Two roads, two Maines

There's a saying in this state - "The Two Maines." The typical separations are the haves and have-nots, north and south, inland and rural versus coastal and populous. There's a saying that could become appropriate to Maine: "The Two Roads."

It's been awhile since a state leader has risen above these divides to implement a type of united strategy. So, with the gubernatorial contest heating up, we should start testing the candidates about the critical issues that divide Maine, starting with transportation.

In a mostly rural state, it's a challenging topic. Transportation covers so many areas: moving people, moving goods, walking, biking, automobiles, trucking and railroads. And that's just the modes - forget about where they go, and how to pay for them.

To keep focused, let's look at the basics: roads and bridges, the current condition of which details the inability of the current administration to promote a "one Maine" approach to paying for the building and maintaining of this infrastructure.

A long list of Maine bridges are outliving their usefulness, spring potholes annually wreck vehicle undercarriages and major sections of highways no longer meet modern safety standards. And with gasoline tax revenue not keeping pace with construction inflation, we have a problem in need of a solution. And to find solutions, you need leadership. From where, you ask?

Our next governor, to start.

What will he or she face? A transportation system seemingly funded based on political convenience, lack of vision, and maybe a little bit of "close your eyes and hope no one notices." The most glaring example are Maine's highways - the aforementioned "Two Roads."

This past week, a $35.3 million repaving project was completed on I-295 between Topsham and Gardiner, funded through the generosity of stimulus money. Right now, a more than $5 million project to repave a section of I-95 between Saco and Scarborough is being funded by toll payers. In Bangor, multiple multi-million dollar I-95 bridge rehabilitation projects are being paid for through federal and state gas taxes.

On I-95 in Lewiston, bids are out to rehabilitate the bridge that sends the Turnpike over Route 196, funded by tolls. Widening I-295 between Exits 3 and 4 in South Portland? Federal earmarks and gas tax pays that bill. Widening I-95 from York to Scarborough? Tolls.

The differences should now be quite clear. One part of Maine's highway system is self-sufficient through tolls, and leverages revenue from users to ensure modernization and maintenance. Another part is accessed for free, but needs earmarks, taxes, and stimulus money to get projects done.

Is that sound policy? Is that a "one Maine" approach?

The attempt of the current administration to unify this system was merging the two transportation agencies, the Maine Department of Transportation and the Maine Turnpike Authority. Even if that shaved positions and earned cheap political capital by sliding some Turnpike revenue into state coffers, it wouldn't rebuild dozens of bridges at $5 million apiece or repave roads at a $1 million a mile.

Nowhere is the effect of this disjointed approach seen more than Lewiston-Auburn and Brunswick, which both need growth and sit on the highway between Portland and Augusta. One community benefits from having that same highway crossing through wealthy coastal suburbs. One benefits from a "free" road, modernized through stimulus money, earmarks and gas taxes.

The job for policymakers is to ensure we have a reliable and modern transportation system with a predictable funding source that enables long-term planning. For individuals and business owners, they need to find cost-effective transportation solutions.

When I fill up my tank to drive to Augusta or Portland, not only do I enter the Turnpike and pay my fair share for road upkeep through tolls, I get to subsidize through the gas tax the free road 20 miles away.

The typical response of Lewiston-Auburn, and other communities on the Turnpike, is how unfair it is that they pay for their road and others get it free. The answer is simple - neither road is free. The only difference is who pays to maintain it.

For my dollar or two, I will gladly pay to maintain the road I take. The question for Maine and our next Governor, though, is why should users from Bangor or the coast keep from paying to take care of theirs as well?

Jonathan LaBonte, of New Auburn, is a columnist for the Sun Journal and an Androscoggin County Commissioner. E-mail: jlabonte08@gmail.com.

Stay informed — Get the news delivered for free in your inbox.

I'm interested in ...

In order to make comments, you must verify your account.

In order to comment on SunJournal.com, you must use your real name and include the town in which you live in your profile. A member of our staff will call you to verify this information. To join in, fill out your user profile completely and check the box "please verify my status." We'll get back to you within one business day to verify your account.

Login or create an account here.

Our policy prohibits comments that are:

  • Defamatory, abusive, obscene, racist, or otherwise hateful
  • Excessively foul and/or vulgar
  • Inappropriately sexual
  • Baseless personal attacks or otherwise threatening
  • Contain illegal material, or material that infringes on the rights of others
  • Commercial postings attempting to sell a product/item
If you violate this policy, your comment will be removed and your account may be banned.

Advertisement

Displaying comments, from newest to oldest

DR's picture

I think the highway toll

I think the highway toll system today is nuts. It used to make a lot more sense: toll booths at every exit/entrance, fixed fees from one exit to the other. Everybody had to pay something to get on and off the highway. Today, the toll situation is nothing short of a hot mess. Free in some places....$1.00 to get on in many places....and then for some insane reason known only to bureaucrats, there's a $1.75 fee in the middle of nowhere (between Gray and Auburn exits). What's that all about? Who's crazy enough to take that stretch of highway instead of 202/100/4 through New Gloucester? And God forbid you get off the highway more than once, as in when shopping in both Westbrook and South Portland. KaChing! That's a buck every time you get off and back on again. I've stopped taking the toll roads except in an extremity, and stopped shopping in places where my pockets get picked 2x for making a stop.

Mike Peters's picture
verified

You are correct. They should

You are correct. They should also pay. When money is appropriated for roads, or when a new bond brings road money to Maine coffers, it is most generally diverted by the executive to balance the budget. Hold them accountable, Mr. LaBonte. Let the people know when money is diverted.

Advertisement