Letters
Be careful in voting
People in politics usually come with an agenda, some altruistic, others more selfish. I want to compare two such agendas.
The first is that of City Councilor Mike Farrell of Ward 1. He had the unique foresight to have seen a great opportunity in the Ingersoll Arena. Originally, the arena opened for only a few months a year, yielded approximately $19,000 yearly. Farrell's idea of a capital bond, approved by the present sitting council, keeping the arena open year-round now returns $19,000 monthly, while paying down the bond without using any more tax dollars. The arena is now booked regularly for public skating, hockey and parties.
That is what a real agenda should do: save taxpayers money without cutting services.
Then there's the other side of the agenda coin — that of purchasing the Gooseberry Barn property. The four people who voted this in at a price tag of $615,000 had, at best, a very weak agenda. The city has lost tax revenue in 2008/2009 of $13,647. Though leasing some part of the land did give a return of about $1,000, the property loses tax revenue of $5,100 for every year the city owns it.
Two of the four people who voted in that regrettable agenda are presently running for office, one for mayor and the other for Councilor-at-large. If things are to progress positively in Auburn, residents need to be extremely careful about who they vote in.
Dan Herrick, Auburn
City Councilor, Ward 3
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Most Popular Today
verified on "P. Nachman: Confidence probably misplaced"
Its not trivvializing it
Hey, I throw in 11% that doesn't override the rest of the comment. 11% is huge. That's why I talked about what they have recently done to improve it.
But you reaction is based not on the numbers, but on your assumptions. "Government is overreaching" that's an assumption or better yet your bias. "they are outside their span of control". Again a bias or at best an assumption. Have you tested their "span of control". Do you really know its breath? Based on these two untested and untestable assumptions you reach the conclusion that waste and fraud will continue or get worse." "ObamaCare is simply opens the door to more opportunity" Again a conclusion with no support at all.
You have to know the capabilities of Federal systems and be able to test them to make the judgements you are. When Medicare was implemented Federal "span of control" was very low. A top of the line computer system used tape for I/O. The legislation gave them 6-12 months to implement new features/programs. Current computer systems are thousands of time more productive. Project development techniques are orders of magnitude better. And the Affordable Care Act staged implementation over a number of years. True these systems process millions of transactions per day and thats a real task for any operation. But they have the tools to do it today that they didn't have in the 1960's. The "span of control" today is huge. A medicare for everyone program is very doable. Minimimzing errors is very doable. Checking and preventing deliberate fraud is very doable today (credit card fraud detection is orders of magnitude better than just a few years ago). The Affordable Care Act provides te opportunity to greatly reduce real fraud. Nothing will reduce error too much.
verified on "Maine eyes $21 million in multi-state suit against mortgage lenders"
"Dead on" Robert
I'm so glad the first post was from someone who pays attention. Financially sound banks, which did nothing wrong, were forced to take the money too even though they didn't need it. That way the Obama Administration would later be able to say that they had to do this to avert a crisis. After all, look how many banks got that taxpayer funded bank bailout money. A person would have to be blind not to see that well timed lie coming.
verified on "J. Ziehm: LePage forgetting his childhood"
Nice
Like the commenting on purging DHHS from the budget while neglecting spousal and child abuse. Seems to me liking it to keep it silent and in the family.
In order to make comments, you must verify your account.
In order to comment on SunJournal.com, you must use your real name and include the town in which you live in your profile. A member of our staff will call you to verify this information. To join in, fill out your user profile completely and check the box "please verify my status." We'll get back to you within one business day to verify your account.
Login or create an account here.
Our policy prohibits comments that are:
- Defamatory, abusive, obscene, racist, or otherwise hateful
- Excessively foul and/or vulgar
- Inappropriately sexual
- Baseless personal attacks or otherwise threatening
- Contain illegal material, or material that infringes on the rights of others
- Commercial postings attempting to sell a product/item
If you violate this policy, your comment will be removed and your account may be banned.