Welcome Guest - Please Login | Subscribe |FAQ's | Why Register | Privacy Statement |
| Classifieds | Jobs | Cars | Real Estate | Directories | Yellow Pages+ | My Clips | 
     
 Today is August 29, 2008 Current Temperature: 71° in Lewiston, Maine 
Take our quiz


Printer Friendly Version      Email Story     Increase Text    Decrease Text
iPod Friendly
  Comments
Indictment alleges sex at prison

,
Wednesday, July 16, 2008

MECHANIC FALLS - A prison guard from Mechanic Falls has been indicted on charges that he had sex with an inmate and that he failed to report another guard who did the same.

Glen Works, 45, was charged in the case nearly half a year after he came forward to alert prison investigators about illicit sex at the Maine Correctional Center in Windham.

Works was charged Friday with gross sexual assault and with two counts of failing to report the sexual assaults of persons in custody.

A guard at the Correctional Center for roughly two decades, he remains free awaiting arraignment on the charges.

Works was indicted the same day as Bradford Howard, 36, of Lyman, the second guard charged in the case that involves a note used to blackmail a guard, sex in a prison broom closet and a false report of pregnancy.

Howard has been charged with four counts of gross sexual assault. Prison officials said Howard resigned earlier in the year.

According to court records, the case began on Feb. 26, the day a prison investigator said he was first contacted by Works. In that phone conversation, Works told the investigator that he believed Howard was having sex with possibly two female inmates at the prison.

What follows in the court documents are revelations that two female prisoners had been fighting over their relationships with Howard and that one of the inmates had handed him a note claiming she might be pregnant.

The note, according to the affidavit, was later used by a third inmate to blackmail Howard and prevent him from moving another inmate away from her friends.

A prison investigator said in the court document that one of the inmates admitted to having sex with Howard on two occasions in a broom closet in a section of the prison known as C-Walk.

In the affidavit, investigator Peter Herring recounts how he later reviewed prison camera footage from around the times of the alleged sex acts.

In both instances, the document states, the female prisoner is seen following Howard toward an upstairs day room where the C-Walk broom closet is located. In both instances, the pair return less than an hour later and Howard enters an officer's bathroom.

The affidavit is dated April 17 when charges against Howard were first filed. Works is not implicated in that document. In fact, one of the prisoners interviewed is quoted as saying she believed Works may have known about Howard's indiscretions but that "he was not OK with it."

Works was indicted last week after prison officials presented their case against him to a grand jury in Cumberland County. The documents associated with that case have not been made available.

Prison officials have not said whether Works is accused of being sexually involved with the same inmates as Howard, although they have commented that the cases are connected.

Works resigned his position last week.

By Maine law, consensual sex between prison guards and inmates is considered gross sexual assault because guards have supervisory authority over the prisoners.

CLICK HERE To Show/Hide Discussion Thread - (20 Comments)
Comments
Posted By:PAUL at July 16, 2008 7:06 AM (Suggest Removal)
You know i hope they put this guy in Prison for 50 years. What a scum bag!1 People that get a job where they think they have some sort of authority always seem to abuse it deserve what they get when caught. I hate people like that

| Add your comments
Posted By:maggie at July 16, 2008 7:41 AM (Suggest Removal)
GET HIM A VASECTOMY TOO SO NO MORE BREEDING CAN OCCUR

| Add your comments
Posted By:Jamie at July 16, 2008 7:57 AM (Suggest Removal)
25 Years for murder and 50 years for having sex? Just dont seem right!!!

| Add your comments
Posted By:dan at July 16, 2008 8:33 AM (Suggest Removal)
last time i knew security guards did not have power. they just watch you after you get busted

| Add your comments
Posted By:ConcernedCommunityMember at July 16, 2008 8:39 AM (Suggest Removal)
This is pathetic! But so is the entire judicial system....

| Add your comments
Posted By:MikeD at July 16, 2008 10:02 AM (Suggest Removal)
Well justice is a funny thing.... If he is found guilty, he will have many years with Bubba reading him bed time stories, among other things :)

| Add your comments
Posted By:Car 2 at July 16, 2008 1:14 PM (Suggest Removal)
What a mess! Not only should this be a crime because guards have supervisory authority over inmates, HOW ABOUT held to a higher standard????? The nincompoop who signed the job offer to these "correctional officers" should be examined. Is the only stipulation to employment is that you possess a valid driver's license??? Perhaps I just discovered the key in getting a state government job. Mr. Governor..........

| Add your comments
Posted By:Heather C at July 16, 2008 2:33 PM (Suggest Removal)
"The nincompoop who signed the job offer to these "correctional officers" should be examined." Is that to say that anyone who hires someone shall be examined if that person turns out to be a bad seed?

| Add your comments
Posted By:Car 2 at July 16, 2008 4:08 PM (Suggest Removal)
NO- just anyone hiring people who should be held to a higher standard. A lot more goes into hiring law enforcement personnel than hiring at KFC. Just like our children's schools. Hire to a higher standard. Simple........

| Add your comments
Posted By:just kidding at July 16, 2008 7:08 PM (Suggest Removal)
WHO REALLY GIVES A SH*T! People are murdering people in prison, on the streets, Babys getting raped and murdered, THis country is pretty god damn messed up. And to the idiot who thinks 50 years is a just punishment, A child can be killed and still the accused will only see 14 years, cut a third off for good behavior and hes out, and you want 50 years for this guy who got laid? I'm suprised you can even read the paper jackass

| Add your comments
Posted By:A Correctional Officer at July 16, 2008 7:11 PM (Suggest Removal)
Let me tell you about how we get hired. 1-An indepth background check. 2-A Psychological exam that takes 4 to 7 hours. 3- a 3 to 5 hour lie detector test. People make mistakes. I have known some officers who have been tempted by females before. Some people are not as strong minded as others. Just keep in mind, Correctional Officers, Police Officers, we are all still people who makes mistakes.This particular Officer did not use his power over the inmate to get her to comply. She consented.

| Add your comments
Posted By:Tepgunset at July 16, 2008 7:29 PM (Suggest Removal)
She's locked up, he's free and wears a badge to show he is in authority over her and other inmates. THAT is NOT consensual sex! That is sex under duress!! If I were to lock my wife up in our bedroom because I was horney but she was not...told her until I got laid that she couldn't leave...she then complied w/ my demands...THAT constitutes rape you idiot! Not consensual sex!!! I most definitely could be prosecuted for that crime!!! Sex under duress is not consensual sex... Perhaps you need to rethink your job profession. Or at least maybe your boss might need to rethink having you as a "correctional officer". You sound as though you justify his and all other male correctional officers actions who are "tempted" by female inmates. What bothers me about your attitude in this is that the last time I checked, we lowly civilians have one hellova time prosecuting those in authority, those who wear a badge (yes I am talking about cops and correctional officers). Consented?!?!...Give me a god damn break. ~T~

| Add your comments
Posted By:A Corrections Officer at July 16, 2008 7:52 PM (Suggest Removal)
You dont have a clue. First off, i do NOT feel thathe made the right decision Second, he held nothing over her...if you told your story knowing the facts it would have been...there was a ladythatgot locked in your basement. she was horny, there were noother guys guysaround to screw. So she decided to havesex with a guy who was stupid enough to say yes.he never said "you canleave only after youhave sex with me." My boss wouldnever think of getting rid of me because i judge people, i learn the facts so that i dont make a fool of my self like you did. Lastly, its not just males. An officer that worked at my jail was cought messing around with inmates. And the officer was a FEMALE. open your eyes. learn the facts.

| Add your comments
Posted By:A Corrections Officer at July 16, 2008 7:57 PM (Suggest Removal)
To correct my error, i ment "before i judge people, I learn the facts."

| Add your comments
Posted By:Tepgunset at July 16, 2008 9:01 PM (Suggest Removal)
Make a fool of myself? LOL... Why...because I know the difference between when someone has consensual sex or sex under duress? Because I know when I see a person use their power over another person to gain the upper hand?? After listening to you a 2nd time...scuze me...a 3rd time...I basically have proven my point about some people should not wear a badge...let alone allow them to be in a position where they have power over other people. I was using a hypothetical situation as an example to show you a difference...never said THAT'S what she said you putz! Maybe you are tooooooo close to this problem. I commented on the problem in relation to the story and then in response to something you said that, to me, sounded as though you are defending someone who works in your own field. Perhaps you need to open YOUR eyes and actually attempt to read what I wrote rather than continue to show what a biased idiot you truly are.!!! LOLOLOLOL ~T~

| Add your comments
Posted By:A Corrections Officer at July 16, 2008 10:15 PM (Suggest Removal)
Funny how all some people want to do is fight on the keyboard. Call people names... kind of like being back in high school. Believe what you want, it makes no difference to me. Just know that there are always 2 sides of the story. And normaly, the news only shows 1 side to the story. Just keep that in mind. I do agree that when people use their power to get sex out of someone is bad. But I dont believe that is the case MOST of the time in the jails. One of our officers went off and married a former inmate of our jail. Do you think she was made to do that. And if they had sex...was it not consentual? People still have attractions towards other people, in jail or not. Just some food for thought.

| Add your comments
Posted By:23 yr. employee at July 17, 2008 8:35 AM (Suggest Removal)
To A Correctional Officer - you should not be in this job!! You give all if us who work in this field a bad name!!! Listen IDIOT - the LAW doesn't allow consent!! What don’t you get about that!! I know you are trained every year on PREA so maybe you need more training. You and your co-workers with the same mentality should spend $100 on the street getting sex and save the rest of us the embarrassment of knowing you!!!

| Add your comments
Posted By:A Corrections Officer at July 17, 2008 8:17 PM (Suggest Removal)
Not trying to say i agree with it. People are trying to make him look like a monster who deserve a long jail sentance. Alli was trying to say is that there are 2 sides to every story.YES what he did was wrong... but i still want to know the facts before i pass judgement, unlike most of you.

| Add your comments
Posted By:23 yr. employee at July 18, 2008 12:27 PM (Suggest Removal)
Re-reading your postings is absolutely horrifying!! I can't believe you would even say the things that you did - you've minimized this serious crime as well as make excuses about some being attracted to others in or out of jail!!! PLEASE, PLEASE seek help with EAP because you are headed down the wrong path and it will be you in the paper soon!! You claim 2 sides to every story but here you defend these actions without knowing both sides either. The fact that a Grand Jury handed down an indictment speaks volumes. But this won't go to trial - mark my words, the officers will take a plea deal because the evidence is insurmountable!! Good luck to you - you are going to need it. I've seen it happen time and time again. But if you remember one thing you will be ok - it's very simple and not confusing at all. Ready? ...DON'T HAVE SEX WITH INMATES - IT'S A CRIME!!!

| Add your comments
Posted By:A Corrections Officer at July 19, 2008 12:10 AM (Suggest Removal)
I would never even think of touching an inmate. My point i was trying to make is that this man screwed up. He does not deserve 50 years like someone mentioned. Its not like he is a skinner. I am sure the evidence shows that he violated the law. Like the female officer that got fired from my jail, and charged. She was giving B.J.'s to her ex-boyfriend (or close friend, or someone she knew from the outside), who was an inmate. Yes, she violated the law...but its not to the extent of rape. I know some of the things i have said have not sounded right, because i am trying to make my point in only a few sentenances. Trust me, there is nothing to worry about with me ever even thinking of touching an inmate....ever! Good luck to you 23 yr employee, and stay safe.

| Add your comments
Advertisement
CMMC College of Nursing and Health Professions
will offer five general education courses during its fall session.
read more >>
Cancer Education Series in Bridgton
“Holistic Approaches to Wellness for Cancer Patients, Survivors and Caregivers” is the subject of a six-part series being presented by The Patrick Dempsey Center for Cancer Hope and Healing in Bridgton beginning September 9.
read more >>
Cancer Education Series in Rumford
“Holistic Approaches to Wellness for Cancer Patients, Survivors and Caregivers” is the subject of a six-part series being presented by The Patrick Dempsey Center for Cancer Hope and Healing in Rumford beginning September 4.
read more >>
Contents of this site © 2008 Sun Journal
| Forgot Password |Blog Policy | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Advertise With Us | Contact Us | About Us | Faq's | Help |