Voters in some of Maine’s more rural communities will soon get a chance to add their voices to an ongoing and growing national debate over whether America should reform its law enforcement policies toward marijuana crimes.
Pushed by a petition circulated by the Maine Marijuana Policy Initiative, West Paris voters, on Saturday, will decide whether to make marijuana the lowest police priority in town.
In June, Sumner voters will also take up the proposed ordinance change being pushed by Sumner resident and Maine Marijuana Policy Initiative Executive Director Jonathan Leavitt. Selectmen in other towns, including Paris and Farmington, have blocked the proposed ordinance from going to a vote, claiming it is not only illegal and unenforceable, but also in conflict with state and federal laws on marijuana.
Leavitt’s Lewiston-based organization is linked up with the national Marijuana Policy Project, which advocates ending marijuana prohibition and is involved in many campaigns around the country similar to the one here in Maine. It is also helping to free incarcerated nonviolent offenders and trying to pass federal medical marijuana legislation, among other missions, Leavitt said.
He secured $60,000 from the national group and about $25,000 more in funding from about 30 other donors to launch his effort here in 2006.
He is asking for another grant from the 12-year-old Marijuana Policy Project to continue working through next year and hire another staff person.
“The Marijuana Policy Project was looking for someone to build their organization in Maine,” Leavitt explained. “They were looking at where opportunities might present themselves. The dialogue here is not a harsh dialogue ... and there is a strong framework of local democracy and making sure people spend money wisely.”
He also mentioned support here for local farmers, as well as a willingness to not be constrained by political ideology. And he brought up, as he frequently does in conversations, that Maine’s number one cash crop is marijuana, a rich source for potential taxes, he says.
At the Marijuana Policy Project based in Washington D.C., legal analyst Anthony Wagenseil said, “We hold ourselves to a very high level of standards and we don’t just award money left and right to anyone, so you have to be the best of the best to be funded by us or receive funding by us.”
At the campaign headquarters in Lewiston, a bare-bones office on Lisbon Street with a soft wall-to-wall carpet, stenciled into the wall in different colors is the message:
“Politics without principal, wealth without work, commerce without morality, pleasure without conscience, education without character, science without humanity, worship without sacrifice.”
Leavitt nodded toward the wall and said, “Ghandi’s seven deadly social sins.”
Like Ghandi’s strategy to bring down British colonialism, Leavitt said his tactic is to change society by starting at the lowest level, on the ground, with the people in West Paris, Paris, Sumner and Farmington.
But not all locals in those towns want to be part of Leavitt’s vision. So far, despite his claims he chose these towns because of the strong support he found in them, the public outcry has been resoundingly dismissive, from selectmen to local police chiefs to voters.
“I am against drugs and alcohol,” said West Paris resident Bertha DeHaas. “They do terrible things to the family.” DeHaas said she lost a grandson to a drug overdose and a step-daughter drifted away from the family after becoming involved with drugs. After a Jan. 25 selectman’s meeting where it was decided town voters would get to weigh in on the issue, DeHaas and about 10 other townspeople formed an opposition group. That group meets weekly, sends out mailers and puts up posters urging voters to reject the ordinance.
“We cannot let something like that pass, we do not want to be the gateway for marijuana in the state of Maine. They pick on little towns because they think we will lay over and play dead,” DeHaas said.
And there is also talk in West Paris and Paris that the petition circulated to gather signatures to put the proposed ordinance on town warrants tricked signers. Mary Ann Brown of West Paris said she never would have written her name had she understood the ordinance’s full intention. Brown had asked petitioners what the ordinance meant, and they explained, “If cops find marijuana in their homes, smoking marijuana, they will charge them with a misdemeanor, which I have no problem with.” She said she never saw the four-page ordinance on the table, but after reading it later was troubled with the way the ordinance conflicts with state law, its seeming unenforceability and the paperwork demanded of the town’s volunteer committee.
If the ordinance passes it would have little impact on how law enforcement handles marijuana crimes in West Paris, especially as the town doesn’t have its own police force, said First Selectman Wade Rainey. But selectmen decided to let the voters take a vote anyway as Leavitt gathered the required signatures for the vote. “It’s not any kind of statement about how the board feels about the marijuana part of this,” Rainey said.
Maine Municipal Association Attorney Richard Flewelling advised nearby Paris they did not have to honor Leavitt’s petition in that town.
“The ordinance’s clearly implied intent (and its proponents’ stated objective) is effectively to repeal the laws governing the manufacture, sale, possession or use of marijuana by adults,” Flewelling, wrote in a December 2006 letter advising Paris officials against adding the ordinance to the town’s upcoming warrant.
“These are state laws, however, and local law enforcement officers are sworn to uphold them,” Flewelling wrote.
Paris Police Chief David Verrier said it is critical he is allowed to investigate marijuana infractions, especially in the wake of a recent brutal attack on a Paris couple in their home Feb. 1 that appears to have been an attempt to steal 90 pounds of homegrown pot. Verrier also said that in his police experience, he has seen marijuana become the “gateway” to harder drugs like cocaine and heroin.
Leavitt said the proposed ordinance does not prevent police from making marijuana-related arrests. An oversight committee of three volunteer townspeople would oversee and track police involvement in marijuana investigations.
Another petition seeking to bolster medical marijuana laws was passed out simultaneously on Election Day with the initiative’s petition, which may have confused some voters who support marijuana for medical purposes.
Leavitt claims this is an intentional distortion to cast aspersion on the group. “I have been around this game long enough to spot a ‘smokescreen’ when it comes to people voicing their opposition. And this is clearly one of them. If they can make us look like we are underhanded or manipulative, then they don’t have to argue the facts and the failed policy itself,” Leavitt wrote in an e-mailed message.
And even if the law fails to catch in these four towns, Leavitt said he plans to march on for perhaps several more years, or however long it takes to establish an organization that can chip away at Maine’s marijuana laws. On the agenda is a statewide ballot proposal to legalize marijuana, putting it on par with alcohol as a regulated and taxed commodity.
“Based on how these campaigns go and what kind of feedback/interest we get in other towns we will be open to new campaigns at any point,” he wrote, stressing that at the moment most of the group’s resources are being directed toward West Paris. During the next few days, he and other volunteers will be calling voters in the town of about 1,800. “This campaign will provide some insight into what we can expect from semi-rural, small towns, and help us map out how we approach our next campaigns.”
rgoldfine@sunjournal.com
Posted By:SAM at February 25, 2007 8:17 AM(Suggest Removal) Jonathan Leavitt is your typical drug addict, college DROPOUT so the SUN JOURNAl gives him front page coverage!? Interesting that you left out how Marijuana is
1. A gateway drug that leads to the harder stuff.
2. Creates dismal apathy especially in our youngsters - the 30 year old dope smoker still laying around accomplishing nothing is quite common.
3. Studies have shown that male's reproductive ability is diminished among those who smoke pot regularly.
4. Marijuana smoking leads to lung cancer just as any smoking does and the fact that these smokers inhale more deeply creates exacerbated problems.
As stated in the paper by those he duped, Leavett thinks he can make grassroots progress in our small Maine towns - he thinks the people are ignorant and stupid and that he can find like-minded people - those breaking current laws to overcome the votes and concerns of decent, law-abiding citizens.
We are sickened by this crass, free publicity that you allow this person to have.
Posted By:angela at February 25, 2007 8:38 AM(Suggest Removal) sam sam sam, what do you know? cancer from weed?! never heard of it nor have their been any cases. it doesnt lead to harder drugs. i have smoked for years and NEVER did harder drugs.
Posted By:john at February 25, 2007 9:55 AM(Suggest Removal) I see no need for the "escape" that that drug, or any other illicit drug provides, nor for the catharsis that "tying one on" with alchohol provides, but if the US legitimzed drugs and controlled them as it has with alchohol (and tobacco, a much more seriously addictive drug than cannabis with end effects that cost billions) we could halt the funnelling of american dollars to criminal economies of other countries and create a catch system for identifying addictive personalities and providing proper treatment early on.
Posted By:sue at February 25, 2007 10:29 AM(Suggest Removal) The uneducated/apathtic/pothead stereotype was born directly from harsh laws against the use of marijuana. The reason you do not see those who are college educated/sucessful become active in marijuana law reform is because they want to remain sucessful in the eyes of the public who have fallen for the propoganda. Some imbibe in private, some have let it go to save face. It's a catch 22 situation. Look at any poll when it comes to legalizing or relaxing laws against it's use. The majority of the public knows the laws are far to harsh.
It would be nice if no felt the need to ever take any mild altering substance, but that is only an ideal. To attempt to mandate such a mindset is futile. Alcohol prohibition did not work, only made matters much worse.
It's professed dangers, asside from perhaps some respiratory problems and inertia to those who smoke extreme amounts, have never been proven. Moderation, as with anything, is key. Few know that the propoganda war started back in the '30's when marijuana was cited as the cause for making Mexicans and jazz musicians "crazy and violent". Go figure. Race issues. There is nothing new under the American sun.
Posted By:Fred at February 25, 2007 10:59 AM(Suggest Removal) The attacks on marijuana as "gateway drug" are farcical, at best, and an irrational basis for making sound drug policy. By any measure, the greatest "gateway drug" of all is alcohol. Not only is there a greater statistical correlation between alcohol use and other drugs, alcohol is the drug of choice in crimes of violence. In cases of assault and domestic violence, the rate of alcohol involvement is staggering. Not so for marijuana. In a culture steeped in violence, it is nonsensical, to say the least, that booze would be legal, while marijuana, which simply does not trigger such violent behavior, is not. Of course, that begs the question of why legalize any intoxicants. The answer is simple. The human brain desires intoxication they same way it desires pleasure, knowledge, and the spiritual. Indeed, anthropologists believe that drugs lie at the source of our belief int he divine. Thus, we see the effects of prohibition -- both in the twenties and today: organized crime growing and profiting on the sale of these substances (from the Hell's Angels to Columbian drug dealers), ordinarily law-abiding citizens being deemed criminal for non-violent, private behavior, and children being taught, sadly, that all drugs are equally bad. Of course, they're not. One of the reasons that drug education fails is that, by ninth grade, kids realize how idiotic it is to say that pot is as bad as heroin or cocaine or ecstasy.
Posted By:Joshua at February 25, 2007 1:45 PM(Suggest Removal) Unfortuately, the federal government's policy concerning marijuana has prevented scientists from studying the effects of the drug.
We really do not know whether or not it causes cancer or decreases male fertility. It would take a large group and a long time to fully study these effects.
There are many educated and successful people that do use the drug in a responsible manner. The reason that you don't know that they use is because they don't want you to know.
Marijuana does have one advantage over all other drugs including tobacco and alcohol. It is not physically addicting, that is your body will not suffer from withdrawl symptoms. Nicotine in tobacco is one the most physically addicting substances known to man and many who have over induldged in booze have had a hangover.
I feel America would be better off if we as a whole could differentiate between marijuana and more dangerous drugs such as cocaine, herion, and meth.
Posted By:ERIN at February 25, 2007 3:15 PM(Suggest Removal) I'd like to know where you the persons who are blogging get there facts from. Pot does cause cancer, one joint is like smoking 4 cigarettes (proven medical fact), Pot can be a gate way drug because a lot of it is laced with addictive drugs such as opium, LSD, and acid to name a few. Making it legal may help cut down on the crime related to it and help regulate how its sold and to who. However if legalized it does not automatically make it a harmless drug. It will still hinder your judgement, decrease motovation, and although theres no medical studies saying pot affects the brain (because the federal government does not allow research on pot), I can show a majority of friends and family members that are living proof. My uncle has smoked pot heavily since he was a teen, now in is 50's he has an extremely diffcult time even forming a sentence. Not only that but other states (like Alaska) have tried for years to legalize pot and have been unsuccessful, and even if the state allows it, its still illegal federally. Which means you get caught with it, you still do the time.
Posted By:john at February 25, 2007 4:37 PM(Suggest Removal) Erin, you are horribly misinformed, and using your uncle as an example of the ill effects of mariujuana is ludicrous, whatever his communication difficulties are. I don't smoke it, but it should be legalized and controlled. If the Coca leaf was used the way its original users did, cocaine wouldn't be a problem, either, but it is the tendency of people to take a good, natural thing (yes cocaine is a naturally occuring alkaloid in the leaf of the coca plant, just as caffeine is a naturally occuring alkaloid in the coffe bean)and distort it's use. But hey, we don't want to put all those drug cops out of a job now do we?
Posted By:JOHN at February 25, 2007 4:52 PM(Suggest Removal) Well, I am a successful professional with 11 years of service (and counting)at the same company, where I am an Ass't VP. I smoke pretty regularly, so I am your example of a smoker that is not lazy, has never touched anything harder, can hold a job, has a nice home and family, is active in the community, and is generally well respected. Maybe I'm the exception.
Posted By:ERIN at February 25, 2007 5:50 PM(Suggest Removal) Fred I was just saying that a lot of people blogging are trying to make the drug out to be harmless, no drug is harmless, this issue isn't black and white, and persons on both sides should stop making it that way. People can become addicted to many things, including caffinee, cocaine, pot, and all of them have side effects. Also you said it best, its people who took the drug and distorted it. That needs to be taken into consideration before its made legal. Also the other article about the cops perspective says it best. The guys are going about it the wrong way, its still illegal federally so no matter how many states allow it you can still be charged. It just changes where you do your time (federal prision instead of state). It also changes the amount of time you serve, I'm pretty sure you get more time if you are charged federally. There are good apples and bad apples in everything and I was tired of those saying Marijuana has no side effects cause thats bull...its has good values and bad and all need to be considered. I was using my uncle as a example, hes one of many people I know and if you were being honest with yourself you could probablly find people you know where pot has had a negitive effect on them, same as with alcohol, some people can drink others can't. Point is should this drug be made readily available to those that abuse it? If made legal should you be allowed to operate a car? There should be more medical studies done, just like with tobacco. This issue is not BLACK AND WHITE and person need to stop painting it that way.
Posted By:ERIN at February 25, 2007 6:08 PM(Suggest Removal) Fred also don't tell me I'm misinformed because I did at one time smoke pot on a regular basis. It caused me to have breathing problems. Also I have family who produce and sell and know for a fact that joints are laced with other more addictive and dangerous drugs..again going back to people distorting things, and making it legal won't change the way people distort things.
Posted By:Otis at February 25, 2007 6:36 PM(Suggest Removal) If pot laws were removed, do people actually believe that everyone would become a drug addict and society would go down the drain? This is a fallacy based on the assumption that pot cannot be purchased now. Current laws are a failure, as the number of court cases prove. Prohibition does not work,but is a major reason behind increased crime activity and imprisonment of many citizens who choose to comsume cannibus, a relatively safe drug in comparison to alcohol,and harder drugs. (check your local hospital for the number of patients hospitalized for pot use).The issue of a persons right to consume whatever and have control over themselves along with the responsibility of the consequences of their decisions must be a factor in keeping pot illegal. Is pot harmless, NO, what substance is? Should people be criminalized for a non violent activity? NO
Posted By:sue at February 25, 2007 7:57 PM(Suggest Removal) Devil's advocate
I must be another exception. :) I, too, am a college educated professional with a very sucessful 25 year career in healthcare. I rarely smoke these days, but do on occasion. Don't drink, don't do hard drugs. We're not so rare at all, now are we?
Posted By:Sheila at February 26, 2007 6:11 AM(Suggest Removal) this drug is not harmless i know peoples perception were impaired while using this drug and were invloved in car accidents.. !!!! if this can do this to you while driving like alcohol does.. which it goes !!! i think iy should be a top priority to police officers !!!!
Posted By:Vet 4 Pot at February 28, 2007 7:44 PM(Suggest Removal) It's almost comical how the people who oppose marijuana can't even type a full sentence without a typing error. I am a 23 year old who smokes regularly. I despise cigarettes and rarely drink acohol because both of them just make me sick and my body refuses them. I am also a veteran of this unjust war on the good people of Iraq. I served 11 months in Mosul Iraq (a very heavily hit city in northern Iraq)as a carpenter with the Maine National Gaurd and now I'm a disabled veteran. I now have a full-time job as a carpenter. I didn't stay in the military because it wasn't for me and I wasn't taking the chance of going back and serving in Bush's war.
Before I went to Iraq I had never picked up a musically instrument in my life, but now I play drums, bass, guitar and keyboards and I'm very dedicated and determined to become a musician. It's always been my dream since I was younger. It just goes to show how you can't just label someone "pothead" and assume they're useless and lazy. I know a lot more useless, lazy and ABUSIVE drunks!! Not to mention I've never in my lifetime heard of anyone dying where the number one cause was strictly smoking marijuana. My grandmother died when I was about 11 of alcohol abuse. It boggles my mind to think that a natural herb from God's green Earth is illegal, yet cigarettes and alcohol which kill millions each year is just fine and dandy. Whatever makes the government money...and thats wrong! What were the lawmakers thinking? Were they saying that the creators of the planet made a mistake??
“Holistic Approaches to Wellness for Cancer Patients, Survivors and Caregivers” is the subject of a six-part series being presented by The Patrick Dempsey Center for Cancer Hope and Healing in Bridgton beginning September 9.
“Holistic Approaches to Wellness for Cancer Patients, Survivors and
Caregivers” is the subject of a six-part series being presented by The
Patrick Dempsey Center for Cancer Hope and Healing in Rumford beginning
September 4.