The Sun Journal article, "Maine guns for Mass. drugs: Bay State criminals find Pine Tree State a great place to buy guns, sell drugs," states that there are “... no indications that gun laws in Maine ... will change any time soon.”
But why?
Maine gun laws do not merely protect the rights of sportsmen and women and other upstanding citizens to bear arms. “In Maine, a person can buy a gun fairly easily. Thumb through a swap magazine, contact a seller and fork over the cash. You have a firearm, whether it’s a sawed-off shotgun or a semi-automatic handgun.”
Every gun starts life as a legal weapon, but guns seep into the sewer of illegal street weapons through porous drains such as Uncle Henry’s and gun shows. Why would any honest citizen object to banning such unregulated gun sales?
The “Pentagon Shooter,” John Patrick Bedell, with a long history of mental illness, bought his two handguns without a background check at a Nevada gun show.
Imagine our shame should Maine someday be identified as the source of guns used in such an attack; or of weapons used in a terrorist attack such as took place at Fort Hood; or in an incident such as the shootings at Virginia Tech.
I hope Maine citizens will not be hoodwinked by the strong gun lobby that, by stonewalling and demonizing much-needed legislation to regulate gun sales, ownership and safety, supports the rights of criminals to arm themselves and to harm honest citizens.
Sheila Leavitt, Newton, Mass.
Editor's note: Writer Sheila Leavitt asked the Sun Journal Friday to note that she grew up in Turner and owns property in South Paris, where she spends her summers.



nfl jersey
AARON CURRY jersey
Aaron Kampman jersey
Alan Page jersey
ALBERT HAYNESWORTH jersey
Antonio Cromartie jets jersey
Bobby Hebert Jersey
Brian Westbrook 49ers Jersey
Bruce Smith jersey
C.J. Spiller Jersey
Chester Taylor bears Jersey
CORTLAND FINNEGAN jersey
Devery Henderson Jersey
Dustin Keller jersey
Eric Berry Jersey
Gerald McCoy jersey
HARRY CARSON jersey
Hines Ward jersey
HOWIE LONG jersey
Ike Taylor jersey
Jahvid Best jersey
JAKE LONG jersey
James Farrior jersey
Jared Odrick Jersey
Jay Ratliff Jersey
Jerome Bettis jersey
Joe Flacco jersey
JOE KLECKO jersey
Joe Theismann jersey
Kareem Jackson Jersey
Karlos Dansby dolphins jersey
KENNETH MOORE Jersey
Kory Sperry Jersey
KYLE ORTON jersey
LAVERANUES COLES jersey
Lofa Tatupu jersey
MARK BAVARO jersey
MARK DUPER Jersey
MARK GASTINEAU jersey
Marques Colston Jersey
Mike Bell Jersey
Mike Iupati jersey
Morten Andersen Jersey
PHIL SIMMS jersey
Roger Staubach jersey
Santonio Holmes Jets Jersey
SONNY JURGENSEN jersey
Stefan Logan jersey
Steve Atwater jersey
STEVEN JACKSON jersey
Terence Newman jersey
TIM HIGHTOWER jersey
Tony Dorsett jersey
TRACY PORTER Jersey
Tyson Alualu Jersey
VINCE YOUNG jersey
BOB SANDERS jersey
Brandon Marshall Dolphins Jersey
Broncos Tim Tebow Jersey
Chad Henne jersey
Charles Woodson jersey
Dan Williams Jersey
DARREN McFADDEN jersey
Darren Sharper Jersey
Demaryius Thomas Jersey
Dez Bryant Jersey
Drew Brees Jersey
DWIGHT LOWERY jersey
Earl Thomas jersey
Haloti Ngata jersey
Jamarcus Russell jersey
Jason Pierre-Paul Jersey
JEREMY MACLIN jersey
Jermaine Gresham Jersey
Jerry Hughes Jersey
Joe Haden Jersey
John Elway jersey
Jonathan Vilma Jersey
Karl Mecklenburg jersey
KEN STABLER jersey
LANCE BRIGGS jersey
Marion Barber jersey
Maurice Jones-Drew jersey
Michael Irvin Jersey
Michael Turner jersey
Russell Okung Jersey
Ryan Mathews Jersey
Sean Weatherspoon Jersey
Taylor Mays jersey
THURMAN THOMAS Jersey
Torry Holt jersey
Trent Williams Jersey
VERNON DAVIS jersey
Adrian Peterson Jersey
Andre Smith jersey
NAPOLEON HARRIS jersey
D.JOHNSON jersey
Bart Scott jersey
Paul Krause jersey
PERCY HARVIN jersey
Tony Romo jersey
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.gun shows
I've purchased several firearms at Maine gun shows and a background check was performed for every single one. No different than buying a gun at L.L. Bean or even Wal-mart. Do a little more research. The Uncle Henry's, I will agree, is another story.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Maine Gun Shows
It was my understanding that a recent bill, LD814, concerning Maine Gun Show Sales, was killed. LD 814 would have required a National Criminal Background Check be performed by a federally licensed gun dealer prior to the sale or transfer of a firearm at a gun show. If you tell me that some gun show sellers are already doing this, I believe you, but I don't think that they must, or that all do. I'll try to do better research. Thank you for the information.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.http://michellemalkin.com/200
http://michellemalkin.com/2009/08/19/sheila-leavitt-another-weird-doctor-for-obamacare/
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.http://fishwars.blogspot.com/
http://fishwars.blogspot.com/2005/07/uncle-sam-rest-in-peace.html
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Google the nut job shiela
Google the nut job shiela leavitt and you will find the rest of the story!!!!!!!!
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Hmmm...interesting
Imagine the local used car dealer who sold a vehicle to someone who killed a family of four on their way home from the movies because he was drunk. Murder is character issue, Dr. It matters not what the device used to commit the act. If someone wants to go on a murderous rampage, he doesn't need a gun to do it (see Jack the Ripper, Lizzie Borden, countless others). Would you like to outlaw anything that can be used to commit mass murder? How about airplanes, too? This is not an issue of safety for you, Doc, so stop hiding behind your ideology. You don't like guns...period. If this was about safety, you would want to ban cars...they are involved in far more fatalities than guns are. But since you don't like guns, I'll make sure I don't use mine to protect you.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Off-topic Rant
I did not propose banning guns, just legislating some reasonable regulations about who can buy them, and, more importantly, who can't. Keeping weapons out of the hands of criminals and the mentally unsound should be the business of all honest citizens. What's your ideology?
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Off-topic rant?
Off-topic rant? Hardly..."Dr." I have actually spent considerable time around criminals and I can tell you categorically that they don't give two hoots about laws telling them they can't have guns. I can also tell you that they will choose an unarmed target over an armed one at every opportunity. My ideology? We don't need more laws. We need government out of the face of the law-abiding. More gun laws only punish the law-abiding; they do not deter the criminal. There are already laws in place that do what you claim needs to be done. We don't punish the law-abiding because others violate the law.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Gun Control is...
Gun Control is...a smooth trigger squeeze.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Not only that....
Much more than 'Smooth trigger squeeze'
A good grip, firm control, accurate sighting, continual breathing, etc....
A may be a flaming liberal on the boards here, but in a previous life was a State Certified Police Firearms Instructor who consistantly scored 'Master' class in combat competitive shooting.
My epiphany was learning the 'Weaver Stance' shooting technique in which an isosceles triangle is formed, with equal, but opposing forces formed by the arm/hands gripping the gun to steady it, quick, smooth non-anticipatory trigger squeeze, three shot burst (two center mass - 3rd to the head).
I can be the azzhole I am here because - well, just because.... ;)
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Bumper Sticker Brilliance
Oh. The originality. The pithiness. I am speechless.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Speaking of bumper sticker
Speaking of bumper sticker brilliance, is this or is this not a picture of your car with a dead Uncle Sam on the top of it? A simple yes or no would be appreciated.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Not dead, but, at the time Uncle Sam was. . .
seriously ill, Scotty O. Shock (and Awe), I believe.
O---what? Anonymity is cowardly, Mr. O. (If "O" is all you got, I apologize. I know a number of Oo families from Myanmar, but no one with just O, so you would be the first! Please let me know!)
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Did you own/design/parade
Did you own/design/parade this vehicle or not?
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Your Question, Mr. Scotty O
I would be more than happy to answer your question, Mr. O (since you pose it so very politely), but I only answer questions from real people, not from anonymous/pseudonymous blogger/comment writers. So, who are you? Oh, O, maybe you are related to Jackie O, O?
Just let me know, O, and I will be happy to give you chapter and verse of the Uncle Sam Mobile (anyway, a matter of very public record, should you take the time and effort to look), which I may (or may not?) have designed and driven during the mendacious build-up to the invasion and the actual invasion of Iraq.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Shame
Ya its a shame we dont give up our guns and let Crimminals rob us in the light of day and not care, why shouldnt we fall victim to Violent crime, isnt that the american dream, thats what our ancesstors were thinking..hmmm lets go to america were its the land of the free home of the Violent crime... Ohh wait heres an idea. this guy goes into a bank robs it using a knife, gets in his car and runs over about a dozen people while fleeing the scene... Shall we have shame because we didnt outlaw Knifes and cars? It looks like your another sheep, you like to keep your head in the sand... but when the wolf comes along you yell for a sheep dog for protection!!! You are the shame!!
Sheepdog
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Sheepdog's barking
Did you read my letter, or are you just ranting?
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Sheepdog's barking
Did you read my letter, or are you just ranting?
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Did you read my letter, or
Did you read my letter, or are
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Sheepdog's barking
Did you read my letter, or are you just ranting?
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.C'mon Doc.... Get up here and
C'mon Doc....
Get up here and perform a 'Short-arm Inpection' or two on these folks.
It'll give you some insight as to their inadequecies and psychological overcompensations.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.What you said.
“Fear and Loathing in Attitude Formation: The Physiological Basis of Politics,” by Kevin B. Smith PhD (University of Nebraska), Douglas Oxley, Matthew Hibbing, John Alford and John Hibbing.
These researchers have found that some humans are particularly alert to threats, particularly primed to feel vulnerable and perceive danger. Those people are more likely to be conservatives. Experimental subjects who had a stronger blink reflex in response to a loud noise were more likely to take such conservative positions as favoring gun rights, supporting warrantless searches, and opposing foreign aid.
Liberals released only slightly more moisture in reaction to being shown disgusting images than to photos of fruit. But conservatives’ glands went into overdrive (that is, they sweated a LOT).
Now folks, I'm very sorry for all those blinking, sweaty, trembling people, especially if these (very sketchy and preliminary and maybe even methodologically suspect) findings are proven true, and show gun-clutchers can't help themselves because they're just born that way. And maybe it's really nothing to be proud of that, as a group, more liberals can stomach the thought of eating worms without flinching. Yes, there's a lot of material there, isn't there?
But how about we just give guns to the sweating, blinking tremblers who can prove that they are not also either mentally impaired or possessed of criminal tendencies or both. Too much to ask?
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Well...I certainly do
Well...I certainly do appreciate the peer-reviewed study. However, when I was in college we were required to offer studies offering opposing viewpoints so readers could make an unbiased, yet informed, decision. Studies can be manipulated, Doc. Anyone who has done research knows that.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.When Phyllis Schlafly goes in Drag....
Ever see a Gun Nut "offer studies offering opposing viewpoints so readers could make an unbiased, yet informed, decision."
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Wow...now I am Phyllis
Wow...now I am Phyllis Schlafly in drag? What a great, well-researched response. Beautiful...
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.That was not my contribution . . .
. . . although I appreciate any truthful support I receive from Mr. Veritas.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Shame
Imagine our shame when one of our senators is so drunk he drives off a bridge then waits 8 hours or longer to let the authorities know he has accidentally murdered a lover. Imagine our shame when the state of Maine is found to be full of hypocrits? just like the residents of Mass? Right on Maine. Gun control in Mass is very strict, yet it hardly deters criminal activity. Imagine our shame when Maine becomes a GUN FREE zone and our families are victimized by individuals who don't care about laws, that is why you call them criminals. No thanks Mass, I'll keep my guns.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.If the Snowshoe fits . . .
I believe that if you take the time to read my letter you will find that I was not proposing laws that would deprive you of your precious weapons --- unless you are not an upstanding, honest citizen but someone for whom a reasonable background check would pose a problem. . .
Gun laws in MA are quite strict, but when thugs can drive an hour or two north and arm themselves with ease and impunity, it is harder for the MA forces of law and order to fight crime. And innocent people, many of them kids, get hurt in the crossfire.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.If the Snowshoe Fits etc.
Dr Leavitt, first of all I would like to applaud your efforts. My Precious weapons as you call them, are like your surgeons scapels, and other things you use in your day to day activities. From 1963 onward to today, my profession required that I be armed with a firearm, and know how to safely use it. I have undergone numerous background checks to determine my suitability. A criminal who desires to own a firearm, or any other weapon, can easily obtain them without having to bother with a short trip to Maine, NH, Vermont or even Canada. Disarming the honest citizen serves no purpose, for example look at the Aussies, who chose to surrender their firearms and souls. I am sorry that innocent people are hurt. However, I would rather not have a Nazi germany either. Thanks for reading this. I too, attended Leavitt in the Early 1960's, class of '63.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Sheila Leavitt, Newton,
Sheila Leavitt, Newton, Mass
keep your opinions about certian laws to the state of where you live!
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Parochialism and xenophobia
(1) I live in both states. Clue: my use of the first person plural pronoun in my projection of the shame "we" would collectively feel should our lax state gun laws result in the enabling of a terrorist or other mass murderer; (2) Even if I didn't hail from and spend lots of time in Maine, the First Amendment protects our right to carry free speech across state lines. (3) Don't write dumb stuff. It makes us Maine people look bad.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Imagine our shame when a
Imagine our shame when a crook uses a car as a get-away vehicle at a bank robbery....our state will be so ashamed. If you're not going to think before you speak Sheila Leavitt, M.D. , please don't speak.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.So, we should not license Maine cars and their drivers?
I do not understand your undoubtedly very cogent argument.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.So, we should not license Maine cars and their drivers?
I do not understand your undoubtedly very cogent argument.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.What I'm getting at , moron,
What I'm getting at , moron, is that if a crook wants to commit a crime, he or she will not acquire the tool to do so in a legal manor. They are criminals. They break the law and no law will stop them from doing so. Do me a favor and research violent crime in the U.K. before and after all of their gun laws and get back to me when you have something intelligent to say.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Lies, damned lies . . . and statistics
In July of 2009, the Home Office of the UK released newest crime statistics: the murder rate in England and Wales has fallen to its lowest level in 20 years, with 648 homicides recorded in 2008/09 – 136 fewer than the year before. There was a significant further fall in gun crime with the number of incidents involving a firearm down by 17% to 8,184. The number of fatal shootings fell from 53 to 38. This is a gun death rate of approx. 0.07 people per 100,000 in the UK in 2009. The overall rate for the U.S. was 10.2 per 100,000.
I believe that if you do the math, this means about fifteen (15) times as many people per capita died from guns in the US last year as compared to the UK.
I'm afraid I still fail to grasp your point.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Sorry, Miss Tucker!
God, I never did check my math properly! 10.2 divided by 0.07= nearly 150 (not a measly 15) times as many people dead by gun per capita in the U.S. in 2009 as in England and Wales combined. My bad. I knew we were more than 15 times worse, but 150?? Yup, those terrible gun laws in the UK are really creating havoc among the beleagured citizenry, alright. Probably blinking madly and sweating all over themselves.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Sorry, Miss Tucker!
God, I never did check my math properly! 10.2 divided by 0.07= nearly 150 (not a measly 15) times as many people dead by gun per capita in the U.S. in 2009 as in England and Wales combined. My bad. I knew we were more than 15 times worse, but 150?? Yup, those terrible gun laws in the UK are really creating havoc among the beleagured citizenry, alright. Probably blinking madly and sweating all over themselves.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Well your stats are
Well your stats are interesting but the Fatal shootings fell from 53 to 38. So that makes me believe that criminals are still getting firearms fairly easy. Also I see crimes stats that envolve guns but what about the stats of crimes that would be prevented by guns. Why don't you post the stats of robbery, burglary, and rape.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Combat Action Ribbon!!!
Congratulations, Doctor!!
If you're attacked in Michelle Malkin's whack-job column - you've obviously fought against Hate and the Anti-American Way.
Now 'taxpayer' - I trust you are filing a complaint with the appropriate boards to follow-up on this liddle, above reproach discovery you've made?
Or are you just going to drop a fart in church and leave...
Let's see what you are made of.....
No balls - no glory.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.What?
What? Sorry: I don't go to church, like to fart in the open. What do you advise? And: I generally keep my balls in my purse.
(And yes: both Miss Michelle M. and Mr. Rush L. -- the latter in an airborne attack! I wear the scars proudly, although they do itch.)
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Michelle Malkin and Rush Limbaugh
I'm afraid that, yes, this sort of brainless ad hominum attack is what we are often left to deal with when a lazy and/or dishonest person finds himself losing an argument. If you actually believe that Malkin and Limbaugh and others like them have any concern for presenting the truth, or even in merely stating the facts, you've been drinking some pretty serious Kool-Aid. Malkin scooped some slime directly out of the blog-o-sewer and merrily reprinted it without fact-checking; Rush Limbaugh did the same, and trumpted on his silly radio program the "fact" that I was a "fake doctor" and a plant for Obamacare. You can go ahead and splash this slander around a bit more, if it will make you feel big and proud and like you've had a "gotcha" moment --- but, again, it will make you look stupid in the end. Better do some more fact checking. Intelligent use of internet sourcing should be required in all schools, although it is probably too late for many.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.What a Crock
"Imagine our shame should Maine someday be identified as the source of guns used in such an attack"
Are you kidding me? The only shame I can see is if we let someone from Mass tell us how to run our State. Let Mass clean up their own act and we'll worry about ourselves without your help or input.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Kudos AwardedAgree (1)
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Please see "Parochialism and Xenophobia," above.
Hate to repeat myself.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Good thing pedophiles
cannot possess firearms either, we wouldn't want those Boy Scouts getting hurt, would we Bob?
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.tron, i gotta hand it to you,
tron, i gotta hand it to you, thats was a good comeback, and a sad day for those who work with the boys for better reasons. I was going to come back at you with a comment about catholic priests, but the church hid them welle nough that most have never been convicted and now have statute of limitations to worship and thank.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Except the Ratzinger cover-up.
Now there's a pope with his knickers in a bit of a twist, eh?
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Thankfully felons cannot have
Thankfully felons cannot have weapons legally. Can you imagine tron with a gun?
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Uncle Henry's - Anyone????
Like forbidding felons from having guns will prevent them from obtaining them.....
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Right
So what you're implying is: "Let's make it as easy as possible!" Is that your point? So, like . . . forbidding people from driving drunk isn't going to keep drunks off the roads, so . . . what the hell? Or like . . . making laws against rape isn't going to keep rapists from doing the nasty, so why bother?
It's very hard to keep felons from buying guns if they can buy them without anyone even asking them to prove that they're not felons. Is this not so? Doesn't seem such a stretch.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.ignoRANT statements.
Private citizens selling firearms to a prohibited person places themselves in serious civil and criminal jeopardy under existing Maine and federal law.
You can find many exiting laws here: http://www.mainecwptraining.com/IMPORTANT_LINKS.html
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Jeopardy? It's a Game!!!
PjM writes: "Private citizens selling firearms to a prohibited person places themselves in serious civil and criminal jeopardy under existing Maine and federal law."
Odds are they'll never come under the radar of law enforcement unless someone screws up big time. Most folks who need a firearm for each finger and toe on their bodies are well aware of this....
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Hmmm . . . Thank you, I think.
I appreciate the link. This is true (and was covered in the Sun Journal article). I am just unclear about the object of your subject heading.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.