Join the community!

Login, register or Connect to comment.

Letters

Keep eyes on the road

Published on Saturday, Oct 31, 2009 at 12:12 am | Last updated on Saturday, Oct 31, 2009 at 12:12 am 9 Comments

As students at Jay Middle School, we are doing a project on the Lego League theme, "Smart Move," which explores transportation safety and technology. It is our objective to inform the community about the dangers of distracted driving, and to decrease the number of distracted drivers on Maine roads.

In September, a new Maine law against distracted driving took effect. It bans any activity that distracts drivers, which could include cell phone use, eating, using electronics, reading and putting on makeup.

Recently, 2003 data from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration was released. Interesting facts presented included that one out of every four traffic crashes is caused by distracted driving, and that more than 200 million in-car phone calls occur daily by cell phone users while driving. The NHTSA concluded that the use of cell phones, while driving, has contributed to an increase in the number of crashes, injuries and fatalities. Research also showed that hand-held or not, the risk from using a cell phone while driving remains the same.

People must keep their eyes on the road and not be distracted while driving. Driving distracted is a very dangerous thing to do. People should avoid talking on their cell phones, texting, eating, playing with the radio and any other things that are distracting while driving.

It is not just unsafe, it is now against the law.

Emily Taylor, Alexa Perkins, Kendra Peart

Jay Middle School Lego League Team

In order to make comments, you must verify your account.

In order to comment on SunJournal.com, you must use your real name and include the town in which you live in your profile. A member of our staff will call you to verify this information. To join in, fill out your user profile completely and check the box "please verify my status." We'll get back to you within one business day to verify your account.

Login or create an account here.

Our policy prohibits comments that are:

  • Defamatory, abusive, obscene, racist, or otherwise hateful
  • Excessively foul and/or vulgar
  • Inappropriately sexual
  • Baseless personal attacks or otherwise threatening
  • Contain illegal material, or material that infringes on the rights of others
  • Commercial postings attempting to sell a product/item
If you violate this policy, your comment will be removed and your account may be banned.

Advertisement

Displaying comments, from newest to oldest

news4u's picture

Emily, Alexa & Kendra: I am

Emily, Alexa & Kendra: I am embarrassed by all of the name calling that has gone on in the comments section of your letter. Often, instead of debating the topic and articulating their thoughts, ideas and opinions, people feel the need to verbally attack one another. One of the first rules in debating is that you may attack the idea, but not the person.
As the use of cell phones continues to rise, so will the number of traffic accidents and fatalities. Thank you for taking the time to write this well written article.

ke6pij's picture

You are correct!! I

You are correct!! I apologize if I offended anyone.

Gil's picture

That's the whole point I am

That's the whole point I am making. people like you and Emily throw these stats out as though they are truth when they are not. there is no data that shows that traffic accidents rising since the advent of widespread cell phone usage. You can't make a claim like that if there is no proof. It's simple alarmism, like global warming and the swine flu 'epidemic'.
"Reasoning with a liberal is like trying to pick up a turd by the clean end. " Pirate

ke6pij's picture

OK, I do not agree, but a

OK, I do not agree, but a good point.

ke6pij's picture

Gil, Statements like

Gil,

Statements like yours are exactly the problem with anyone trying to make a point that does not follow your narrow views, If you don't like someone's particular view it is categorized as a "Liberal" statement, pretty common for your type of beliefs, remember not every subject is black or white!! Your missing the point of Emily's letter.....,

Gil's picture

I'm throwing the BS flag on

I'm throwing the BS flag on your claim. There has been no evidence to show an increase in accidents since the inception of the cell phone, so how can you claim more accidents because of them? If I were you Emily, I would stop believing everything someone tells you and spend your education time trying to find a way out of Jay.
"Reasoning with a liberal is like trying to pick up a turd by the clean end. " Pirate

the_poorman's picture

"There has been no evidence

"There has been no evidence to show an increase in accidents since the inception of the cell phone, so how can you claim more accidents because of them?"

Gil - meet Google, Google Gil.

http://www.livescience.com/technology/050201_cell_danger.html
http://www.californiainjurylawyerblog.com/2007/09/personal_injury_accide...
http://www.wral.com/news/local/story/141696/
http://www.isri.org/AM/TemplateRedirect.cfm?template=/CM/ContentDisplay....
http://www.unews.utah.edu/p/?r=062206-1
http://www.chicagocaraccidentattorneysblog.com/2009/03/odds_of_deadly_ca...

Gil you are so damn stupid I do not understand why you continue to post hear or talk out loud. You should be forced to sit in a library for two years and read every book you can so that you intellect and vocabulary get beyond their current second grade level. Do you even have the internet in you lean to?

Any problem that can't be solved with taxcuts, republicans pretend doesn't exist.

Gil's picture

http://www.livescience.com/te

http://www.livescience.com/technology/050201_cell_danger.html - Because data on cell phone use by motorists are limited, the range of uncertainty is wide, those researchers said. The estimate of fatalities in that HCRA report ranged between 800 and 8,000.
http://www.californiainjurylawyerblog.com/2007/09/personal_injury_accide.. - Absolutely nothing that shows how cells statistically cause more accidents
http://www.wral.com/news/local/story/141696/ - They allude to a study done, no reference.
That's three strikes right off the bat. You call me stupid and yet you have no idea what constitutes proof to validate an argument, your research sucks, and I'm pretty sure you didn't bother to read them. Cut and paste from Google does not prove your point. And try to use better Grammar and spelling if you are going to insult mine. Just a thought.
"Reasoning with a liberal is like trying to pick up a turd by the clean end. " Pirate

tron's picture
verified

You are stupid, you accept

You are stupid, you accept your research and dismiss any and all research that doesn't support your ideas. A fleck on a flea has more intelligence than you'll ever have.

Advertisement

Stay informed — Get the news delivered for free in your inbox.

I'm interested in ...