where either organization gets its funds. Far too much of the campaigning consists of organizations criticizing each other and/or soliciting money, instead of focusing on the issues. Meanwhile I suspect that very few of the votes cast on this ballot question on November 3 will be the result of Mutty's or Connolly's efforts. I think most of us knew what we thought about the issue before we ever heard of those guys.

tron's picture

Let's see, a group in NJ was

Let's see, a group in NJ was created to amass contributions to promote discrimination but circumvent disclosure laws because people and businesses who support discrimination do not want that fact know because they as ashamed of what they're doing is being sued by a group in California to force disclosure of the contributors in accordance with Maine law, where all this money is being spent on the pro discrimination referendum. Isn't time we kick out all these out of state groups and decide this among ourselves?

melora's picture

I can see why a donor list

I can see why a donor list would not be provided if they have the freedom to govern their business. I heard about the gay groups in CA where the extremists were posting lists of donors so that pro-gay marriage supporters could boycott or harass (or worse) those who support traditional marriage. Here is one story I read about awhile back:

'Gay' threats target Christians over same-sex 'marriage' ban:
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=80220

Some of the blogs post violent suggestions towards those who support traditional marriage.

After you hear about this, I don't think either side of the debate should post lists of donors (when they are individuals) but only businesses. Boycotting a business for supporting gay marriage is a good idea but asking for donor lists to target individuals is seriously wrong and could lead to people getting hurt.

Advertisement