Maine's wind-energy leaders know they are in a race — one where the clock has already been ticking for 10 years.
But they need look no farther than 150 miles north of the state's border at Van Buren to Quebec's Gaspe' Peninsula for a model of wind-energy development.
Efforts in that region have not only added a bolt of new green energy generation, but also incubated a supply chain of hard goods prompting a manufacturing renaissance and an injection of foreign investment from Denmark and Germany, the countries leading the wind-energy development race in Europe.
"There is no question that Quebec is an international leader in the development of energy," says John Kerry, the director of Maine's Office of Energy Independence and Security.
In the last five years, the Gaspe' region has installed more than 620 megawatts of wind-powered generation. That compares to about 200 megawatts installed in Maine over the same period.
Through government policy, incentives and funding, the region has established a half dozen manufacturing enterprises, many of which also ship their products — including wind turbine blades, towers and generator housings, called nacelles — to the U.S. and other places around the globe, including China, South America and parts of Europe, the world's fastest growing wind-energy market.
Beyond that the region is known as a developer of technology, including cold-weather construction and turbine blade fabrication.
Being able to carve out a niche in the giant global supply chain of a booming business is tricky, but in Maine's favor are a multitude of factors, Kerry says.
"We are behind, but we have the capacity to catch up," Kerry says.
To that end a coalition of private Maine businesses, the University of Maine's Advanced Structures and Composites Center and the Maine Port Authority formed to highlight what is already available here and to recruit new talent and investment to the state.
Known as the Maine Wind Energy Initiative, which includes 11 private companies, including large employers like Bath Iron Works and Cianbro Corp, was in Dallas this past week during an American Wind Energy Association conference.
The group had a special kiosk on the exhibit hall floor to show off the state's available workforce, its wind resource and the progress already being made by university and private researchers.
The state was twice mentioned by the U.S. Department of Energy's Assistant Secretary for Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Cathy Zoi, during the conference's keynote address, according to Steve Von Vogt, the executive director the Maine Composite Alliance.
The focus was the state's leadership role in developing off-shore wind energy and, while Maine now has close to 20 land-based wind farms either online or in the development stages, one of the state's best chances to secure a slice of the global wind-energy market may be in developing and advancing off-shore technologies, says Von Vogt.
Part of the research and development will be fueled by a recent $25 million federal grant to the university's Advanced Structures and Composites Center. U.S. Sen. Susan Collins and U.S. Energy Secretary Steven Chu are expected to tour the facility in June, according to a recent release from Collins'office.
"I believe that deepwater, offshore wind has enormous potential to help us meet our nation's electricity needs and to reduce our dependence on foreign oil," Collins said in a prepared statement announcing the visit.
Kerry notes Maine's fossil fuel habit — 90 percent of our homes are heated with oil or natural gas — costs the state an average of $5 billion a year.
That's $5 billion out of the state's economy, most of it going to foreign companies, a December 2009 report from Kerry's office to the Legislature shows.
"Talk about a tax on the economy," Kerry says.
Sectors of growth
Everything from composite technologies for deep-water wind turbine components, including turbine towers and blades, to the building of ships specially designed to maintain these at-sea wind farms, to software specific to operating wind farms are possible sectors for growth in Maine.
"When anybody thinks of wind-energy jobs they often think only of the maintenance or construction side of building a facility, the image of somebody crawling around up there on the outside of the turbine is what comes to mind," Von Vogt said.
But the bulk of green energy jobs are more likely to be found in the manufacturing, engineering and consulting side of building a wind farm, either at sea or on land, Von Vogt said.
"The supply chain is complex, but it's very important for the long-term growth of our economy," says Von Vogt, who is also a director of the Maine Wind Energy Initiative.
A 47-page joint report on employment opportunities issued by the initiative and Von Vogt's composite alliance in January of 2010 concludes: "Without establishing a full supply chain that includes turbine and tower manufacturing, the employment opportunities in Maine will be limited."
The report further states: "Full advantage of the wind energy opportunity can only be taken if the full supply chain or at least the key factors (i.e. turbine manufacturing) have a local presence in Maine."
Von Vogt says, in forming the coalition, organizers discovered there were already companies active in the industry or with expertise in wind-industry related fields. "It has helped us to see all we have out there already and where we can go," he says. "Maine is actual well-positioned in areas that I wasn't aware of before. We have to figure out what our competitive advantages are and, if we develop the resource, we also need to benefit from it in terms of the supply chain."
Estimates on the number of jobs that could come from creating this manufacturing supply chain range from 15,000 to 25,000 but, so far, Maine cannot claim any companies are actively manufacturing and exporting components for the wind-power industry.
And the transition or diversification of Maine companies, already successful in other industrial sectors, like shipbuilding and heavy construction, makes perfect sense, says Catherine Renault, director of the Maine Office of Innovation, a division of the state's Department of Economic and Community Development.
"We know from the experience in Europe that if you build the parts you can have a very significant industry" Renault says. "We know how to build big things that have to go in the ocean, so who cares if they are lying down or standing up."
Still, obstacles both in state and federal regulation exist, including a federal permitting and siting process for off-shore wind projects that can take up to eight years to complete, Renault says.
Siting farms in Maine can be more problematic. Kerry points out population densities here, while among the lowest in New England, are still bigger than parts of rural Canada.
Fewer people usually means fewer conflicts over locating farms, he says.
Also the pace of development and ongoing growth in wind-energy manufacturing sector in other countries, including Canada and those in Europe and Asia, means Maine and the U.S. needs to move quickly.
The United Kingdom, for example, was "late to the game" when it came to developing a manufacturing sector for renewable energy, Renault says.
"Because the industry had established itself in northern Europe they could import components, but were not in a good position to establish manufacturing facilities as well," Renault says. "We (in Maine) are all concerned about the time frame because it's a very competitive environment."
That said, Maine's state and federal lawmakers have not been idle and many, like Von Vogt and others in his coalition in both the private and public sector, have been working furiously on the supply chain issue.
Meanwhile, Maine Gov. John Baldacci has made renewable energy a key focal point of his administration, and has devoted resources to its development, she says.
Policy changes that allowed for streamlined permitting of wind farms in almost all of the state covered by the Maine Department of Environmental Protection have also helped accelerate wind-energy development. Some of that effort is starting to show as each year additional generating capacity from wind comes online, she says.
But, all working on the issue are aiming to position Maine in an even more competitive position, Renault says.
That the state is now being recognized as a leader in the field is heartening, she says.
"We've gotten Maine on the map," Renault said. "The developers and people who build turbines, they know we have really good winds."
The state may not be a giant in the global market, but even a portion of that global market share would be a giant boost for the state's economy long hammered by exiting manufacturing industries, many of them tied to Maine's natural resources, she says.
Policies in place in Quebec, especially like ones requiring up to 60 percent of the materials and content for all wind farms developed in the province come from sources within the region and one that requires the kilowatt costs from wind be at par with other prominent energy sources like hydro-power, work when the wind resource is good enough that developers are virtually guaranteed profitable returns on their investments, both Renault and Von Vogt say.
Even more aggressive goals for production may be needed, and a long-term commitment to green energy from policy and lawmakers is key, Von Vogt says.
Texas, for example, has set the goal that 20 percent of all energy produced in the state will come from the wind, Von Vogt says.
"I think Maine can and will have to get to that stage," he says."We are at the end of the pipeline and now is the time for us to figure out how to get to the beginning of the pipeline."
Kerry paints a cup half-full scenario, largely because Maine's wind resource — especially offshore — is valuable and unique. Weather research shows the Gulf of Maine has some of the most consistently steady winds in the U.S.
That's worth enough that it should draw foreign investment, both on the generation side and the manufacturing side, if state and federal policy makers can act quickly and adeptly enough to allow that potential to blossom.
Other pluses for Maine:
• a well-motivated and available workforce;
• two state universities focusing on green-energy production, composites and technology development and technicaland engineering skills for workers;
• recent approval and announced funding for a major transmission line upgrade;
• large federal government-backing for university research; and
• recently passed state legislation authorizing the Maine Public Utilities Commission to put out "requests for proposals" for up to 25 megawatts of deepwater wind energy
These factors and others should all add up to positive economic news, Kerry says.
"There's an awful lot that's right in the state of Maine," he says.
Still Quebec's relatively unified position on green energy and it's long-term determination to reach it's goals are an enlightening story for Maine, he says.
"The province of Quebec has a system to develop energy and they are sticking with it and they are making great progress because they have stuck with their plan and that's a great lesson for us," Kerry says.






THe German Experience, Must We Repeat It?
While employment projections in the renewable sector convey seemingly impressive
prospects for gross job growth, they typically obscure the broader implications
for economic welfare by omitting any accounting of off-setting impacts. These impacts
include, but are not limited to, job losses from crowding out of cheaper forms
of conventional energy generation, indirect impacts on upstream industries, additional
job losses from the drain on economic activity precipitated by higher electricity
prices, private consumers’ overall loss of purchasing power due to higher electricity
prices, and diverting funds from other, possibly more beneficial investment.
Proponents of renewable energies often regard the requirement for more workers
to produce a given amount of energy as a benefit, failing to recognize that this
lowers the output potential of the economy and is hence counterproductive to net
job creation. Significant research shows that initial employment benefits from renewable
policies soon turn negative as additional costs are incurred. Trade- and
other assumptions in those studies claiming positive employment turn out to be
unsupportable.
In the end, Germany’s PV promotion has become a subsidization regime that, on a
per-worker basis, has reached a level that far exceeds average wages, with perworker
subsidies as high as 175,000 € (US $ 240,000).
From:
Rheinisch-Westfälisches Institut für Wirtschaft sforschung
Economic impacts from the
promotion of renewable energies:
The German experience
Final report
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.The expensive Wind Scam, Maine
Wind energy isn’t free. And, it’s destructive.
The cost of electricity in Maine will double because of Gov. Baldacci’s climate change policies favoring wind energy.
Despite the claims of "Wind Week" propagandists, there is no empirical evidence that wind power will: 1. reduce the cost of electricity in Maine, 2. reduce carbon emissions, 3. make Maine ‘energy independent’, or 4) be environmentally friendly.
Average residential monthly electric bills could go up by $50 to $100 when these policies are fully implemented.
The total cost of wind turbines and transmission upgrades will be $7 billion, but produce less than 700 megawatts of electricity.
The Baldacci government rejected from the energy mix cheaper, clean hydropower available for purchase at 3.5 cents per kilowatt-hour from our Canadian neighbors.
Rejected also was supporting less expensive clean energy from hydro or nuclear power in the northeast.
Managers of semiconductor plants in Maine have warned that electricity costs are 120% over budget compared to other locations.
Debt-ridden Spain’s experience shows that despite a temporary increase in construction jobs to build alternative energy, 2.2 permanent jobs were destroyed for every construction job created.
Why is our government forcing job-destroying policies on us? To reduce carbon emissions?
Despite claims that wind power will offset fossil-fuel electricity -- reducing carbon emissions -- there is no empirical evidence that has occurred or will ever occur.
Maine has only one oil-fired plant, producing 2.75% of Maine’s electricity. It is only used during hot, calm summer days and frigid, calm winter days, or for emergency capacity.
Newpage in Rumford has the only coal-fired electricity plant is in Maine, producing less than 1% of electrons. It is used to help make paper and keep employees working.
About 53% of the electricity generated in Maine comes from renewable sources already, one of the highest in the nation; the remainder, is generated by using clean North American sourced natural gas.
Best-case scenario estimates place the hypothetical reduction of carbon at about 140,000 metric tons, assuming that wind will replace only fossil-fuel fired generation.
Using the reasonable assumption that wind will offset electrons from all types produced cuts that estimate by more than half.
Recognizing that wind-generated electrons are erratic, and most are generated at night, reduces that estimate to negligible amounts.
Real-world experience proves no emission reductions from wind power.
The erratic nature of wind power requires gas-fired generators to run at lower efficiency levels, causing higher rates of CO2 emission, as experience in Europe has proved. Wind policies have actually increased CO2 emissions there because of this intractable problem.
Zero emissions reduction, for doubling electric bills?
The probability that heavy wind will coincide with peak need is rare. It is very hard to see how installing thousands of wind turbines on mountains and hundreds of them offshore will make Maine energy independent from imported oil.
Maine’s primary use for oil is for heating. Less than 5% of the oil comes from Saudi Arabia. We import none from Iran or Iraq. The majority of heating oil used in Maine comes from the United States, Canada and Mexico.
Heating oil represents one of the best values Mainers can buy. At $2.79 per gallon, heating oil is 60% less expensive than heating by electricity at 15 cents per kwh. The price would have to go to $6 per gallon -- $200 per barrel -- to just reach the equivalent cost and $400 per barrel to get to 24 cents per wind-driven kwh.
Wind power is destructive to the environment and harmful to people’s health.
Over 30,000 acres of Maine’s mountaintop forests will be permanently clear-cut and destroyed to build industrial parks.
Ironically, by killing the trees on over 30,000 acres, wind parks will lessen the amount of carbon sequestered and the manufacture and transportation of the turbines will result in no net gain in the reduction of carbon.
The wind turbines in Maine will cause over 45,000 new bird kills per year, using U.S. Fish and Wildlife estimates.
Recent news stories have shown health problems from living near turbines in Mars Hill and Vinalhaven.
Another destructive power of such policies is the power to corrupt.
In a story appearing on the front page of the May 6 edition of the Sun Journal, The Maine Center for Public Interest Reporting revealed it uncovered possible double-dealing by former Maine Public Utilities chairman Kurt Adams. According to the story, “Adams said he signed an employment contract with First Wind — and while he was still PUC chairman.”
This contract awards the potential for John Baldacci’s friend and appointee to make a multi-million dollar windfall profit when the company goes public.
What other connections should we know about?
Do our public servants have our best interests in mind or theirs?
Perhaps Mainers will begin to reconsider their support for the wind power industry, now that they know what it’s costing them.
i have to laugh when they say that so many birds get kill by windows and cars but with the mills it will go way up , now you have to add on that so now what is the bird kill going to be and they are going to cut out gas and oil ,but what are theygoing to grease the gears with? and how they going to keep the blades going when there is no wind ? so that they can cheat the peole and make us think they are producing elec. and they make sound like theres goingto be somany jobs ,they dont tell you that they are onlypart time jobs more lies
J Dwight
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Wind power has been the
Wind power has been the driving force in corruption and bribery for years in Maine politics. I would refer to the flatulance by Governors, members of the bloated legislature & their butt kissing of special interests. This was prevelent in the Brennan, McKernan, King & Baldacci administrations and will no doubt continue until we can find honest men & women to enter politics for the good of the people..
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.windpower
Windpower will NEVER happen in Maine because of the political power of the NIMBYists and their neo-Luddite allies. northwoods_maine is a classic example. He/she has absolutely no problem using power produced by a fossil-powered facility located in someone else's backyard, but no way are they going to allow it in their little piece of the world. Their property values and lifestyle are sacrosanct, even if it means a hundred others have to lower their own standard of living to maintain it. Funny, these NIMBYists are the ones who holler the loudest about global warming, demanding something be done before the sky falls -- as long as someone else pays the price. They need to quit their hypocritical posturing and complaining about global warming as long as they're not willing to do something meaningful to fix the "problem". But then, it is and never has been about any environmental crisis. It's about keeping lesser beings in a state of squalor and the slavery of dependence of their parsimonious largesse.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Shoddy journalism
Where's the yellow dot that represents the proposed Bowers Mtn. project in Carroll Plantation? The met towers have been up on Bowers for almost a year now, and First Wind's project (named Champlain Winds LLC) has just last week petitioned LURC to move the town of Kossuth into the expedited permitting area so they can tie the Bowers Mtn. project in with an extension project in Kossuth. This project on Bowers Mtn. will overshadow and devastate the Grand Lakes Watershed. These industrial wind turbines which stand well over 400' tall will overshadow Pleasant Lake, Junior Lake, Keg lake and all the lakes of this watershed. Having a hard time envisioning 18-25 400' tall wind turbine? Just imagine if you built 18-25 thin office towers that were 40 stories tall on top of the already 1,200 ridgeline. That's right, these towers are taller than any building in Miane you can think of. These ugly industrial projects will be very visible all the way to Grand Lake Stream. The folks of Grand Lake Stream and supporters from throughout the area, and throughout the world have spent many years buying land and conservancy status for much of the land around these lakes in order to preserve the scenic value and nature of these semi-remote lakes and now Gov. Baldy and the rest of his hacks are going to ruin all that by allowing and encouraging these projects. Not only will mother nature suffer, but what about the lost revenue and jobs from the lodges, sporting camps, guides, and other small businesses in Grand Lake Stream and other towns around this watershed?
What to learn more, check out: www.ppdlw.org The Partnership for the Preservation of the Downeast Lakes Watershed is standing tall to fight this unseemly project on one of our state's last true unspolied watersheds.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.exciting! slowly but surely,
exciting! slowly but surely, little by little it will happen... every little single thing we do for renewable resources (greener way of living) will make a difference. i would rather pay out to have some renewable resources to be fed into the grid. now only if we could break free from plastic! chemicals and not easily biodegradable...
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.A scam
All parts are made outside of Maine. The actual electric turbines are made in CHINA. Why doesn't Maine demand that 75% of the components be made or assembled in Maine?
The University of Maine gets its funding for 'pie in the sky'
Remember "Grow Sugar Beets" - "Heat with Wood" - "'Wood Pellets" -
now it's "The Wind"
How about a real world sustainable competitive business contribution...
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.John Kerry - Come on
How does John Kerry keep from laughing every time he says we're going to stop using oil if we can just cover enough of Maine with wind turbines. Is he delusional, stupid, or just bought and paid for? (The latter is not too outrageous a thought, it seems, in Maine these days - think Kurt Adams.) Those of you who support the placement of wind turbines all over the Maine landscape so that we can be southern New England's resource colony, crack a book and learn a little bit more about this subject. There's more there than meets the eye and it's not encouraging. The only commonly considered renewable with a poorer power density than wind is ethanol. That should tell you a lot about wind power's chance of replacing oil.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.What is Wrong with the Maps
I direct your attention to the two wind maps used in this article. The one that purports to show the tremendous increase of wind projects from 1999 to 2009 doesn't state that wind projects proliferate only when the government provides subsidies and outright grants of taxpayer money and preferential treatment in the market. In fact, the industry did no new projects when the federal government dropped the production tax credit and expanded again when it was reinstated. What does that tell you about the financial feasibility of wind?
Regarding the Maine map of wind projects, it is the NRCM's propaganda. NRCM has completely sold out its credibility as a protector of Maine's environment, as these sprawling industrial sites are destructive. Furthermore, it is erroneous and misleading to call the yellow dots "upcoming projects". Some examples: #6 & #7 in Aroostook County are just developers looking at a map and dreaming about sites from which to reap taxpayer subsidies. #10, Passadumkeag Mt. has a met tower owned by Noble Environmental that is in such dire financial condition that it likely will never be built. #9, First Wind's Rollins Project was to have been built and operating two years ago. It has been delayed by two factors: local opposition (see www.friendsoflincolnlakes.org) and First Wind can't find financing because it is such a shaky company. This, in spite of the fact that these thieves got an outright grant of $115 million of Obama stimulus money last September to keep it afloat. They face possible default on a $93 million loan coming due in June. The collateral? The 40 Chinese made turbines and 120 Brazilian made composite blades they had purchased for Rollins that have been sitting under snow and ice all winter in Chester.
I could move on to critique the western Maine portion of the map, but you get the picture. If wind was such a viable industry and if Maine had high wind potential these projects would be under way, as Baldacci and an unknowing legislature created an Expedited Wind Permitting statute to open the floodgates and deny citizens' rights to determine if there should be industrial wind projects in their communities or the unroganized territories. If Mr. Thistle hadn't been so hell bent on doing a promotional piece, this kind of information would be part of the story.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.More wind hype
Does anyone promoting or supporting wind turbines all over Maine ever think to look behind the "feel green and good" facade of this industry and the state and federal mandates that keep it alive? Wind power in it's present form has about as much chance of replacing oil consumption as does ethanol. Like ethanol, DEMONSTRATED environmental benefits are a missing part of the story. They're missing, because they really don't exist. As more evidence is revealed that turbines don't contribute to greenhouse gas reductions anywhere near the level at which they are hyped, the industry has largely moved to jobs hype to push their product as evidenced by the article above. Supporters want so badly for wind power to be the magic bullet, that they won't ask tough questions and are happy to believe the empty rhetoric the wind industry uses to market their federal subsidy capture scheme. Elixir for the masses.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Wind Power
is a waste of space, beauty, inefficient and noise! It makes LITTLE power! Making the wind turbines yes, that's a god business. Spain is a model of wind power too and they are going under from the high prices of everything including energy.
Liberal are so uninformed and stupid. The oil spill is Liberals fault too! They wanted it way off shore like it is! If it was closer on land or in shallower water we wouldn't be in this mess. THANKS LIBERALS!!! You have taken over my country and are ruining it with the help of your Marxist leader, Barrack Hussein Obama , Um, Um , UM!!!
Liberals are Unpatriotic and a stain on the history of America. As soon as he is in Federal Prison for crimes of treason and sedition, we can build back up what he and his America-haters and ignorant voters have torn down. If any of you out there read anything besides this POS you might know something about what your Dear Leader is REALLY doing.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.One sided reporting
Shame on an editor to throw journalistic integrity away and write a two day fluff piece about any issue, but especially on industrial wind. This is one of the most contoversial issues of today, yet this editor's reporting is so one sided that it might as well have been written by the American Wind Energy Assoc. PR office. Where is the balance when industrial wind has such extensive negatives? Where are there any critical remarks by those who have different views? Wind is an industry that would not exist without heavy subsidies of TAX money. When people bitch about a tiny increase in taxes to support local schools, they should be howling mad about the thieves in the wind industry putting up turbines for the sole purpose of collecting TAXPAYER subsidies. Wind is an unpredictable, unreliable, inefficient, costly form of electrical generation. It is pushed by those people who will profit from it, which is very clear in this article. The TAXPAYERS and RATEPAYERS get gouged while wind developers and their minions grab money they are not earning in an honest way.
Is the Lewiston Sun Journal going to do an extensive 2 part investigative piece on the real economics of wind, the failed science of wind, the "green myth" that surrounds wind, the noise and low frequency infrasound problems of wind, the environmental destruction associated with land based wind development, and the many other problems with this issue? I challenge the Sun Journal to do so. Since they likely will not, I direct readers to the statewide coalition, Citizens Task Force on Wind Power website: www.windtaskforce.org There, as Paul Harvey used to famously say "is the rest of the story"
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Look at Map
Please look at the color coded map. Most of Maine has marginal wind. Off shore wind is difficult and expensive. Maine rate payers will pay dearly for this expensive mandate while John Baldacci and John Kerry will profit in his new wind energy job
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Wait...
While I am concerned about global warming, have supported conservation efforts in Maine for many years, I think we should stop the wind turbine farms and monitor their energy contribution for five years. This movement is so much like "band wagon" thinking that we must be wary of it at some point. Second, I do not want wind turbines on every hill in Maine, I am sorry to say, which will detract from one of Maine's most important points, the natural environment. This does not need five years of monitoring.
I usually value Sun-Journal articles like this, but feel the present is a promotion of wind farms. This obvious slant belongs on the editorial page.
Let's stop, curtail our use of energy, button up homes and take action with other methods, monitor the wind farms for their energy contribution, then move in a fact-based direction.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.THANK GOD
SOME ONE IS USEING THERE BRAINS,ITS SURE NOT GOV BALDY/SUSAN COLLING/OR SNOWEE/ WIND SURE BETTER THEN OIL SPILLS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.No reduction in oil use
Sorry, to be or not, you can cover Maine in wind turbines and it will not change the amount of oil we use. That's a fact.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.About time Maine awoke to renewable energy
So many years have gone by completely wasted and with the state sending billions of dollars overseas for oil, and only now do we wake up and realize renewables are the only way forward. One can only hope the NIMBY (Not In My Back Yard) STFU for the good of the state.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.The mind is a terrible thing to waste
SSDD - if you'd just spend a little time reading up on the wind power projects proposed or already constructed in Maine you'd know that no amount of wind turbines will affect our consumption of overseas oil by a single barrel. As for your NIMBY comment .... you're darned right it's also a "Not in My Back Yard issue"! Many of us here in the parts of Maine that are under fire from these projects certainly will fight to maintain their way of life and their property values. It's always easy to advocate for this or any other project when you live 100+ miles away and probably will never even see one of these projects. I'd like to see someone propose a coal fired electical generating plant or a nuke plant in YOUR backyard SSDD, then we'd hear some screaming! Do a little reading before you take sides on this issue. Open your mind before you open your mouth.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.What is wrong with the leadership in Maine
Windmill power can only be profitable in Maine if we produce the windmill parts. We have many closed, unused factories in Maine that would, seem to me, be able to be transformed into factories that make windmill parts. Why is no one investing money in something like this kind of factory?
Also, in the short run, we need to negotiate more strongly with the windmill companies. We need to keep some of the power produced in Maine, and there needs to be a property tax advantage to us Mainers. The windmill companies are getting all the profits and tax breaks while the State of Maine residents get nothing. The Baldacci administration has given away the farm on this one. Of course, they have seen personal profit and will probably continue to do so. John Baldacci has taken good care of himself and his friends. I wish he had been more concerned about the people of Maine.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.