Shoppers at Best Buy in Auburn Sunday may have seen a young man in a black T-shirt, hat, sunglasses and camouflage pants.
But what really set him apart from other shoppers was the large handgun strapped to his hip.
As Mainers, of course, we realize citizens have the right to carry their firearms openly in public. But merchants have the right to decide whether the public can carry firearms in their places of business.
Most retail establishments seem to have made a calculated choice that it is better to allow customers to carry firearms than incur the protests of pro-gun activists.
The popular argument developed by open- and concealed-carry proponents is that if a shooting breaks out, it's better to have a law-abiding citizen available with a gun to shoot a robber or crazed gunman.
As we have pointed out in the past, either scenario is extremely unlikely in Maine. In fact, we have yet to see a case of a random mass killing by a gunman.
In Maine, family members more often kill spouses and children, and friends kill friends with their guns.
But, as Sunday's experience demonstrates, there's a problem with open carry: When that person walks through the door, how can customers tell if the person bearing the weapon is a potential rescuer or killer?
In other words, is the guy or gal with the gun angry with the store's management or return policy, or simply browsing for a new digital camera?
With police officers and members of the military, the gun and uniform just go together.
Otherwise, shoppers are forced to make a hasty decision about the gun-bearer's mental state and propensity for violence.
In a country on edge, where political, social and personal tensions seem on hair trigger, allowing people to openly carry guns in places of business is bound to put other customers on edge rather than reassure them.
And that can't be good for business.
The opinions expressed in this column reflect the views of the ownership and editorial board.

Just read the Constitution!
"Amendment 2 - Right to Bear Arms. Ratified 12/15/1791. A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." I think that says it all. Americans would all be better off if we all read, understand and follow what is written in our Constitution; and stop trying to govern by "feelings."
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Open-carry puts shoppers on edge
Good editorial √ Hawai'i ≠ 9 am - ish HST • Tuesday
Private business owers can set their own promulgations , rules , covenants , and regulations about hunting on their own property . They are not public institutions ( i . e., " No Hunting " ) . Probably cause ? Yeah √ Poor Bambi . No AK-47's welcome here . They also retain the right to refuse service to n e one they deem unsuitable ( " No Shoes , No Service , " etc. ) . Their privately retained security forces ( Wells Fargo ® ? ) will escort n e one they deem unsuitable to the door and show them the way out
Sounds a bit like ƒlori-duh to us
What's the problem ?
/s, Dr. Dosh , http://www.dumblaws.com/laws/united-states/maine
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.A guy carrying concealed...
...goes to walk into a store where a guy is standing out front carrying openly. Concealed, thinking open carry is going to fire on the crowd, pulls his weapon and fires, killing the open carry. Justifiable homicide? I think that's as likely to happen as any other scenario they can come up with to carry and show the world how macho they are.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Kudos AwardedAgree (1)
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Best Buy copped out
People shouldn't be allowed to open carry in a store. You don't have a right to open carry on private property. And from how he dressed(as the sun journal describes it: "black T-shirt, hat, sunglasses and camouflage pants") he sounds like he was looking for trouble.
That just rude. This guy sounds like a jerk
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Kudos AwardedDisagree (4)
Agree (4)
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.The parrot likes your new
The parrot likes your new picture...he sez he found the Jesus and the Cross riding the dinosaur photo troublesome. Good choice.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.He was exercising his LEGAL
He was exercising his LEGAL right to opne carry and caused no trouble nor inflicted any harm. When did black T-shirt, hat, sunglasses and camo pants become the criteria for "a rude jerk looking for trouble"? Ever been to the Fryeburg Fair?
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Kudos AwardedAgree (1)
Disagree (3)
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Was it the "right" thing to do?
Hi pirate!. Seems it takes gun issues to have us cross paths, eh? I can't judge on the demeanor of the
gentleman carrying nor do I know why he did it. Maybe there's more to this story, maybe not. Maybe he was a law enforcement officer? This type of event will always cause concerns and it should. Brandishing a gun in a public place is NOT going to make the majority of people comfortable. Why would it? It just provokes and some people in this world just can't handle being provoked. I read this event as maybe someone flaunting their right without the concern of the people around him. Sure would be nice to hear his side.
Speaking of "rights", the person calling him a rude jerk is well within his "rights", free speech. He may have a different criteria than you for a "rude jerk" ... eh?
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Kudos AwardedAgree (1)
Disagree (2)
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Yeah, Gary, the gun gig does
Yeah, Gary, the gun gig does seem to bring you and me out from under our rocks, doesn't it? Actually, I agree with everything you say above. He had the legal right to do what he was doing, but he also exercised poor judgment. The gun carrier was being painted with too broad a brush (rude jerk, looking for trouble, etc.) which is what evoked my "criteria" comment. These days, many of us allow our "rights" to overshadow our responsibilities to one another.
Good to hear from you, man...AARRGHH!!
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.This is what I fear the most.
This is what I fear the most. People pushing the limits. As one person in Bangor stated, our gun laws were fine for years with no problems, why start changing them now. Of course we all know why but .... we also do have the extremists to deal with. Ban guns and no restrictions. We can't have it both ways. The broad brush will always be there as long as the majority of the people don't consider it the norm, and it ain't, and likely never will be. The "looking for trouble", by the mere fact the person could very well realize the stir it could cause, is sure debatable in my book.
Nice to see your still kicking, good to hear from you too!!
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Jerk? Careful - He just may be a "law abiding citizen"
I don't know what the current laws are, stores may need to post a sign?, and I'm guessing he thought he was exercising his "right". The current wave across this nation is for more relaxed laws, no restrictions on open/concealed carry. We, the silent majority, need protection. From what I haven't quite fathomed yet. If he's an NRA member, he knows the laws, he'd be well trained and could handle any situation. Would that make you feel any better about this event? Naw ... me neither.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Kudos AwardedDisagree (3)
Agree (2)
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.I agree
Walking into a department store with a Pistol on your hip is dumb....grow up. I'm all for gunowner's rights but I'm also all for using your brain being respectfull and humble about the rights you have. This guy has a sad life if this is how he derives his daily pleasure by dressing the part and scaring citizens. Sadly enough, this guy hurts the things he flaunts. Gunrights detractors like to paint weirdos like this the norm.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Kudos AwardedAgree (5)
Disagree (2)
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.There's only one way to carry
There's only one way to carry a protective weapon; stealthily,unobtrusively, and in a manner that NO ONE knows you have it, except you and the one you use it against to protect yourself or loved ones from bodily harm. Paperwork optional.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.What's Behind His Statement?
Here's where it would be nice to know what his intentions were and what his background is. Sure would be nice if he would share his thoughts here or elsewhere. Is this a reflection on what some of the "law abiding" citizens consist of? Maybe there was a potential threat of violence to the shoppers and he was going to prevent it? He couldn't be an NRA member,.... could he? Hopefully more will be known. I'm a gun CONTROL advocate and I know this is NOT the norm, but ..... in this day and age, with the gun rights frenzy and paranoia going on ..... we don't really know what the future brings, do we?
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Kudos AwardedAgree (2)
Disagree (2)
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.His statement
but of been just plain simple "FREE SOVEREIGN CITIZEN". Big Brother has some of us just plain paranoid!
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.People should stop looking
People should stop looking over their shoulder for the boogey man, he ain't there!
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.That's how innocent people
That's how innocent people get into trouble, Gary. Assuming that harm and evil are not around us is dangerous and naive.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Not in my book, unless
Not in my book, unless someone enjoys pushing the envelope when they really shouldn't. I don't let what some people think MAY happen affect how I lead my everyday life, nor does my family. If something crops up that justifies thinking differently so be it. My glass is always half full, unless maybe someone "shoots" a hole in it?
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Does that mean you don't buy
Does that mean you don't buy in to the man made global warming bs?. Twelve years ago they were telling us the ice age was coming.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Yeah ..... pretty much. Too
Yeah ..... pretty much. Too many centuries out for this old crank. I think it's just part of evolution and we're going to revert back to maybe fishes with all the water that could show up. The polar caps ARE melting. I hope my future generations end up in the shark family, they've done well. Another alternative would to be to transport and be true Martians. I could rest in peace for sure on that one.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Darwin didn't mention
Darwin didn't mention anything about regression in his theory did he? I've yet to have a Darwinist clearly explain to me why Darwin, in his later years, turned to Christianity.
When the ice age does come, will we still have access to LIHEAP?
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.