Oxford in line for casino
By M. Dirk Langeveld
,
Staff Writer
Friday, October 10, 2008
OXFORD - A Las-Vegas based group announced Thursday that it plans to build a resort casino in Oxford if the project is approved by Maine voters in November.
Dean Harrold, vice chairman of Olympia Gaming, said the town of Oxford has a ready work force and represents "the corridor to Western Maine." Placing the casino there would open up other economic opportunities in the area, he said.
He did not identify the specific site where the casino would be located.
"We have very stringent criteria when we look at our sites," Harrold said. "We have several options out there right now. We want to do our due diligence and pick the best site for Oxford and the best site for us."
Pat LaMarche, spokeswoman for the Yes on 2 campaign in support of the casino, said the specifics of the site would be released before the election on Nov. 4.
Harrold said the group needs to discuss available sites with town officials before a decision is made.
"I don't understand why we have to rush, whether it's tomorrow or next week and say, 'Well, it's XY,'" he said. "We have made the decision that Oxford is our host community, and that's good enough. We will come out, and we will make a decision. And I'm not going to tell you exactly when, because this is a major, major business decision for all of us."
On Oct. 2, the Oxford Board of Selectmen and the town's Economic Development Advisory Committee voted to support a casino in town if the referendum passes.
Town Manager Michael Chammings and Board of Selectmen Chairman Floyd Thayer spoke in favor of the decision at Thursday's press conference at the Oxford Public Safety Building.
Chammings said Oxford has lost about 300 jobs in recent years. If the casino vote passes, the town's tax rate would decrease by more than 34 percent. Also, Oxford would pay more toward the SAD 17 school district and to the county, reducing taxes in surrounding communities, he said.
The proposed $184 million resort casino would be constructed in two phases over five years and would include a hotel, casino, spa and restaurants. LaMarche said the casino would be built on a 40-acre lot, an expansion from the 25 acres originally proposed. Clyde Barrow, director of the Center for Policy Analysis at the University of Massachusetts in Dartmouth, said construction of the resort would create 1,277 jobs with an average annual wage of $30,975. The resort itself would include 907 jobs with an average annual wage of $35,876.
Barrow, who was hired by the Olympia Group for $10,000 to conduct the economic study, said the host community would receive 2 percent of the casino's revenues, an estimated $1.7 million in its first year and $2.8 million after the fifth year. Oxford County would receive 1 percent of revenues: an estimated $870,000 in the first year and $1.4 million after the fifth.
Casinos No!, a group opposed to the project, argues that a casino would take profits out of state and increase social problems. The group also argues that passage of the referendum would lower Maine's gambling age from 21 to 19 and would extend credit to gamblers.
LaMarche said the bill was "inherited by Olympia" when the group purchased Evergreen Mountain Enterprises, which initially led the drive for a casino in Oxford County.
LaMarche said the Legislature's Legal and Veterans' Affairs Committee would make the necessary changes to the proposal, such as moving the gambling age back to 21.
"We won't extend credit," LaMarche said. "That will not happen in this casino."
The group was initially looking at Oxford, Rumford and a third unidentified town as potential host communities for the casino. LaMarche said the group's decision took into account the proximity to population centers and the unanimous support of the Oxford Board of Selectman. Rumford selectmen voted 3-2 vote in August to support the project. |
CLICK HERE To Show/Hide Discussion Thread - (52 Comments)
Comments
 |
Posted By:mainexile at October 10, 2008 5:36 AM (Suggest Removal) Congratulations Oxford. Now we can only hope that the voting populace has the intestinal fortitude to approve the referendum thereby launching an economic rebound for the county.
| Add your comments
|
Posted By:Vicar at October 10, 2008 6:22 AM (Suggest Removal) I lived next to two Casinos in SE CT. The Casinos did provide jobs and some additional income to the area (most money was spent at the Casinos and not in the community). Coupled with these however were a number of negatives. Crime shot up as people committed robberies etc to get money to go to the Casinos. There was a huge increase in embezzlements. Gambling is an addiction. The presence of the Casinos in such close proximity led to countless marital problems, work related issues and community difficulties in general. Having grown up in the Oxford Hills area and seeing the effects of gambling, I would hope the voters defeat the proposal.
| Add your comments
|
Posted By:tony at October 10, 2008 6:31 AM (Suggest Removal) IF YOU HAVE MARITAL PROBLEMS THATS YOUR OWN FAULT.ITS LIKE DRINKING& DRUGS,IF YOU DECIDE TO DO THEM NOTHING IS GOING TO STOP YOU BUT YOURSELF.YOU HAVE TO HAVE SELF CONTROAL.AND FOR EMBEZZLEMENTS [[[WELL HAVE YOU LOOKED LATELY MANT WOMEN HAVE ALREADY ODNE THAT AND THERE IS NO CASINO YET]]]I AM NOT WORRIED ABOUT ROBERIES WE HAVE THE BEST POLICE FROM TOWN /TO STATE/ TO SHERIEF/ IN THE AREA WE MIGHT JUST NEED A FEW MORE WHICH IS NOT A BAD THING,MORE JOBS,SO I [[[[SAY GO WITH CASINO OXFORD]]]
| Add your comments
|
Posted By:helga at October 10, 2008 6:45 AM (Suggest Removal) Oxford will pay more to SAD 17? Awesome.
| Add your comments
|
Posted By:Jay Bee at October 10, 2008 7:05 AM (Suggest Removal) Whoo - hoo! Take those chips and cash them in for a new trailer home! Take some of the leftover money for lawn ornaments and four-wheelers! Still some left? Get those glow-in-the-dark Truck Nutz! That says "class" to the ladies!!!
| Add your comments
|
Posted By:NightCrawler at October 10, 2008 7:25 AM (Suggest Removal) To Vicar, I say BALONEY! I have been to Mohegan Sun COUNTLESS times over the past five years. Vicar says that the casinos provide "some" additional income? How about 20,000 people making $40,000 a year and much more? Where do you think these employees spend their money? Perhaps locally? That is one item that rarely gets addressed bby either side. How about the millions of dollars that the casino patrons spend every year? How about the hotels and restaurants and retail businesses that sprout up OUTSIDE of the casino and in the surrounding areas? Crime? I have NEVER seen ANY instance of BAD BEHAVIOR, much less crime, at Mohegan Sun. Some people who have a few too many to drink? Of course! Some people who get a little loud and obnoxious? Sure (especially after they hit a jackpot!). I'm sure the instances of petty crime increased compared to the "pre-casino" days, but when you add thousands of people to an area that used to have empty fields and empty businesses, isn't that to be expected? I am really sick and tired of these anti-business, anti-free enterprise know-nothings telling me how to spend MY money. Maybe I'll start a "Red Sox No!" or a "Patriots No!" organization. After all, it costs several hundred dollars to attend Red Sox and Patriots games, and God knows there is plenty of crime and mayhem going on in and around Fenway Park and Gillette stadium!
| Add your comments
|
Posted By:Ernest at October 10, 2008 7:33 AM (Suggest Removal) Roughy 20 years ago a golden slipper slipped from our hands and ended up in Loudon NH. Lets learn from the past. People are going to do what they do regardless. Some will gamble beyond their means, and some won't gamble at all. We already have gambling in this state, like it or not.
| Add your comments
|
Posted By:M at October 10, 2008 7:39 AM (Suggest Removal) Helga you always have the nicest things to say about SAD 17.
| Add your comments
|
Posted By:helga at October 10, 2008 7:49 AM (Suggest Removal) M, I live in Oxford, do you? 2/3 of my property taxes already go to SAD17. I wouldnt mind throwing that kind of money at the schools if they actually TAUGHT our kids. How many tests did we fail this year? Last year? I do believe our schools are on the "watch list". Huge budget, enrollment is down. If you work for the school system M, I suggest you get of the computer and start teaching our kids.
| Add your comments
|
Posted By:ROCKO at October 10, 2008 7:53 AM (Suggest Removal) Just think of it jobs that pay more than wal-mart,jobs that may allow people to have a better standard of living construction jobs during the build that alone would help the area! more money for the State which means they maynot come up with more crazy taxes,gee that would STINK!!! As always Mainers will vote no for no other reaason than false fear!Mainers will continue to go out of State and with them their money!
It is NO SMALL WONDER why we even in good times have such a hard time making ends meet! I say VOTE YES VOTE for prosperity !!!
| Add your comments
|
Posted By:David at October 10, 2008 8:00 AM (Suggest Removal) Everything Vicar says is right. He forgot one problem that comes with casinos. Within a few years of a casino coming to an area that never had one suicides increase because gambling addicts start feeling hopeless. One person shot himself in Hollywood Slots. Nightcrawler, of course you don't see these problems in the casino. all casinos have top-notch security. he crimes happen in a 50 mile radius of a casino. I urge people to vote against this. The new problems will outweigh the good that comes from new jobs.
| Add your comments
|
Posted By:A Mom at October 10, 2008 8:19 AM (Suggest Removal) I'm seeing red just because people are acting like having this casino will be such a beautiful and wonderful thing. Come on people, what the hell are we thinking. Too many people who NEVER thought they'd have to are looking for public assistance just to make ends meet. So that brings us to the question of, exactly who is going to be able to ENJOY the new ammenities. As far as all these new jobs, reality is that only some of these jobs will be given to locals the rest will go inevidably to out-of-staters/immigrants who will only strain our economy even more. Think, people. We do need more employment opportunities but let's have something that provides employment and DOESN'T provide a direct route to lose paychecks at the same time. VOTE NO!
| Add your comments
|
Posted By:kaos at October 10, 2008 8:27 AM (Suggest Removal) yes casino yes Obama
| Add your comments
|
Posted By:John at October 10, 2008 8:39 AM (Suggest Removal) "The new problems will outweigh the good that comes from new jobs." Wow! Just Wow! Poverty is, without debate or question, the #1 cause of social problems in this country. Not drugs, not alcohol, not gambling, not anything else but POVERTY. To make a statement like that and look at yourself in the mirror with a straight face must be near impossible. Personally, I would rather start with jobs and any problems that come with it, then the other way around.
| Add your comments
|
Posted By:sheesh at October 10, 2008 8:43 AM (Suggest Removal) All of my family and friends are voting NO to this project for many reasons. IF you have the cash to gamble, you can drive to Bangor or CT. What's wrong with placing this casino in Androscoggin or Cumberland County? The ski resorts are saying no also, there has to be a reason for this too. Oxford County is country, PLEASE keep it this way. The residents of Oxford County need to vote no because the tax on your property will shoot up and you will have to pay more. What is the community in Bangor getting from Hollywood Slots? Ask before you vote yes because this will be a disaster for our county. Keep this in mind when you vote. Again I am going to say, NO to casiNO and NO to Obama McCain/Palin '08
| Add your comments
|
Posted By:Unirok55 at October 10, 2008 8:44 AM (Suggest Removal) Let's get on with it. Vote Yes. Get it done.
| Add your comments
|
Posted By:Aim High at October 10, 2008 9:04 AM (Suggest Removal) I am with Jay Bee.. that's funny right there.
| Add your comments
|
Posted By:Gordon at October 10, 2008 9:11 AM (Suggest Removal) I'm with Unirok55 Lets get it done & passed... we ALL know this state can use all the revenue & it get. It if we can't use jobs I'm mean comme on people!!!!! today is my 1 yr. Ann. being out of work. PASS THE CASINO!!!!!!!
| Add your comments
|
Posted By:PAUL at October 10, 2008 9:20 AM (Suggest Removal) The only thing i hate to see is more money the State will figure out how to screw this up with all the dems in Maine. They have made this the most unfriendly State in USA for business so lets hope the Casino will help het Repubs in Maine elected infact i know 1 that will run in Maine next election and this guy will win and fight for Mainers
| Add your comments
|
Posted By:Jolly Roger at October 10, 2008 9:55 AM (Suggest Removal) sheesh said: "All of my family and friends are voting NO" .
Sounds like a small group to me!
VOTE YES on #2
| Add your comments
|
Posted By:horsefeathers at October 10, 2008 10:26 AM (Suggest Removal) Here is one of the biggest problems in the state of Maine whether it is a Casino, small busines or large business.
Here are the people least likely, willing or able to move Maine toward the national average for tax burden, energy costs, health care costs or business climate. They are hostile or indifferent toward getting or retaining good jobs in Maine's private sector.
Legislators with an average MERI score of 25 or Lower Town AVG MERI RATING
Maine State Senate,Mitchell, Elizabeth H. Vassalboro 25 (running for Senate President)
Bowman, Peter York 24 Rotundo,Margaret R. Lewiston 24
Bryant, Bruce Dixfield 17
Brannigan,Joe Portland 16
House of Representatives
Pendleton, PeggyScarborough 25
Farrington, David Gorham 25
Rines, Peter Wiscasset 25
Carey, Michael Lewiston 24
Smith, Nancy Monmouth 24
Theriault, Charles Madawaska 24
Driscoll, Timothy Westbrook 23
Koffman, Theodore Bar Harbor 23
Blanchette,Patricia Bangor 23
Cain, Emily Ann Orono 22
Cummings, Glenn Portland 22
Eberle, Jane South Portland 22
Wheeler Sr., Walter Kittery 21
Kaenrath, BryanSouth Portland 21
Marley, Boyd Portland 21
Dunn, Michael Bangor 21
Briggs, Sheryl Mexico 20
Babbidge, ChristopheKennebunk 20
Piotti, John Unity 19 (running for House leadership)
Percy, Leila Phippsburg 19
Miller, Elizabeth Sommerville 19
Simpson, Deborah Auburn 19 (running for the Senate)
Peoples, Ann Westbrook 18
Bliss, Lawrence South Portland 18 (running for the Senate)
Dill, Cynthia Cape Elizabeth 18
Grose, Carol Woolwich 17
Boland, Andrea Sanford 17
Brautigam, John Falmouth 17 (running for Attorney General)
Pingree, Hannah North Haven 17 (running for Speaker of the House)
Trinward, Pamela Waterville 17
Pineau, Raymond Jay 16
Watson, Thomas Bath 16
Tuttle Jr., John Sanford 16
Eaton, Robert Sorrento 16
Pratt, Benjamin Holden 16
Bryant, Mark Windham 15
Webster, David Freeport 15
Jackson, Troy Fort Kent 15 (running for the Senate)
Harlow, Charles Portland 15
Weddell, Lance Frankfort 15
Norton, Jacqueline Bangor 14
Craven, Margaret Lewiston 14
Faircloth, Sean Bangor 14 (running for Attorney General)
Gerzofsky, Stan Brunswick 14 (running for the Senate)
Patrick, John Rumford 13
Adams, Herbert Portland 12
Conover, Jill Oakland 12
Miramant, David Rockport 12 (running for the Senate)
Wagner, Richard Lewiston 12
Burns, Richard Berwick 11 (running for the Senate)
Priest, Charles Brunswick 11
Rand, Ann Portland 11
Makas, Elaine Lewiston 10
Treat, Sharon West Gardner 10
Berry, Seth Bowdoinham 9
Hinck, Jon Portland 9
| Add your comments
|
Posted By:Pseudonym at October 10, 2008 10:47 AM (Suggest Removal) Look what is written into the referendum for the owner of the casino: "a ten-year monopoly on casino operations in the state, carte blanche on where it is built, and permanent voting seats on the boards of some of the most important agencies in Maine, including the Finance Authority of Maine, the University of Maine System, and the Land for Maine’s Future program. Carey’s law asks voters to keep the 1,500 slot machine limit for track-related racinos while giving Evergreen an unlimited number of slots, plus table games such as blackjack and roulette. It would drop the legal gambling age to nineteen. And it would allow the casino to extend house credit to gamblers but not let them use their credit or debit cards." Reference: http://www.downeast.com/Down-East-Magazine/November-2008/House-of-Cards/
| Add your comments
|
Posted By:Jolly Roger at October 10, 2008 10:52 AM (Suggest Removal) Pseu -
now open your other eye and read even today's lsj article. In olympia's press event yesterday they specifically said they a) want the law to ban anyone under 21 from working there, b) would NOT extend credit to guests. They have also said they are flexible on the '10 year deal' and could live with a minimun distance between a casino in oxford and any others in state. Olympia has repeatedly said they want the act re-written!
VOTE YES on #2
| Add your comments
|
Posted By:horsefeathers at October 10, 2008 11:05 AM (Suggest Removal) There are lots of dailey corrections in the SJ. In one instance they were completely wrong in what they reported.
| Add your comments
|
Posted By:Jolly Roger at October 10, 2008 11:14 AM (Suggest Removal) horsefeathers: "There are lots of dailey corrections in the SJ."
Agreed, however I was at that press event and those statements were made.
| Add your comments
|
Posted By:Pseudonym at October 10, 2008 11:16 AM (Suggest Removal) Open my other eye? That's mature. I only shared what is in the referendum that is already on the ballot.
| Add your comments
|
Posted By:myopinion at October 10, 2008 11:22 AM (Suggest Removal) No to over 900 new jobs in this are from the casino alone? I ask all you no voters, have you ever had to choose whether you will buy groceries or pay your bills? The average worker in this area gets no assitance with their heat, food, housing and utilities. In my family we are working on trying to cope with our second layoff/cutback because of a local company shutting down within the last 8 years. We make too much to qualify for help, but can barely fll our oil tank and buy frood for our son. I say bring the jobs and income that average people need to this cummunity and vote yes.
| Add your comments
|
Posted By:Jolly Roger at October 10, 2008 11:27 AM (Suggest Removal) pseudo-
"Open my other eye? That's mature. I only shared what is in the referendum that is already on the ballot." It's equally mature to only share 1/2 of the facts...or to omit relavent information.
| Add your comments
|
Posted By:CasinoYes! at October 10, 2008 11:31 AM (Suggest Removal) It's absolutely exhausting seeing all these people shoot down a casino referendum every time it comes up. Casinos are not the ultimate evil as you would like everyone to believe. More than 1/2 the states in the country have casino gambling of some type. Are all of these states terrible places to work and live because there's a casino there? If you don't like casinos, fine, that's you're right. But why deny the opportunity for revenue, wages and entertainment to everyone in Maine that could benefit from, or enjoy it?
Try to open your minds enough to realize that this is an economic opportunity for Oxford county and for the state. You don't have to like casinos. You can stay away from it and that's fine. But don't deny others the opportunity to benefit from this. We can't keep legislating morality.
| Add your comments
|
Posted By:Pseudonym at October 10, 2008 11:39 AM (Suggest Removal) You're right, Jolly Rancher . . . that was immature of you.
| Add your comments
|
Posted By:A Mom at October 10, 2008 12:06 PM (Suggest Removal) To all you 'YES' votes, can't you see that you're already falling into the addiction of gambling just by thinking it's the answer to your prayers? Yes, I am a parent that has to make hard choices on how to spend what very little money I have. And yes, I do believe we need more jobs but NO I do not believe a casino is the answer.
| Add your comments
|
Posted By:Jolly Roger at October 10, 2008 12:07 PM (Suggest Removal) pycho - see...you've now proven your immaturity!
| Add your comments
|
Posted By:? at October 10, 2008 12:14 PM (Suggest Removal) Hey stay on welfare. vote no on this and yes on Obama. Enjoy ..... the hills as u keep it like it is
Not going to get in to it... the people who talk the most are the ones who know the least.. Case in point above obama. Get a real education o-wait this is the hills. lol sorry
| Add your comments
|
Posted By:CasinoYes! at October 10, 2008 12:15 PM (Suggest Removal) "falling into the addiction of gambling"???
Everyone who gambles is not addicted, just as everyone who drinks the wine at church is not an alcoholic. People can gamble responsibly. There are addicts to many things in life, but this is the exception, not the rule. My wife and I go to Foxwoods 1 time per year. That's it. We enjoy it, we have fun, but we are far from addicted. It's a vacation. Simple as that. Is it ok to be "addicted" to the ocean and spend $800 to stay two days at an oceanside inn?
That's the problem. People like to stereotype gambling as an addiction and profess how everyone who gambles will be addicted. It's like prohibition of the 1920's. People can, and do, gamble responsibly and purely for entertainment. The addicts are the exception, not the rule.
Realizing that there are benefits that can come from having a casino in Maine is not "falling into the addiction of gambling". It's simply being open enough to realize puritanical views of gambling are outdated. It's not evil and it does not breed addiction in everyone who visits a casino. Furthermore, I don't think anyone believes it's "the answer to your prayers". It's quite simply economic development. Something we don't have enough of in Maine. If you're aware of any Fortune 500 companies that would like to come to Maine, I'm sure everyone would be all ears. Unfortunately, since the Fortune 500 companies are not knocking on our door, let's open our minds to other forms of economic development. If we can't do that, Maine is destined to be an overtaxed and underfunded state.
| Add your comments
|
Posted By:RESIDENT at October 10, 2008 12:33 PM (Suggest Removal) There is a few things that I'm still wondering about with this Casino. Who is going to pay for all the extra emergancy personell? Oxford county will be getting only $870,000 the first year. Will that cover all the extra cost? How about the host town 1.7 million will that cover an ambulance, extra police, new cars ect...? And what happens to towns just outside of this host town? How are they going to pay for all the extras that will be needed? $35000.00 is a nice wage but is it enough to pay for all the extras? And what happens to the people that cannot work because thier 80 social security is not going to go up to help them. I think that Oxford should really think, and get all the facts before making a large decision.
| Add your comments
|
Posted By:Pseudonym at October 10, 2008 12:34 PM (Suggest Removal) Jolly Roger: It was an honest mistake that I called you "Jolly Rancher". But, you're calling me "Psycho" only confirms what I was already thinking: that I can't believe I've lowered myself to arguing with you on here. If you want to continue to fight, you'll have to pick on someone else. I'm done.
| Add your comments
|
Posted By:Chad at October 10, 2008 12:42 PM (Suggest Removal) Kind of funny, Olympia could revise their requested rules before the actual vote, but claim they will work with amended rules after the vote. Why not make adjustments now?
| Add your comments
|
Posted By:Jolly Roger at October 10, 2008 12:44 PM (Suggest Removal) Pseudonym- forgive me for ever doubting you on the typo. I have not been 'fighting' with you. But as you see it that way, it only confirms what I was already thinking as well. Have a nice day & see ya at the blackjack table!
| Add your comments
|
Posted By:ANDY at October 10, 2008 1:08 PM (Suggest Removal) Well, I do believe it is a reality that the casino is coming to Oxford. What a GREAT thing for them and Maine. I only wish Rumford would have seen the light and jumped on a chance to help out our area. They always keep their heads buried in the sand to opportunities that could help us "low wage earners/high taxed" citizens. When the citizens change jobs for better pay and benefits who will fill these jobs? Say Good-bye to Rumford and surrounding towns!
| Add your comments
|
Posted By:Steve at October 10, 2008 3:58 PM (Suggest Removal) Sheesh, Please Explain why Taxes in this town will shoot up. Don't just say stuff in here back it up, Like the City of Bangor has recieved just over 3.5 million in NEW Tax revenue since hollywood slots started. Their taxes have decreased. The Crime rate is actually Down. Please back up your comments
| Add your comments
|
Posted By:Kelly at October 10, 2008 6:39 PM (Suggest Removal) C'mon Steve, who needs facts when you have fear.
| Add your comments
|
Posted By:Greg at October 10, 2008 7:18 PM (Suggest Removal) Vote Yes on 2 for Maine on Nov 4!!
Vote Yes for Oxford County!!
Vote Yes for Oxford!!
Vote Yes for lower taxes!!
Vote Yes for 900-1400 new jobs in the Oxford Hills!!!
Vote Yes for a new resort with a great new entertainment venue for top comedians, musicians, magicians, etc.!!!
Vote Yes to help Maine college students fund their current or past education!!!
Vote Yes for a new resort with a huge conference center to draw thousands of people and companies to Western Maine for special events!!
Vote Yes for a state of the art spa!!
Vote Yes for $33,000,000.00 in new payroll being spent in the Oxford Hills and through-out Maine!!!
Vote Yes for an abundance of new jobs in our towns that allow our children to stay and work in the area they grew up in after they complete their education!!!
Vote Yes for new revenue to help seniors pay for ever rising prescription drugs!!!
Vote Yes for improving Maine roads and bridges!!! (This money does not go into the general fund for the legislature to rob, but directly to these projects!! Imagine!!)
Vote Yes for an additional $50,000,000.00 in revenue to the State of Maine, that does not go into the general fund!!! (this is without creating a new tax that you the worker are forced to pay for!!)
No Fear, No Fighting, No Misrepresentations, No Problem!!!
Bring it On!!!
Git-R-Done!!
etc, etc, etc,
Vote Yes on 2 for MAINE!!!
| Add your comments
|
Posted By:Chad at October 10, 2008 7:27 PM (Suggest Removal) Steve, total number of violent crimes in Bangor decreased. Overall total crime rates increased in Bangor. Three methadone clinics, a larger homeless population than in the past, and a growing number of high school dropouts. The increase in Bangor crime rates was a result of property related crimes, not gambling issues.
| Add your comments
|
Posted By:Greg at October 10, 2008 7:34 PM (Suggest Removal) Sheesh, you said;"The ski resorts are saying no also, there has to be a reason for this too."
Did you know that Sunday River and Sugarloaf are owned by a Michigan company called Boyne? They claim to be worried about Maines "branding" and take a stand against our resort-spa-casino. Boyne is concerned that this new year round resort may take away their more skilled bartenders and waitstaff who are looking for better pay, better tips and full time fringe benefits. They don't want to compete for the workforce, that competition is good for us, the workers!! Did you know that Boyne also owns two ski resorts in Michigan that sit on either side of a Michigan casino? Oh the horrors!!! Did you also know that they are tourism partners with that casino and Boyne provides free shuttle services and even a $25 gaming voucher for their guests.
So why exactly are they opposed to our new resort-spa-casino in Oxford. Do they wish to discriminate against Maines workforce? Don't give me that smack about the profits going out of state, Michigan is out of state too.. The link is below; they need to be exposed for their hypocrisy which I find beyond belief! All Maine workers should boycott all Boyne owned ski mountains and enterprises until they change their postion!! After the referendum passes is not the time to change their position.
Read for yourself:
http://www.boyne.com/BoynesBestDeals/Deals/Golf/109_Golf_MIdweek.html
| Add your comments
|
Posted By:mainegirl at October 10, 2008 8:33 PM (Suggest Removal) I am voting for the casino because this area needs jobs! How many people have lost jobs in Oxford in the last year because of the housing industry going belly up? It seems to me the people that don't want the casino are the ones who have come here to retire after earning their money at a decent job out of state. People talk about wanting jobs to keep young people here, but when an opportunity comes along, all we here is...oh no we don't want that in Maine, or that...it's time for change!!
| Add your comments
|
Posted By:Vicar at October 11, 2008 6:52 AM (Suggest Removal) A comment was made about the state and more money. CT receives a huge percentage of all slots from both Casinos. Even with that, CT has an income tax, state sales tax, is considered one of the most heavily taxed states in the country and yet, the states is crying poverty all the time.
Someone stated that a large number of jobs $40,000 or better were brought into the area. Very true however, few of those jobs have gone to local residents. Most to members of the tribe, others with Native American ties and those with professional gambling credentials. By the way, Foxwoods just had a huge lay off and the Sun has delayed plans for expansion. The Gambling industry is not doing all that well right now.
Before jumping in and giving your approval, please take a look at studies of areas that had Casinos added to their community.
| Add your comments
|
Posted By:Greg at October 11, 2008 8:22 AM (Suggest Removal) Your comparing apples and oranges.
Foxwoods and the Sun are owned by the tribes and run by them.
The resort-spa-casino in Oxford will be owned and operated by Evergreen Mountain/Olympia Gaming.
http://www.olympiagaming.com/
Check out their reputation and use that in your arguments for or against this project.
There are a lot of businesses that are not doing very well right now.
Specifically in Oxford, Oxford Homes and Burlington Homes and their employees are not doing very well.
Banks are having a tough time right now. etc, etc, etc,
These economic downturns happen from time to time in any economy. When it happens, people and companies adjust their immediate plans.
By the time the Oxford resort-spa-casino is built, the economy will be in good shape again. Even better with 900-1400 new jobs averaging $35,000 plus benefits being added to our local economy.
Just think of all of the construction money that will be infused into our local economy as it is being built.
| Add your comments
|
Posted By:Marc at October 11, 2008 8:35 AM (Suggest Removal) Vicar, 'The Gambling industry is not doing all that well right now'? After; the past week's happenings, what is doing well? How many tribal members are going to hired at the potential Oxford resort?
| Add your comments
|
Posted By:PAUL at October 11, 2008 9:17 AM (Suggest Removal) Vicar I have a relative that works at Foxwoods and they are doing fine. Walmart does supply some great paying jobs to Maine and we are lucky to have them. If you work at the lg center in Auburn you can start at over 15,00 dollars an hour thats not bad stay they for a cpl years and you can make 20.00 thats a good weeks pay for anyone. The casino will even be better. Dont blow this
| Add your comments
|
Posted By:linda at October 11, 2008 11:54 AM (Suggest Removal) OMG..nightcrawler..once again..(twice now) I agree with your post.......I have never been to the casinos', but trust what you say about them, as I do know several people who go often, and say the same as you.....peace
| Add your comments
|
Posted By:Citizen at October 11, 2008 12:57 PM (Suggest Removal) I will vote for the casino but even if everyone in Oxford County voted YES (which we all know is not going to happen) the rest of the state also has a say in this as well. I do not forsee the casino being voted for. Sanford tried to get one and it did not pass. Washington County tried and failed as well. I believe there are still way to many people in the southern part of the state that will vote NO. I can not blame them, the other 2 locations for a casino lost so forgive me if I can't believe that Oxford County will be a different then the other places.
| Add your comments
|
Posted By:Greg at October 11, 2008 1:30 PM (Suggest Removal) Most of the people in the southern part of the state are more worried about NIMBY than the boost to the economy. There are an abundance of jobs in the southern part of Maine. Most of them are not hurting for new jobs. Their local economy does not depend on out of state tourism to drive their businesses.
I would ask that the people from southern Maine consider the good that will far outhweigh any negative impact that this resort may have locally. You may not need the influx of jobs, fair wages and increased tax revenue into your local economy, but we really do.
Our police, fire and rescue personnel do an outstanding job at keeping our citizens safe. If more are needed, their organizations will hire more skilled personnel to occupy those positions. Nothing wrong with that. Sounds like growth we need!!!
As for the comment that Oxford County won't be any different than the other places in southern Maine:
1. The people and business of Oxford county cater to tourists. The people of southern Maine are tourists to Oxford county.
2. The people and businesses of southern Maine have been allowed to experience growth for many years. Oxford county has experienced lost jobs and business being shipped over seas for many years without any new growth. This resort is not the be all end all solution to our economic situation but will certainly help as an anchor to new growth in the tourism industry.
3. The people in Washington county and Sanford and Saco and Westbrook did not want this type of business in their neighborhood. The people of Oxford county and Western Maine want this resort in the Town of Oxford.
Please vote YES!! on 2 for Maine and Oxford County. We are counting on you to help us in our time of need!!!
| Add your comments
|
|
Advertisement

|
 |
| “Paint Your Heart Out: Embracing Art and Healing” |
a collection of watercolor paintings, will be exhibited at the Central Maine Medical Center Rotating Art Gallery from November 7 through December 1. |
read more >>
|
| Central Maine Obstetrics-Gynecology |
is the first Midwifery Service in Maine and only the second in New England to be recognized by the American College of Nurse-Midwives with its Golden “With Women for a Lifetime” Commendation. |
read more >>
|
| Deborah Taylor |
associate director of the Central Maine Medical Center Family Medicine Residency Program, has been elected to the Society of Teachers of Family Medicine (STFM) Board of Directors. |
read more >>
|
| Erwey A. Teng, M.D. |
a pulmonologist and intensivist, has been elected to the Central Maine Medical Center Medical Staff. He is practicing with Pulmonary and Critical Care Associates in Lewiston. |
read more >>
|
| Medicare Program |
Central Maine Medical Center and SeniorsPlus will offer individual counseling for seniors who want to review their Medicare drug coverage for 2009. |
read more >>
|
|
|