Join the community!

Login, register or Connect to comment.

Oxford Hills

Kean pulls wind power application

Published on Tuesday, Jul 7, 2009 at 12:12 am | Last updated on Tuesday, Jul 7, 2009 at 1:01 am 1 Comment
BUCKFIELD - Kean Project Engineering President Kirk Nadeau pulled his application for three wind turbines on Streaked Mountain, after Planning Board members and residents expressed doubts about the project. The application was due to be signed by Code Enforcement Officer Glen Holmes on Tuesday.
Planning Board members and residents alike were distressed to learn that with the permit signed, they could not stop the installation because there is no ordinance.
"This does not make the least bit of business sense but I am going to withdraw my application for the three turbines until the town can decide what they really want, Nadeau said. "It's not worth the direction this is taking. I don't intend to split the town."
Nadeau has signed a lease on private property on Streaked Mountain and received a permit to erect a meteorological tower on the site. The tower will be finished in about a year and will determine how much wind power can be generated with the three turbines.
After making a PowerPoint presentation at Monday's board meeting, questions arose from planners and others.
Board member Perley Lovejoy said he had been for the project at first, but has changed his mind.
"My daughter who lives a half mile away raises horses and that worries me." He said he liked Nadeau and thought he was treating the town right, but getting a permit for the three turbines so quickly didn't seem right.
Planning Board member Warren Wright said, "The turbines are not scenic and one thing the Comprehensive Plan calls for, which the town and state approved, was to preserve the beauty of Buckfield such as Streaked Mountain."
Holmes reminded the group that the Comprehensive Plan is just a plan and does not have any authority.
"I get the feeling that we are only getting part of the picture," board member Anthony Buckley said. "I don't see enough evidence to generate reliable statistics on the many factors which seem unpredictable."
Resident James Parker referenced a letter from a man who lives near the Freedom turbines which said his life had been made miserable due to the low-frequency emissions sounds from the turbines. Parker wanted to know why another mountain in Buckfield couldn't be chosen. Parker's property line is 1,200 feet from the proposed site on Streaked Mountain.
"What is the logic to all this?" asked Kennard Hicks. "Is there an overall plan for windmills in Maine? Is it good for all of us? Maine doesn't allow
billboards, yet windmills messing up the scenery is OK?"
Board Chairman James Burke suggested the board quickly organize a plan to work on a wind turbine ordinance, and they agreed.

In order to make comments, you must verify your account.

In order to comment on SunJournal.com, you must use your real name and include the town in which you live in your profile. A member of our staff will call you to verify this information. To join in, fill out your user profile completely and check the box "please verify my status." We'll get back to you within one business day to verify your account.

Login or create an account here.

Our policy prohibits comments that are:

  • Defamatory, abusive, obscene, racist, or otherwise hateful
  • Excessively foul and/or vulgar
  • Inappropriately sexual
  • Baseless personal attacks or otherwise threatening
  • Contain illegal material, or material that infringes on the rights of others
  • Commercial postings attempting to sell a product/item
If you violate this policy, your comment will be removed and your account may be banned.

Advertisement

Displaying comments, from newest to oldest

CarolynR's picture

CarolynR This article

CarolynR
This article is becoming a repeat performance like in many other proposed locations for industrial scale units. The Planning board is very smart to raise legitimate questions in regards to the scale of these units and potential effects. I have a turbine at residential scale that is installed 180 ft away from my back door, 50ft up on a tower with a 9ft rotor diameter and we have experienced flicker that gave my 11 year old daughter a headache everyday for two weeks raising significant valid concerns. In my personal experience it seems logical to have even greater concerns when the scale of these units is multiplied 10 times the scale of my unit.
It also seems questionably irresponsible to not be presenting these details in a project proposal in the form of a detailed cost/benefit analysis or to even be minimizing valid concerns coming from those citizen's who's lives and investments could be seriously effected. Another detail about Wind Turbines that I feel the general public lacks in valid information and should be asking the developers to explain is the energy production rating of these units in comparison to it's actual capable production. My unit is rated at 200 kw a month. Just like the general public when looking at anything as a potential investment, you look for the assurance that it will live up to what it presents itself as. We live in a good wind area, (one of the potential sites for industrial scale- Dixmont) and our unit has only produced 138kW since Nov. 08. This falls far below our expected calculations for that units contributions to our energy needs. This would be the nature of wind, and the ratings are deceptive to true expected outputs. This validates people having concerns and asking for details.

Advertisement

Stay informed — Get the news delivered for free in your inbox.

I'm interested in ...