A part of reality

The time is getting near when the people of Maine must decide on Question 1.

I will vote "no" on that question in order to preserve quality of life for all people. I believe that homosexuality is very normal and very much a part of reality. I fully accept its presence in the world. We are all individuals (very different and very OK), and a part of life, a part of God as I understand it.

Most Christian religions believe that marriage is to be between one man and one woman, and I need to honor those beliefs.

I am evolving toward different beliefs. God, life and love are about having the courage (faith) to consider changes that preserve and renew life; all of life.

I truly feel that the meaning of marriage is for two persons who love each other unconditionally to have equal rights under the law, and be honored and respected by all people.

Lou Giard, Turner

Stay informed — Get the news delivered for free in your inbox.

I'm interested in ...

In order to make comments, you must verify your account.

In order to comment on SunJournal.com, you must use your real name and include the town in which you live in your profile. A member of our staff will call you to verify this information. To join in, fill out your user profile completely and check the box "please verify my status." We'll get back to you within one business day to verify your account.

Login or create an account here.

Our policy prohibits comments that are:

  • Defamatory, abusive, obscene, racist, or otherwise hateful
  • Excessively foul and/or vulgar
  • Inappropriately sexual
  • Baseless personal attacks or otherwise threatening
  • Contain illegal material, or material that infringes on the rights of others
  • Commercial postings attempting to sell a product/item
If you violate this policy, your comment will be removed and your account may be banned.

Advertisement

Displaying comments, from newest to oldest

triumph's picture

maddad, don't flatter

maddad, don't flatter yourself. No one gives a crap about YOUR acceptance. It is a matter of law and civil rights. Anyone can refuse to accept black people as equal, but as Bob Taylor of the NAACP said of discrimination, "It was wrong 40 years ago, it is wrong now." Your opinion or acceptance is important to none of us who are working for equality.

Robert61's picture

Lous, there are many in many

Lous, there are many in many who do NOT consdier homosexuality to be normal. Simple point, apparently lost on those with a left wing agenda....they'd rather call us bigots than actually debate the merits.

veritas's picture
verified

OK - so we'll give you the

OK - so we'll give you the benefit of the doubt. You're NOT a bigot.

Merely ignorant.

------------------------------------------
When I was a young Sailor - I drank like a Sailor, fought like a Sailor, and screwed like a Sailor. Now that I am old and wise - I have a few scars, but many fond memories.

mad dad's picture

There is another part of

There is another part of reality. No matter how many laws are passed or how many books are written, there are many people who for many different reasons will not accept the gays lifestyle. It's not only reality, it is a truthful fact, which the gays and libs will NOT accept.

veritas's picture
verified

Which ranks right up there

Which ranks right up there with "If man were meant to fly, God would have given him wings."

------------------------------------------
When I was a young Sailor - I drank like a Sailor, fought like a Sailor, and screwed like a Sailor. Now that I am old and wise - I have a few scars, but many fond memories.

scott's picture

There is supposed to be

There is supposed to be separation of church and state. Period. Gov't has no right to interfere with marriage wether it is right or wrong. This bill should never have passed to begin with because of that. The qustion on the ballot should read, "Do you favor removing the separation of church and state and allowing the gov't to interefere with whatever beliefs a church has?"

Lil's picture
verified

Too late for that. Where do

Too late for that. Where do marriage licenses come from?
______________________

"A conservative is a man with two perfectly good legs who, however, has never learned to walk forward."
Franklin D. Roosevelt

veritas's picture
verified

From the union of both a

From the union of both a male and a female marriage license..... ;)
------------------------------------------
When I was a young Sailor - I drank like a Sailor, fought like a Sailor, and screwed like a Sailor. Now that I am old and wise - I have a few scars, but many fond memories.

triumph's picture

No on Question 1 By BDN

No on Question 1

By BDN Staff
BDN Staff

Do you want to reject the new law that lets same-sex couples marry and allows individuals and religious groups to refuse to perform these marriages?

Mainers have heard a lot in recent weeks about the consequences of allowing same-sex couples to marry, some of it accurate, some of it not. While such debate is healthy, this question boils down to a simple point: Everyone must be treated equally under the state and U.S. Constitution. Denying civil marriage rights to same-sex couples violates that tenet.

Further, extending the right of marriage to a small segment of the population that has been excluded furthers the state’s interest in promoting stable families and communities. The Maine legislation also took important steps, mirroring the state’s Human Rights Law, to respect religious freedom and traditions. No church will be compelled to perform or recognize marriages that run counter to its faith. This strikes the difficult balance of respecting religious freedom while ensuring equality.

Maine was unusual in passing a law to allow same-sex marriage rather than being required to do so by a court order. Since then, Vermont and New Hampshire have followed suit.

Lawmakers, including Gov. John Baldacci — the first governor to sign such legislation into law — moved Maine toward tolerance and fairness. Repealing this law would move the state backward while denying guaranteed rights to a small minority.

The repeal effort has been led by the Roman Catholic Diocese. Bishop Richard Malone called same-sex marriage “a dangerous sociological experiment.” The fact that gay couples have existed for generations — many of them raising children — counters this argument. Worse, however, is the church’s attempt to force its views on all Maine’s residents, whether they are Catholic or not.

“It’s important to have your own faith and connection to God,” Gov. Baldacci, a Catholic, told The Associated Press recently. “At the same time, it isn’t just that faith that you’re the governor of. … You’re governor of all the people.”

Taking the next step, the governor explained why civil unions — a popular alternative to same-sex marriage — are inadequate. “I was creating second-class marriage for certain people, which wasn’t right. I wasn’t doing my duty to the constitution I swore to uphold.”

It is only natural that changing the definition of something as fundamental as marriage makes some uncomfortable. However, marriage has changed over time — interracial marriages were once banned, and men were allowed to have many wives — without harming heterosexual marriages. In a country where the divorce rate is too high and too many children grow up in dysfunctional and abusive families, encouraging more adults to commit to long-term, loving relationships is a positive, not a negative.

Opponents of same-sex marriage warn of the consequences — all negative in their view — of such a definition change. When pressed to list those consequences, they cite lawsuits and a requirement to teach same-sex marriage in schools.

There are likely to be lawsuits, as that is how the boundaries of laws are tested and set. At the same time, gays and lesbians are already protected under the state’s human rights laws — a protection Maine voters refused to rescind in 2005 — so discrimination against them is already illegal and there has been no flood of lawsuits.

As for education, children are already being raised by gay couples. Those children attend our schools, and have for decades. If Sally’s two dads come to an elementary school awards night, or if Billy’s two moms come to the school concert, the relationships may become a topic of discussion at school the next day. Whether Sally’s or Billy’s same-sex parents are married or living together does not change the discussion the teacher might facilitate.

Along the same lines, those seeking to repeal the law have used the book “Who’s in a Family?” as evidence of homosexual education. The book shows families made up of a mother and father, single parents, grandparents, stepparents, husband and wife with no children — and gay and lesbian parents. “Who’s in a family?” it asks. “The people who love you most.”

It is hard to see how allowing more people to marry will weaken marriage. Instead, it seems the strong desire of gay and lesbian couples to be married, rather than declared domestic partners, shows the value and importance of marriage.

Advertisement