LEWISTON — Former Maine Gov. Angus King told local businesspeople to start conserving and to think about investments in renewable energy sources in his keynote address at a conference held at Bates College on Thursday.
The Androscoggin County Chamber of Commerce hosted the event, titled "Surviving the Energy Crisis: How to Save Money," which was sponsored by the Unitil Corp., Efficiency Maine and the Natural Resources Council of Maine.
King is a principal investor in Independence Wind, a company seeking to develop large-scale wind power projects in Maine. The group recently won state regulatory approval for a project in Roxbury.
"For every dollar that gasoline and home heating oil go up, that represents $1.2 billion a year out of the Maine economy," he told the audience of about 30 people. "It affects you as businesspeople because that's money people don't have to spend to buy CDs or go to the movies or go out to dinner or buy clothes. It's money that just disappears."
The combined state earnings from sales and income tax is about $1.8 billion a year, King said.
"So if gas goes up $1.25, it's as if the major taxes in Maine doubled and we get nothing for it," he said.
King pointed to Maine's exceptional reliance on fossil fuels — up to 88 percent of all the energy consumed in state — and its inability to control the price or supply of things such as gas and home heating oil as a dire problem.
"In my view, we're really in borrowed time on this and we really need to be thinking about what the alternatives are and how to hedge our bets," he said.
The first step to solving the problem, King advised, is conservation.
"It's the least expensive, the quickest, the least permitting involved, the least hassle and there are all kinds of things that can be done," he said.
But, he added, conservation alone would not be enough to counteract the growing global demand for fossil fuels.
"While we're caulking windows, in China they are building whole new cities," King said.
So, King said, looking to invest in alternative energy sources, like wind power, makes sense both for Mainers' pocketbooks and the environment.
"We have this energy going by us every day that's free," he said of wind power. "It's just the opposite of gas, which is cheap to build but more expensive to operate because you have to pay for the gas."
Successful off-shore wind development could produce enough energy to completely wean Maine off oil, King said.
The University of Maine has been awarded federal money to development technology that could withstand the rough off-shore elements, such as corrosive saltwater, and create a way to tap into the high-powered winds in the Gulf of Maine — "the Saudi Arabia of wind," according to King.
Americans tend to look for one solution to a problem, but King said that wouldn't work in this case.
"There is no one answer, but there are lots of little ones," he said. "We have to do for ourselves, we have to look at what it is we have."
rmetzler@sunjournal.com

"Yes, engineers can make-work by adding wind flux to the system. They can lead a horse to water; but they can't make it change its spots.... By its nature, wind will require lots of whips and whistles, even at small levels of penetration, in ways that will negate the very reason for its being. This is why people quickly switched to steam 200 years ago. Retrofitting modern technology to meet the needs of ancient wind flutter is monumentally backasswards, a sure sign that pundits and politicians, not scientists, are now in charge. It would take more than a smart grid to incorporate such a dumb idea successfully.
Because of wind's unpredictable variability, it can never replace the capacity of conventional generation. Twenty-five hundred 450-foot wind turbines, spread over five hundred miles, can mathematically offset a large coal or nuclear plant; but they cannot do so functionally--for what must happen when 5000MW of volatile wind is only producing 100MW at peak demand times, a common occurrence?
This business is absurd. The whole point of modern power systems has been to move beyond the flickering flutter of variable energy sources. Prostituting modern power performance to enable subprime energy schemes on behalf of half-baked technology is immoral. As is implementing highly regressive tax avoidance “incentives" to make it appear that pigs can fly. No coal plants will be shuttered and little, if any, carbon emissions will be reduced as a result of this project—or thousands of them.
Indeed, wind technology mirrors the subprime mortgage scams that wreaked havoc with the economy. Both are enabled by wishful thinking; bogus projections; no accounting restraints, accountability, or transparency; no meaningful securitization; and regulatory agencies that looked the other way, allowing a few to make a great deal of money at everyone else's expense while providing no meaningful service. "J Boone
"There is little that is cognitively more dissonant than supporting the concept of minimizing the human footprint on the earth while cheerleading for the rude intrusiveness of physically massive/energy feckless wind projects. The slap and tickle of wind propaganda flatters the gullible, exploits the well intentioned, and nurtures the craven. It is made possible because there's no penalty for lying in the energy marketplace. The country has evidently arrived at a point in its legal culture where no negative consequences seem to exist for making false or misleading claims to sell wind energy—the stuff dreams are made of. But industrial wind is a bunco scheme of enormous consequence. And people who value intellectual honesty should not quietly be fleeced by such mendacity, even from their government."
Jon Boone
And now , we have this ex-governor , and his son Angus S. King III of Firstwind(merger and acquisition's), keeping it "All in the Family", to the backs of all of us in Maine!
It is not about Green (you silly dillies ), ITS aBOUT GREED, for the few.
If wind (and other alternative source) power were that great, subsidies with taxpayer (our) money would not be needed. If King and his ilk feel so greatly about wind power let them build it with their own dollars. People like him are what has ruined the economy of this area. Look at all the subsidised housing built with taxpayer dollars to make untold riches for their providers while private landlords are left holding empty apartments. These parasites of taxpayer money should be banished from the State rather than invited as public speakers.
We conserve because it is stupid to stand there and rip up dollar bills. Energy is expensive and shouldn't be wasted.
I don't believe that global warming is caused by man. I believe that the science is bogus and politically motivated. I do believe that humans have a responsibility to keep the air we breathe clean and water pure.
I would advise everyone to be very aware of "cap and trade" that Obama and most congressional Democrats are pushing. It has everything to do with driving our economy into socialism and the dark ages.
'I don't believe that global warming is caused by man...'-if i didn't know better, that is almost humorous. Seriously-we are going to be our own and children's demise if we keep ignoring whats going on. This has not a thing to do with Obama or most congressional democrats or made-up socialism... but it could very well be the new dark age. We're abusing our earth and abusing our privileges. We are blind to the fact that humans are parasites on this earth. Always taking, 'me, me, me' and never giving back.
"I believe that the science is bogus and politically motivated."
To what end?
Paranoia
What I don't understand is all those who have the need to criticize someone and NOT hear what the actually article is about.
Its CRUCIAL at this day and age to do someTHING for our environment. Starting with businesses is a great idea. Recycling paper, to using LED lights, or CFL bulbs. To conserve energy. It takes everyone to do a lil' something to make a great impact. We need to start now instead of complaining. Businesses in Maine use a lot of the energy and its even more predominant for other cities and states to use more (i.e.: new york city).
To get the light bulb to work when you flick a switch comes from a source. Ultimately that source is a GRID. What is being fed into that grid is coal, oil, (in maine use to be nuclear power). The use of coal and oil has so many pollutants. We are using our nasty, polluting resources up-so eventually if we don't get on the ball-we're running it dry. Just think a flick of a switch from all across America probably causes more emissions than driving cars... Unfortunately, what SHOULD be fed into the grid is cleaner, renewable resources. Wind turbines, solar panels, geothermal energy, biomass, landfill gas can even be used. Unfortunately-they are not being fed into the grid. Its up to us to make a difference.
So maybe many can see just how IMPORTANT it is to conserve and do someTHING about it rather than complaining about energy costs, or having to get political. There is a more important discussion and concern here.
I have sat through King's stump speech on energy and it is so filled with hyperbolic dire warnings and self serving push towards wind energy that it would be laughable--if it wasn't such a serious public policy blunder.
You are absolutely correct about pushing innovation in conservation. However, to subsidize every megawatt of wind-generated electricity at $23.37 (2007 figure, US Energy Information Office) is an unconscionable raid on the taxpayers and ratepayers. Wind energy in general is too unpredictable, unreliable, and inefficient to compete in an energy free marketplace. It is worse in Maine where the areas that sprawling industrial wind sites are proposed have poor to marginal potential (again, US Energy Information Office mao). It is an unnacceptable trade off to destroy the quality of place in rural Maine for a trickle of electricity, all of which will go to Southern New England, disrupting the grid along the way, and causing back-up baseline generators to go into inefficient, more highly polluting spinning reserve. It is insanity brought to you by the same folks who were involved in Enron.
Unfortunately it has to come for somewhere and in all honesty, I would rather pay-out since I am not a millionaire and can't contribute or have wind turbines and solar panels on my land. All for the sake of getting this up and running... what are we waiting for? Our children or children's children to pick up and deal with OUR and forefathers mess.
Windturbines are NOT the only source of renewable resources that we can use in the state of Maine. Even then-a little better than nothing.
Drill drill drill!!!
King uses his lingering popularity to push his own selfish goals. That is, to enrich himself and buddy Rob Gardner by being pigs at the wind subsidy trough. How ironic that two men who made a mark in Maine by working to preserve special places are now involved in pushing projects that enrich them at taxpayer and ratepayer expense and entail blasting away the tops of mountains, erecting huge inefficient wind turbines, clearcutting hundreds of acres of land, and stringing hundreds of miles of new powerlines across rural Maine. They ought to be ashamed of this, yet King's accolytes still come out to listen to his self-serving diatribe.
Wake up people! Before you know it, King and his ilk are going to surround Maine's rural beauty with thousands of wind turbines. There won't be a viewshed without them, from Katahdin to Bigelow to Tumbledown and the Mahoosucs. It is an unfettered rape of rural Maine and we have to stop it.
He is right in his statement, major taxes have doubled in Maine and we do get nothing for it! The taxes are going up to pay the 30% subsidies his company recieves up front when they put the wind farms up.... So I ask you this, if the energy going by us every day is free why is there so much goverment subsidies involved and why does it push up electric rates???
he's already a millionaire.Did he get paid to speak at Bates,or was this topic important enough to him to speak about it for free?
millionaire
You make it sound like having a million dollars is something unusual, special, and/or obscene.
In order to make comments, you must verify your account.
In order to comment on SunJournal.com, you must use your real name and include the town in which you live in your profile. A member of our staff will call you to verify this information. To join in, fill out your user profile completely and check the box "please verify my status." We'll get back to you within one business day to verify your account.
Login or create an account here.
Our policy prohibits comments that are:
- Defamatory, abusive, obscene, racist, or otherwise hateful
- Excessively foul and/or vulgar
- Inappropriately sexual
- Baseless personal attacks or otherwise threatening
- Contain illegal material, or material that infringes on the rights of others
- Commercial postings attempting to sell a product/item
If you violate this policy, your comment will be removed and your account may be banned.