Friday, November 20, 2009 in Lewiston, Maine

Auburn-Lewiston:
Clear sky, 44.6 °F

A committed marriage is a worthy aspiration

At every juncture of the conversation and debate about protecting same-sex marriage in Maine, we must remind ourselves that we are talking about heart and soul, flesh and blood human beings. We are dealing with people's lives: people who are in love.

We are all wired for relationship, and that includes intimate relationship. When any person finds that special someone, we aspire to marriage. It is a noble and honorable way to live out our lives. It breaks my heart to deny any loving couple the opportunity to experience married life.

As a practicing Catholic contemplating the issues presented by both sides of referendum Question 1, it seems to me that agitated people are oddly warning Mainers about speculative outcomes should gay and lesbian people be allowed to choose marriage.

Mainers need to be reminded that being afraid is not a desirable quality. Commentary that springs from fear should be critiqued for credibility. I experience these fear-based arguments as quite hard-hearted.

I urge Maine people to recognize the harshness of the words coming from people afraid of same-sex marriage.

Let's not treat our gay and lesbian relatives, friends and neighbors as if they are not in the room with us as we debate their lives. No matter how said, those words are a form of rejection. I imagine they penetrate like daggers into the hearts of gay and lesbian people, their families and their friends.

I am particularly perplexed by people insisting they genuinely want gays and lesbians "to be happy," but then deny married happiness as an option for them. The terms are contradictory. It is as if to say, "You are special, but you are not special enough to live out your life in this deeply loving way"; or, "You are special, but you are far too different to aspire to the honor of marriage."

It is a paradoxical statement and must be exposed for what it is: Minimizing human beings who desire to love one another deeply within a marriage.

Using questionable interpretations of legal and educational events from other states and generalizing them to Maine in an effort to scare people is quite troubling to me. This fuels the fire of discrimination. When linked with commentary offered by overtly fearful people among us, the result forms the basis for alarming discrimination.

Demeaning and hate-filled vocabulary in letters to the editor have associated gay and lesbian life with "war," "carnage," "aberration," "deviation" and "abomination" (just to name a few from recent letters). Those are undeniably hate-filled words.

We do not need to protect our children from gays and lesbians seeking the honor of marriage to live out their lives. Rather, we must protect our children from people spreading questionable, fearful and outright hurtful rhetoric about gays and lesbians who live, work and love in our state.

Quite frankly, I believe most Maine citizens are not afraid. I believe most Maine citizens can discern who is speaking from love and who is speaking from rejection and fear. More commentary on the facts can be viewed at www.religiouscoalition.org, a Web site offered to us by informed, educated, prayerful, and open-minded Maine clergy and lay leaders who have recognized that same-sex marriage must be spoken to in truthful and loving terms and without useless anxiety.

Love, monogamy, commitment, integrity and morality are family values offered by the No on 1 campaign. To be around any couple (gay, straight, or lesbian) who advocates for loving, life-long, married commitment, can only enhance my life, my 20-year marriage, and our daughters' lives.

It is a privilege for me and my family to know other couples (gay, straight, or lesbian) who are committed to married life and who raise their children with integrity, love and compassion. I encourage all Mainers to have a tender heart toward gay and lesbian neighbors.

The bottom line is: No on 1 is advocating for committed marriages as a means to express the depth of loving relationships, and that is a beautiful and worthy aspiration for all human beings.

As Mainers, let's take the high road. Blessings come in abundance to those who choose love over fear.

Pamella Starbird Beliveau is a graduate student at Boston College School of Theology and Ministry, a Catholic, lector, and Eucharistic minister at Prince of Peace Parish. She is a spokesperson for Maine Catholics for Marriage Equality. She lives in Lewiston with her husband and their two daughters.


Comments

devoutmainecatholic says

"we must protect our children from people spreading questionable, fearful and outright hurtful rhetoric about gays and lesbians who live, work and love in our state. "

Is it just me, or did this lady just admit that she agrees with the gay activists - that children should be taught acceptance of the homosexual lifestyle regardless of the desires and beliefs of their parents?

The way this lady describes legal marriage for "committed relationships" is ludicrous. Aside from this column completely begging the question when it comes to the debate on "same - sex" marriage, for a supposedly educated Catholic, she apparantly knows nothing about the Catholic Church's teachings on marriage, sexuality, or the inalienable rights of children to both a mother and a father. None of the Church's teachings on these issues have anything to do with spreading" fear" or "hurtful rhetoric". Anyone who wishes can learn not only what, but why the Catholic Church believes what she does regarding these issues - the Church is only too happy to explain her beliefs - that the state has no authority to change the definition of marriage - and that it is a grave injustice to society, especially to children, and therefore a grave sin for Catholics to support such a position.

Although I am not associated with any campaign, and I don't work for the Church, I am getting a little tired of the no on 1 campaign trotting out all these make believe so called "practicing" Catholics. Anyone who refuses to believe what the Church teaches on Faith or Morals puts themselves out of the Church. Why can't these people at least be honest enough to say "I used to be catholic but I disagree with the Church..."

It's time for this poor lady to practice what she preaches - in more ways than one. She should stop impugning "hate" and "fear" in the name of "tolerance", and she should have the honesty to attend a church that reflects her beliefs.

Posted 4 weeks ago (permalink)

apologia411 says

Wow, I don't know where to begin. I too am Catholic and want happiness for everyone, but redefining marriage will not make everyone happy. Don't forget that the redefinition of marriage will affect ALL Mainers, not just those that want to have their relationships called marriage. Anyone that supports traditional marriage is not fearful of gay marriage. That is a ridiculous statement. They just do not want a radical redefinition of marriage. Also, this bill is NOT about equality or love, because if that were the case, then the bill would allow ALL people to marry. Why doesn't LD1020 allow polygamists to marry or a bi-sexual to marry both a male and female? They all love each other and this is about treating all people fairly. What about a brother and sister? Or two cousins? If we were truly striving for equality, then any people that love each other should be able to marry, especially by your thought process. Marriage is not just about love or benefits. As a Catholic, you should know better. You are purposefully trying to lead other Catholics away from the faith....Shame on you!!

Posted 4 weeks ago (permalink)

Jasper775 says

The very first step in defending the sanctity of marriage is to
outlaw divorce. Couples contemplating marriage must be made to understand that
the vows they take before God, their family and friends and the state are not
fungible. Nothing is more destructive to the sanctity of marriage than the ease with
which couples repudiate their solemn vows and dissolve their marriage. Gay marriage
doesn't begin to compete with divorce in threatening the sanctity of marriage. Let's work
on divorce first.

Posted 4 weeks ago (permalink)

John 28 says

Pamela,
Thank you so much for the beautiful well written article and so agree with you. I have already voted "NO" on 1 and I urge all who LOVE do the same.

Posted 4 weeks ago (permalink)

Traylblaze says

Thank you for writing this well written piece.

Posted 4 weeks ago (permalink)

Traylblaze says

Thank you for writing this well written piece.

Posted 4 weeks ago (permalink)

Contests
Radio City Racing
NASCAR fantasy racing at its finest. Weekly prizes. Grand prize is a flat screen TV. Click here to play!
Copyright 2009 Sun Media Group