Ruling recommended in religious marijuana case

PORTLAND — A federal judge has recommended that the court rule in favor of the state and two law enforcement agencies in the case of a man claiming violation of his religious rights in a marijuana cultivation arrest.

U.S. Magistrate Judge Margaret Kravchuk also recommended that the U.S. District Court deny a request by plaintiff Norman Hutchinson, 48, of Granite Street in Mexico. Hutchinson requested $75 million from the state and the Maine Drug Enforcement Agency, as well as hundreds of thousands of dollars in damages from the Mexico Police Department.

Hutchinson was charged with marijuana cultivation and had to forfeit an ATV in August 2004. Police found the ATV with a man tending marijuana plants off Route 2 in Dixfield, and a subsequent search of Hutchinson's residence found 55 marijuana plants, grow lights and other cultivating equipment.

In his complaint, Hutchinson says he is a member of the Religion of Jesus Church, which was founded in 1969 and is based in Hawaii. The Religion of Jesus Church mandates the smoking of marijuana based on 12 tenets, including amplification of the worship of God, increased ability to feel God and the creation of peace.

Hutchinson, who is representing himself, charged the state and law enforcement agencies with violation of the federal and state constitutions, violation of the Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993, violation of the U.S. Code, false imprisonment, trespass, conversion, invasion of privacy and negligent and intentional infliction of emotional distress.

In May, U.S. District Court Judge George Singal ruled in favor of the state and MDEA on the latter six charges, saying Hutchinson had not filed a notice of claim within the statute of limitations. Kravchuk recommended the same ruling for the Mexico Police Department on those charges, based on Singal's ruling and Hutchinson's failure to disprove the department's statement of facts.

In her motion for the state and MDEA, Attorney General Janet Mills said the issue of religious use of marijuana has been addressed before.

"State and federal courts have uniformly upheld the constitutionality of laws [...] prohibiting the possession, use, and cultivation of marijuana, even if such laws infringe on the free exercise of religion," Mills said.

mlangeveld@sunjournal.com

Stay informed — Get the news delivered for free in your inbox.

I'm interested in ...

In order to make comments, you must verify your account.

In order to comment on SunJournal.com, you must use your real name and include the town in which you live in your profile. A member of our staff will call you to verify this information. To join in, fill out your user profile completely and check the box "please verify my status." We'll get back to you within one business day to verify your account.

Login or create an account here.

Our policy prohibits comments that are:

  • Defamatory, abusive, obscene, racist, or otherwise hateful
  • Excessively foul and/or vulgar
  • Inappropriately sexual
  • Baseless personal attacks or otherwise threatening
  • Contain illegal material, or material that infringes on the rights of others
  • Commercial postings attempting to sell a product/item
If you violate this policy, your comment will be removed and your account may be banned.

Advertisement

Displaying comments, from newest to oldest

Taxpoor's picture

If he can't afford a lawyer

If he can't afford a lawyer one would be appointed for them FREE. How can you not know that? YES they are almost always idiots . How many idiots do you respect besides your self. None because their IDIOTS But of course an Idiot wouldnt understand

tron's picture

Any IDIOT knows that a

Any IDIOT knows that a lawyer is appoint to criminal defendants at trial. Any IDIOT who read this story would realize that Mr. Hutchinson is the plaintiff in this case. Apparently certain IDIOTS don't look in the mirror!

Hulk's picture

No need to look in a mirror

No need to look in a mirror just read a tron post and you can feel your IQ dropping!

Licia Kuenning's picture
verified

If a person represents

If a person represents himself in court, it is probably because he can't afford a lawyer. That doesn't make him an idiot, or unworthy of respect. It's true he is not the first to try a religious defense, and that has never succeeded before. I am skeptical about the claim of marijuana being part of anyone's religion; but then I think marijuana should be legal anyway.

Hal's picture

Odd isn't it. We can get

Odd isn't it. We can get drunk and drive our cars and we joke about it. We own as many guns as we like and we use them on each other. Booze and guns are lawfully carried around like items of honor. Bars are built, arms range's built in every state. Citys have areas so dangerous to walk thru that to do so is in most cases impossible without a trip to the hospital. But marajuana is too dangerous to possess. People who feel that it is dangerous should be made to move to places like Orlando, Fl. Marajuana doesn't make the 6 o'clock news very often but the booze and guns, which I might remind you as being perfectly legal, are on the news every single night. But then again lawmakers drink daily and most if not all own guns. Odd itsnt it. BTW, has anyone read the front page of the Sun Journal? I mean the people that have died from Marajuana use.

Taxpoor's picture

Hutchinson, who is

Hutchinson, who is representing himself. Anyone who is representing himself most of the time will not win in court because they are IDIOTS. Did this fool think he was the only one who ever thought he would use this excuse to smoke dope and get away with it. If this made it legal that Religion of Jesus Church would have a really big fallowing for sure. NUT CASE. Put him away and charge him for wasting the couts time.

Advertisement