Maine residents push back against wind power farms

AUGUSTA, Maine (AP) — As wind power expands in Maine, the industry is feeling a gust of push back from those who worry about the turbines' noise and impact on scenery and about whether too many towers are going up too fast.

Kibby Mountain Wind Power
Pat Wellenbach

In this Oct. 15, 2009 file photo, turbines are seen along the Kibby Mountain Range in Western Maine. Five commercial-grade wind farms are online or under construction and more are on the drawing board. Some Maine residents are challenging the state law that expedites the permitting process for setting up a wind farm. (AP Photo/Pat Wellenbach/File)

"The wind industry has had a decade head start working behind the scenes, working below the radar and positioning itself to have a favored status," said Brad Blake, of Cape Elizabeth, spokesman for the Citizens Task Force on Wind Power, an umbrella group of residents fighting wind projects around the state. "It's been a stealth attack on rural Maine, and the citizens of Maine are catching up."

State officials acknowledge heightened awareness across the state to wind power as it transforms "from the theoretical to the practical," said Karin Tilberg, senior policy adviser to Gov. John Baldacci. But the administration remains committed to wind and other forms of renewable energy to help wean the oil-dependent state from fossil fuels, she said.

"It is important that people have a discussion based on science and good information," Tilberg said Wednesday.

In 2008, the Legislature streamlined the permitting process for wind farms. With a regulatory welcome mat out, five commercial-grade wind farms are online or under construction, and more are on the drawing boards. In the meantime, the state has moved aggressively toward making offshore wind power a reality.

But as the windmills have risen on the mainland, so have concerns over their impact. Some critics, including Blake, question the very economics of the renewable energy source. Others, including some who live near the state's first major wind farm in Mars Hill, dislike windmills' looks and say they're too noisy.

In Penobscot County, Dixmont passed a one-mile setback ordinance. Just south in Jackson, Waldo County, a moratorium was imposed before passage of an ordinance stipulating that any 400-foot-tall turbines erected must be at least a mile from any houses, largely out of noise concerns.

In Oakfield, where the state Department of Environmental Protection has approved Massachusetts-based FirstWind's application for a wind farm, a family trust that owns land near the Aroostook County site said it would appeal the DEP's action, citing visual concerns.

Union, which has two small wind farms, has drafted for public review a measure aimed at addressing noise and light reflection from spinning windmill blades. Fort Kent is considering an ordinance limiting noise even though no large-scale wind project has been proposed in the northern Maine border town.

New Vineyard, in Franklin County, is asking voters to put a moratorium on commercial wind power development until it can pass an ordinance regulating the industry.

Noise has become an issue on Vinalhaven island, where New England's largest community-owned wind farm has begun generating power. Opposition has organized in western Maine to the project under construction in Roxbury near Rumford. And a proposal to build a wind farm along the ridgelines of five mountains in Highland Plantation in Somerset County has already generated vocal opposition from people who say the area's scenery would be marred.

The Highland group's chairman, Alan Michka, said there's good reason why towns have taken those actions and why people are complaining about turbines that have already gone up in Mars Hill, Freedom and Vinalhaven.

"It's not a good track record for a state trying to accelerate its development of wind power," Michka said.

Critics who say the state's been moving too fast have taken their case to the state Supreme Court, which last week heard arguments from a Penobscot County group called Friends of Lincoln Lake. The residents, who oppose a 40-turbine project on Rollins Mountain, are challenging the state law that expedites the permitting process for setting up a wind farm, saying it's technically flawed.

Tilberg said those and other concerns have drawn the Baldacci administration's attention. She said the 2008 law doesn't pre-empt local control to regulate windmills and even includes a model ordinance towns can adopt.

The state also is continuing to review technical information on setbacks, noise, health implications and other aspects of wind power to see whether regulations should be revisited.

FirstWind spokesman John LeMontagne said the company has sought to work closely with communities such as Oakfield to make sure they understand all the implications of their developments. He said people should not lose sight of the benefits of wind power, including clean energy, jobs and spinoff economic activity.

While it may seem as though the flurry of wind worries is new, the matter has long been a subject of public debate in Maine, observed state Rep. Jon Hinck, House chair of the Utilities and Energy Committee, who was an environmental advocate before being elected to the Legislature.

Hinck, D-Portland, noted that the issue has been debated in Maine at least since the mid-1990s, when a proposal to rezone areas in western Maine's Boundary Mountains for wind development prompted opponents to organize. Now, with turbines up and turning, people have developed a variety of perspectives on wind power, he said.

"In terms of opposition in Maine, I don't think it has too many consistent threads," said Hinck, whose attorney wife represents the wind power industry in Maine. "There is not, as far as I know, a perfect source of power."

In order to make comments, you must verify your account.

In order to comment on SunJournal.com, you must use your real name and include the town in which you live in your profile. A member of our staff will call you to verify this information. To join in, fill out your user profile completely and check the box "please verify my status." We'll get back to you within one business day to verify your account.

Login or create an account here.

Our policy prohibits comments that are:

  • Defamatory, abusive, obscene, racist, or otherwise hateful
  • Excessively foul and/or vulgar
  • Inappropriately sexual
  • Baseless personal attacks or otherwise threatening
  • Contain illegal material, or material that infringes on the rights of others
  • Commercial postings attempting to sell a product/item
If you violate this policy, your comment will be removed and your account may be banned.

Advertisement

Comments

danteng's picture

nfl jersey

AARON CURRY jersey
Aaron Kampman jersey
Alan Page jersey
ALBERT HAYNESWORTH jersey
Antonio Cromartie jets jersey
Bobby Hebert Jersey
Brian Westbrook 49ers Jersey
Bruce Smith jersey
C.J. Spiller Jersey
Chester Taylor bears Jersey
CORTLAND FINNEGAN jersey
Devery Henderson Jersey
Dustin Keller jersey
Eric Berry Jersey
Gerald McCoy jersey
HARRY CARSON jersey
Hines Ward jersey
HOWIE LONG jersey
Ike Taylor jersey
Jahvid Best jersey
JAKE LONG jersey
James Farrior jersey
Jared Odrick Jersey
Jay Ratliff Jersey
Jerome Bettis jersey
Joe Flacco jersey
JOE KLECKO jersey
Joe Theismann jersey
Kareem Jackson Jersey
Karlos Dansby dolphins jersey
KENNETH MOORE Jersey
Kory Sperry Jersey
KYLE ORTON jersey
LAVERANUES COLES jersey
Lofa Tatupu jersey
MARK BAVARO jersey
MARK DUPER Jersey
MARK GASTINEAU jersey
Marques Colston Jersey
Mike Bell Jersey
Mike Iupati jersey
Morten Andersen Jersey
PHIL SIMMS jersey
Roger Staubach jersey
Santonio Holmes Jets Jersey
SONNY JURGENSEN jersey
Stefan Logan jersey
Steve Atwater jersey
STEVEN JACKSON jersey
Terence Newman jersey
TIM HIGHTOWER jersey
Tony Dorsett jersey
TRACY PORTER Jersey
Tyson Alualu Jersey
VINCE YOUNG jersey
BOB SANDERS jersey
Brandon Marshall Dolphins Jersey
Broncos Tim Tebow Jersey
Chad Henne jersey
Charles Woodson jersey
Dan Williams Jersey
DARREN McFADDEN jersey
Darren Sharper Jersey
Demaryius Thomas Jersey
Dez Bryant Jersey
Drew Brees Jersey
DWIGHT LOWERY jersey
Earl Thomas jersey
Haloti Ngata jersey
Jamarcus Russell jersey
Jason Pierre-Paul Jersey
JEREMY MACLIN jersey
Jermaine Gresham Jersey
Jerry Hughes Jersey
Joe Haden Jersey
John Elway jersey
Jonathan Vilma Jersey
Karl Mecklenburg jersey
KEN STABLER jersey
LANCE BRIGGS jersey
Marion Barber jersey
Maurice Jones-Drew jersey
Michael Irvin Jersey
Michael Turner jersey
Russell Okung Jersey
Ryan Mathews Jersey
Sean Weatherspoon Jersey
Taylor Mays jersey
THURMAN THOMAS Jersey
Torry Holt jersey
Trent Williams Jersey
VERNON DAVIS jersey
Adrian Peterson Jersey
Andre Smith jersey
NAPOLEON HARRIS jersey
D.JOHNSON jersey
Bart Scott jersey
Paul Krause jersey
PERCY HARVIN jersey
Tony Romo jersey

Blueyes1119's picture
verified

Liars and spinmeisters! Look

Liars and spinmeisters! Look at the drivel Tilberg put out: “It is important that people have a discussion" You call a stacked deck going through the motions of only looking at and hearing pro-wind propaganda a discussion? That is what the Gov's Task Force on Wind Power amounted to. Then they produced that heinous "Expedited Wind Permitting" statute. Slam dunk for Big Wind. No "discussion" with the citizens

Tliberg also says: "those and other concerns have drawn the Baldacci administration’s attention." ! The Governor will drive all the way to Stetson Mt. in support of his buddies of First Wind---twice---but not drive an extra 45 minutes to meet with the people in Mars Hill whose lives have been ruined by the turbines. Of course not, the turbines are First Wind. It is pathetic that Tilberg & John Kerry (State Wind Zombie in Chief) had to be pressured into meeting with leaders of the Citizens Task Force on Wind Power, but treated erstwhile citizens to political pabulum, then squashed the CTFWP efforts to bring some sanity to this run-away train wreck of pushing industrial wind down the throats of people.

She refers to the state ordinance---yet another farce that doesn't protect people. As stated in the article, recently some towns have actually written just, fair, and scientifically sensible ordinances.

Lastly, she refers to "The state also is continuing to review technical information on setbacks, noise, health implications and other aspects of wind power to see whether regulations should be revisited." That's news to me! They aren't seeking any citizen input. DEP & LURC have been pressured by Baldacci to make it easier on Big Wind and harder on citizen involvement.

DEP & LURC have both been presented with many considerations that would enable them to modify the statute and their own regulations. DEP ignored the recommendation of its own noise consultant to use dBc scale measurements on turbine noise. Freedom of Access Act has been used to uncover so many manipulations that it borders on criminal. DEP & LURC officials act like coaches to the developers, telling them how to modify their applications to enable them to approve them. They are afraid the citizens might uncover these flaws, but, then again, well documented material and serious questions about these projects are either ignored or brushed over lightly. I know, I've been through this un-civic process!

Give me a break, Karen Tilberg! And don't get me started on John LaMontagne or Jon Hinck!

LewistonNative...'s picture
verified

My only statement to this is,

My only statement to this is, people in L/A, Greater Portland and other southern towns/cities should have absolutely no say as to whether or not these places should or shouldn't have wind farms. These wind farms are in THEIR backyards not ours. So, I respectfully have to suggest that the Rep. from Portland should not bother commenting on something that doesn't pertain to him or his constituents.

northwoods's picture

Lewistonnative Well said.

Lewistonnative Well said.

lisan180's picture
verified

STOP TALKING ABOUT OIL AS IT

STOP TALKING ABOUT OIL AS IT RELATES TO WIND POWER!! You are listening to our idiotic governor too much. A guy who has accomplished little to nothing for seven years. Destroying our mountains does not equal a decrease in our dependence on foreign oil. That's just marketing and totally false.

Publikwerks's picture

This state is so stupid.

This state is so stupid. Someone wants to do something productive in the state, and everyone freaks out. Fing nimby arseholes should have their taxes doubled

Jolly Roger's picture

Wind power is a fantastic way

Wind power is a fantastic way to reduce our need for overseas oil.

It doesn't pollute, they are not noisy...and I'd like to hear what the treehuggers would rather look out onto from a hiking trail -- windmills or a nuke plant stack?

Perhaps those that don't want domestic energy would be willing to help pay my oil or electric bills?

Queenie's picture
verified

Industrial wind power is a

Industrial wind power is a scam of the highest magnitude. It would not even exist if it weren't for the huge subsidies (that's our taxdollars) given out. The proponents of wind power are like the snake oil salesmen of yesterday or the rainmakers who used fear as a tool against the gullible.

Industrial wind power will destroy our forests and as everyone knows forests remove CO2s from the air and give us, in return, oxygen. To clearcut thousands of miles of forest is insanity.

Maine does not need the pitiful amount of power these wind turbines produce. We already export a surplus into the New England grid. And, let me be clear about this -ALL of the power produced will be exported out of state and our electric rates will go up to pay for the new high voltage lines needed to export it. So, we pay twice for something not needed, once with our tax dollars and again when we see our electric bills doubled or tripled.

Wind power went out along with the hoop skirts because it is unreliable.(25 % in the best of times) The wind does not blow all the time and backup power plants must be kept running in reserve which adds more CO2s (carbon dioxide) into the atmosphere. Add in the CO2s generated in the building and transporting the turbines, the massive amount of blasting, the building of access roads and transformer substations and the spraying of herbicides which will leach into our waterways and wells and you get the picture - Maine people are being taken for a ride big time.

Think about it. We do not use electricity to run our vehicles and most of us do not use electricity to heat our homes. Maine uses mostly hydro-power and natural gas from Canada.

Our children and grandchildren will be paying for years when these turbines cease to run (20 years or so) and the cleanup begins by removing these derilict turbines from our land. And even then, the damage will be done to the land that will never recover fully.

All this to enrich a few at the expense of the rest of us.

Genisek2004's picture
verified

Windmills are all over the

Windmills are all over the landscape in Pennsylvania and you hardly notice them. I am told by people down there that they really aren't that noisy. I think we should be using more wind and solar power as a source of energy in this country. Yes, we will still rely upon oil, natural gas, and coal (while it exists) but we have to be more proactive with alternative energy sources. I'm not sure why people are so opposed. I would put one in my back yard if I thought I had enough wind to generate it.

As for nuclear power - the waste is not worth the power. Just my opinion!

DR's picture

Yipes! Typo - correct

Yipes! Typo - correct spelling is "derelict".

DR's picture

Wind power is not a

Wind power is not a "movement" but a bona fide source of power.  It just requires the right conditions to make it viable. I don't know if Maine has significantly viable areas or not. Windmills certainly do not require placement on mountain tops, but they do of course require placement in an area of sufficient wind forces.  I could argue that there are plenty of places in Maine so ugly with industrial development and/or derelect buildings that no windmill could possibly be a detraction.  Whether or not windmills could function in those areas is another question.

Pirate's picture
verified

Just open all the windows at

Just open all the windows at any gathering of the State Legislature. You'll get enough wind to supply the turbines of three states.

skippy's picture
verified

Just another way for the

Just another way for the political favorites to make money by being subsidized with taxpayer (our $$$) generated funds. If investors are ready to put them up without any guarantees it is fine, but would they be????

jalbrecht1's picture
verified

Wind power does not displace

Wind power does not displace oil. It might displace coal, but because wind power is inconsistent backup generation facilities which are coal, natural gas, and occassionally oil fired are need to be in place ready to run when the wind generation fails. So for a practical matter, wind may displace nothing.

macmac's picture
verified

one nuclear power plant can

one nuclear power plant can produce the electrical output it would take 2500 wind turbines to produce. nuclear produces a steady stream of electricity, unlike wind, which generates at only a certain wind speed range, causing grid problems. Thanks to computer monitoring, nuclear is now one of the safest forms of electrical generation. reprocessing of spent rods is reducing the waste significantly.

Wind power is a MOVEMENT. Movements are frickle and only remain sustainable by proof of public benefits. The costs to the public with wind power far outweigh the benefits. Higher electric rates to consumers, noise, loss of scenic value to properties, additional resources required to accomodate wind power to grid are all factors pointing out the uncertainty of wind power. This movement will not last.

Hymn@work's picture
verified

Way to many unknowns with

Way to many unknowns with Nuke power. The big one is storage of the long lasting radio active waste that is created. If we could find a place and a way to store the waste I could see it used again but till then it is not a low cost remedy.

Pirate's picture
verified

Unknowns? Nuke power has been

Unknowns? Nuke power has been around for 40 years. Eurpope is thriving on nuclear power. Maine Yankee performed flawlessly for the 20 years of its existence. Its reward was extinction by the tree hugging, sap sucking environmentalists. Everybody is worried about what happened at Three Mile Island. The fail safe systems at Three Mile Island work. Damages were minimal. More people have died in Ted Kennedy's car than died at Three Mile Island.

'

T's picture

Ya know, I was agreeing with

Ya know, I was agreeing with what you were saying until you chose to discredit yourself by saying the "tree huggers" closed Maine Yankee.  Nothing could be further from the truth.   BTW...it's impossible to know exactly how many people may have become ill (or died) due to Three Mile Island's radioactive gas release.  You seem to have little knowledge of this facility and accident as well. You need to do some research and dispense with the political rhetoric, then someone might listen to you.  Think for yourself for a change.

rstonge's picture
verified

It was nice to see that

It was nice to see that President Obama is making $8 Billion available in federal loan guarentees to build two reactors in Georgia.

Gregg's picture

The money seems to be made by

The money seems to be made by federal subsidies, not in the power generated

.  Put them on every mountain top and it won't be long before the scenic vistas that Maine is famous for are spoiled.  What happens to Maine when the tourists who come to see the natural beauty stop coming????

northwoods's picture

We need to stop the wind

We need to stop the wind mafia

to be or not's picture

I WILL TAKE ONE IN WATERFORD

I WILL TAKE ONE IN WATERFORD ,AND WHAT WOULD YOU RATHER SEE OIL FOR OUR GRAND CHILDREN OR CLEAN AIR? I SAY CLEAN AIR!

Advertisement

Stay informed — Get the news delivered for free in your inbox.

I'm interested in ...