The Maine Legislature is considering a package of budget cuts. Many of the cuts suggested for the Department of Health and Human Services will most certainly cost Maine far more money than it will save. And it will take us many steps backward.
The non-strategic, 10 percent, across-the-board cuts are reckless. They will begin to dismantle the system of care and the safety net that Maine has worked very hard to create for its most vulnerable people. The proposed 24 percent room and board subsidy to disabled people living in group homes is also a shortsighted move. Dumping people from stability into homelessness is egregious and, as a method to save money, is a poorly planned strategy as costs will skyrocket when people are displaced.
Right now in Maine we have a nationally respected system of care. We have carefully evolved from institutional care to efficient and effective home-based community care. Over the past seven years, strategic budget cuts have caused some damage, but also increased efficiency. At this point, there is no more efficiency to gain, only a reversal of progress and, ultimately, gross inefficiency.
The governor's proposal will mean leaving 66 cents out of Maine for every 33 cents we cut. When we serve people in the community, we serve people in the most efficient and effective manner, using mostly federal money to do so. When we fail to serve people, which these cuts will cause us to do, people will be forced into crises and into our emergency system of care — the most expensive and least efficient way to serve people.
Unfortunately for Maine, the cost of this inefficient service will be borne by Maine entirely. As a taxpayer, I see this change as fiscally irresponsible. As a parent and person who cares about my neighbors, I see this as unacceptable.
And it will do more than that to damage the Maine economy.
These cuts may cause thousands of job losses:
• Undermining thousands of supportive living arrangements that work. According to the DHHS commissioner's 2008 report, there are 4,800 people receiving developmental services each month, and 2,498 people receiving home and community support. This includes 477 in shared living, 236 in family centered support, 285 living independently, and 1,500 in agency operated homes.
• Thousands of job losses by people working in this service sector. There are 679 agency-operated homes in Maine, employing an estimated 4,000 direct support professionals. In addition, approximately 1,000 direct support professionals provide community support and shared-living services equaling a total of 5,000 dedicated individuals working to provide essential services to one of our most vulnerable populations.
• Millions of dollars in lost wages. This is a $280 million sector of the Maine economy, of which wages to Maine citizens represent $210 million.
• Loss of federal matching funds. Millions of dollars from the federal government come to Maine to match our investment in our most vulnerable citizens. MaineCare match is 2:1. It is unconscionable for us to abandon those much-needed resources.
• Parents being forced to quit jobs that contribute to the economy. Who will take care of developmentally disabled people if services are cut? Their parents. If I have to give up my job it will affect the financial stability of my family and my nonprofit organization's stability, and Maine will lose my contributions as a taxpayer and a professional in an important field.
• Dramatic increases in crisis costs, including use of emergency rooms, crisis facilities, EMT, rescue and police.
• Expensive out of state placements. The cost of these placements caused Maine to create its own group homes to save money. We'll be reinventing the wheel, but this time at greater expense.
• The abandonment of developmental disabled individuals at state offices due to a lack of support services, akin to the recent "safe haven" occurrences in Nebraska where reportedly 80 percent of the children abandoned were either developmentally or mentally disabled.
• A reversal of a well thought out 100-year plan to reach a point of community inclusion. Consequences include a loss of human hope and the loss of the betterment of society.
It is time for the Legislature to carefully raise revenues to cure the structural and perpetual problems in our budget. Recommendations include a temporary increase in the state sales tax, and a tax on cigarettes, alcohol and soda. Please don't underestimate Mainers' willingness to share with one another, especially now.
We will all pay far more if we don't.
Cullen Ryan is chairman of the Maine Coalition for Housing and Quality Services and executive director of Community Housing of Maine in Portland.

Why not go after all the DB Coopers who worked for big banks and golden parachuted onto some tropical island. Get OUR money back, hold them accountable so people will trust our markets again. Quit robbing small business's in the name of Workers Comp and taxes so there are jobs for those who can work. At 10% unemployment some of those cats need to stay up the tree. Finally leave the true elderly and disabled alone they have been cut enough. Try cutting the top for once, their still giving themselfs raises for their good work??? and creat real jobs, there will be no need for cuts. We have a good system minus dishonest people abusing it, like republicans at the pulpit.
Queenie is one of them that has theirs and doesn't want to share. Her golden parachute works just fine, so we have to leave it alone.
These neo-liberals, of which Baldy is one, do not give a damn about anything that does not make a profit. Cutting aid for people in desparate situations or clear cutting thousand of square miles of forest for his buddies in Big Wind - same thing to those creeps, crooks and liars.
He is setting our state on a backwards course which we all will end up paying for.
He is a disgrace.
Pirate, you really think that's how it is, don't you? Read the article. Was TANFF cut? NO. Was section 8 cut? NO. Food stamps? NO. Whatever payment they are receiving that gets spent on tattoos and piercings instead of groceries for their kids? NO. Those people aren't the ones being cut. It's the crippled and mentally ill and developmentally disabled who can't even care for themselves, who have been cut. The fraudsters are being told that it's business as usual for them.
Let's all hope no woman has this happen to them, but if it does happen, let's all hope the woman he picks is you, dumbass. Dems outnumber Repubs. 20-15 in the Maine Senate and have a 40 seat advantage over the Republicans in the house. I'll bet you already knew that but had to blame Republicans for something else today. Oh yeah, and wasn't this proposal made by the governor, a Democrat? Now get back to your mom's room. Her back needs to be waxed again.
The legislature is full of mean spirited republicans who do not want what's best for this state. They refuse to consider increasing revenue, in fact they don't even want to accept a more equitable tax structure. All they can think is cut taxes, no matter what the consequences. A case in point is the guy in Portland who threatens to rape and murder a woman so he can get appropiate mental care. We do not have the money to provide that kind of care so he'll have to rape and murder someone before the judicial system will be force to do something. Let's all hope the woman is a republican! I realize that's mean spirited, but republicans cannot see beyond their noses.
The only thing wrong with Baldacci's proposal is that the 10 percent across the board budget cuts don't go deep enough.
Those of us who work and pay taxes are sick and tired of carrying those who won't work on our backs. Enough is enough. Getting people off of social programs is not much different than worrying about a cat that's been up in a tree for three days. If the cat gets hungry enough, he'll find a way to come down. Not so? How many skeletons of cats do you see in trees? If those on welfare don't get it and get hungry enough, they'll find work and even take a job. The social programs just don't allow them to get hungry enough. Why do only conservatives and libertarians see this?
I'm with you, Pirate! As if things weren't bad enough here, more people flock to this state because we give so much away. I'm tired of the entitled class living off the diminished working class and complaining when they don't get thrown as many bones as they want! Really, if you're going to live your useless life riding on my tired back the least you can do is not complain about the view. Raise Revenues?! Really?! Why don't people like tron send in more of their own paycheck and leave the rest of us the hell alone? I spent the majority of this winter without oil in my tank... do you think the entitled class did the same? How about this... we dismantle DHHS. Think about how much revenue that will save us! As for the poor, entitled folks out there: starve, die, fall off your tree, wash down the drain, bu-bye!
Those aren't the ones being cut! read the article!
It has to start somewhere, and it has to be sweeping. I did read the article. I also know about the changes; many of which make common sense. It used to be that programs could keep clinical staff on full time regardless of whether or not they are being used. Now, they have to bill in 15 minute increments, making them, in essence per diem. The same holds true for residential programs. If a client goes somewhere else for the weekend, the program does not get paid. The reality of what's happening now is simply a matter of cleaning house and making sure monies are not hemmoraged when clients are not being served. The emotional capital this article tries to elicit is a pathetic attempt to keep the status quo.
You seem to think that this will address welfare fraud! Will you please answer me on that!
The things you list have been in place for a long time. This new round will try to change from community-based care back to regional warehouses. Is it common sense to go back to a Pineland-Style living situation for these people? Rhetorical! The answer is no!
The new billing situation just rolled out. As for "warehousing", perhaps it's time we look into consolidating community residences into a larger, albeit better regulated setting. Clinicians and Case Managers would be able to remain on site and bill more responsibly. Duties of already over worked and under paid residential staff can be consolidated. Finally, we could stop pretending that these are just another house on the street where police and ambulances frequent. As for the fraud end, I have already stated that the cuts are a fine beginning. Once this end is stabilized, the state should go after socities human doorstops and yank the feedbag from their jowls.
You have no idea what you are talking about. My son lives in one of those houses and the police have never been there in the 7 years he's
been there. He was in a dorm situation in the past and got hurt by other residents and by non-caring staff. I won't allow it. We closed Pineland for a reason. I am determined that he will be safe even after I die. I was 25 when he was born so I cannot hope to outlive him. I hope you never know this fear because it would kill you. If you want to go after welfare cheats, then do it. Totally different topic, different group, different budget.
Let's get something straight, you're not carrying anyone, in fact you suck more out of the government than you ever contribute.
Conservatives like to make people so hungry that they become desperate, and if they cannot find any alternative, they commit crimes and then are incarcerated at a far higher cost than any assistance program
And the reason you never find dead cats in trees, is because after they die they fall off, crash on the ground and are washed away during a storm. Unfortunately the same doesn't happen to humans, but try and tell that to a stupid conservative, like you pirate.
There was a southern politician who said something about feeding strays and how once you do that, they never go away. In some way, he was trying to tie that in with what happens with people who are given welfare. He got hammered in the press, and while I don't agree that everyone who gets a free lunch could otherwise get it for themselves if their benefits were cut, I do believe that hunger is a fine motivator for those who can.
In order to make comments, you must verify your account.
In order to comment on SunJournal.com, you must use your real name and include the town in which you live in your profile. A member of our staff will call you to verify this information. To join in, fill out your user profile completely and check the box "please verify my status." We'll get back to you within one business day to verify your account.
Login or create an account here.
Our policy prohibits comments that are:
- Defamatory, abusive, obscene, racist, or otherwise hateful
- Excessively foul and/or vulgar
- Inappropriately sexual
- Baseless personal attacks or otherwise threatening
- Contain illegal material, or material that infringes on the rights of others
- Commercial postings attempting to sell a product/item
If you violate this policy, your comment will be removed and your account may be banned.