Join the community!

Login, register or Connect to comment.

Our View

Amber Alert: Did it work?

Published on Thursday, Nov 12, 2009 at 2:02 am | Last updated on Thursday, Nov 12, 2009 at 2:02 am 5 Comments

Did Maine's first Amber Alert work? Yes, but there is room for improvement.

Two-year-old Hailey Traynham of Sanford was found Wednesday, safe and sound, by an eagle-eyed New Hampshire hunter who knew about the alert and recognized her fugitive father's pickup truck. He started a conversation with the man, Gary, and helped convince him to give up.

The Amber Alert — as a concept — worked to perfection. By spreading the widest information net possible (including across state lines), an informed citizen solved the mystery, saved the child and delivered the abductor into custody. A scriptwriter couldn't have spun it better.

Kudos to the hunter, Mike Grant, for intervening and doing the right thing.

How the alert went out, however, needs some sharpening. Broadcast stations — which are integral to the function and success of Amber Alerts — are raising good questions about why authorities took more than six hours to notify the public a little girl was missing.

Until 2008, according to national Amber Alert statistics, a majority of alerts were broadcast within six hours of a proven abduction. In 2006, this was 85 of 142 alerts. In 2007, it was 56 of 106. In 2008, however, only 49 of 116 alerts were delivered within six hours, a disconcerting trend.

While this could be an aberration (until 2009 figures are compiled, we won't know), slower response times could also indicate complacency or confusion.

Regardless, a delay of greater than six hours to broadcast an Amber Alert must be avoided; each wasted moment is too valuable.

The protocol should call for no more than three hours to broadcast, once the criteria of an Amber Alert is determined. This would ensure the alert system is used to its maximum effectiveness, because its potential for preventing a tragedy depends on timely delivery.

There are other areas where alerts could be improved.

Maine Turnpike officials were notified of the Amber Alert about 30 minutes after the media, which is backward. Once a suspected abductor is mobile, motorists become crucial eyes for law enforcement. Getting alerts on electronic Turnpike notice boards should be a higher priority.

There are also reports of technology failings in distributing the alerts that authorities are troubleshooting, according to WGME. This should give law enforcement a chance to review its alert procedures, to ensure the message is being spread over every instant communication medium.

Let's not forget to applaud, though. This Amber Alert, Maine's first, worked as designed. No system is perfect, but judging by outcome alone, nothing went wrong. Hailey Traynham is safe and her abductor is in custody.

That is what matters.

editorialboard@sunjournal.com

In order to make comments, you must verify your account.

In order to comment on SunJournal.com, you must use your real name and include the town in which you live in your profile. A member of our staff will call you to verify this information. To join in, fill out your user profile completely and check the box "please verify my status." We'll get back to you within one business day to verify your account.

Login or create an account here.

Our policy prohibits comments that are:

  • Defamatory, abusive, obscene, racist, or otherwise hateful
  • Excessively foul and/or vulgar
  • Inappropriately sexual
  • Baseless personal attacks or otherwise threatening
  • Contain illegal material, or material that infringes on the rights of others
  • Commercial postings attempting to sell a product/item
If you violate this policy, your comment will be removed and your account may be banned.

Advertisement

Displaying comments, from newest to oldest

Erin's picture
verified

sorry double post.

sorry double post.

Erin's picture
verified

I can't believe I'm saying

I can't believe I'm saying this, but Tron is correct about Amber Alerts. They have strict criteria that must be met before a broadcast can be issued. One being that the child is in immediate danger. So yes it can be used in custodial fights if the parent shows intent on hurting the child. I don't know all the details to this case, and neither does the majority of readers, so I can't judge on the time frame the alert was issued. What I can tell you coming from a law enforcement background is that this program is one of the only ones that is not bowing to liabilty suits and sticking to its main goal. Which is why the program is sucessful. When domestic violence restraining orders were first created they had a good purpose and were treated with urgency. Over time and fear of being held liable judges began awarding them to frivilous cases without much merit. They have gotten out of hand in America to the point if someone calls me a name I can get one. Quite literally they are a joke. This is a tragedy because there are still persons who need this program to work.

SJ is right the flow of information can be greatly improved. However at the same time I applaud the Amber Alert system for keeping to its standards.

debutante's picture
verified

Tron, Amber Alert is also

Tron, Amber Alert is also used if a parent abducts a child. This man was a dangerous man; he sexually assaulted the mother of the child. Amber Alert caused people in New Hamshire to know about this case; therefore, the hunter was aware of what was going on.

tron's picture
verified

I understand, all I was

I understand, all I was saying is that with parental custodial disputes police must be more cautious, that's why it took longer to issue the alert. The main point I made was the SJ was lax in passing on the alert, or did you just not want to see that?

tron's picture
verified

First this was the intended

First this was the intended use of the Amber Alert, this was not a case of stranger abduction but a case of parental custody issues. The authorities knew exactly who did the abduction and approximately where he was heading. Needing help to locate the father they used the Amber Alert, which was debatable because if it is continually used for custodial cases, people won't be on noticed as much.

Second, thought, the SJ was extremely lax in its role. While air broadcasts are probably the most useful, in this age many people get their information from the Internet and the SJ site didn't even post the Amber Alert until the next day. So criticize the authorities all you want, but look in the mirror, also.

Advertisement

Stay informed — Get the news delivered for free in your inbox.

I'm interested in ...