Welcome Guest - Please Login | Subscribe |FAQ's | Why Register | Privacy Statement |
| Classifieds | Jobs | Cars | Real Estate | Directories | Yellow Pages+ | My Clips | 
     
 Today is December 01, 2008 Current Temperature: 36° in Lewiston, Maine 


Printer Friendly Version      Email Story     Increase Text    Decrease Text
iPod Friendly
  Comments
Turner egg farm fined $150,000

,
Wednesday, August 13, 2008

AUGUSTA - Safety officials levied $150,000 in fines against a Turner egg farm Tuesday, claiming workers were forced to work in and on a building that partially collapsed under snow.

The action is directed at Maine Contract Farming, an affiliate of DeCoster egg farms, one of the largest producers of eggs in New England.

William Coffin, Maine's area director with the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, said his office investigated a complaint stemming from a Feb. 16 incident at the farm. According to the investigators, Maine Contract Farming workers were forced onto the roof of a partially collapsed egg-processing building to remove snow and ice, and inside the building to retrieve eggs and brace the roof trusses, without assessing the soundness of the building first.

"It's pretty obvious that's something you don't do," Coffin said. "They were lucky no one was seriously injured or worse. Any darn fool should have been aware of the danger."

Bob Leclerc, compliance officer at the farm, said the company is meeting with officials in Augusta to discuss the action and decide whether to formally contest the fines. He said the citation was just received Friday and he hasn't had time to determine the company's specific objections.

"But we've put them on notice," he said. "We'll have a heart-to-heart with them."

The egg farm has 15 working days after the citation to file a formal response.

Coffin said OSHA was notified of the situation by U.S. Department of Agriculture workers who were at the farm to inspect and grade eggs and would not go on the site of the damaged building.

"They observed the conditions," Coffin said. "They saw people working in the building and on the roof."

OSHA followed up by interviewing workers and managers at the farm. The agency determined workers were in danger of being struck by falling pieces of roof, walls and framing, and that the workers on the roof were in danger of falling 22 feet.

It assessed fines of $140,000 for those two types of hazards. An additional $10,000 in fines was levied because the farm did not determine the weight-bearing capacity of other buildings' roofs, nor did it remove accumulations of snow and ice from those roofs. Also, some employees using farm trucks weren't wearing seat belts, according to the action.

The egg farm covers more than 1,600 acres in seven separate complexes and supports more than 3.5 million hens, Leclerc said.

CLICK HERE To Show/Hide Discussion Thread - (11 Comments)
Comments
Posted By:bernice at August 13, 2008 7:04 AM (Suggest Removal)
iget sooooooooo sick of these do gooders that go out , inspect, and try to find some thing wrong !!!!!!! AND, first of all --- you said failure to clean off the roof ] was one cause, then the next sentance --said--- they were in danger [ because they were up cleaning off the roof,, -no wander people are in the [dark] as to knowing what to do !

| Add your comments
Posted By:bernice at August 13, 2008 7:10 AM (Suggest Removal)
AND if I WAS THE EGG FARM OWNER I WOULD GIVE THE EGG FARM TO WILLIAM COFFIN AND LET HIM MANAGE THE FARM !! Leave the poor people alone and let us have this [little ]one lasting business here in MAINE.Before that too gives up and we lose another business here in MAINE.

| Add your comments
Posted By:JB at August 13, 2008 7:18 AM (Suggest Removal)
Bernice, They were cleaning off the roof because the roof had already partially collapsed. Whether they were doing it to prevent further structural failure or to cover up the fact that they let the roof collapse, it doesn't matter. The fine was levied because of claims that employees were forced to climb onto a partially collapsed building and enter a partially collapsed building without securing it from further collapse. They are just lucky no one was injured when the roof collapsed in the first place and when they forced employees to enter the building afterward. If I were to apply for a position as an egg collector, I am almost certain my job description would not require me to climb on top of buildings in the first place.

| Add your comments
Posted By:andrea at August 13, 2008 7:40 AM (Suggest Removal)
This is not the first time this egg farm has been in trouble. They have been charged with mistreating employees before. When are they going to realize that they should treat their employees with more respect.

| Add your comments
Posted By:Johnny P at August 13, 2008 7:52 AM (Suggest Removal)
Jack DeCoster will not learn to treat his employees with respect... A leopard cannot change his spots.

| Add your comments
Posted By:ohmy at August 13, 2008 8:33 AM (Suggest Removal)
The mexicans get treated fine down there. They get whatever they want because if not they file a law suit against the company. It is the poor mainers that work there that are treated unfairly. Jack needs to smarten up or the company will be gone, they what are all those people going to do for work?????Lord knows that we already have a shortage of work in this start. And JB are yo part of the union..??NOt in my job description, give me a break. If you are not union you usually just do what the boss says, or look for another job.....

| Add your comments
Posted By:Pol at August 13, 2008 8:44 AM (Suggest Removal)
'Just do(ing) what the boss says' is fine as long as the request is both safe and legal, regardless of one's job description (or color). However, a boss who orders an employee to break the law or subject themself to an obviously dangerous condition in order to keep their job, deserves to get nailed. This isn't like failing to provide a ventilator mask or some other technical violation.

| Add your comments
Posted By:Gene at August 13, 2008 9:37 AM (Suggest Removal)
Either Decoster's is a serious offender time and time again, or someone above is out to shut him down

| Add your comments
Posted By:cab_codespring at August 13, 2008 9:56 AM (Suggest Removal)
I worked at Decoster's once - what a miserable job. The poor chicken's were wretched, the workers were wretched. I would have no problem seeing it shut down.

| Add your comments
Posted By:Michael at August 13, 2008 7:44 PM (Suggest Removal)
WOW some of you don't understand that business, or don't know what your talking about! Decoster hires illegal immigrants to work there, pays them jack S&%T! And yes screws hard working mainers with a terrible wage, and an even worse job

| Add your comments
Posted By:Cj at August 13, 2008 10:42 PM (Suggest Removal)
Seriously it needs to be shut down. Living in that town was so bad. The smell from the burning chickens filled the air. It was unbreathable at times. So much animal cruilty going on there...employees don't get treated right either, does no one see the whole picture?

| Add your comments
Advertisement
“Paint Your Heart Out: Embracing Art and Healing”
a collection of watercolor paintings, will be exhibited at the Central Maine Medical Center Rotating Art Gallery from November 7 through December 1.
read more >>
Central Maine Obstetrics-Gynecology
is the first Midwifery Service in Maine and only the second in New England to be recognized by the American College of Nurse-Midwives with its Golden “With Women for a Lifetime” Commendation.
read more >>
Deborah Taylor
associate director of the Central Maine Medical Center Family Medicine Residency Program, has been elected to the Society of Teachers of Family Medicine (STFM) Board of Directors.
read more >>
Erwey A. Teng, M.D.
a pulmonologist and intensivist, has been elected to the Central Maine Medical Center Medical Staff. He is practicing with Pulmonary and Critical Care Associates in Lewiston.
read more >>
Medicare Program
Central Maine Medical Center and SeniorsPlus will offer individual counseling for seniors who want to review their Medicare drug coverage for 2009.
read more >>
Contents of this site © 2008 Sun Journal
| Forgot Password |Blog Policy | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Advertise With Us | Contact Us | About Us | Faq's | Help |