Mexico Sewer District threatens to flush Dixfield from system

DIXFIELD — If an agreement isn't soon reached between Dixfield officials and the Mexico Sewer District, health concerns could arise by mid-August due to the inability to flush toilets into a closed sewer system.

At Wednesday night's Dixfield selectmen meeting, Town Manager Eugene Skibitsky told the board that they're being threatened by the district's trustees through the trustees' lawyer, Paul Dumas of Mexico.

"They're threatening to shut down our sewer system based on an unknown problem at some point in the future," Skibitsky said on Friday while recapping the meeting.

The currently stalled negotiations are being driven by a Maine Department of Transportation project to replace the Webb River Bridge which connects the two towns on Route 2.

Two hundred feet of the Dixfield sewer main is attached to the underside of the existing bridge. It must be replaced when the new span is built sometime next year.

The state wants an agreement reached between the district and Dixfield by Tuesday, Aug. 4.

Skibitsky said the District's three trustees have refused to meet publicly with Dixfield selectmen and Skibitsky to negotiate a new maintenance contract.

Instead, he said Dumas wants the meeting held in executive session.

The previous 30-year contract expired in June 2008, and steps weren't taken to create a new one until MDOT announced the bridge project.

Thirty years ago, the district installed sewer pipes from its treatment plant through Mexico and Dixfield. Peru was originally part of the three-way contract.

However, Skibitsky said that, at some point, Peru backed out of the contract, leaving Mexico and Dixfield to cover any costs to repair or replace piping.

Referring to a July 13 letter from Dumas, Skibitsky said he told selectmen that Dumas now wants to end negotiations and impose terms.

"He said that if we don't agree within 21 days, he will interrupt the service," Skibitsky said. "If we do give into him, Mexico is prepared to let Dixfield continue using the (sewer) lines, so there should be no interruption in service."

If Dixfield doesn't give in, Dumas has threatened to sue the town and shut down the sewer system.

"We don't understand from where this comes, so we're upset and agitated," Skibitsky said. "We plan to answer the letter, but it's very hard to negotiate when you're being threatened and browbeat."

He said selectmen are also "fed up," because they can't talk to the trustees.

"We've been told the district won't talk to us, except only through their lawyer," Skibitsky said. "So, from our perspective, we don't know if these are the views of the trustees or the lawyer."

"It's absolutely nonproductive when you have to deal with a layer that shouldn't be there and, in this case, it's a very negative layer," he added.

tkarkos@sunjournal.com

In order to make comments, you must verify your account.

In order to comment on SunJournal.com, you must use your real name and include the town in which you live in your profile. A member of our staff will call you to verify this information. To join in, fill out your user profile completely and check the box "please verify my status." We'll get back to you within one business day to verify your account.

Login or create an account here.

Our policy prohibits comments that are:

  • Defamatory, abusive, obscene, racist, or otherwise hateful
  • Excessively foul and/or vulgar
  • Inappropriately sexual
  • Baseless personal attacks or otherwise threatening
  • Contain illegal material, or material that infringes on the rights of others
  • Commercial postings attempting to sell a product/item
If you violate this policy, your comment will be removed and your account may be banned.

Advertisement

Comments

macmac's picture
verified

What will they do now? The

What will they do now? The state won't replace the bridge without an agreement. A project ,no doubt, advanced due to the federal stimulus money. The current bridge has been deemed to be safe for the next 5 years by the DOT. Removing and replacing the sewer main on this bridge has been estimated to cost the ratepayers of Dixfield a quarter of a million dollars. A tax increase during troubling economic times? Remember the other bridge across the Webb River on Coburn Ave. Dixfield taxpayers ended up paying over $35,000 in cost overruns on that project. Who is the real hostage here? Who ends up paying?

Advertisement

Stay informed — Get the news delivered for free in your inbox.

I'm interested in ...