I have a little news for advice-givers who attended last week's Advice for America conference hosted by the Center for Preventing Hate. They may believe the Somali integration post-2006 here has been a success worthy of national model, but that view is not wholly shared in the Twin Cities.
Near the end of the day-long conference, the Center's executive director, Steve Wessler, asked the predominantly white, social-working audience how many had heard a negative comment about Somalis in the past week. Less than a dozen of the 90 seated there raised their hands.
I hear negative comments every day. Every. Day. It's distressing, but it's real.
I can only guess that these social workers, educators and others working in the public sector do not always hear what I hear on the street because they can be insulated in their programs, focused on their mission, and too many do not — themselves — integrate with the community at-large.
One woman made a point to inform others that although she works with the Somali community, she lives "in another world in Lewiston where the people don't interact with the newcomers." She doesn't socialize with Somalis and doesn't know anyone who does. Just comes to work in the downtown and goes home.
How better to insulate oneself from the more general community of Lewiston? Or never hear what others who do not agree with you may have to share about their experiences?
I was surprised to hear, repeatedly, that this group overwhelmingly believes local businesses have not done enough to help the immigrants, and need to do more. Not a little more. A lot more.
They suggested repeatedly, and with conviction, that local businesses need to consider providing transportation, child care, on-site translation services, and hire immigrants for the fast track to advancement if new Mainers are to be truly welcomed.
Doing all this would require an enormous amount of resources that would be downright impossible for most businesses here, even with massive public support.
Lewiston's two largest businesses, the only ones employing more than 1,000 people, are the nonprofit hospitals. The five next-largest businesses are Bates College, Tambrands, TD Bank, Wal-Mart Distribution Center and Wal-Mart. These businesses, especially the hospitals, are doing much, if not all, of what conference-goers advise.
The rest of the businesses in Lewiston and Auburn employ fewer than 500 employees, most far fewer than that, and it would be a tremendous burden to comply with this advice. Suggesting otherwise is not routed in reality.
Provide transportation? To whom? For anyone without a car, or just an immigrant?
A better recommendation might have been for businesses to make a point to acquaint all those without cars with the cities' public buses and services provided by Western Maine Transportation. Or, maybe simple carpooling.
In one of the morning sessions I attended, I listened to nearly three hours of advice about how Americans can learn to build safe and inclusive communities, without stereotypes, rumor and innuendo. During that conversation the media was attacked for negative coverage, the facts of how the Sun Journal reported the recent car accident at Lewiston High School were incorrectly repeated, and then I was asked to leave because my presence was making at least one member of the group uncomfortable.
See the interesting irony here? While listening to what this group advises for others to develop safe and inclusive communities, I was verbally attacked and asked to leave. That's neither safe nor inclusive.
Outspoken members of this group were uniformly angry that the Sun Journal identified Bilow Farah, the driver charged with driving to endanger and driving without a valid driver's license after striking a 16-year-old student at the school with her car, as a Somali woman in the headline. The Sun Journal did not do that. Any suggestion otherwise is fiction.
Farah was identified, at the end of the story, as having participated in a series by Colby College in Waterville about Somali Bantus who immigrated to Maine from Africa, demonstrating her civic commitment. That's a good thing, right?
Members of the group went on to criticize the report for including the year, make and model of Farah's car, saying it wasn't relevant to the story. These details are included, when we know them, in every accident story of any significance, and this was one was significant. I don't recall ever getting a call of complaint from anyone in that room for publishing the year, make or model of vehicles involved in other accidents in Lewiston or elsewhere, so it was this singular accident seen as a problem.
The Sun Journal was further criticized for publishing Farah's photo, taken when she was booked at the Androscoggin County Jail. Once again, publishing photos of people facing criminal charges is routinely part of reports as a matter of basic information.
In the Farah photo, she was not wearing her traditional headscarf, which had been removed as a matter of jail policy before the photo was taken. A police officer sitting in on this discussion explained that the scarf was removed as a safety measure during the booking process, per jail policy, because of fear of suicide. Not fear of Farah's suicide specifically, but standard operating procedure to prevent such an action in any cell by any inmate at the jail. There was no purposeful effort here to embarrass or target her because of her faith, despite innuendo otherwise.
It was maddening to sit in that room and hear direct and pointed criticism that the media distorts the facts, after hearing how far this group had distorted the facts of the Sun Journal's coverage of the Farah accident.
Hypocritical or just uninformed? I don't know, but it was definitely biased. The very measures being discussed as essential to protect New Mainers were not afforded the hard-working and intensely talented, caring staff here at the Sun Journal.
I saw with great clarity a gap in how this group perceives the climate of acceptance in Lewiston and what that climate actually is in multiple corners of this city, and a real chasm in this group's view of the media and the truth.
There is no question that the Center for Preventing Hate has done and continues to do important, productive and progressive work, and the effort to share Lewiston's experience is admirable and imaginative. But any advice coming out of Lewiston should be viewed as through a kaleidoscope of distorted views.






The Sun Journal got it
The Sun Journal got it right!! Tell the news not make the news..... good job.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.It is time for a reality
It is time for a reality check for the refugee program.
This fiscal year the U.S. resettled almost three times as many refugees as all the rest of the countries in the industrialized world combined. Despite the recession, growing poverty, unemployment and homelessness, the U.S. resettled 75,000 refugees, the highest number of admissions since 9/11.
This is only possible because what was once the calling of true sacrificial charity and private sponsors is now the responsibility of the American taxpayer. Traditional sponsor duties have been replaced by access to welfare upon arrival for refugees and an opaque stream of grant money from seemingly every government agency except NASA.
In recent years up to 95% of the refugees coming to the U.S. were referred by the UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) or were the relatives of UN-picked refugees. Until the late 90’s the U.S. picked the large majority of refugees for resettlement in the U.S.
Considering that the refugee influx causes increases in all legal and illegal immigration as family and social networks are established in the U.S., the U.N. is effectively dictating much of U.S. immigration policy.
A non-profit nation of 100’s of taxpayer funded organizations has grown up around refugee resettlement in the U.S. A government-funded study finds “U.S. resettlement communities are awash with ECBOs that exist in name only but provide little meaningful assistance”. * (ECBO stands for Ethnic Community Based Organization, a government-defined category of grant recipients.)
The expansion of the fraud-prone refugee program and the transformation of refugee resettlement into a federal contracting business have given birth to a global refugee industry well-adapted to the federal grant and contract environment. Catholic Charities with its parent the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB ) is the largest refugee agency both nationally and in Nashville. It is neither a charity nor Catholic, but more an extension of a state welfare agency.
65% of Catholic Charities USA’s $3.6 billion annual budget comes from government sources. Refugee resettlement, a relatively small portion of its services, is covered by the government at closer to 100%.
For non-profits it is profitable to be in refugee resettlement and the executive directors of some of the 10 major resettlement agencies make almost as much as the President of the United States.
The possibility of a generous reception in the U.S. has created a “magnet effect” for refugees deciding between resettlement in the U.S. and integration in the region where they reside.
The once independent faith-based and civic organizations have suffered their own “magnet effect” causing a shift of efforts away from traditional works towards the more profitable refugee program. USCCB even lobbies for more business – that is, for higher refugee admission quotas.
Incentives built into refugee resettlement are behind much of its growth, especially as refugees themselves enter the federal contracting and lobbying business.
It is long past the time to lift the curtain of myth which protects this program from scrutiny.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Good Perspective
Good Perspective piece........ It always befuddles me when people say that native Mainers dont do enough for our immigrant community.. Is it not enough that we pay for them to live here, we pay for them to drive these brand new cars ( one with a liscence plate reading "ubotit"), The federal government giving them loans with no established credit what so ever.. It would have been nice when I was a youngster to start with a GOOD credit rating, instead those of us who are born here need to work for our credit rating... Also the double standard that the Center for preventing hate would like to see in the media is an insult to all citizens in this community. I for one like to be able to read the sunj and see the faces of those who may be out to commit a crime against me or my neighbors no matter what theyre immigration status is. I want to see trouble coming at me , not get blind sided by it. Maybe these bleeding hearts should take a walk down Knox street and through Kennedy park after dark and see which group is spreading hate towards the other.. After they get beaten and robbed they might sing a different tune... Enough is enough. If the Somali community is not happy with the way we here in Maine live , then maybe they should find somewhere else to live....... Equal rights ..... NOT special rights.. I have seen more accomodations being made for them than any other minority in this state and there needs to be a limit... The state of Maine just cannot afford to spend more money to accomodate them. If they dont speak english , Go learn . We have already picked up the bill to establish classes where they can learn and ways for them to get special help...If they CHOOSE not to learn then we cannot be expected to keep accomodating this shortcoming on theyre part. In the end if he Somali community is upset over the SunJ reporting the facts when a Somali breaks the law the simple solution would be DONT BREAK THE LAW, respect the law and abide like the rest of us.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Great post, KD...My
Great post, KD...My sentiments exactly.
Judy Meyer...Great editorial. Not what I would have expected. What a pleasant surprise it was to read something so real and accurate. Your insight on this topic is right on target.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.so that's what bigots call
so that's what bigots call their bigotry, "insight"
You know the old adage, if it looks like a bigot, talks like a bigot.........
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Kudos AwardedDisagree (1)
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.If you could really
If you could really understand the complete definition of what a bigot is, you'd see that you're also the biggest one here.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.So, we should offer childcare
So, we should offer childcare and transportation?! And only for immigrant populations?! That is discrimination.. to favor this group over all others. Maine is tough enough on business, and now they want to put further hardships upon them by telling them that the right thing to do is dig deeper?
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Looks like clear cut racism
Looks like clear cut racism to me. Encouraging the favoring of any group over another with privilage (transportation, child care, etc...) and excluding the rest marches boldly across the line of discrimination. Be careful they don't go after the 1st Ammendment next, Judith.. oh wait, they already did.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Now where are all our media
Now where are all our media bashers???? The silence is deafening.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Could it be the media got
Could it be the media got right for a change?
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.