AUGUSTA — A Republican lawmaker wants rest stops along the Maine Turnpike to sell local products, but a 30-year contract between the quasi-governmental Turnpike Authority and a national company could threaten the proposal.
Sen. Chris Rector, R-Knox, is sponsoring LD 217, a bill that would require the Maine Turnpike Authority to promote and sell Maine products at rest stops along the 109-mile toll road.
During Tuesday's public hearing, Rector wondered why the rest stops were selling Sbarro pizza instead of Amato's pizza, a local franchise.
"We should be showcasing our finest Maine vendors," Rector said.
He said he hadn't contacted Maine companies to see whether they were interested in selling their products at rest areas.
Nonetheless, several members of the Legislature's Transportation Committee believe Rector is on to something.
But according to the Maine Turnpike Authority, the MTA has little control over who sells products at its rest stops. That's because the authority has leased the rest areas to a private company, HMS Hosts, which in turn contracts to private vendors.
HMS is a national company that contracts with turnpike authorities and airports around the country.
Conrad Wetzel, a spokesman for the MTA, said Maine products could be sold at the rest areas and that some local companies have previously tried to do so.
However, some panelists wondered whether local companies were at a competitive disadvantage to national vendors.
HMS requires that potential vendors prove that their products are popular with travelers, a provision that could be a challenge to some Maine companies.
In 2007, the MTA signed a 30-year contract with HMS. Several committee members said they were stunned that the authority would enter such a lengthy contract.
Sen. Bill Diamond, D-Windham, said he was "flabbergasted" at the duration of the contract, adding that the agreement gave the authority little latitude to consider "good ideas like this one."
Wetzel said the length of the contract was common among other turnpike authorities. He added that the MTA received 20 percent of the gross sales at the rest stops in addition to a flat, upfront payment.
The bill will undergo a work session at later date.



Money the State of Maine and the MTA and MDOT
What gives with the MTA anyway .Why is it not the MT of MDOT.
In todays world the MTA is outdated and need to be put into the history books .
MTA was only going to be untill the road paid of it self and now that has happen a very long time ago .
The pike is a cash cow ,one of the only cash cows the state has but for taxes and fees and fees are nothing but a tax.
Talk about something that needs to be change around ,once again the people in Augusta are sitting on there hands and looking in all the wrong places to find money to keep the state in the balck or should I say here to move the State Of Maine out of the RED mess it is in .
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Kudos AwardedAgree (2)
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Simple, Because...
Amato's isn't any good, and Sbarro is tasty! Maybe if Maine Pizza wasn't a gross loaf of bread with Pizza toppings on it, we could talk. Honestly, If Maine food services want to compete, they need to make something competitive. The last thing I want after 100 miles of driving is maple syryp, and whoopie pies. Should we have a Sam's? No thanks, Most of the folks I know including myself, like food with flavor. While I'm not crazy about 30 year contracts, at least I know that I can get food that is different from the same old same old local fare that I am stuck with in this area, when I drive out of state.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Kudos AwardedDisagree (4)
Agree (2)
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.The MTA
Gifts Cards... 30 year contracts... The MTA has quietly constructed it's little kingdom within Maine. It is time to bring this little kingdom down. Dissolve the MTA. Bring it and it's revenue under the DOT umbrella. There is no reason that ONE road in this state needs it's own agency to manage it.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Kudos AwardedDisagree (3)
Agree (7)
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.