Welcome Guest - Please Login | Subscribe |FAQ's | Why Register | Privacy Statement |
| Classifieds | Jobs | Cars | Real Estate | Directories | Yellow Pages+ | My Clips | 
     
 Today is December 01, 2008 Current Temperature: 36° in Lewiston, Maine 


Printer Friendly Version      Email Story     Increase Text    Decrease Text
iPod Friendly
  Comments
State seizes 46 dogs in New Portland

,
Tuesday, July 22, 2008
PHOTO GALLERY
« Previous | Next »
thumbnails | gallery

The state has taken 46 dogs from two New Portland houses where officials said they were found malnourished, covered in feces and living in cages.

"It was a disaster," said Norma Worley, director of the state's Animal Welfare Program.

The dogs, mostly medium-sized mixed breeds, were discovered last week after officials received an anonymous complaint. They were found in a pair of homes owned by relatives. The dogs' former owner had moved in October and had given them to a caretaker.

Worley said the animals were also likely living in poor conditions before the caretaker became responsible for them.

"This was a long-term situation," she said. "It didn't happen overnight."

Worley declined to release the caretaker's name, saying the state is considering animal cruelty charges. The dogs - 45 adults and one puppy - were surrendered to the state and sent to shelters on Friday.

The Greater Androscoggin Humane Society in Lewiston is caring for 29 of the dogs. The Kennebec Valley Humane Society in Augusta is caring for eight and the Humane Society-Waterville Area has nine.

"They're much better than they were," said Melissa Hewins, senior technician at the Kennebec Valley Humane Society. "They were pretty excited to get some TLC."

The 46 dogs were matted with feces and suffering from a range of problems, including worms, fleas and mange. The three shelters are cleaning the dogs and assessing them for health and behavioral problems.

All of the dogs will likely be put up for adoption. Some could be ready for new homes in a week or two.

"With love and care, I think they'll be able to turn right around," said Steven Dostie, executive director of the Greater Androscoggin Humane Society.

CLICK HERE To Show/Hide Discussion Thread - (31 Comments)
Comments
Posted By:m at July 22, 2008 6:57 AM (Suggest Removal)
Stories like this make me sick at heart. Thank you to the people caring for these dogs! I have a shelter dog and he is WONDERFUL. I hope they all find good homes.

| Add your comments
Posted By:PAUL at July 22, 2008 7:16 AM (Suggest Removal)
And sick it should, i hope they people fry. How can anyone hurt aan animal is beyond me. Thanks Androscoggin for jumping in and rescuing these find little friends. A donation is one your way this season, for all that you guys do for our helpless. People who treat animals bad and dont take care of them make me sick

| Add your comments
Posted By:don at July 22, 2008 8:13 AM (Suggest Removal)
And fry they should. Thing is, more often than not, cases involving animal abuse and neglect at best amount to a slap on the wrist. Maine enacted some sort of law regarding animal abuse, making it a more serious offense, time will tell if the punishment is consistently carried out.

| Add your comments
Posted By:next door at July 22, 2008 8:35 AM (Suggest Removal)
thank god these poor dogs have been saved! maine is horribly lax on these byb's and puppy mill people; just look at uncle henry's pet classifieds and it is crammed with ads for pups which have not been health tested, from parents who should never have been bred in the first place! with everyone in maine struggling to make ends meet; many are turning to home breeding to pick up a few bucks and the results are devastating! please don't buy your pet from a pet store and do investigate private breeders before you purchase your next puppy. the best choice is a rescue or shelter; these dogs are desperate for loving homes!

| Add your comments
Posted By:Heather C at July 22, 2008 8:45 AM (Suggest Removal)
Even though this particular article doesn't indicate a puppy mill it is very sad that people are so irresponsible. They are unconsciously incompetent. Below is a link for people who don’t know about puppy mills. It is informative and sad http://www.stoppuppymills.org/inside_a_puppy_mill.html

| Add your comments
Posted By:E at July 22, 2008 8:46 AM (Suggest Removal)
Put these people in a cage barely big enough for them to lie down, barely feed and water them and let them lie in there own excrement and urine for a couple of months then put them in a regular jail.

| Add your comments
Posted By:Linda at July 22, 2008 9:39 AM (Suggest Removal)
This is why our support of the adopt plate program is so important. It will benefit the Animal Welfare Program, including HELP FIX ME (spay/neuter program). They need to pre-sell 2000 before they can bring this plate to legislature. These agencies work tirelessly rescuing pets in Maine and with little resources. See Planetdog.com for more info.

| Add your comments
Posted By:Larry at July 22, 2008 9:57 AM (Suggest Removal)
I can see most people don't understand what really happened in this case. The dogs were surrended not seized. If they were seized they wouldn't be up for adoption in just two weeks. Don't be so quick to judge others. Here is a link it some information about what is going on in Maine http://www.rao-of-me.com/

| Add your comments
Posted By:Gene at July 22, 2008 10:25 AM (Suggest Removal)
Animal abuse is very often discarded with little more then a small fine, maybe an order to not own another pet. it doesn't appear to be taken seriously enough. Sometimes the abuse is severe. Personal opinion---if they can hurt a living creature, they can hurt YOU or your loved ones. How tragic when the animal only wants its pwners love and to return it two-fold.

| Add your comments
Posted By:next door at July 22, 2008 10:28 AM (Suggest Removal)
larry, its true the details are not provided in the article; but the article does say: 'the 46 dogs were matted with feces and suffering from a range of problems, including worms, fleas and mange.' these doggies don't care about the technicalities of their rescue and no dogs should have to suffer this way. whatever human intentions behind this tale; hoarding, byb/puppymill, or ignorance..are irrelevant; we are just thankful for the authorities intervention!

| Add your comments
Posted By:next door at July 22, 2008 10:34 AM (Suggest Removal)
just went to look at your link larry and it is abominable!! if you are a reputable breeder, you should have nothing to fear from an inspection! nor should you oppose animal control removing a distressed animal from an overheated car! what a crumb bum you are..worried about your rights being violated? hogwash. you're worried to let somebody inside to see how you turn puppies into dollar bills. shame on you!

| Add your comments
Posted By:Dawn at July 22, 2008 10:35 AM (Suggest Removal)
This story makes me sick. I have had a dog and a cat from the animal shelter. They are the most loving pets I have had. I hate see people use animals to make money(puppy mills). People shouldn't be able to get pets if they can't give them a good home, TLC, etc. It doesn't just happen to dogs and cats. When you go to the shelter you have to fill out papers to see if you can give the pet a good home or not. I think pet shops should be band from all states.

| Add your comments
Posted By:Larry at July 22, 2008 10:44 AM (Suggest Removal)
I can see you didn't really look over the site. You read one thing on the first page and you didn't read it all the way through. I'm not against someone removing a pet from a hot car I'm against the agenda behind it and you would have know that had you bothered to read the rest of the site. You need to get involved with the legislative process so you can see how they slipped the criminal part into that bill. Have they advertised to the general public that if they take their pet with them and stop at the store they could lose their pet and be labled a criminal? So you think anyone that doesn't agree with your animal rights mind set is automatically a breeder? And to the person that agreed the aticle didn't say the dogs were surendered,if the article was wrong on that why should we believe any of the info. Remember AW doesn't get as many donations if the story isn't sensationalized. Not as many people would dig deep in their pocket if the article said "owners realized they were overwhelmed" and thought they had to have a vender's license just to advertise the dogs for free. I'm glad the dogs are getting the help to find new homes but we as a public should think before we condem.

| Add your comments
Posted By:Gene at July 22, 2008 11:05 AM (Suggest Removal)
maybe I read something incorrectly but i took it that the owner had left and left the dogs to relatives?! no excuse the relatives could have done something! Also this breeding stuff being blogged about...the article clearly states they were mixed breeds! Puppy mills are a horrible thing, but I personaly don't read this article as having been a puppy mill

| Add your comments
Posted By:next door at July 22, 2008 11:14 AM (Suggest Removal)
ok larry, call these people 'overwhelmed'. 46 dogs don't appear overnight; surely anyone with a microspeck of common sense would be 'overwhelmed' with only a few puppies to care for. i have one puppy now and can assure you that she alone is exhausting! the appaulling condition of these dogs speaks for itself; i could care less about the owner's motivations. take a look at the color of the water in the sink where one of the doggies is being washed and ask yourself what difference it makes why these dogs were so neglected. i saw enough at your website to see that you are not concerned about dogs being mistreated and abused; but about keeping animal control from simple look-sees; what are you afraid of? let them look if you take such good care of your dogs. thank you animal control for saving these pups.

| Add your comments
Posted By:JW at July 22, 2008 12:36 PM (Suggest Removal)
Thank you to all the rescue organizations who are taking in these dogs. To all you who are as appalled about this as I am, please send a donation to Androscoggin Humane Society or one of the other rescue organizations taking these dogs in. Even small amounts add up and are much appreciated. These shelters are staffed by volunteers and run on shoestring budgets, so they need all the help they can get, especially when large numbers of dogs come in like this. You can do to the Androscoggin website gahumane.org and donate by Pay Pal.

| Add your comments
Posted By:Bruce at July 22, 2008 12:49 PM (Suggest Removal)
If only we cared as much about child neglect

| Add your comments
Posted By:JW at July 22, 2008 1:11 PM (Suggest Removal)
Bruce, we DO care about child neglect, but this article is about dog neglect.

| Add your comments
Posted By:WARD at July 22, 2008 3:18 PM (Suggest Removal)
Yes do look at the water in the sink it is mostly yellow,the color of sulfur dip that is used for mites. So what is your point? You have a one track mind and no one is going to derail it even if you are hit by the train. I have done rescue for years,spending my own money to treat and place dogs. Next door when was the last time you used your own money vet,treat and to drive a dog 400 miles to it's new home? Spending your own money for the gas? I suspect NEVER!!!!

| Add your comments
Posted By:WARD at July 22, 2008 3:27 PM (Suggest Removal)
JW if these shelters run on shoestring budgets why was it the the Waterville shelter lost $16,000 out of the cash draw and didn't even know it until they were audited?

| Add your comments
Posted By:MRC at July 22, 2008 4:50 PM (Suggest Removal)
I love how Oprah does a puppy mill story and then all of the sudden everyone is "in the know". Some people are just backwoods slobs with no regard for self-dignity or hygiene. Not only is this cruel to the dogs (in no indication a puppy-mill), but it poses a major health risk to people in the area as these dogs could become major vectors for zoonotic diseases in that type of squalor.

| Add your comments
Posted By:gunslinger at July 22, 2008 5:02 PM (Suggest Removal)
hm... we could feed them to the snakes?

| Add your comments
Posted By:J. at July 22, 2008 7:37 PM (Suggest Removal)
"you are not concerned about dogs being mistreated and abused; but about keeping animal control from simple look-sees" Excuse me, it's not about trying to hide anything. It has to do with the US constitution and the Maine constitution. You are not entitled to a look see unless you have probable cause. I don't breed and have nothing to sell and therefore have nothing to hide. But I still don't want you or anyone else coming on my property for a look see.

| Add your comments
Posted By:B at July 22, 2008 8:23 PM (Suggest Removal)
gunslinger your sick

| Add your comments
Posted By:ws at July 22, 2008 10:14 PM (Suggest Removal)
larry i was there you have no idea what youre talking about.

| Add your comments
Posted By:Larry at July 22, 2008 10:36 PM (Suggest Removal)
Oh but I do know. I know the aniamls were signed over not seized. Even if it was a mess the people got overwhelmed and did the right thing by signing them over. But that isn't good enough, now they want to prosecute. What happened to the deal AW made with these people? Why is an open case being leaked to the press? Glory of NJW or a money making proposition? Or both?

| Add your comments
Posted By:Jay at July 23, 2008 7:40 AM (Suggest Removal)
I called it in to Animal Welfare. I live on the road and drive/walk by the house everyday. Larry obviously don't know much of anything...the dogs were seized. The smell was horrendous. We thought it was from all the cats outside, but occasionally over the past several months we would hear a dog bark from inside the house (the one where no one was living). Never more than one, and I've only ever seen one dog outside, once. After talking to the local ACO, I was told that there were 12 dogs being kept in the uninhabited house and that they had probably never seen the light of day, but they were being fed by the relatives across the street. That's when I knew something had to be done. I'm glad I did, I just wish I had done it sooner. Luckily, it looks like they will all survive, and hopefully they will all find good homes. No mention of the cats though, there had to be almost as many between the two homes. Shelter/rescue animals make wonderful pets. Both of my dogs are rescues and they are the most loyal, loving companions one could ask for.

| Add your comments
Posted By:JW at July 23, 2008 9:38 AM (Suggest Removal)
ok Larry, Technically you are correct. They were surrendered, but not til AFTER they were siezed. The owners don't want the dogs and won't fight to keep them, so they signed them over to the authorities. If they are such good people and just overwhelmed, why didn't they contact the authorities themselves?

| Add your comments
Posted By:Larry at July 23, 2008 11:57 AM (Suggest Removal)
Maybe like so many other they were afraid to call. After all NJW just proved what people have been saying all along. That AWD can not be trusted. They surrended the dogs and now NJW wants to punish them. Cases like this and with these results will just push people further underground. I know much more about this situaton but I'm not going to reveal it on an open blog. I will say AW broke their agreement with these people.

| Add your comments
Posted By:Larry at July 23, 2008 12:04 PM (Suggest Removal)
Ok Jay you just proved my point. If the animals were seized then why were the cats left behind? When AW seizes someones animals they take them all not just a few. It is true that some shelter aniomals make great pets but just as many don't.

| Add your comments
Posted By:ralph at July 23, 2008 1:00 PM (Suggest Removal)
Larry, the site you recommended is an example of people who care more about themselves than their animals. What is wrong with the bill LD2010? Most of the articles on that site are fabrications by a very sick person. Since when are all the vets wrong? Sounds like this person has a personality disorter. If she was really innocent why did she not persue her conviction to the highest court? She has been in the courts all the way to US District Court of Columbia trying to sue every judge who has disagreed with her. They in turn dismissed as the presiding court is the District of Maine. Oh, and about all that money she claims to have why is she filing all her claims in forma pauperis. Who do you think pays for all the paper work to be filed and US Marshals to serve summons. I know its the tax payers who could use their money for something better than false claims.

| Add your comments
Advertisement
“Paint Your Heart Out: Embracing Art and Healing”
a collection of watercolor paintings, will be exhibited at the Central Maine Medical Center Rotating Art Gallery from November 7 through December 1.
read more >>
Central Maine Obstetrics-Gynecology
is the first Midwifery Service in Maine and only the second in New England to be recognized by the American College of Nurse-Midwives with its Golden “With Women for a Lifetime” Commendation.
read more >>
Deborah Taylor
associate director of the Central Maine Medical Center Family Medicine Residency Program, has been elected to the Society of Teachers of Family Medicine (STFM) Board of Directors.
read more >>
Erwey A. Teng, M.D.
a pulmonologist and intensivist, has been elected to the Central Maine Medical Center Medical Staff. He is practicing with Pulmonary and Critical Care Associates in Lewiston.
read more >>
Medicare Program
Central Maine Medical Center and SeniorsPlus will offer individual counseling for seniors who want to review their Medicare drug coverage for 2009.
read more >>
Contents of this site © 2008 Sun Journal
| Forgot Password |Blog Policy | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Advertise With Us | Contact Us | About Us | Faq's | Help |