AUBURN — A judge has ruled against the city of Lewiston's motion to dismiss a civil suit brought by the parents of three local students who died in a 2006 plane crash during an orientation flight for Air Force ROTC cadets.
The ruling means the parents' claims of wrongful death will continue. The city has promised to appeal.
A lawyer representing Lewiston argued last week that the city should have been granted governmental immunity under the Maine Tort Claims Act.
Lawyer Ed Benjamin Jr. of Portland said the city contracted with Twin Cities Air Services to provide a service, which included using an airplane. He told the judge it was not the city's use of the aircraft, according to state law.
Writing in his order, Androscoggin County Superior Court Justice Thomas Delahanty II said: "The city's use of the aircraft was indirect, as contractors were employed to operate the aircraft, but nevertheless constituted use under the plain meaning of the word."
Benjamin also said city employees are given the discretion to make public policy without having to fear lawsuits that may arise from those decisions under the Maine Tort Claims Act. The school's decision to use Twin Cities Air Services for the flights, and to let the company choose its pilots, should be viewed as an extension of the discretionary function covered under the Maine Tort Claims Act, he told the judge.
But Justice Delahanty wrote that Col. Robert Meyer, the Lewiston High School employee who headed up the school's ROTC program, wasn't making governmental policy when he decided "whether, and to what extent, to review what the pilot was doing during a particular flight ... Rather, it involved operational decisions made by a school employee regarding the safety of the children participating in that particular" program.
Benjamin could not be reached Friday for comment.
Chris L'Hommedieu, who represents the estates of two of the students, said Friday all of the plaintiffs were pleased by Delahanty's ruling. "We think the judge made the right decision," L'Hommedieu said, in opting for "the common sense definition of 'use.'"
The Air Force Junior ROTC students — Nicholas Babcock, 17; Teisha
Loesberg, 16; and Shannon Fortier, 15 — were flying in a single-engine plane operated by Auburn-based Twin Cities Air Services
LLC out of Bethel Airport. The plane crashed into Barker Mountain in nearby Newry.
A federal report showed there was no mechanical failure by the Cessna 172 N that caused it to crash. The National Transportation Safety Board pointed to incidents, including a cadet flight earlier on the day of the crash, when 24-year-old pilot William "Charlie" Weir reportedly took unsafe chances. He reportedly flew too low, performed stall-and-dive maneuvers and executed a "zero G" maneuver, according to the complaints.

It seems to be standard operating procedure to blame a pilot that isn't there to defend himself. Climbing and diving an airplane is not against regulations, in fact it's fun. The accident report mentions nothing against regulations or anything unsafe. They were having fun to the instant of the accident
YES the city of Lewiston is liable as with Twin Cities Air and the R.O.T.C. Col. Meyer and the estate of William Weir. It is about time Maine's get me out of trouble language won't save them. If Lewiston had honor they would settle and stop trying to weasel out.
its about time now they need to take the city of lewiston to the cleaners
In order to make comments, you must verify your account.
In order to comment on SunJournal.com, you must use your real name and include the town in which you live in your profile. A member of our staff will call you to verify this information. To join in, fill out your user profile completely and check the box "please verify my status." We'll get back to you within one business day to verify your account.
Login or create an account here.
Our policy prohibits comments that are:
- Defamatory, abusive, obscene, racist, or otherwise hateful
- Excessively foul and/or vulgar
- Inappropriately sexual
- Baseless personal attacks or otherwise threatening
- Contain illegal material, or material that infringes on the rights of others
- Commercial postings attempting to sell a product/item
If you violate this policy, your comment will be removed and your account may be banned.