USM won't pay rain fee
By Scott Taylor
,
Staff Writer
Wednesday, July 23, 2008
LEWISTON - Barring a court decision or a change in state rules, officials from the University Southern Maine don't plan to pay the city's storm-water utility fee.
"We don't believe that state statutes allow the city to charge this storm-water assessment," said Kelley Wiltbank, an attorney for the University of Maine system.
According to the city, the University of Southern Maine's Lewiston-Auburn College owes $8,725 in delinquent storm-water fees for properties at 61 and 51 Westminster St.
That's a portion of the $113,299 in outstanding rain taxes that the city says it is owed. The city lists 419 accounts with unpaid balances, including 233 single-family homes and 147 larger buildings.
City Administrator James Bennett told councilors last week that the city cannot force property owners to pay the fee, but it can take them to court. If the court found in favor of the city, defendants likely would be forced to pay court costs as well, he said.
Bennett said he expects the city to take at least one delinquent property owner to court this year.
Wiltbank said that's what it would take for USM to pay.
"We are tax-exempt," he said. "They can charge service fees, but for someone in our category, they can only assess them on residential properties that are not dormitories. And we don't have anything like that."
Wiltbank said the college simply does not plan to pay the fee.
"They can't even charge it to us," he said. "And until the statutes get modified in some fashion or until the law in Maine says otherwise, we don't believe they have the authority to do what they are doing."
Bennett said Tuesday he's confident the city's fee is valid and legal. "We spent a lot of time working on this and investigating all of the legal angles," Bennett said. "It's not something that was done without deliberate consideration."
The city adopted the storm water utility fee - dubbed a rain tax by many - in 2005 to pay for culvert maintenance, street-sweeping and storm sewer-line projects. It's based on the amount of hard surface on each property, including roofs, sidewalks, parking lots and driveways.
Single-family homes pay $40 per year, duplexes $45 per year. All others, including businesses, churches and nonprofits, pay 4.4 cents per square foot.
"One premise of this is that it is not a tax - it's a utility fee," Bennett said. "The college pays utility fees now, for water and sewer. This is no different."
Bennett said the City Council is scheduled to hear an appeal from Pepperell Mill owner Bob Gladu on his fees in August. Gladu, as Pepperell Associates, owes $41,675.47 for back storm water fees on the mill buildings at the corner of Lisbon Street and Adams Avenue, according to the city.
"We are waiting on further collection activity until after that appeal," Bennett said. "Once the council makes a decision, we'll give the other people on the list some time to settle their bill, then we'll move forward."
The college is not the only property owner on the list refusing to pay. Donald Dufour, who owns a storage facility at 6 Fireslate Place, owes the city $3,084 in back fees, according to the city.
"I don't think it's right, not at all," he said. He argues that his property doesn't have storm drains nearby and he shouldn't be required to pay.
"As soon as they put storm drains in my road, that's the day I'll start paying this fee," he said. "So they can go ahead and take me to court. I want a judge to look at this and see where this storm water is really going."
But Augusta attorney Alonzo Garcelon said he was unaware he was in arrears on three properties he owns along Sabattus Street. He tried to pay it over the phone Monday afternoon, and planned to pay what he owed by Tuesday.
According to the city, Garcelon owes $7,943.34 for the lots between East Avenue and Spofford Street on Sabattus Street.
"I'm not thrilled to find this out, but if this is my share, that's it," he said. "I'll pay it. It's as simple as that."
Garcelon said he must have missed seeing the city's notices.
"I'm sure they tried to contact me," he said. "But I get a lot of letters from the city, and most them are notices that someone nearby is building a home or something like that. So, I'm sure I just missed it." Unpaid storm-water utility fees
Top 10 delinquent accounts
1. Pepperell Associates: $41,675
2. USM's Lewiston-Auburn College: $8,725
3. Alonzo Garcelon: $7,943
4. Howard D. Johnson Corp.: $6,490
5. Merrill Road Self Storage: $4,723
6. DFS Jr. Incorporated: $4,039
7. Pleasant St. Plaza Mall: $3,904
8. Donald P. Dufour: $3,084
9. Caleb Maine Devel. Corp.: $2,620
10. River Valley Village Assoc.: $2,236
Source: City of Lewiston |
CLICK HERE To Show/Hide Discussion Thread - (32 Comments)
Comments
 |
Posted By:JM at July 23, 2008 6:34 AM (Suggest Removal) THIS HAS TO BE THE DUMBEST THING LEWISTON HAS YET TO DO, TAX RAIN. WHATS NEXT? A CLOUD TAX? TREE TAX?
| Add your comments
|
Posted By:ROCKO at July 23, 2008 6:45 AM (Suggest Removal) I could not agree more the city can GIVE away the Colisa (spelling is wrong)yet they continue to charge stupid fees for something like this! LA its happening ! Really where ?????????????
| Add your comments
|
Posted By:Dr. Hassan Bin Sobah at July 23, 2008 6:45 AM (Suggest Removal) This tax was designed by former Councilor Mark Paradis as a way to "get at" the high paid executives at CMMC, St. Marys and Bates College. They are getting paid exorbitant salaries and the old Lewiston City Council came up with this scheme to get them to pay their "fair share." The scheme takes the pressure off the homeowner, to some extent, and starts tapping the non-profits and commercial property owners. We all know that businesses have a vault full of gold in the basement that they can go to and get cash any time they need it, right? That is the standard fiberal thought process. I really don't have too much sympathy for the highly paid execs at the hospitals or over at Bates (the President pulls down over $300 grand a year), but this will be an interesting court case.
| Add your comments
|
Posted By:Not-So-Freshman Ryan at July 23, 2008 6:51 AM (Suggest Removal) You're right "DUMB," this was terrible. It lowered taxes for most people by forcing non-profits who don't pay property taxes, like USM, Bates, and the hospitals, to pay more of their share of the bill.
| Add your comments
|
Posted By:bill at July 23, 2008 7:29 AM (Suggest Removal) Pay up sucker! Stop living off the hard working home owners that pay through the nose for everything you "others" feel is an entittlement.
| Add your comments
|
Posted By:Just a thought at July 23, 2008 7:35 AM (Suggest Removal) As expensive as it is to live in Maine to begin with, like the citizens of Lewiston need another tax!!! In todays tight economy, you would think they would do away with this ridiculous tax, people are having a hard time paying the gas to put in their car to get to work to be able to put food on the table...let alone affording any luxuries!
| Add your comments
|
Posted By:bill at July 23, 2008 7:45 AM (Suggest Removal) M. - Without the rain tax for all property (non-profits included) owners the home owners would pay much much more. This isn't something Lewiston thought up just to make money. This is something they needed to do to take care of a mandate passed on to them either by the state or feds. Talk with Jim B. and he will explain it to you. It actually was a smart move! As for USM, they charge all kinds of fees including a parking fee. I used to take course for my own enjoyment of learning and I paid for these course all by myself. The fees have gotten so crazy I stopped taking courses. (USM wonders why enrollment went down) I already have three college degrees (paid every cent myself) and find USM- Lewiston courses not up to "my" standards and prefer going to CMCC.
| Add your comments
|
Posted By:citizen at July 23, 2008 7:48 AM (Suggest Removal) Good for them. Everytime I turn around, my taxes go up and I'm paying a new fee for something. And for what? Let's cut back on our "social services" and supporting the bums and lowlifes downtown who refuse to work.
| Add your comments
|
Posted By:Frank at July 23, 2008 7:57 AM (Suggest Removal) The tax was Bennett's idea to plug a $1.7 million budget revenue gap to make up for the pre-budget amount he thought he would get from the Casella deal.
| Add your comments
|
Posted By:justin at July 23, 2008 8:10 AM (Suggest Removal) I having a feeling this will end up in federal court. Non-profits have a point. I agree that Hospitals and places that say they are non-profit (who really are for profit) should pay. But I think the city is pushing the legal limits to tax people they know they can't constitutionaly tax under normal tax codes.
| Add your comments
|
Posted By:Lew. Taxpayer at July 23, 2008 8:43 AM (Suggest Removal) First off this is not a "tax" it is a fee. The feds and state have enacted all sorts of mandates but do not fund them. The city is requires to start separating storm runoff from sewerage water. This is very costly as new pipes and systems have to be installed. If this fee was discontinued than the homeowner,me included, would pay 5 times the $40 fee that I have paid. The PUC which regulates water and sewerage fees as well as electricty, telephone, and other utilities do not allow local governaments to raise their rates other than to pay the current costs. In other words, they can not start a bank account to start SAVING money to pay for all of this work. The city would have to bond that means borrow money to pay for this work. Stop and think about the amount of land that these top 10 own and most do not pay one penney of property taxes. What would your opinion be if they were to say we will not longer pay our water and sewerage bills as we are nonprofit? Can you imagine how much water the two hospitals and Bates College use?? Should that cost be passed on to the local taxpayer?? Gee I also wonder what would happen if the city decided to reject and not assist these nonprofits when they need something from the city!!!!!!!!!
| Add your comments
|
Posted By:Matt at July 23, 2008 8:46 AM (Suggest Removal) The hospitals and Bates can and should pay their fair share. The City was smart to roll this out, but they should never have called it the "rain tax". The $40 for each homeowner would have been a much larger amount if they had simply had to raise property taxes. At least this way the so-called non-profits pay something!
| Add your comments
|
Posted By:Robert61 at July 23, 2008 9:00 AM (Suggest Removal) The city never called it a rain tax, the opponents to the plan were the ones who came up with that name. It is a federal mandate that we do not have a choice on. The city could either charge a fee to all USERS of the system or increase property taxes to only those who currently pay taxes.
| Add your comments
|
Posted By:bill at July 23, 2008 9:40 AM (Suggest Removal) Put the screws to the top ten Lewiston! Once they see you mean business others will gladly pay up.
| Add your comments
|
Posted By:Jeff at July 23, 2008 9:46 AM (Suggest Removal) I have agreed with the rain fee since Day 1, because it forces the colleges, Hospitals, Church's to pay. If it hadn't been for this fee, most water users(Lewiston residents) would pay more for their water, or a $100 a year more on their property taxes.
| Add your comments
|
Posted By:BEN HARRISON at July 23, 2008 9:47 AM (Suggest Removal) The city never called it a rain tax, The official name is storm-water utility fee what's the difference a tax by anyother name is still a tax, The city did not lower anyone's taxes Tryng to trick the hospitals colleges ect into paying storm-water utility fee as a way to tax tax-exept's is a load and it just shows how foolish the last coucil was. If USM and others challenge this and win the city could be forced to return all the money they have collected from these non-profits
I hope the city dident spend that money already!!!!
| Add your comments
|
Posted By:just a thought at July 23, 2008 10:03 AM (Suggest Removal) it is not a tax it is a utility fee and this is another case of business taking advantage of the residents. And yes USM is a business. The residents near any one of the businesses list above should stop patronizing them for one reason only...they don't pay.
| Add your comments
|
Posted By:horsefeathers at July 23, 2008 10:07 AM (Suggest Removal) Send the rain tax bill to GOD....The storm water fee is nothing more than another tax. The real chuckle is that the USM, another "sacred cow", calls themselves exempt status as a state agency.... albeit one with multi million dollar endowments. Next thing we will be told is that 'wards of the state' are tax exempt for the rest of their lives.
| Add your comments
|
Posted By:Lew. Taxpayer at July 23, 2008 10:50 AM (Suggest Removal) If the USM, Bates and the hospitals are tax exempt, do they pay excise tax and registration fees on the motor vehicles that they use??
| Add your comments
|
Posted By:Robert61 at July 23, 2008 12:03 PM (Suggest Removal) Their vehicles are registered.
| Add your comments
|
Posted By:Hymn at July 23, 2008 2:49 PM (Suggest Removal) Horsefeathers..
Thats a good angle.. Wards of the state not needing to pay the rain fee.
| Add your comments
|
Posted By:Lew. Taxpayer at July 23, 2008 3:28 PM (Suggest Removal) Robert61, I know that the vehicles are registered. I have seen the plates on them. The question is Do they pay the excise tax and registration fee??
| Add your comments
|
Posted By:Matt at July 23, 2008 3:44 PM (Suggest Removal) If they don't want to pay, then the city should charge them every time they plow their street, fill a pothole, or send a police car or firetruck to any of these non-profits.
| Add your comments
|
Posted By:007 at July 23, 2008 4:31 PM (Suggest Removal) where does Auburns' rain water go?
They don't have a f'n rain water runoff fee!!!!If the state and fed are requiring this rainwater/sewer separation how is Auburn doing it....Lisbon,Sabattus,Greene,doing it? Is there storm water running down hill to lewiston? If it is we should be charging those towns for what the the citizens of Lewiston are paying. WHY IS ONLY LEWISTON THE ONLY F'N CITY IN THIS STATE PAYING THIS BULLSH@T FEE?
| Add your comments
|
Posted By:1adam12 at July 23, 2008 4:58 PM (Suggest Removal) hey matt, things were going just great for thousands of years without this STUPID rain tax, let the fat ass politicians stop stuffing their pockets, then the little guy would catch a break.
| Add your comments
|
Posted By:ROCKO at July 23, 2008 6:49 PM (Suggest Removal) Matt you must be on crack or welfare of some sort you a dud of the greatest size get a life your nothing but poision !!
| Add your comments
|
Posted By:David Hughes at July 23, 2008 7:18 PM (Suggest Removal) USM will win. Breyer's wrote the opinion that is controlling while he was on, I think, the 1st District Court of Appeals. If you cannot avoid it then it is not a fee. I'd start the contingency planning if i was on the city council.
| Add your comments
|
Posted By:Lew. Taxpayer at July 23, 2008 7:59 PM (Suggest Removal) Well if USM does not have to pay a fee then why should I have to pay a student activity, technology and lab fee when I take a class at USM??? The homeowner in Lewiston has enough to pay with the taxes and heating oil let alone all the other stuff we have to pay. The folks that do not work but collect welfare, food stamps rent subsizidies need to start making contributions or else cut the benefits to them. There needs to be a limit on how long someone can be on welfare. It is supposed to be a hand up not a hand out!! I see a taxpayer revolution coming.
| Add your comments
|
Posted By:David Hughes at July 23, 2008 9:02 PM (Suggest Removal) 1) you choose to enroll there. 2) the fee is collected and used for a very narrowly defined purpose and not put into the general fund of the university. 3) the beneficiaries of the fee are not wide spread and general but are narrowly defined. The storm water utility fee is a tax, no matter what you call it. Any organization exempt from city taxes could mount a challenge and be successful. Like I said, if I was on the city council I would be making contingency plans. There is a bright spot, as a tax they can't get a court ordered injunction against collections until the case is settled.
| Add your comments
|
Posted By:Nick at July 23, 2008 11:49 PM (Suggest Removal) Well David correct me if I'm wrong but those companies choose to be here. That being said I do believe if they are tax exempt they will get away with this because as said if they aren't paying taxes towards other things then most likely wont end up for this (not that its right)
| Add your comments
|
Posted By:Anthony at July 24, 2008 4:12 AM (Suggest Removal) David...really...if you can't avoid it...it's not a fee?? If I use an ATM machine from a bank other than my own...I pay a fee...unavoidable. If I buy concert tickets...I will pay a fee...unavoidable. If I buy an airline ticket...oh boy...fees fees fees...unavoidable. Make a phone call...check your bills for fees. Turn on the lights in your house...what do you pay for delivery "fees?" Your definition has holes too numerous to count. The rain water fee was in fact a smart move...the powers that be did their homework...it'll stand in court without breaking a sweat.
| Add your comments
|
Posted By:David Hughes at July 24, 2008 9:16 AM (Suggest Removal) Anthony, you don't have to use an ATM from a bank not yours, you don't have to go to a concert and the fee collected likely goes to a narrow purpose that aids concerts in some way not the general population. Making someone pay a fee just for existing in the taxing authorities area of control is a tax, not a fee.
| Add your comments
|
|
Advertisement

|
 |
| “Paint Your Heart Out: Embracing Art and Healing” |
a collection of watercolor paintings, will be exhibited at the Central Maine Medical Center Rotating Art Gallery from November 7 through December 1. |
read more >>
|
| Central Maine Obstetrics-Gynecology |
is the first Midwifery Service in Maine and only the second in New England to be recognized by the American College of Nurse-Midwives with its Golden “With Women for a Lifetime” Commendation. |
read more >>
|
| Deborah Taylor |
associate director of the Central Maine Medical Center Family Medicine Residency Program, has been elected to the Society of Teachers of Family Medicine (STFM) Board of Directors. |
read more >>
|
| Erwey A. Teng, M.D. |
a pulmonologist and intensivist, has been elected to the Central Maine Medical Center Medical Staff. He is practicing with Pulmonary and Critical Care Associates in Lewiston. |
read more >>
|
| Medicare Program |
Central Maine Medical Center and SeniorsPlus will offer individual counseling for seniors who want to review their Medicare drug coverage for 2009. |
read more >>
|
|
|