Friday, November 20, 2009 in Lewiston, Maine

Auburn-Lewiston:
Clear sky, 46.4 °F

Panhandler not welcome in Auburn

AUBURN — Moments after John Stevens held up his cardboard sign at Wal-Mart on Thursday, asking for donations because he lost everything in a house fire, the insults began.

"I know all about you pedophiles," one man shouted.

Another threw four pennies at Stevens, saying, "That's all you're worth."

Another driver, calling Stevens over to his car window with the promise of a dollar, waited until Stevens was inches away and then spat at him before driving off.

And another, pulling up in a late-model pickup, rolled down his window and said, "A couple of weeks ago I gave you money for food to eat." Stevens asked if the driver wanted his money back, and the driver said no. "I just want you gone."

Before Thursday, people stopped at the light would roll down their windows and talk with Stevens, he said, wishing him good luck and, many times, offering him money. During a half-hour at the same spot Thursday afternoon, there were no offers of good wishes. Only gestures of anger and suggestions that he leave town.

"The article in the paper didn't do anything for me," Stevens, 43, said of the Sun Journal's profile of him and his panhandling efforts at the Wal-Mart entrance on Mount Auburn Avenue, published Thursday.

Stevens and his wife were burned out of their apartment on Chapel Street in Augusta in March, and Stevens aggravated an existing back condition when he jumped out of a second-story window to escape the flames. He started panhandling in Augusta because he couldn't find work, and has been in Auburn panhandling for the past five weeks.

The Sun Journal's story about him listed a summary of his criminal background, including a number of felony convictions and a 1997 conviction for unlawful sexual contact. Stevens must register on the Sex Offender Registry for life.

"I'm no predator," Stevens said Thursday, agitated that people would think he might hurt children. He defended his sex-offender status, saying he had been a victim of circumstance, pleading guilty to a charge on the advice of his attorney and then subjected to the shifting law that expanded the registry to include older sex convictions.

"People are always judging people," he said, adding that there's no getting away from the cloud of being a sex offender.

Stevens said he didn't think people needed to know about his criminal background to be able to help him. He was angry that the newspaper included his background, and had wanted the story to be limited to the reason he was homeless.

"Hard knocks everywhere I turn. Hard knocks. Hard knocks," he said, fighting back tears.

Stevens, who had worked as a mason and a carpenter years ago, injured his back in a car accident in 2000 and later tried to work jobs doing light janitorial work. But, "swinging the broom," he said, "I couldn't do it."

He has applied for disability insurance, but said he's been waiting more than a year for approval. He said he's also approached the city of Augusta for General Assistance and various social services for help. He has found no help for a fire victim in Maine, especially for one who doesn't have extended family support, he said. As soon as people learn of his felony convictions, the offers of help stop.

"I'm at my wit's end," Stevens said. "I'm at my lowest point."

He said he had been asked to leave shopping centers in Augusta, Waterville and Brunswick, and that Auburn was the only place he could panhandle without being run off by police.

On Thursday, he set up his sign on Wal-Mart property between the store and the Burger King restaurant.

Store Manager Dale Brann, responding to complaints from customers, asked him to move along to the Mount Auburn entrance. Brann said that he had regularly received complaints about Stevens' presence, but on Thursday the complaints escalated after customers had learned of Stevens' criminal record.

According to Deputy Chief Jason Moen of the Auburn Police Department, the city doesn't have a local ordinance that prohibits panhandling, and Stevens' presence on Mount Auburn Avenue hadn't presented traffic problems.

Police had checked on Stevens before, Moen said, and he wasn't violating any state law by asking people for help. If Wal-Mart were to object to Stevens' presence, though, store officials could tell him to leave.

"Auburn was the only place I could go where cops wouldn't bother me or harass me because I'm a sex offender," Stevens said. "I have no idea what I'm going to do now. No idea."

He had been able to save a couple of hundred dollars from the donations collected in Auburn, Stevens said, because he and his wife lived in their truck. But it was too cold on rainy nights, so they used that money to stay in a hotel in Augusta. And, he said, they had to eat. He has no savings.

Stevens said his wife of five years doesn't like what he's doing. He had hoped that people might be more charitable Thursday, but after a half-hour he decided he wasn't welcome.

At one point, a car with three young men stopped at the light and yelled at him. Stevens yelled back, and the driver opened his door and got out. Stevens invited the man to hit him. "Look, the media's right there."

The man got back in his car and drove off.

Stevens said that in the five weeks he'd been in Auburn, he'd had multiple offers for help and had taken the names and phone numbers of people who offered him furniture and places to stay. He had intended to call some of them, but didn't think he'd bother now because they probably wouldn't help.

He wasn't sure he'd ever come back to his Wal-Mart spot here, but he'd keep the donations of food, clothes and other goods that people had given him since early September.

In researching Thursday's story, the Sun Journal obtained Stevens' driving record from the Department of Motor Vehicles, which noted that his driver's license was indefinitely suspended on Oct. 21 for not having insurance on his vehicle when he had an accident in Augusta. According to Auburn police, Stevens' license is not currently under suspension.

jmeyer@sunjournal.com


Comments

wheelie207 says

I just want to point out that all those people at Walmart or the Auburn Mall, how many there are sex offenders. Can you tell who they are, NO because they could be from another town and people around Lewiston and Auburn only looks at the list for the LA area. We don't know who or how many that are from out of town.

I have found 4 or 5 sex offenders out at the Auburn Mall hanging around and watching everyone. I don't like it when I see them staring at the kids, but I'm not getting into trouble for harassment either. I'm sure they could find better things to do besides sitting around the Mall doing nothing when they could find odd jobs around making money for themselves and staying out of trouble.

Those that harassed that panhandler could be in trouble because I read in the paper when they show a sex offender in the paper at the bottom it says harassment or threats is against the law.

Posted 2 weeks ago (permalink)

bigfish says

Law man, yes you are.

Posted 3 weeks ago (permalink)

Scotty_O's picture

Scotty_O says

He must make a killing at Wal-mart on the first of the month. All those paychecks rolling in from the government. Wait a minute, do losers give to losers? We need a 5 billion dollar federal study to investigate this, oh wait we'll have to pan handle in Beijing to raise research money.

Posted 3 weeks ago (permalink)

Eagle's picture

Eagle says

Bigfish, Scott the Herring, if you give him half of your 650.00 monthly income, you will also end up panhandling, unless you live under a bridge!

Posted 3 weeks ago (permalink)

Law man says

So why is it, if someone is a conservative or a rupublican, they are always talked down to. How did you just word it...trashy? Just because I believe differently then you, doesnt give you the right to talk down to me. Thats the great thing about this country, the will to think and say what you believe. But since I am not a liberal, then I am a bigot or uneducated or 'trashy'.

Sorry you feel the need to mock those who dont agree with you...or am I being trashy here?

Posted 3 weeks ago (permalink)

bigfish says

Ohh and keep on making your twice weekly trips to walmart you trashy Republicans. Go ahead and continue to support China. Then trash some guy who has the gall to stand out there all day and beg. Woooooooo losers.

Posted 3 weeks ago (permalink)

bigfish says

I support this guy, and what people are doing to him is awful. Who cares if he is standing there? Who cares what he has done in his past? Clearly you guys to care enough to go around and harass other that are on the sex-offender registry. This is BS. If I can find him, I gonna give him half of my $650 paycheck. So there you go guys, and thanks SJ, this guy is getting a chunk.

Posted 3 weeks ago (permalink)

Tired says

While I'm in full agreement that if he has the stamina to stand there all day panhandling, he should get a job. But anyone who would pull over, start trouble with this guy, spit at him, throw pennies, etc, deserves to get a beating themselves! I mean c'mon people. The guy is just standing there, not bothering anyone except for holding up a sign, and it's OK to just pull over and start in on him? What a world. Not that I didn't expect this kind of behavior after the first article, hoodlums from the dirty Lew are that predictable. Anyone who would go out of their way to do that is a scumbag - 10 times worse than this guy.

Posted 3 weeks ago (permalink)

LewistonNative... says

I realize that you are so high and mighty, but when did this article talk about Lewiston? Last I checked it was Auburn people who deem themselves better then everyone. Also, instead of trying to bash Lewiston, how about you stand out there and do a survey to see what the odds are of a Lewiston person pulling over to do such thing.

Posted 3 weeks ago (permalink)

Publikwerks's picture

Publikwerks says

BTW- How many people here have given money to the Catholic Church?

Yeah, I went there.

Posted 3 weeks ago (permalink)

concerned KD says

Come on people.....Stevens called Sun journal himself looking for they're help in getting his story out...Ask yourself , why did he do this.......answer......Monetary gain... He was trying to pull on the heart strings of the community to fill his pockets with loot. Sun Journal is not to blame here. Just because he did not get the story he wanted he is now upset because he is being held accountable for his past by the public....If you dont want accountability, DONT try to stick yourself in the limelight. Especially for monetary gains. If Sun Journal had writen the story in the bleeding heart context that he wanted, and then this man offended a child while panhandling in Auburn you people would be criticizing Sun Journal for NOT notifying the public of this predator after they had researched his past.. I commend SJ for telling the truth and not promoting this guys greedy agenda..That would have truly been a disservice to the public.
- It would be interesting to see just how much money he has made panhandling. Does panhandling = tax exemption? Oh wait thats right he said it himself... He TAKES SSI too . SOOO, he takes tax money , He pays no taxes , and he wants your hard earned cash to line his pockets. And the liberals on this Blog want us to feel bad for him....NO.... I feel bad for the hard working, non criminal man/woman who has been laid off from they're full time benefit offering job who now has to hold down 2 part time jobs to support their family with no benefits... They deserve the handouts and would probably only take what they need instead of everything they could get.. Stevens is a scabb on the epidermis of society. Until he takes action to heal himself and stop screaming for someone to GIVE him a bandaid he deserves NO handouts.

Posted 3 weeks ago (permalink)

tron's picture

tron says

I will accept that you do not like this person and do not wish him well. However, just leave him alone. Don't yell, spit throw dangerous things at him, just leave him alone. If enough people like you do that, he'll go somewhere to greener pastures. But it is mean-spirited people like you right wing wackos that create such a hostile environment for everyone else. Learn the civilized way of doing thing.

Posted 3 weeks ago (permalink)

Law man says

I could not agree with any comment on here more then yours.

Posted 3 weeks ago (permalink)

MrBubbaGeek says

Someone in the Community needs to stand next to him with a big sign

Sex Offender => (Don't forget the pointing arrow)

What is good for the Goose is Goose is good for the Gander

Posted 3 weeks ago (permalink)

PoppaCap says

It only takes one bad Panhandler to ruin it for the rest of us...... LOL

Posted 3 weeks ago (permalink)

ojhuig's picture

ojhuig says

You didn't own the building that burned, you were just renting an apartment. Your wife still works. You could have gotten temporary lodging, clothes and furniture from the various charities. Why are you panhandling?

Posted 3 weeks ago (permalink)

Publikwerks's picture

Publikwerks says

Just to add one last point - I don't agree with him panhandling, but leave the poor bastard alone. The person who held out a dollar to get him close buy, and then spit on him is a piece of poo. Don't like him, fine, don't give him money. But leave him alone.

Posted 3 weeks ago (permalink)

speedbump says

Oh pleeeeaaaaaaaaase - he can't work my a$$ !!! He's standing around all day holding a sign asking for money - he could easily be direct traffic in a construction zone , be a teller , or a cashier most anywhere . Times are tough all over , pal ! He must be doing OK with the panhandling thing - CarHartt clothing doesnt come cheap , hes clean and has some fairly new glasses . Send your sob story to Obama - he'll take care of you . I'm wondering also if hes claiming all of his donations to the IRS as well .

Posted 3 weeks ago (permalink)

leo says

eventually what goes around comes around. help comes to those who help themselves. tough love, hmmm maybe this will help turn the guy in the right direction. makes me wonder though with the many opportunities he has already passed up. john has to be willing. as far as the sj, john asked for the interview.

Posted 3 weeks ago (permalink)

Winterbear98 says

The S=J made this man a target for the sole purpose of selling their crappy-ass RAG of a paper. They should be ashamed of themselves. Sunjournal CANT AFORD TO FIX THIER TIME AND TEMP CLOCK OUTSIDE THERE BUILDING PORTLAND PRESS HERALD IS NUMBER 1

Posted 3 weeks ago (permalink)

jayla says

Really? Seems like they've had a lot of problems over the years. I don't recall Sun Journal being bought out...a couple of times.

Posted 3 weeks ago (permalink)

DR says

Public shame may have the effect of pointing someone in the right direction where every other effort has failed to impress them. Anonymous panhandlers can play on your sympathy and separate you from your hard-earned cash, as Stevens has obviously learned. Playing the "poor me" card has been successful for him. But instead of taking advantage of the various types of honest help available, he prefers to panhandle. I have to question his bad back story as well, given his proven ability to sit in a car and stand on street corners for extended periods of time. The "I have a bad back" story is the oldest one on the books for trying to get disability. So yeah, you've got to be able to prove it in a reasonable way.

No matter what the reality of his status as a sex offender, if that's the point you want to quibble over, he also has a criminal record of other types of offenses. His own comments show that the thought of returning to criminal activity is not far from his mind. When the average person really wants to turn their life around, they take responsibility for their actions, suck up the consequences, and DO the honest things they need to do. You don't get a "poor me" pass when you refuse to stop taking questionable or even criminal ways out of your problems. Or when you repeatedly try to con people. People respect you when you make honest efforts to help yourself that don't involve shady activity.

Of course Stevens is a human being and deserves help. But for his part, he must be willing to accept help that will put him on the path to being a productive and honest citizen. I don't think he's ready to do that yet, and that's his own free choice. He could choose to stop panhandling right now. Will he? Or if he needs help for some problem that prevents him from taking the right steps of his own volition, will he ask for that help?

Posted 3 weeks ago (permalink)

Publikwerks's picture

Publikwerks says

He bailed on the janitorial work. He should realize that an honest day pay is an honest days pay. It beats panhandling

Posted 3 weeks ago (permalink)

Eagle's picture

Eagle says

Boy the beggars rights crowd sure are in a tizzy, the SJ sure gave them a wedgie. Good story Judy and the SJ staff.

Posted 3 weeks ago (permalink)

K0NPHL1C7 says

Good job?

What about writing an article about the THOUSANDS of FAT-LAZY-DRUGGIE scumbags that abusie the piss out of Maine's Social Services, BLEEDING taxpayers dry? How many sex offenders do you think are on food-stamps? How about investigating CRIMINALS who are more of a dead-weight than this man will ever be?

Inciting a mob-against a man simply because he is a sex offender, when the Sun-Journal sends sex offenders to your doors every night? How about reporting on that?

The S=J made this man a target for the sole purpose of selling their crappy-ass RAG of a paper. They should be ashamed of themselves.

Posted 3 weeks ago (permalink)

jayla says

Well, the difference between them & him - they didn't agree to an interview & have it plastered in the paper! I love how everybody is blaming the paper. LOL. Accountability people!

Posted 3 weeks ago (permalink)

Reason says

A sad case, but I had wondered from the beginning why this man and his wife had not accepted the initial help after the fire that displaced them. Something seemed wrong. After reading the Sun Journal article, I found it enlightening about this person. It is sad that people put themselves in such despair. How does someone dig themselves out of such a situation? I may sound harsh and without sympathy, but I believe that it is time for this man to move to another city, etc. He can only enrage the local population by staying in Auburn after the article was published yesterday. This is a situation just waiting to explode. It brings to mind that fact that Auburn doesn't have a law against panhandling. Perhaps Auburn should consider one and make it retroactive to prevent this from continuing as a Reasonable choice I hope you will agree with me. City Council action might be called a knee jerk reaction, however, it might also be considered just catching up to the present time. Certainly, I am glad that the Sun Journal published facts and not opinion.

Posted 3 weeks ago (permalink)

Winterbear98 says

Michele says
He is still a human being, shame on you people for harrassing this man due to the SJ article. He has made many mistakes and there is no excuse but we are no better treating him like trash, and ridiculing him because of his criminal past. I think it is sad that he has to resort to panhandling but no one is forcing you to give him money. I dont agree with the way the Sunjournal handled the article they knew by publishing it that it would create problems for this man just so they could have another story, shame on you SUNJOURNAL!
very well said sun journal shame on you

Posted 3 weeks ago (permalink)

lead dog says

When Mr Stevens and his wife were living in their Augusta apartment she was working, he was not. The fire did not change her income so their family income has stayed the same. If they could get by without panhandling before why can't they now? Her income was enough to support them before the fire. It should still be enough. He has turned down offers of work and help from charitable organizations. People who accept that kind of help don't remain homeless for months. By refusing constructive help Mr Stevens has chosen to be in the situation he is in. Maybe it wasn't his choice to end up there but it was his choice not to pick himself up and improve his life.

Posted 3 weeks ago (permalink)

PropertyPriority says

I agree with you he turned down them offers because he wanted the free ride he was getting with all that money people were just giving him.Now that the gravy train stopped he wants to call up on those offers from weeks ago.I bet he made thousands.He had to have been clearing at least 7 or 800 a day.Where did that money go? p his nose in his arm?

Posted 3 weeks ago (permalink)

Law man says

Agreed

Posted 3 weeks ago (permalink)

K0NPHL1C7 says

BREAKING NEWS –

The Sun-Journal hires Sex Offenders to deliver your paper every day. They do NOT screen their carriers.

That’s right. The same perverts that you want out of your city, the Sun-Journal gives a free-p[ass to wander your streets at all hours of the night. The same sick people you yell vulgarities too as they try to make a buck, the Sun-Journal sends right to your unlocked door at 3:30am every single day.

Write an article about that Sun-Journal.

Posted 3 weeks ago (permalink)

Blue Eyes says

queenhoneybee......a sex offender is a sex offender.. whether they offend one or many times. I'm a survivor too and am really blown away and insulted that you can sit there and defend sex offenders and claim they each have their own story. you can sit there and preach your holier then thou speech to everyone, but your sex offender defense is an insult to other victims and survivors.

Posted 3 weeks ago (permalink)

queenhoneeybee's picture

queenhoneeybee says

I forgive my sex offenders and even those who were going to sexually offend me. They did their time and had to pay to consequences. Its not just jail time or probation... but loss of their families-the ultimate penalty. I believe that my sex offenders have full, surreal, and honest remorse for what they had done to me. That is a sentence for life. I only ask that they too-can and should start forgiving themselves to live a truly, enriching, satisfying life. As humans we all deserve it. I came to this conclusion all on my own. I am not religious. Heck, I don't even know if there is a God. All I know is that I am human, and that is the greatest privilege of all no matter how traumatic of experiences I've had to endure.

There are 18 yr old boys with a mentality of a 12 yr old that get convicted as a sex offender for having a sexual relationship with a willing 15/16yr old. There are girls that do lie about being sexually abused and admit in later years that they made a mistake. Now this is NOT ALL CASES, however again... every offenders story is different and they should not all be treated the same.

There is nothing greater in the world than being 'free', forgiving, and letting go.

Posted 3 weeks ago (permalink)

Erin says

Lets look at Johns actual crime then. He was convicted in 1997 which would have made him 31 at the time. He was convicted of unlawful sexual contact with someone under the age of 14. So at best he was 31 having had some kind of sexual contact with at best a 13 year old. Now as a survior and someone who has dealt with investigations and sentencing of pedophiles I can tell you that this conviction is not something they easily give out. There normally has to be some damning evidence or witnesses to the incident. Persons are not convicted soley on hearsay or testimony. Maine also has some of the lowest standards of sentencing when it comes to sex offenders. National studies show that most sex offenders have multiple victims especially when they involve children. You should also know as a survivor that most sex crimes against children are never reported and worse tolerated by family members who look the other way. The registry was formed to help bring light to an epedmic problem and to force those who would otherwise continue to violate be held accountable. The registry is not about punishing those offenders, IT IS ABOUT HOLDING THEM ACCOUNTABLE

Posted 3 weeks ago (permalink)

Law man says

Actualy, Title 17-a states if the victim is 15 or older, a crime is present if the actor is more then 5 years older then the vic...so there is no excuse. 21yr old is an adult, regardless of mentality...15yr old is a kid

Posted 3 weeks ago (permalink)

queenhoneeybee's picture

queenhoneeybee says

willING... and in other states-the maine law may not be the case.

Posted 2 weeks ago (permalink)

gladtobegone says

Ernest..what a moron. He obviously does not want to call them because his name has been smeared all over the paper!!

When a crime is commited...you serve your time. This country/state has laws in place as to how long you serve for your crime. Who are any of you to decide that those laws dont matter, and you can make him serve his time forever?? do you think sitting on the side of the road is fun?? Easier than getting a job...I think not. Very boring, very cold, very embarassing. Why dont you try on this mans shoes for a day prior to judging?

Posted 3 weeks ago (permalink)

Law man says

The law does state "forever" as the punishment for sex crimes. A life time of registering as a sex offender. Now knowing that is part of the punishment, are you going to commit this offense? I know that forever of being hated is an added reason why I would never commit a crime. If theft would make it so that I would need to register for life as a non-trustworthy person, I would never think of doing that crime either.

Posted 3 weeks ago (permalink)

gladtobegone says

Who the heck are any of you to judge this man?? At least he is not breaking into your house and stealing your things!!! He is asking for help, and this sort of thing happens everwhere...except those of you who have never left the state of Maine..would never know what is going on in the world around you. Not ALL people on the registry actually commited the crime. Heres a little story..A guy I currently work with was accused of touching a child..when the mother was in the other room, as well as his wife. he was immediately arrested, spent 6 weeks in jail, and never had any say into it. He spent $25000 defending himself..and it hadnt even gotten to court yet. He ended up having to plea down, not because he was guilty, but because he had no money left to fight it. All it takes is one mother to fly off the handle and accuse you and you are automatically guilty if you cannot afford $70,000 to defend yourself. Then, he has stipulations on where he can work, live, etc...and these people have to put that on their job application...so...going to Burger King and applying would probably be a waste of ink. If we want to see who is on the registry..we can look at it. Shame on the Sun Journal for intentionally creating a lynch mob against this man. Shame on all of you who THINK you know what has gone on in this mans life...when really..you havnt a clue. Enjoy your day and I hope that nothing in your life ever goes wrong. Oh....do you get all fired up when firefighters are collecting "tolls" in a roadway..or sports team at the WalMart entrance? That is panhandling as well, because they are not actually doing a "fundraiser" (selling donuts, candles, etc)..they are simply standing in the roadway, asking for money.

Posted 3 weeks ago (permalink)

taxpayer says

Excuse me but this guy admitted in his own words that if he didn't have a bad back he would be out thieving. He's scum. End of story.

Posted 3 weeks ago (permalink)

Law man says

Couple things, first off I know and work around MANY offenders...they ALL say that they did not do it and have a story sounding alot like the guy that works with you and is probably the same as this guys. Second, I look at them having to register as part of the punishment...dont do the crime if you dont want to pay for it in the end.

Posted 3 weeks ago (permalink)

gladtobegone says

Who the heck are any of you to judge this man?? At least he is not breaking into your house and stealing your things!!! He is asking for help, and this sort of thing happens everwhere...except those of you who have never left the state of Maine..would never know what is going on in the world around you. Not ALL people on the registry actually commited the crime. Heres a little story..A guy I currently work with was accused of touching a child..when the mother was in the other room, as well as his wife. he was immediately arrested, spent 6 weeks in jail, and never had any say into it. He spent $25000 defending himself..and it hadnt even gotten to court yet. He ended up having to plea down, not because he was guilty, but because he had no money left to fight it. All it takes is one mother to fly off the handle and accuse you and you are automatically guilty if you cannot afford $70,000 to defend yourself. Then, he has stipulations on where he can work, live, etc...and these people have to put that on their job application...so...going to Burger King and applying would probably be a waste of ink. If we want to see who is on the registry..we can look at it. Shame on the Sun Journal for intentionally creating a lynch mob against this man. Shame on all of you who THINK you know what has gone on in this mans life...when really..you havnt a clue. Enjoy your day and I hope that nothing in your life ever goes wrong. Oh....do you get all fired up when firefighters are collecting "tolls" in a roadway..or sports team at the WalMart entrance? That is panhandling as well, because they are not actually doing a "fundraiser" (selling donuts, candles, etc)..they are simply standing in the roadway, asking for money.

Posted 3 weeks ago (permalink)

Ernest says

"Stevens said that in the five weeks he'd been in Auburn, he'd had multiple offers for help and had taken the names and phone numbers of people who offered him furniture and places to stay. He had intended to call some of them, but didn't think he'd bother now because they probably wouldn't help. " Why didn't he calll those that offered to help. Because panhandleing pays better. If you come across someone with a sign will work for food, stop and offer them a job. They won't take it, because they don't want it they only want the donations.

Posted 3 weeks ago (permalink)

TREEHUGGARRR says

Irony is, SJ did a fact check before they did a bleeding heart story and are still getting criticized.
They've been burnt in the past for printing stories about the down trodden, only to find the subject of the story arrested the day the story printed ,(i.e. Calvin Tidswell, drug trafficker).
Kudos to Judy Meyers for doing it right the first time!

Posted 3 weeks ago (permalink)

queenhoneeybee's picture

queenhoneeybee says

I think that this only shows all the more reason for why I commented on what I did, when I did in the last article 'Auburn Panhandler Has Criminal History'. There are some people out there that think they know everything and every aspect of a person's life period and eveb more so because they are a registered sex offender-on top of those same people thinking that it is their right to harass, verbal/mental/or physically attack people that they disagree with or sex offenders. Not ALL people and NOT all sex offenders are the same... all stories are different. However, I think a majority of sex offenders are not able to get the RIGHT kind of HELP AND SUPPORT to increase their chances of not re-offending because these 'know-it-all' people just don't want to help (again, whether it be hiring them and even by NOT harassing/attacking them). It is not our right to inflict HATE/HURT among other people in life no matter what they did in the past. That's what the law is for.

This is too bad really. Economic times are tough and its hard for anyone to find a job or do some kind of work. I think part of being a human being is having some compassion and a little more understanding... but all too often people are just too quick to judge. Unfortunately for sex offenders that little thing called 'privacy' doesn't exist no matter how much of an outstanding citizen they may be. I agree that there are some that are high-risk and may not have got the right kind of help. That doesn't entitle anyONE to violate their privacy by posting their personal information, exact addresses where they live, or exact work addresses. This only heightens their risk to be physically attacked or harassed.

This jeopardizes their safety and the safety of their families, no one seems to think that maybe they have children themselves or a wife or maybe even that they live with their mother.

All sex offenders are treated the same and there is no biased when it comes down to the law/sex offender registry. No matter what we do as a society, no matter the precautions we take, no matter what we do to violate another person's privacy... its still going to happen by other people, in another place, in another city.

They only thing that we can do to protect our children and ourselves is to be educated. Maybe self-defense classes or maybe even being a trusting enough of a person that they would come to us if their is an issue. More often times than not, its someone from within the family that offends...

I know its all hard for you all to believe, but there are some out there that don't re-offend. One of the best ways and getting them help-whether it be giving a panhandler money till he gets by to rightfully be on social security because of a physical disability, hiring them-so that they can be working class citizens and not have more stresses, and housing them (in our cities) or our towns to give them a chance at life... all in the sake of making of increasing the possibility statisticallly that some don't re-offend.

Its crucial for an addict to get the right kind of help, what is so different about getting the right kind of help for an offender. All it can do is increase that chance with the right kind of support. I agree that there are some that can not be helped, just like any addict. But we need the resources here for all of them. Every sex offender's story is different.

Yes, call me crazy-go right ahead. However, I know first hand because I am a SURVIVOR (of sexual abuse, rape, and even sexual harassment). I takes a lot of guts to forgive and let go. There is nothing more empowering and NO ONE from SJ who wants to make a rude comment back to me, or society, or anyONE else can take that away from me.

Posted 3 weeks ago (permalink)

K0NPHL1C7 says

Very well said. People are too quick to light the torch and grab the pitch-fork, without ever even looking at the other side of the story.

And shame on Sun-Journal for knowingly exploiting the mob mentality.

Posted 3 weeks ago (permalink)

K0NPHL1C7 says

Way to go Sun-Journal. Way to spark that “mob-mentality” that brings out the best in people. I love seeing these fools drive up and yell vulgarities at him after reading only 1 incredibly BIASED article about the man. It really makes me proud to be an American.

Yesterday’s article was hardly investigative journalism. It was straight slander. You posted that article knowing damn well what it was going to do to this man.

I would rather hand this man a dollar than pay my taxes KNOWING they are going to THOUSANDS of FAT-LAZY SCUMBAGS who don’t even have the MOTIVATION to hold up a sign.

Posted 3 weeks ago (permalink)

wirelessbug says

I dont think this guy should be panhandling for money, there are other ways to obtain money... SJ never put in if his wife works... but I do fault them for putting into yesterdays article that he is a sex offender when they quoted him saying that he didnt want his status made public. This article above states what I believed was going to happen... people opening their arms to this man, reading that article, then turning it into random acts of violence. I do not agree with what a lot of people do in their own personal time, I am a parent, yes, so I do care who my child comes into contact with... but subjecting an unfortunate person to random acts of "discrimination" because of a "status" with the law is not fair. The first thing that comes to mind is those 2 men that were murdered in lewiston because they were sex offenders... is the SJ going to be held responsible if something like that happens to this man because they knowingly printed something that he did not want published?

Posted 3 weeks ago (permalink)

Licia Kuenning says

I misunderstood the earlier SJ article as saying that John Stevens had invited the SJ to publicize his past. If he only asked for help and the paper used the opportunity to dig up his criminal record and publish that, it was a shabby trick. As for "conservatives," the word seems to have a variety of meanings, but I think of myself as a conservative in many ways, and I try to help people. I'm a follower of Jesus, if that's conservative. If I didn't feel called to contribute to a particular needy person (because one can't help everybody), I certainly wouldn't insult him or spit on him.

Posted 3 weeks ago (permalink)

Contests
Radio City Racing
NASCAR fantasy racing at its finest. Weekly prizes. Grand prize is a flat screen TV. Click here to play!
Copyright 2009 Sun Media Group