Rumford selectmen plan work on wind farm issues

RUMFORD — Thursday night's wind power workshop by selectmen resembled a planning session that covered a lot of old ground.

By meeting's end 75 minutes later, Town Manager Carlo Puiia “assigned” selectmen homework: to be prepared to discuss decommissioning, safety setbacks, and turbine blade flicker at the next workshop Thursday, Jan. 27.

Noise issues with turbines and allowable decibel levels will be discussed separately with experts, likely from the Maine Department of Environmental Protection.

When discussion deviated to ordinances created by other towns, Puiia reminded the board five times that they had previously approved creating a new ordinance from a template produced by the Office of Maine State Planning.

That decision came after voters on Nov. 2 defeated the board's proposed first ordinance by a tally of 1,339 to 1,048. That proposal, which was publicly labeled anti-wind, was drafted after nine months of work and research by the board's Wind Power Advisory Committee.

During Thursday's discussion, other than Selectman Greg Buccina, most suggested basing Rumford's ordinance on a regional wind development ordinance created in Bethel for Bethel, Woodstock, Greenwood and Newry.

“I think the Bethel regional one is a good one to review, because they're our neighbors,” Puiia said.

Rather than start anew with the state template, Buccina remained loyal to the defeated ordinance he helped the Wind Power Advisory Committee to create. Reasons for doing so, he said, were that more than 1,000 people voted for it; a committee spent nine months on it; and all this board should do is make certain objectionable restrictions are less restrictive.

However, Selectmen Mark Belanger, Jeff Sterling and Chairman Brad Adley said they want to better understand noise decibels, and what sounds they can expect to hear from turbine-topped ridges under a variety of atmospheric conditions.

They want firsthand accounts by taking a field trip to the Mars Hill wind farm, listening to turbines and talking with residents and municipal officials.

They also asked Puiia to schedule presentations by unbiased experts in noise and flicker.

Belanger said the Bethel regional ordinance increased a decibel level restriction from 55 in the state template to 65 and he wanted to understand why.

“We need answers before we can decide what's reasonable and what's not, I think,” he said.

“To Mark's point, we could get this all done tonight if we wanted to, just plug in whatever numbers we want to and we'd be done with it, but would any of us feel good about it?” Selectman Jeff Sterling asked.

“Just speaking for myself, I have to be relatively sure — and relatively is the key word — that what we give to the voters to vote on in June is solid, and not just something where we went, 'Let's put 55 here, 65 there, 45 here.'”

“I think this is our last shot at it,” Sterling said.

“If we don't come up with one that gets voted in, I think it's going to be really hard for us to find another group to do it a third time, because we'd probably be better off to just give it to DEP and say, 'There you go, make us something,' and we would lose any sort of a say in what's allowed.”

“So we've got to do this right — and that's not to say the previous group didn't do it right — so we give the town at least some control over this type of development,” Sterling said.

Prior to adjourning, Rumford residents only were allowed to speak. From the 11 people present, Roger Arsenault identified himself as a member of the board's committee that drafted the defeated ordinance.

He said the committee attempted to bring in experts on wind power issues, but they were criticized because said experts were labeled too one-sided.

He then asked the board to bring Boston-based wind developer First Wind to a workshop or forum.

“Bring them to the table and let the taxpayers hear what their project is being proposed for our community,” Arsenault said.

“You're going to bring an ordinance to the table just as the advisory group did last year, and people are going to vote on something that they know very little about, so this is an opportunity for them to be here.”

He also advised selectmen to seriously consider “what happens if you pick a number and you're wrong.”

tkarkos@sunjournal.com

Stay informed — Get the news delivered for free in your inbox.

I'm interested in ...

In order to make comments, you must verify your account.

In order to comment on SunJournal.com, you must use your real name and include the town in which you live in your profile. A member of our staff will call you to verify this information. To join in, fill out your user profile completely and check the box "please verify my status." We'll get back to you within one business day to verify your account.

Login or create an account here.

Our policy prohibits comments that are:

  • Defamatory, abusive, obscene, racist, or otherwise hateful
  • Excessively foul and/or vulgar
  • Inappropriately sexual
  • Baseless personal attacks or otherwise threatening
  • Contain illegal material, or material that infringes on the rights of others
  • Commercial postings attempting to sell a product/item
If you violate this policy, your comment will be removed and your account may be banned.

Advertisement

Displaying comments, from newest to oldest

windsprawl's picture
verified

?

Rumford, just say NO to windsprawl. My neighbor sold his home for half price because he knew he could not sell it at all after the structures went up. It should be a crime to ruin the mtns. When I hear the voters approved it I know they were ill informed or uninformed. Get the facts and save our state

Karen Pease's picture
verified

Being safe, not sorry

The state's wind development plan is sure to be the leading story in Maine in 2011. I am saddened when I see neighbor pitted against neighbor, when the only 'plus' side to this industrial wind plan is that folks believe that the short-term jobs brought to the region and the temporary reduction in property taxes might make the whole thing 'worth it'. I also can understand why townspeople might get antsy about receiving input from people who aren't residents or tax-payers. We're territorial and proud.

But realistically, we ALL have a stake in this game. Rumford is only one of dozens upon dozens of communities and UT's which are targeted for wind development. And citizens who are concerned about the long-term financial, and environmental health of this state, as well as that of its residents, have put in countless hours researching the facts about industrial wind. Not the hype or rhetoric given by the wind lobbyists, but facts garnered from unbiased experts... scientists, doctors, economics experts, physicists, accoustics engineers, utilities experts... and on and on. As frustrated as citizens become over the conflict spurred by wind development projects... imagine how frustrated Mainers get who have dedicated months or years of their time and thousands of their own dollars, as they try to educate fellow Mainers about the vagaries of industrial wind.

I commend those who have the desire to learn more. But I urge you to get your data from those who have no financial stake in wind developments.

The facts show that wind is an unreliable, intermittent energy source which will cost tax-payers and rate-payers far more in the long-term than any short term gains a few might realize.

The facts show that properties within two miles of industrial wind developments can lose 25-40% of their value... with some properties showing a complete loss.

The facts show that unless the full amount for decommissioning these projects is collected up front and held in a third party escrow, developers often sell off and/or abandon their projects (once the government subsidies and tax production credits and renewable energy credits expire and they've made their millions in profits) leaving it up to the host community to deal with the rusting and abandoned equipment.

And right here in Maine, the facts show that many of our neighbors are suffering from a loss of their quality of life. They are miserable in their homes... homes which, for many, are their only real investment.

And for brave citizens who have had the courage to stand toe-to-toe with a powerful corporate lobby, the facts show that there are no depths to which the wind industry will not stoop to convince Mainers to support this ill-advised plan.

I've witnessed proponents of 'wind' use scare tactics.. saying that wind energy will reduce carbon emmisions, counter the effects of global warming, reduce our dependence on foreign oil and bring our soldiers home. And yet... when they are challenged on these statements, they retreat, quoting 300 temporary jobs and a short-term boom for local shops and restaurants.

When they are confronted with scientific data showing they tell untruths, they hide behind statements like: "Well, that study was paid for by the oil industry!" Never mind that independent scientists verified the data, never mind that many oil companies like BEP are ALSO invested in wind energy-- that statement is intended to negate the validity of such studies.

On the opposite end of the spectrum-- wind proponents like to quote a survey which says that 80% of Mainers support industrial wind... but that survey was paid for by Reid&Reid, one of the major wind development contractors... and the questions asked haven't been made known to the public. Without full disclosure, how are Mainers to know what was asked in that survey? If people were asked: "Which would you prefer... electricity produced by coal, which pollutes and which entails the complete degredation of Appalachia's mountains--or electricity produced by 'windmills'?", many would most likely say they supported wind energy. I'm not saying that is what the questions were... I'm saying, if you expect to be believed--then give full disclosure. That is only fair.

But the wind industry works hard to maintain their 'proprietary information'. That is why we see very little production data made public. That is why they can still quote 'capacity' figures rather than real production rates.

I've witnessed the wind lobby talking about national security being tied to wind energy-- until they are challenged on it. I have seen them try to make Mainers feel guilty about coal mines in Appalachia... when we do not get our electricity from coal. There is no end to the tactics they try, or the spin they create..

So, yes. Please learn all you can about industrial wind, But remember where your information comes from. Take it with a grain of salt. Don't believe me, and don't believe the wind lobby. Do your own research. If you truly want the FACTS, you will find that the paltry benefits of 'wind' are far, far outweighed by the enormous negative impacts.

Respectfully,
Karen Pease
Lexington Twp., Maine

KNSaisi's picture
verified

Expert?

Ms. Pease,
I find it funny that you tell us to seek out information from those who have no financial stake in wind developments, then you then go on to state "facts" from unknown sources. You expect us to accept what you say, without disclosing whether or not you have ties to wind initiatives. Based upon what I read, you appear to be an anti-wind lobbyist. How do we know you aren't? Due to the overwhelming amount of lobbying on both sides, it is virtually impossible to research wind development on the Internet. It is just as difficult to research it using "professionals" because they all have an opinion.

I believe that the best option is to provide a reasonable ordinance with reasonable protections. If we attempt to pass an ordinance to block development entirely, the town will end up spending big bucks in court defending the ordinance. If we have no ordinance, we go unprotected.

jdoar's picture
verified

The Bethel Region's Wind Ordinance

proposal is available on the Bethel website www.bethelmaine.org (Mr. Olds, thank you for calling). I want to stress that it is a DRAFT PROPOSAL. No one in any of the partner towns has voted on anything, yet. Further, it was drafted with the express purpose of being incorporated into an existing site plan review ordinance. Each of the towns who worked together to agree on a draft will be able to amend it and adopt it, adopt it, or vote it down outright.

Mr. Olds you are correct to find Mr. Belanger's statement that "Bethel" increased the noise level from 55 to 65 decibels unbelievable. No such thing happened. I direct you to page 13 of the ordinance "control of noise."

Question Everything's picture
verified

Decibels

"However, Selectmen Mark Belanger, Jeff Sterling and Chairman Brad Adley said they want to better understand noise decibels, and what sounds they can expect to hear from turbine-topped ridges under a variety of atmospheric conditions."

Understand this, Selectmen, every place the turbines have been built, they are out of compliance with the very generous 45 decibel (nighttime limit) the turbines have been given by the DEP. Mars Hill was so bad the state granted a 5 decibel variance before they were even built. Vinalhaven residents had to spend large amounts of their own money to buy the scientific equipment to prove to the DEP the three turbine project was out of compliance (the DEP acknowledges the turbines are out of compliance, but has not taken any action to rectify the situation). Freedom's three turbine project is out of compliance, but because there are only three turbines, they somehow get a free pass.

The moral of the story is…don’t look to the DEP for help policing the noise from the turbines. I guess you’ll have to tell those people in your town affected to buy their own equipment and get trained on how to measure decibels!

The only safe way to protect your citizens is to enact at least a one mile noise setback.

As to the Bethel Ordinance increasing the decibel level from 55 to 65 (which I find unbelievable in the first place), I just called the Bethel Town Office to see if I could get a copy and was told it wasn’t available yet.

lisan180's picture
verified

I'm not clear

on why First Wind would be invited to the party. Haven't they already had their say? The vision you have for the future of your town is just that. By "picking the wrong number" (Roger Arsenault's words) I guess he means that if the set-backs or noise levels are too restrictive, First Wind would walk away. Safety of the residents who live close to these projects come first. And, really, I include their financial safety in that. We need a better understanding of how these projects affect home values as this is a serious issue for those who are not stakeholders but who stand to be seriously impacted financially. Once these and other issues are determined, then you write the ordinance. To ask First Wind to make sure the ordinance is right for them *before* figuring out if it's right for residents...why bother with an ordinance at all? It's up to First Wind to then work within the restrictions of the ordinance if possible. If it's not possible, then you recognize that the proposed project is not a good site for a large-scale wind farm. Can't have it both ways.

gempaint's picture
verified

receptors

Mr. Buccina may have an ego, but this is not the problem. Mr. Buccina knows more about the wind industry than others want to know.
Either way, any citizens within 2 miles from proposed ridges must be notified.
Carthage selectmen neglected to contact receptors of Saddle back Ridge. Now these 50-60 people are getting madder and madder.
They are realizing that the property they invested in is not resellable.
From day one, Carthage 1st selectman has told the citizens "It is a done deal" "private property rules".
Public meetings are turning one sided. Wind proponets are scared someone may expose their faults.
It is not the citizens fault, the media has helped flaunt wind industry as our way out of a failing economy. Mountains in Maine are selling as developments. Sunday River area, Rangeley, ect.
Please our mountains and rivers are worth more as vacation homes and steady growth. (Carthage doubled in value in 7 years) The wind industry will kill this growth.

watchdog's picture
verified

Shouldn't Take long

To get this ordinance written. You have a template. Use it and get going. Get your unbiased experts here with you. Continue to let only Rumford people speak. Who are also unbiased. Mr Buccina's ego prevents clear thinking so that won't help you. BMOM should be on board for wind because it could help them considerably. WOOPS! that board wants to keep coming to the town for help. The voters want you to see you accomplish something asap. No dragging of feet and making excuses. Rumford people want wind. Listen to them for once.

macmac's picture
verified

Sold to the selectboard, try selling it publicly

I attended that workshop. The man from First Wind seemed pretty comfortable. Of course he is, this ordinance is for him and his outfit. Do you want to step up before the public and tell us about it, Mr. First Wind ?

Advertisement