Collins critical of Postal Service shut-down proposals

LEWISTON — U.S. Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine, expressed frustration with the continued financial woes of the U.S. Postal Service during a committee hearing Thursday morning in Washington, D.C. 

The hearing featured testimony from an executive of NewPage

Collins said the Postal Service lost about $2.8 billion in 2008 and is projected to lose more than $7 billion this year, due to people mailing fewer items.

"The Postal Service is the linchpin of a $900 billion mailing industry that employs 9 million Americans in fields as diverse as direct mail, printing, catalog production, paper manufacturing and financial services," Collins said during her opening statement at the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Subcommittee on Federal Financial Management hearing.

The federal agency is considering raising rates or decreasing delivery days. Companies such as NewPage Corp., the nation's largest coated paper manufacturer, which operates a mill in Rumford,
may have to respond with layoffs, increased prices to consumers or reduced services, Collins said.

Mark Suwyn, executive chairman of NewPage, said the challenging economic climate had already forced his company to reduce capacity, reduce costs and focus on new products and services. He suggested the Postal Service do the same.

"There is a tendency to look at postal issues only from the standpoint of the Postal Service, but it is important to remember that the Postal Service is part of a large economic network," he said at the hearing. "Industries that rely on the Postal Service for distribution employ roughly 8.3 million workers and represent 9 percent of the U.S. economy."

Collins was particularly critical of a Postal Service proposal to review 677 of its 3,200 branches for potential closure.

"The Postal Service cannot expect to gain more business if it is reducing service," Collins said, adding that if all the branches on the list were closed, it would save the Postal Service less than 1 percent of its overall operating costs. A representative of the Postal Service said if it did close some of the branches, no workers would be laid off. 

The Postal Service, Congress and the Obama administration must work together to find a lasting, fiscally responsible solution, Collins said.

rmetzler@sunjournal.com

Stay informed — Get the news delivered for free in your inbox.

I'm interested in ...

In order to make comments, you must verify your account.

In order to comment on SunJournal.com, you must use your real name and include the town in which you live in your profile. A member of our staff will call you to verify this information. To join in, fill out your user profile completely and check the box "please verify my status." We'll get back to you within one business day to verify your account.

Login or create an account here.

Our policy prohibits comments that are:

  • Defamatory, abusive, obscene, racist, or otherwise hateful
  • Excessively foul and/or vulgar
  • Inappropriately sexual
  • Baseless personal attacks or otherwise threatening
  • Contain illegal material, or material that infringes on the rights of others
  • Commercial postings attempting to sell a product/item
If you violate this policy, your comment will be removed and your account may be banned.

Advertisement

Displaying comments, from newest to oldest

JOYE's picture

Walk like they used to??

Walk like they used to?? You can tell who does the job and those who think they know all about it. Maybe if the routes were as long as they 'used to be' we could most certainly walk them all. But with hundreds and hundreds and hundreds - and thats NO lie - of houses and businesses to reach each and every day REGARDLESS of weather, traffic, interruptions, vehicle breakdowns or any other interruptions that come along we just might need a vehicle to get us, and the mail, the many many many miles we cover. Come walk (many) a mile in my shoes BIG Daddy.

Hulk's picture

The only concern they have

The only concern they have is that you deliver their checks on time at the beginning of the month.

big daddy's picture

Amen along with the junk

Amen along with the junk mailers throw in the extra mailings from the state and politicians. Maybe if postal workers walked like they use to do instead of driving around wasting gas.

Hulk's picture

So your and trons solution

So your and trons solution to the problem is for the USPS to have fewer paying customers?

You guys need to stick to what you know best, Welfare.

tron's picture

stop giving deep discounts

stop giving deep discounts to junk mailers, they overtax the system and don't pay their way. Another example of corporate welfare!

Hulk's picture

Could you be any less

Could you be any less informed?

Susan2's picture

Shut it down

Shut it down completely!!!!

Private companies do it for a PROFIT!!!!!!!

We are being taken to the cleaners by the Post Office/GOVERNMENT!

The less Government the better...... we need to take away from the Obama Power-Grab.

Look at all the news about them buying million dollar homes of their employees and sell them for a HUGE loss!

kjb481's picture

Due to the federal

Due to the federal legislation which created the Postal Service in 1970, USPS was unable to even plan on profitability. Senator Susan Collins clearly spent much time and effort on the new law she proudly claims to have authored in Dec. 2006 and passed just before the current deep recession began. At that time, USPS top brass pointed out the flaws in the new law but she wouldn't hear of it. Thinking half-a-loaf was at least something, USPS acquiesced and accepted the inevitable.

The law had positive elements, no doubt. But the worst recession in 80 years compounded the effects of new communication options for the public. The loss of First-Class Mail over the past 10 years and the unique, bitter pill of pre-funding retiree health bennies at $5.5 billion a year revealed the 2006 law for what it was: some help, to be sure, but at a price too great to accomplish financial sustainability.
Now she throws a hissy fit over well-intended but flawed legislation which had no hope of succeeding despite billions in already painful cost reductions by USPS.
OK, I'm biased. I work here. But that means I know a little something about the history of the matter.
Senator Collins, some unsolicited advice from a former admirer and supporter of yours: Pay a little less attention to detractors of the Postal Service, one of the best employers in your state, and stop your hypocritical grandstanding like publicly calling for additional major efficiencies while you then sabotage even the smallest atempts at doing so. If USPS can't remove an underused blue collection box without your intervention on behalf of a loud minority, how can it hope to make the major restructuring you and your NIMBY politicians so righteously call for? No wonder Congress is so poorly regarded. Some leadership.

fixit001's picture

Is it not funny how these

Is it not funny how these senators,representatives, & Governor tell how the people who are employed in the private sector are laid off will later think of this time as a learning time and will rebound, however if talk about layoffs of federal, state, or County jobs it is the end of the world and we must never cut one of thier own for eventualy it may be them! If a COLD HARD LOOK AT OUR GOVERMENTS WORKING CONDITIONS THEY WOULD FIND OVER TEN THOUSAND JOBS WHICH COULD BE COMBINDED SAVING MILLIONS, RIGHT HERE IN THE CITY THERE IS NO NEED OF ASSISTANT TO THE ASSISTANT PRINCIBLE NOR A DEPUTY CITY ADMIN THE CITY RAN FOR OVER A YEAR PREVIOUSLY WITHOUT A CITY ADMIN AND THE SKY DID NOT FALL FOLKS MATTER OF FACT THERE WAS VERY LITTLE NOTICABLE CHANGE. It is about time we take the waste out of our corrupt goverment over 1 million each day for state workers and another million for city and county workers is a waste of taxpayers monies the state should be mandated to cut 10% of its workforce with no more than 2% from the blue collar ranks so the highest savings will be saved.

Advertisement