Outdoorsmen are ignored

I can't believe that the state of Maine passed a law so the Inland Fisheries and Wildlife Department can charge $5 for tagging a bear, moose, deer or turkey. Tagging stations get $1 while $4 goes back to the department.

Overall, for the past two years, there has been a decline in the deer and moose populations because of the harsh winters. Where is that $4 going? That money should go into a fund for winter feeding projects, such as other states do.

Other states have put outdoorsmen's ideas first and worked together on the problem. Other states don't have a blind eye for their wildlife.

There was a chance of getting a wildlife research team in Maine, but with all the state regulations, the research team decided it was not worth the effort because of the laws against supplemental feeding. Other states, including Montana, Illinois and Colorado, have thriving deer herds because they have supplemental feeding programs.

And how can state officials issue a statement that there is a low deer density but still have a special deer archery season where hunters can take as many deer as they want for a per-deer fee? They issue a special bonus permit, even with the low deer density. I really don't get it.

Outdoorsmen are not being listened to. They fill out comment cards, but those probably get filed away and forgotten.

State wildlife officials need to learn from other states.

John Stevens, North Monmouth

Stay informed — Get the news delivered for free in your inbox.

I'm interested in ...

In order to make comments, you must verify your account.

In order to comment on SunJournal.com, you must use your real name and include the town in which you live in your profile. A member of our staff will call you to verify this information. To join in, fill out your user profile completely and check the box "please verify my status." We'll get back to you within one business day to verify your account.

Login or create an account here.

Our policy prohibits comments that are:

  • Defamatory, abusive, obscene, racist, or otherwise hateful
  • Excessively foul and/or vulgar
  • Inappropriately sexual
  • Baseless personal attacks or otherwise threatening
  • Contain illegal material, or material that infringes on the rights of others
  • Commercial postings attempting to sell a product/item
If you violate this policy, your comment will be removed and your account may be banned.

Advertisement

Displaying comments, from newest to oldest

98civb18c's picture

Winter feeding programs are

Winter feeding programs are a good idea but I dont think the state should be doing it. It seems anything the state does ends up messed up. I think the money should be going to recreating yarding areas and coyote eradication. But we all know the moneywill go to general fund and Difw will have budget cuts

give a Liberal a fish and he'll ask you to clean and cook it

lead dog's picture

Supplemental feeding does

Supplemental feeding does not help the deer herd. It concentrates the deer into one place making easy picking for coyotes. It also causes competition for the food that is put down. When that happens the biggest deer win and eat all the food. The small young deer lose and many are undernourished and weak. That wouldn't happen if the deer were browsing on natural feeds. Also overcrowding and to much close contact makes it easy for diseases to spread quickly. The state should not be feeding deer and individuals shouldn't either. Except on some islands deer in Maine don't suffer from lack of natural food. Their enemies are destruction of wintering deer yards and deep snow. Supplemental feeding does nothing to counter these factors.

frankie's picture

Other states like Illinois

Other states like Illinois and Colorado have Chronic Wasting disease running rampant among their deer and elk herds partially due to their feeding programs which bring unnaturally large numbers of deer and elk in close proximity....not sure you want that disease here...

more info here:

Chronic Wasting Disease Alliance

http://www.cwd-info.org/index.php

scott's picture

R61, you have hit the nail

R61, you have hit the nail on the head and yet you disagreed with me a while back and even went so far as to want a state statute. It's called taxation without representation. Whether it is a tax or a fee collected for one purpose it should go to that purpose and it only. As for my arguement, snowmobile registration fees should go to the club and yet we get nothing. It is a tax collected for a purpose and yet the money goes to the general fund and squandered. Taxation for a snowmobile should go toward what it was intended for, trail upkeep and club functions just as a tax for tagging a deer should go toward improving the deer herd.

Robert61's picture

Scott, after two years of

Scott, after two years of reviewing budgets and understanding taxes, I must confess, you are absolutely correct. It would be wonderful if we could get cities to take a portion of the excise tax from boats and use it to develop the waterfront, snowmobiles for creating and maintaining trails, etc.

Robert61's picture

This is Maine state

This is Maine state giverment, 4 bucks is 4 bucks...revenues have never been equally distributed back to the purpose they were colected from, but rather to allow representatives to favor their personal projects and ideas.

Advertisement