Oxford manager presents investigation findings

OXFORD — Town Manager Michael Chammings reiterated his support of the town's police chief at Thursday's selectmen's meeting, saying a complaint by a former reserve officer was properly investigated.

Chammings previously told the Sun Journal that an investigation found no wrongdoing by Chief Jon Tibbetts of the Oxford Police Department. Chris Knight, a dispatcher with the Oxford County Regional Communications Center in Paris, has said he plans to file a lawsuit to appeal his termination as a reserve officer with the department earlier this month.

Knight previously said he was fired for recording a meeting with Tibbetts about a prior suspension with an audio recorder and for posting on his Facebook page that he thought members of the town government were corrupt. He also accused Tibbetts of various infractions, including creating a hostile workplace and misuse of the Regional Communications Center, and said the town inadequately followed up on his complaints.

According to a partial document presented by Chammings on Thursday, attorney Jonathan M. Goodman was hired by the town in August to conduct an independent investigation into allegations of policy and procedures violations by Tibbetts. The document also states that Chammings would conduct his own review.

Chammings said Friday he was offended by Knight's claims that he lied about looking into an alleged misuse of the dispatch center by Tibbetts, that the investigation amounted to a defensive action by the town, and that only two to three of Knight's approximately 25 complaints were investigated. Chammings said six complaints were looked into, including misuse of police telecommunications equipment. The other complaints on the document are redacted because they include other names.

"Did he have a longer list? He did, but on that list were a lot of things like 'the chief smokes in his cruiser.' 'The chief smokes in view of the public,'" Chammings said.

Chammings said he did not feel such charges were serious enough for Goodman to look into. He said Goodman billed the town about $150 for each hour of investigation, which ultimately cost about $3,000. According to the document, Chammings instructed Goodman to investigate charges Chammings "deemed to be relatively serious in nature or, for other reasons, lent themselves to independent investigation rather than Mr. Chammings' own review."

Chammings said any complaints against the town are thoroughly investigated, and Goodman's investigation was part of that process.

"It was not a defensive tactic for the town," he said. "It was a discovery for the town."

Jim Miclon, director of the Oxford County RCC, previously said FBI auditors found during a routine 2007 investigation that Tibbetts had run the name of a relative he was seeking to hire part time through the National Criminal Information Center.

Miclon said he was told that the FBI would follow up on the matter, but that he understood neither Tibbetts nor the Police Department would be seriously reprimanded for the error. He also said the department was not put on any sort of probation after the incident.

While Miclon said he did not recall any representative of the town asking him about the matter, Chammings said this was a result of Goodman talking to Miclon instead of a town employee or official. Caldwell Jackson, a county commissioner and former Oxford selectman, said he also looked into the matter on Oct. 6 at the request of Chairman Floyd Thayer of the Board of Selectmen.

"We certainly had that looked into by an unbiased investigator," Chammings said of the RCC complaint. "For (Knight) to say we did not do that is absolutely false."

Goodman's investigation concluded that Knight's credibility was in question due to the timing and "retaliatory nature" of the complaint.

"To the extent that (the) allegations are true, they involve minor issues that have previously been addressed or require minimal correction by Chief Tibbetts," Goodman said. "In sum, I find no evidence that the chief intentionally engaged in any serious misconduct."

mlangeveld@sunjournal.com

Stay informed — Get the news delivered for free in your inbox.

I'm interested in ...

In order to make comments, you must verify your account.

In order to comment on SunJournal.com, you must use your real name and include the town in which you live in your profile. A member of our staff will call you to verify this information. To join in, fill out your user profile completely and check the box "please verify my status." We'll get back to you within one business day to verify your account.

Login or create an account here.

Our policy prohibits comments that are:

  • Defamatory, abusive, obscene, racist, or otherwise hateful
  • Excessively foul and/or vulgar
  • Inappropriately sexual
  • Baseless personal attacks or otherwise threatening
  • Contain illegal material, or material that infringes on the rights of others
  • Commercial postings attempting to sell a product/item
If you violate this policy, your comment will be removed and your account may be banned.

Advertisement

Displaying comments, from newest to oldest

calvintidswell's picture

At least you are not

At least you are not burdened with Theron Bickford anymore. This is an officer who brings libel to any department he works for. Good job Chief! I personally know that this officer has given false testimony under oath and is an embarrassment to the judicial system.

This other incident seems to be slanted and I say, good job Chief Tibbetts, it isn't an easy position, so stick with what you do best, protect Oxford.

ShellyBrewer2010's picture

OK= Officer Knight Think

OK= Officer Knight
Think about this for a second. How stupid would someone have to be to make accusations against a police chief unless he had proof of what is going on? Do we honestly think that Officer Knight woke up one day and thought gee how am i gonna ruin my life and carreer? Im SURE that more stuff will come out and OK will be fine and the truth will come out. OK im behind you and support what you are doing. DO NOT let what is posted bother you. everyone has their opinion and are entitled to it. LPO posted some great info that people need to listen to "its funny he all the sudden becomes a horrible employee after blowing the whistle on the chief about 25 offenses" It sounds like OK rocked the boat and those in charge instead of doing something about it, fired him! cant have that can we. I AM THE CHIEF YOU ARE A PEON!!! off with your head! OK stood up for what is right and get fired for it? You people try that at your job see what happends.

candiceanne's picture

I wonder how long Knight has

I wonder how long Knight has been at the Sheriffs Departmrnt, what his record is and what his co-workers and superiors experience has been with him there and previously. Is his attempt to secretly record his boss in Oxford the first such incident? Is this the first time he has complained about a superior after disipline? Has he gone to outside agencies or newspapers before? Might be more story here for the Sun to follow-up on.

candiceanne's picture

Looks like this chief ran

Looks like this chief ran ONE potential hire through the system and was later told he could not. He made a mistake and has not repeated it. The way Knight makes it sound the Chief is using the communications center as an answering service for another businesses. Also, Knight had no complaint until he tried to get dirt the dirty way to keep a job he did not deserve, got fired and went to the papers because he couldn't get the job back. I would not have this Chris Knight working for me, sounds like someone who can not keep a job honestly and goes aroud bullying and intimidating his bosses and co-workers.

SurfinGuy784's picture

I am going to continue to

I am going to continue to support this officer because I think he is doing a good job! I have some unnammed sources that verify he knew he could not do this because he has had to run family members before but had another officer do it because he said he was not allowed, but when he goes and runs his WIFE he all the sudden forgets? Psh, I wonder why? In the first article it was reported that Knight successfully appealed his first reprimand so that should tell you something...but how do you come up with getting dirt the dirty way? Im very confused because all this came about after that first reprimand and before his termination. He followed proper procedures by filing a complaint with the town manager and felt, at the end, that the complaint went no where and was then terminated after saying he thought there was corruption. Im confused at what he did dirty to dig something up? This only came into the newspaper after his termination and after the complaint had been filed. I dont know Officer Knight well, but I know he is a smart person and I also know quite a bit about the complaints he lodged and Im guessing a few of those complaints may need to be handled by the AGs office. I hope he goes through with all this and wins. Im going to continue to post about this issue because I am standing behind my brother in blue. I wonder if this officer has ever been reprimanded before these incidents....Im guessing not so its funny he all the sudden becomes a horrible employee after blowing the whistle on the chief about 25 offenses (some maybe crimnial by the sounds of it from the talk around the towns). You go from great employee to scum of the earth by standing up for yourself and the town...funny how Knight becomes "dirty" in your eyes Candiceanne.

candiceanne's picture

In the article it says

In the article it says Knight secretly recorded a meeting he had with the chief. To me that says he was trying to get dirt on the chief he could use to keep the job already in jeopardy. He had already been previously suspended according to the article and was about to be fired and knew it. It seems to me he was trying to get something he could hold over the chief's head to save his job and it did not work. Like I said, this is not the kind of person I would want working for me. Seems to be poster child for hostile work place.

SurfinGuy784's picture

Actually the other article

Actually the other article stated he was suspended and appealed that suspension and won...that should tell you that obviously Chief Tibbetts did something he shouldnt have and the Town reversed his decision so he wasnt even close to losing his job. Who knows why he taped the conversation...seems like he didnt trust the Chief so he recorded it for his safety. Seems funny that its ok when the officer does it to the bad guy on the street, but when he does it to protect himself he is a "poster child for a hostile workplace"

Ernest's picture
verified

Concerned Oxford Citizen I

Concerned Oxford Citizen I think perhaps Mr Chammings has his time line a little mixed up as to what happened when, and who did what. I'm sure that it is easy enough to check out through the SJ and other sources. Some good investigative reporting should clear up the facts.

MCHAMM's picture

This former part-time

This former part-time officer went to the paper first and the town did not have a chance to respond, then when we do its unfair? Clearly you can see in the engagement introduction that the sole purpose of the town using this lawyer/investigator was to have an independent investigation of these allegations. Nothing was covered up.

I use my real name and I would take a lie detector test. So why don’t you man up “localpoliceofficer“ and use your real name and say what you have to say in front of me.

SurfinGuy784's picture

Well Mr. Chammings, I dont

Well Mr. Chammings, I dont use my real name for the simple fact that I am in Law Enforcement and want to voice my opinion without anyone complaining to my chief about it because I dont agree with them. Simple as that! As for saying something to your face, I would gladly do that if I were not in the position I am now. I will not get caught up in your corruption and play into your games. As for you getting no time to respond to Officer Knigh's first article....didn't I see you quoted many times in that first article? Are you so ignorant you saw past the fact that you actually got interviewed and your side of the story was printed...Im guessing yes. If thats the case Im sure glad I dont live in Oxford and have you running the town. I say that if you think you are so in the right then have Officer Knight hold a PUBLIC session with all the towns people so he can lay down his evidence for the town and see what they think. Im sure you will quote some law to try and cover yourself because it seems thats all you do. I will say I know Officer Knight and there are MANY people behind him...including those right on your back door! You and Chief Tibbetts disgust me and Im sure you wouldnt want your history dug up to see what kind of credibility you have! Or are you willing to just tell us your criminal history because I imagine someone like you have been caught more than once!.....This is why I dont put my real name, because I want to feel free to say what I want without fear that someone will try and lodge a complaint against me like OFficer Knight had happen to him for envoking his constitutional rights of freedom of speech and letting the world know you are corrupt! I know Officer Knight and I support him for standing up to what he thinks is an injustice. Oh, btw, I know more than you think I know about all the issues...there is a lot more to come I can imagine and I would say he has a DAMN good case against the town. GO FOR THE GOLD OFFICER KNIGHT!

smedley's picture

I believe the term is

I believe the term is slanted journalism

ShellyBrewer2010's picture

I agree with you. This

I agree with you. This article is all 100 percent for the department. Officer Knight isnt even asked his side. I also believe that Officer Knight should continue with what he is doing but they will try to bury this. Good old boy network! as far as the NCIC issue and FBI not doing anything about it? Ask a former Oxford SO Cheif Deputy how that worked out for him. You MUST have a reason to do an NCIC check on someone. Good job Officer Knight alot of us are behind you on this

SurfinGuy784's picture

Am I the only one who

Am I the only one who notices that this article just confirmed what Officer Knight had been saying the whole time? He states that Chief Tibbetts violated the FBI policy by running a family member and Miclon confirmed that the FBI found what he did but was not going to punish him or the department "seriously". Even if Miclon doesnt remeber someone from the town coming to speak with him, it was still confirmed that Officer Knight was telling the truth...so how could he be considered not credible if one of his accusations was true? Also, if the smoking issue is a policy then why doesnt the Chief have to follow it but everyone else does? I think there must be MUCH more than we know about here is Knight feels he has a lawsuit and is willing to go public about what he thinks are injustices. GOOD FOR YOU KNIGHT! I wonder why they didnt interview Officer Knight for this article..seems very one sided to me! I hope the citizens of Oxford find out what is really going on and start to look into the corruption at its highest (i.e.- town manager and chief). I still find it hard to believe that Miclon doesnt remember anyone speaking to him about this issue..one would think that the lawyer would mention he was investigating stuff for the town of oxford...I think Chammings has been cornered and will say anything to make Knight look bad and take the heat of him...Well its not working for this Cop and I hope you sue to crap outta the town Officer Knight!

Advertisement