Our View
Vanishing wilderness down river
Published on Monday, Nov 18, 2002 at 12:12 am | Last updated on Wednesday, Oct 14, 2009 at 4:04 am
Lest there be any doubt as to the political clout of the Sportsman's Alliance of Maine, look no further than John's Bridge.
The bridge crosses Maine's legendary Allagash Wilderness Waterway at the narrows, separating Churchill and Eagle lakes. Over the years, people have been allowed -- or not allowed -- to launch canoes from the land nearby.
Either way, it's been a place of contention during nearly all of those years.
When launching was allowed, conservationists said it shouldn't be; that such a scheme isn't sanctioned by terms of the nation's Wild and Scenic Rivers programs. The storied Allagash, after all, is the first waterway accepted into the federal program that's state-managed.
When launching wasn't allowed, fishers, hunters and others -- primarily aligned with SAM -- cried foul. How dare the state keep them from accessing the Allagash waters, wherever and whenever they wanted. This land, after all, is theirs as much as anyone's.
Well, it seems they've won, at least for now. At least for now because any such controversial issue is always subject these days to some kind of court action.
On Wednesday, the state Bureau of Parks and Lands that oversees the Allagash decided it would move ahead with a plan to make a John's Bridge-area canoe launch and associated parking area a permanent feature of the wilderness.
The action comes now because Gov. Angus King is about ready to leave office. He pushed for John's Bridge as a payback of sorts for SAM's support. While that disappoints conservationists and friends of the Allagash, it shouldn't surprise them.
Among the disappointments the John's Bridge canoe access plan fosters is the decision to act on it unilaterally, without linking it to other issues of access and overuse of Maine's most precious waterway. The state has taken John's Bridge off the compromise table, and that bodes badly for the hopes of others to restore limited access, as was intended, to the Allagash.
Still, there's one kudo for the state. In its wisdom it deemed access will only be allowed in the spring, for fishers, and in the fall, for hunters. It'll be closed during the summer so as not to add to overuse woes already facing the Eagle and Churchill lakes areas.
But opening it in the spring and fall makes us wonder how convenience-minded our sportsmen and sportswomen have become. After all, it's only a few miles from John's Bridge to an already existing canoe launch at Churchill Dam. In reality, John's Bridge access isn't needed, it just makes it a bit easier for those who harvest Maine's fish and wildlife to practice their sports.
Whatever happened to building character and skill based on a bit of adversity or hardship?
And as the state opens more and more access to the Allagash, we should all be asking whither wilderness?
jmeyer@sunjournal.com
The bridge crosses Maine's legendary Allagash Wilderness Waterway at the narrows, separating Churchill and Eagle lakes. Over the years, people have been allowed -- or not allowed -- to launch canoes from the land nearby.
Either way, it's been a place of contention during nearly all of those years.
When launching was allowed, conservationists said it shouldn't be; that such a scheme isn't sanctioned by terms of the nation's Wild and Scenic Rivers programs. The storied Allagash, after all, is the first waterway accepted into the federal program that's state-managed.
When launching wasn't allowed, fishers, hunters and others -- primarily aligned with SAM -- cried foul. How dare the state keep them from accessing the Allagash waters, wherever and whenever they wanted. This land, after all, is theirs as much as anyone's.
Well, it seems they've won, at least for now. At least for now because any such controversial issue is always subject these days to some kind of court action.
On Wednesday, the state Bureau of Parks and Lands that oversees the Allagash decided it would move ahead with a plan to make a John's Bridge-area canoe launch and associated parking area a permanent feature of the wilderness.
The action comes now because Gov. Angus King is about ready to leave office. He pushed for John's Bridge as a payback of sorts for SAM's support. While that disappoints conservationists and friends of the Allagash, it shouldn't surprise them.
Among the disappointments the John's Bridge canoe access plan fosters is the decision to act on it unilaterally, without linking it to other issues of access and overuse of Maine's most precious waterway. The state has taken John's Bridge off the compromise table, and that bodes badly for the hopes of others to restore limited access, as was intended, to the Allagash.
Still, there's one kudo for the state. In its wisdom it deemed access will only be allowed in the spring, for fishers, and in the fall, for hunters. It'll be closed during the summer so as not to add to overuse woes already facing the Eagle and Churchill lakes areas.
But opening it in the spring and fall makes us wonder how convenience-minded our sportsmen and sportswomen have become. After all, it's only a few miles from John's Bridge to an already existing canoe launch at Churchill Dam. In reality, John's Bridge access isn't needed, it just makes it a bit easier for those who harvest Maine's fish and wildlife to practice their sports.
Whatever happened to building character and skill based on a bit of adversity or hardship?
And as the state opens more and more access to the Allagash, we should all be asking whither wilderness?
jmeyer@sunjournal.com
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Most Popular Today
verified on "P. Nachman: Confidence probably misplaced"
It should speak volumes
By Ronald Riml, verified user — Fri, 02/10/2012 - 11:46
that a certain segment never considers restoring historic tax rates.
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account.
You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.
verified on "P. Nachman: Confidence probably misplaced"
No, and that should speak
By Mark Gravel, verified user — Fri, 02/10/2012 - 11:17
No, and that should speak volumes :)
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account.
You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.
verified on "G. Decoteau: They deserve each other"
Come on
By Ernest Labbe, verified user — Fri, 02/10/2012 - 11:13
Come on, yes there are rich republicans. However on the other side of the aisle sit as many rich democrats. None of them know the meaning of poor. The whole system needs a cleanout with fresh faces. Any body in office was elected by money and tons of it. It is time for the people not born with a silver spoon in their mouth to take over. Until people start voting for the outsiders the insiders will be in control. Get out and vote for the real underdogs. The third party candidates. Opps good democrats and republicans can't do that can they.
- Agree Agree (1)
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account.
You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.
In order to make comments, you must verify your account.
In order to comment on SunJournal.com, you must use your real name and include the town in which you live in your profile. A member of our staff will call you to verify this information. To join in, fill out your user profile completely and check the box "please verify my status." We'll get back to you within one business day to verify your account.
Login or create an account here.
Our policy prohibits comments that are:
- Defamatory, abusive, obscene, racist, or otherwise hateful
- Excessively foul and/or vulgar
- Inappropriately sexual
- Baseless personal attacks or otherwise threatening
- Contain illegal material, or material that infringes on the rights of others
- Commercial postings attempting to sell a product/item
If you violate this policy, your comment will be removed and your account may be banned.