Welcome Guest - Please Login | Subscribe |FAQ's | Why Register | Privacy Statement |
| Classifieds | Jobs | Cars | Real Estate | Directories | Yellow Pages+ | My Clips | 
     
 Today is September 08, 2008 Current Temperature: 62° in Lewiston, Maine 
Take our quiz


Printer Friendly Version      Email Story     Increase Text    Decrease Text
iPod Friendly
  Comments
'Oversight' leads to selectman's resignation

,
Saturday, April 12, 2008
PHOTO GALLERY
« Previous | Next »
thumbnails | gallery

ROXBURY - Selectmen Mark Touchette and Deborah DeRoche accepted the resignation Friday of the town's third and newly elected selectman, Christine "Tina" Howard.

They also accepted a petition that seeks to establish a 180-day moratorium on wind power developments to allow the town to research and create ordinances that would regulate such developments.

Both matters and others will be resolved at a special town meeting, possibly to be held mid-June.

Speaking Friday of Howard's resignation, Touchette said that when a majority of town meeting voters on March 3 elected Howard - the town's former town clerk, tax collector and treasurer - town officials weren't aware that such a move was illegal.

According to Maine law, a tax collector can't be elected as selectman or to any other elected position until the collector has completed his or her collection duties.

"Unfortunately, this could not have been done before the March 3 annual town meeting, because we had not elected a new tax collector at that time ... It was an honest oversight," Howard said, apologizing for any inconvenience the situation created.

Touchette and DeRoche voted to backdate Howard's resignation to March 3. Since then, Howard said she has completed the required documents and given them to selectmen so she can again seek election to the board.

Nomination papers will be available at the board meeting Thursday, April 24.

Touchette was then elected as chairman Friday, which became vacant with Howard's exit.

Regarding the three-page petition, based on legal advice, Touchette said the board had to accept it. However, he added, the petition doesn't demand a revote of the March 3 town meeting ordinance amendment vote that OK'd the creation of a wind farm district.

Essentially, the petition is a proposed land-use ordinance that seeks to ban wind power development in Roxbury as of March 3 until the town can create and adopt zoning and land-use ordinances.

It requires planners to regulate wind power development "to minimize its deleterious effects on public health, safety and welfare."

The petition also gives planners leeway to consider and recommend zones or districts in town where wind power development would be better suited.

It was drafted by a lawyer hired by the Concerned Citizens to Save Roxbury, people who didn't believe they were given an adequate opportunity to address negative aspects of wind towers at the town meeting. In one day, they collected 89 signatures and presented them to selectmen.

"We've also been advised to do a revote on the (March 3) ordinance, because there were a few gray areas involved," Touchette said. "We had a public informational meeting instead of a public hearing. It's not the way I want to do it, but that's what we've got to do ... What was in the past is in the past. It's just going to be a clean slate now. Hopefully, we can get started out on a new page."

He also told members of Concerned Citizens - several of whom attended Friday night's meeting - to convene informational meetings to make their arguments clear to townspeople prior to the special town meeting.

Group member Linda Kuras, who came to fight for the petition if necessary, was relieved by the board's action.

"I'm very pleased that the selectmen have decided to act on the petition," she said after the meeting adjourned.

CLICK HERE To Show/Hide Discussion Thread - (11 Comments)
Comments
Posted By:RoxburyPond at April 12, 2008 7:55 AM (Suggest Removal)
Are we also going to have a re-vote on the ambulance thing at this meeting? I hear that Rumford is out now, and Andover is definately out.

| Add your comments
Posted By:sup at April 12, 2008 8:06 AM (Suggest Removal)
I hope the citizens of Roxbury vote down the agreement with Med-care. At a time when the entire state is attempting to cut and the economy is questionable it seems that a NEW facility could wait for now. The service is second to none and I cant imagine coverage from another source. They have rocked the boat and it just might capsize if there not carefull.

| Add your comments
Posted By:Bangor at April 12, 2008 8:19 AM (Suggest Removal)
med-care is moving out of town.....pace is taking over....at a lower cost

| Add your comments
Posted By:RoxburyPond at April 12, 2008 10:18 AM (Suggest Removal)
I do buy it. Not the other ambulance service part, but the other stuff. There's a lot of talk about this and I think Roxbury would be wise to revote and get out now!

| Add your comments
Posted By:byron at April 12, 2008 11:48 AM (Suggest Removal)
Did I miss something? Med care is never mentioned in this article about Roxbury. Byron never voted on the med care issue, it was left off the town meeting warrant. It will be interesting to see how the re-vote on the wind turbines turns out in Roxbury.

| Add your comments
Posted By:RoxburyPond at April 12, 2008 1:19 PM (Suggest Removal)
You're right byron, I went a little off topic there. Just that last time I saw anything about a special town meeting it did include the ambulance service issue so I was wondering if it would be included in that meeting. I think it was in last week's paper. And I've heard so much scuttlebutt about it, its kind of a hot topic, know what I mean???

| Add your comments
Posted By:RoxburyPond at April 12, 2008 1:21 PM (Suggest Removal)
Oh yeah, it was in the Falls Times last week... Someone wanted to look at a revote on ambulance service along w/ this windmill issue. Who's Kevin Scott? And what sort of rude awakening are we talking about? Is MedCare going to sue Andover or something? These are the sort of things I wonder about? Why would MedCare want to sue a Town like that if it is the case? Would we have to worry about the same thing in Roxbury?

| Add your comments
Posted By:RoxburyPond at April 12, 2008 2:45 PM (Suggest Removal)
I guess you can't even ask a question in here. Jeeezzz... I think that its fantastic that these folks were honored. But the article also mentioned the windmills and I saw an article in last weeks Falls Times that said during that special town meeing there would also be a revote on the ambulance building. I didn't see anything that said MedCare was sueing anyone either, but I did see that they told Andover they owed a bunch of money to get out. I think one can see where I would deduce all of this. But if you want to dump on me, feel free. My apologies for even asking.

| Add your comments
Posted By:Facts at April 13, 2008 6:19 PM (Suggest Removal)
Some facts: Med-care is a non-profit organization. That is run by board members from all 11 towns. Also the 2. what ever million estimates to build the new building. The cost to taxpayers is going to be lower because of grants that Med-care should get. Another fact is that isn't it unfair to the other towns in the agreement to have to pay for the back bills of residents of towns that drop out of the agreement.

| Add your comments
Posted By:RoxburyPond at April 14, 2008 6:21 AM (Suggest Removal)
Why do I get the feeling that I am reading some sort of script?

| Add your comments
Posted By:RoxburyPond at April 14, 2008 6:25 AM (Suggest Removal)
Do other ambulance services that cover several towns like MedCare make the town with the offending citizen cover the cost when said citizen does not pay? From what I recall from that Andover article, that paying back was a small number compaired to the number they were looking at for what they owed on that building. Seems like it was close to $200K? Is that right? Anyway, I'll take your advise and start asking some questions, but not of my Rep. The way the answers above are so scripted, I get the feeling that I am chatting with a MedCare Rep now, or an employee. I'll be talking with other ambulance services and the citizens around town. It seems to me that if folks don't want this thing then it simply shouldn't be.

| Add your comments
Advertisement
John R. Hatzenbuehler, M.D.
a sports medicine specialist, has been named to the Central Maine Medical Center Medical Staff. He is practicing with Central Maine Sports Medicine in Lewiston.
read more >>
CMHVI Launching Chapter of Mended Hearts
a national non-profit organization that supports heart disease patients and their families through a visiting program and monthly meetings.
read more >>
“Cholesterol and Cardiac Scoring"
is the topic of a Central Maine Heart and Vascular Institute presentation set for September 15 at a Lewiston restaurant.
read more >>
Cancer Education Series in Rumford
“Holistic Approaches to Wellness for Cancer Patients, Survivors and Caregivers” is the subject of a six-part series being presented by The Patrick Dempsey Center for Cancer Hope and Healing in Rumford beginning September 4.
read more >>
Cancer Education Series in Bridgton
“Holistic Approaches to Wellness for Cancer Patients, Survivors and Caregivers” is the subject of a six-part series being presented by The Patrick Dempsey Center for Cancer Hope and Healing in Bridgton beginning September 9.
read more >>
Contents of this site © 2008 Sun Journal
| Forgot Password |Blog Policy | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Advertise With Us | Contact Us | About Us | Faq's | Help |