How best to describe MDOT's commuter plan? Ridiculous.

“We’ve created sprawl through poor planning, both transportation and land use, and we’re going to follow that up by creating a subsidized commuter system to chase those same commuters on a free highway. That sounds ridiculous to me.”

Androscoggin County Commissioner Jonathan LaBonte is absolutely correct. It sounds ridiculous because it is ridiculous.

The Maine Department of Transportation has spent the past 18 months studying commuter patterns north of Portland, anticipating applying for Federal Transit Authority Small Starts grant funding as part of the so-called Portland North commuter project. The conclusion of that study is that there are more commuters and, therefore, greater need to establish rail or commuter bus lines between Portland and Brunswick and not between Portland and Lewiston.

Should it surprise anyone that there are more commuters between Brunswick and Portland? That population is better able to afford private transportation. But, according to members of Visible Community, there are over 3,000 households in L-A without cars, the highest percent of residences without personal transportation in Maine. Many simply cannot afford to buy cars, gas and tolls to commute.

Counting existing commuters to justify expanding commuter lines is flawed logic because it ignores would-be commuters who are trapped elsewhere without public transportation.

The people of Lewiston and Auburn have proven eager bus passengers, with CityLink Bus System use increasing 89 percent between 2002 and 2008 after the system made adjustments in bus routes within the Twin Cities. There is no reason to think the same pattern wouldn’t emerge if the options to travel between L-A and Portland were improved. But that’s not MDOT’s end goal.

No matter what option is chosen — rail or bus line — the commuter line will be heavily subsidized, so MDOT is leaning toward the option in which travelers will be most likely to pay the fare.

So, the Portland North project is not about serving the public as much as it is about paying the bill. That’s not a bad consideration, but it’s being made without also considering the possibility that should a commuter line open between Portland and Lewiston that the people here would be equally willing to pay. The line doesn’t exist now, so it’s supposition, but if there’s any place that needs public transportation more than another, it’s a place with the largest population of non-driving residents in the state.

But, as MDOT points out, the federal government does not consider economic development and community building when passing out money for transit projects. Only confirmation of existing commuter traffic. That’s ridiculous, too.

If MDOT goes with the bus line, it is considering the creation of a rapid-transit regional bus system traveling along breakdown lanes on either Interstate 95 between Portland and Auburn, or on Interstate 295 from Portland to Brunswick. That's not just ridiculous. It’s daft.

Unless MDOT is going to establish stops to pick up passengers along the sides of these highways, rapid-transit in the breakdown lanes makes absolutely no sense. These buses can ride along in the travel lane in the established traffic pattern. Anything else would be confusing for motorists, and would limit the critical use of breakdown lanes for vehicles to … break down.

The point, we hope, of expanding the commuter line is to improve transportation. If that’s the case, the fact that some 3,000 individuals in the Twin Cities aren’t commuting to Portland because they don’t have personal vehicles must be part of the equation to seek improvements.

In focusing expanded commuter lines along Maine’s coast, MDOT will simply be adding options for a population that already has a lot of options, a lot more means and that will service the wealthiest people in Maine. How’s that for ridiculous?

editorialboard@sunjournal.com

In order to make comments, you must verify your account.

In order to comment on SunJournal.com, you must use your real name and include the town in which you live in your profile. A member of our staff will call you to verify this information. To join in, fill out your user profile completely and check the box "please verify my status." We'll get back to you within one business day to verify your account.

Login or create an account here.

Our policy prohibits comments that are:

  • Defamatory, abusive, obscene, racist, or otherwise hateful
  • Excessively foul and/or vulgar
  • Inappropriately sexual
  • Baseless personal attacks or otherwise threatening
  • Contain illegal material, or material that infringes on the rights of others
  • Commercial postings attempting to sell a product/item
If you violate this policy, your comment will be removed and your account may be banned.

Advertisement

Comments

Dave's picture

A shorter ride?

I truly doubt it.  Are you factoring in stops all the way?   A bus could leave downtown L/A, make a stop near the at the park-n-ride in Auburn,  a stop at the Jetport (about 30 minutes), another stop at the rail/bus site in Portland (10 minutes from the Jetport) and another stop or two, or three in downtown Portland, and return.  Far more efficient than a rail.

ojhuig's picture

You people who say the

You people who say the downtown hasn't improved, must not have lived here very long. Hookers standing out in the open on Lisbon Street, drunks stumbling around, stinky, foamy river water. The Manoir, the Holly, Piece of Work... It has improved a lot. "Free Highways"  is a big reason the growth was halted. Sprawl and the mall took the shoppers away, hence the empty storefronts.

how do you say gasoline in

how do you say gasoline in Samolian.? =DHS

Rinoblast's picture

Bigotry is so much easier to

Bigotry is so much easier to spot when it's paired with bad spelling!

Rinoblast's picture

One thing everyone seems to

One thing everyone seems to be forgetting is that the train may be only half the trip. You still need to find a way to get to and from the station. We're talking about a train that travels in essentially a straight line, with no spurs. How many people will live or work/travel within a short distance of the station? It's around a 2 mile walk to the Old Port and 3 miles to the Mall from the Amtrak Station. It doesn't sound like much, but no one is going to walk it, especially in the winter. There's clearly not enough money to have spurs extending into both cities, so do you really think people will be willing to take a bus ride after taking the train ride? 

I like public transportation as much as the next person, but we do not have a large enough population to sustain a "spider-web" type train system.

BenHarrison's picture

Just wait until they triple

Just wait until they triple excise tax on you cars to get more people using public transportation.

Matt's picture

I have lived in Lewiston

...and commuted to Portland every day for 2 + years. I would MUCH rather pay tolls and gas than ever think about hopping on a bus. Colossal waste of money to even study this. We'll be watching empty buses roll in and out of town all day long.

thinkingman's picture

Look at it financially...if

Look at it financially...if you average 5 gallons gas round trip between here and Portland (yes including intown low gas mileage) and tolls, its going to cost you about $90 per week to travel back anf forth to Portland in gas and tolls. Thats $4,500 a year gone or $375 a month - which just happens to be about the same as the difference in rental values to get something comparable in each city. So I can work in portland and live there, or work in portland and commute from Lewiston and financially I'm at the same place at the end of the day - BUT - I lost 2 hours in comuting time that i could have spent with family.  Having lived in Lewiston Auburn since I was 5 and spent the better part of the past 25 years working out of town, i see no benefit in commuter lines whether it be rail or bus, its just mroe tax dollars being used to prop up industries that cannot survive on their own.

downtown..

1st.... Scottie I agree..it's like a different place,French and Irish morals and work ethics are out the door....the government and unions have driven factories and industry from our cities ,state and country..they think a train will reduce the poverty level? 2nd ...driving into the city, for what? a few bank head quarters....offices , parking cost 2 bucks in the garage for 1/2 hr or hour appointments..3rd ----people living downtown don't want to increase they're wages by working in Portland, they'd loose financial aid...people in Portland  wouldn't use the train so they could live in cheaper housing in L/A

JLaBonte's picture

The bus would be a longer

The bus would be a longer ride than using the LARR and SLR lines from downtown Lewiston to Commercial Street in Portland.

And for those of us that live downtown near the waterfront and can already walk the trails, paddle the river, walk to Fishbones, Fuel, Gritty's the Franco Center, etc, I think there is plenty to make it attractive. 

It seems that the longer people live in LA the less positive their outlook.  Tragic, but we can't let that stop us from growing the economy.

scottie's picture
verified

Depressed...

I have to agree with your comment that the longer people live here the less positive their outlook.  I have lived here almost all of my 39 years and I think this city has a very bleak future.  Welfare and the poor downtown area will always bring this city down, and I really cannot see that changing.  The welfare cycle continues and grows with each generation.  I have heard about the downtown revitalization it seems like forever.  I still have no desire to stroll downtown and 'enjoy' the area.  How about Kennedy Park?  I haven't stepped foot on that grass since I was a kid at one of the festivals there and I can honestly say I have absolutely no desire to do so anytime soon.  So what exactly is attractive about downtown Lewiston?

Epotvin11's picture
verified

scottie scottie scottie..

"So what exactly is attractive about downtown Lewiston?"

 

It's not only about "exactly what is".. but also about what could be. Let's put the last 30 years behind us where they belong and look forward.

scottie's picture
verified

potvin

As I mentioned in my earlier post, I feel like I've been hearing how great the downtown can be all my life.  I'll believe it when I see it...

Epotvin11's picture
verified

alright

Fair enough. Time for us to get to work then.

Dave's picture

Why not a Concord Trailways bus route instead?

It would be less expensive,  could provide more routes, and more stops than a train.

 

JLaBonte's picture

Another view

Would be to look our own downtown real estate prices (read potential) versus downtown Portland realize that with 22 round trips a day, we would likely experience some in-migration as people leave Portland for more affordable downtown options.  And when I say affordable, I mean affordable market rate options.

Loft apartments?  Riverfront condos?  All at a fraction of the price...that would be an economic opportunity.

thinkingman's picture

Might need to make the

Might need to make the downtown more desirable and attractive in order to attract those people,..and the money is not there at present for those improvements.

Epotvin11's picture
verified

build it and they will come..

Isn't that what we spend half of our monday's doing thinkingman?? Have patience, have optimism, have an IPA and sit back on the Gritty's deck and see the vast potential we have in front of us.

thinkingman's picture

So instead of counting actual

So instead of counting actual commuters we should count people who we "think" might commute to Portland if public transportation were available? Not sure I follow the logic given the people who would seek to work in Portland are higher income and will not give up their cars anyway.

use buses

how about... just simple thing like a bus...with stops in new gloster and gray.. it doesn't say that 3000 people want to travel to Portland..just that they don't have cars

Advertisement

Stay informed — Get the news delivered for free in your inbox.

I'm interested in ...