Welcome Guest - Please Login | Subscribe |FAQ's | Why Register | Privacy Statement |
| Classifieds | Jobs | Cars | Real Estate | Directories | Yellow Pages+ | My Clips | 
     
 Today is January 08, 2009 Current Temperature: 21° in Lewiston, Maine 


Printer Friendly Version      Email Story     Increase Text    Decrease Text
iPod Friendly
  Comments
Ed boss: Ideas, please

,
Saturday, November 22, 2008
PHOTO GALLERY
« Previous | Next »
thumbnails | gallery

LEWISTON - State budget cuts will mean half-million-dollar losses to the area's three largest school systems, according to numbers released Friday by the Maine Department of Education.

Statewide cuts in General Purpose Aid to Schools total $27 million for the fiscal year that began July 1 and ends June 30. The cuts are part of Gov. John Baldacci's response to a recession that's slowing spending and shrinking tax revenue. Another cut of $27 million in GPA is expected next year.

This year's cuts could happen as soon as mid-January if approved by state legislators, Maine Education Commissioner Susan Gendron said.

"My message to schools is they need to start making those cuts now," she said.

In Lewiston, that will mean trimming $544,008; in Auburn, $461,328, and in Oxford Hills, $502,080.

To perhaps soften the blow, Gendron will review state mandates to see whether any can be scrapped without harming K-12 education.

The commissioner said she'll receive a report in December of mandates that should be removed, considering the nation's economic crisis.

"I'm more than willing to hear from superintendents about which ones should come off the books," Gendron said Friday. "Superintendents with suggestions should please send them forward."

In Jay, where the school department stands to lose $197,400, Superintendent Robert Wall had an idea: less data collection. The heavy volume of reports schools have to do for the state is time-consuming and requires office staff, he said.

"We'll do our very best to identify cost savings without looking at personnel, but we may not be able to do that," Wall said.

Oxford Hills (SAD 17) Superintendent Mark Eastman suggested eliminating mandates for gifted and talented fine arts programs and allowing schools the scheduling flexibility for things such as four-day weeks. "There's savings to be had there," he said.

In Lewiston, the 1.8 percent reduction in state aid will be significant, business manager Dean Flanagin said. Administrators will present specific recommendations to the School Committee on Dec. 8.

Lewiston schools have cut field trips and travel, and have reduced spending to essential purchases. Lewiston does have a carry-over account that could help, but Flanagin declined to say how much was in it.

Gendron said if she were still a superintendent she would look for cuts that didn't affect classrooms. She'd eliminate field trips and hold off on buying new textbooks and other supplies. She'd suspend travel. She wouldn't hire substitutes and instead use education technicians to cover for sick teachers. If that wasn't enough, "then I'd start looking at staffing."

Those cuts could mean larger classrooms, she said.

Kindergarten through grade two classes should have 18 or fewer pupils. "The research is clear that in early grades the lower class ratio does impact learning," Gendron said. Research does not support the same kind of learning achievement from a lower student-teacher ratio in higher grades, she said.

Ideally, classes should have no more than 20 or 21 students, unless they're specialized classes, such as science labs, where more staffing is needed for safety.

In some cases, classes could grow to 25 students, Gendron predicted. "I don't think that's ideal, but in light of these economic times" there's little choice, she said.

Gendron was not overly concerned that the quality of education in Maine would suffer. Despite the cuts, the dedication of teachers and administrators will not change, she said.

"At the heart of education is the relationship with teachers and students in the classrooms," Gendron said. "That is what's most critical in students' achieving."




CLICK HERE To Show/Hide Discussion Thread - (26 Comments)
Comments
Posted By:Reason at November 22, 2008 5:16 AM (Suggest Removal)
There was a time when it was not uncommon to have 28-34 students in grades 3 through 6 for all activities. This number reflects student populations before special education. We believe that based on the budget issues it is time to return to these numbers. However, remember that special education students were housed in a separate building away from the general population. Lewiston has long worked to integrate special ed students into the classroom by having them earn their way into the classroom. This is in fact a great way to do it. The more severely handicapped need a special program and although students find this enlightening it is not a real world situation. Severely handicapped / wheelchair bound student who need special help just to got to the bathroom or change their clothes, etc were never intended to be part of the daily school program. Due to the liberalization of laws by courts and legislatures bent on giving special rights to special needs students we have negatively impacted the remainder of the educational community. Times are tough and we need to roll back programs to where they were 30 years ago. Get rid to programs like no child left behind. The initial purpose of education is to help students succeed. If we move them ahead before they are ready to grasp the next major educational concepts then they will continue to fail and we continue to push them forward... do you see a problem with this? Parents can prevent children from being retained in one grade for the next year. Perhaps they should listen to the people who know best and who they pay to educate their children... the teachers. Reason this and roll back the crazy state influence to elementary curriculum... it makes sense.. also busing students to school 4 days a week would save 25% on fuel wouldn't it? Longer hours, under emergency circumstances all school systems can be given power to change their calendar and hours of operation. Less administrators is a good thing as there are too many of them and they all are overpaid... also the school systems can under emergency situations employ and across the board pay cut instead of laying off staff. Reason some of this and you will see that all these large school systems can save money. Reason...then act to support ... not opposed change.

| Add your comments
Posted By:Joe at November 22, 2008 6:20 AM (Suggest Removal)
I would advocate for the winter months to go to a 4 day week of school and add hours and days on during the warmer months. This would save $$$ on fuel and heating costs as schools temperatures could be turned down to 50-60 degrees. Hopefully Ms Gendron wont be pig headed and will seriously consider going to a 4 day school week. This would not impact education one bit.

| Add your comments
Posted By:Dennis at November 22, 2008 7:08 AM (Suggest Removal)
I've got an idea, get rid of her and Baldy. We might be able to get this state back on track

| Add your comments
Posted By:Bob at November 22, 2008 7:56 AM (Suggest Removal)
Maybe assigning one Ed Tech for each "special needs" student is a tad excessive.

| Add your comments
Posted By:Frank at November 22, 2008 8:06 AM (Suggest Removal)
Lewiston gets almost $13 million a year more than Auburn.

| Add your comments
Posted By:ALLAN at November 22, 2008 8:41 AM (Suggest Removal)
Duh, I thought we paid big bucks to have people like her run the show, not beg for ideas on how to do her job.

| Add your comments
Posted By:ConcernedCommunityMember at November 22, 2008 8:45 AM (Suggest Removal)
The state educational assessment scores have not improved for most districts, despite all the money thrown into the educational system - one of my basic complaints. So why not place a freeze on all extra-curricular activities, starting with 'all' sports programs (these never get touched)and lets focus on what schools are supposed to be about- EDUCATION. Once you get education back to what its supposed to be then worry about play! As for the growing problem of obesity and kids not getting enough exercise? Put Gym class back in the curriculum and offer some healthy foods on the lunch menu, instead of loaded carbohydrates and sodium products!

| Add your comments
Posted By:notaxforme at November 22, 2008 9:11 AM (Suggest Removal)
Start by looking at your bloated administrative positions in both your department and the Governor's office. Boy her school consolidation bill was a winner---no layoffs of any staff for at least one year. Guess who is going to get to pay for the reductions in subsidy---property tax payers!

| Add your comments
Posted By:g at November 22, 2008 9:13 AM (Suggest Removal)
Does Auburn really need a new high school? Where is the money going to come from in such poor economic times? Understanding this, why is the school department spending money on hiring an architect and acting like money is out there for the picking? Why don't they live with what they have and worry about a new high school once there is a positive turn in the economy. Right now, that's a waste of money that could be used for educating children.

| Add your comments
Posted By:Tired at November 22, 2008 9:40 AM (Suggest Removal)
Yes, Auburn certainly does need a new high school. Anyone who thinks otherwise obviously has not spent any time at ELHS in the past decade. Perhaps the city shouldn't have built the giant, wasteful new City Hall and put that money into a facility that is actually needed. For crying out loud, they'll probably recoup a large part of construction costs in heat savings alone!

| Add your comments
Posted By:JulieL at November 22, 2008 10:27 AM (Suggest Removal)
g I know what you mean about spending on a new school now, but if you were to take a tour of that building you would be disgusted; bathrooms with missing doors, ceilings rotted, dark hallways in the basement where students are harrassed, it looks like an inner city school in much needed repair.

| Add your comments
Posted By:RON at November 22, 2008 10:57 AM (Suggest Removal)
How about every community that has multiple elementary schools look into consolidating some of them into fewer schools? I understand the argument (somewhat) that there may need to be a lower student-teacher ratio for elementary schools, but I find it very hard to believe in a state with a declining student population that we need SO many elementary schools. That would save a fortune for municipal and state budgets.

| Add your comments
Posted By:TED at November 22, 2008 11:25 AM (Suggest Removal)
Reason- you appear to be a bit ignorant concerning the purpose of special education. Special education does not give special needs kids extra rights- special ed gives them EQUAL RIGHTS. Special Education, by law, must first provide for a student's needs to give them an EQUAL OPPORTUNITY to access the general education curriculum. It also, by law, must provide a least restrictive environment- in other words, students with special needs must be educated with the general education population as much as possible. The local school departments teach kids how to be independent so they can have the skills to live on their own when they enter the real world. The extra cost to educate students with special needs is nowhere near as high as what it would cost to support them in their adult lives if they lacked these skills. Long gone are the days of Pineland and AMHI. Further, recent changes in state regulations have redefined and narrowed the criteria required for students to receive special education services. There are many new filters in place that school departments must consider before deciding to provide a student with special education services. Unfortunately, the number of students with mental illness (whether they were born with it or as a result of environment, as in how they are being raised or horrifying things they have lived with- this is not the same world we lived in when we were kids) and the number of students with autism (or forms of it) have increased substantially over the past ten years. You make several good points in other areas, but you are way off the mark if you think special education is harmful to the school environment.

| Add your comments
Posted By:Lumpy82 at November 22, 2008 11:47 AM (Suggest Removal)
We could hold a bake sale :-)

| Add your comments




Posted By:Tired at November 22, 2008 12:09 PM (Suggest Removal)
I don't mean to sound mean, but get the special ed kids back into the resource room where they belong and out of the general population classrooms! I don't advocate lessening their education in any way, but for crying out loud, what about the kids who CAN learn and WANT to learn, yet are held back by foolishness like No Child Left Behind and these special ed mandates? Mainstreaming these kids has dumbed-down the classrooms for all the others, leaving teachers only able to teach to the lowest common denominator. Special Education IS harmful to the school environment! It has taken over as we try and fail to bring these kids up to speed with everyone else. It's never going to happen, and the rest of the population suffers for it! Can't blame the teachers for this, blame the feel-good politicians!

| Add your comments
Posted By:TED at November 22, 2008 12:23 PM (Suggest Removal)
ok, Tired, you do sound mean. I am a special education teacher at a high school. I teach students in the resource room AND I help kids who are in the general education classroom. If you walk into the regular ed classroom, the kids causing disruptions, not doing homework, and not keeping up are usually the regular ed kids. The special education kids are the ones getting the support and the help to keep up and they are the ones being constantly monitored. IF a student can not function in the regular ed classroom (either for conduct or ability)they are educated in the resource room. Students receiving special education services are only placed in course levels they can manage- just like all other students. I agree, I have seen some situations in other schools where a student with special needs has been inappropriately placed in a regular education classroom because the parent demands it and yes, that is disruptive. But that is very rare. Further, since this article is about cutting school expenses, arguing for an increase in small special education classes is probably not the right way to go, since that would require hiring more teachers and special ed staff.

| Add your comments
Posted By:Rodney at November 22, 2008 12:28 PM (Suggest Removal)
You don't see Ms. gendron taking a pay cut. More than likely she will take a raise. Where did they dig her up from anyway?

| Add your comments
Posted By:ConcernedCommunityMember at November 22, 2008 1:29 PM (Suggest Removal)
It's amazing to me that people are talking about getting rid of Special Education services but not any of the extra-curricular stuff. Where are people's heads at? We're failing consistently in meeting education requirements - this is what will aide our children in not only succeeding but leading the future! Not all our children will be professors and high executives but they deserve a chance at their best potential, whatever that is. As for comments on all the local elementary schools - I agree...if we have schools that are not to capacity we should be consolidating to save money. But if you can't shut a whole school down then you're not saving money - it actually will cost more. This needs sensitive and clear thinking - not knee jerk reactions.

| Add your comments
Posted By:RON at November 22, 2008 1:50 PM (Suggest Removal)
Actually Concerned, my comments are not knee jerk reactions. I've believed this and said it many times: I don't know why communities need an elementary school on every block. Most communities have just one high school and one middle school. It's ridiculous the number of elementary schools many communities have in tiny-population Maine, and it drives up both municipal and state budgets. Even if we were in great economic times right now I'd say the same thing: consolidate the elementary schools!

| Add your comments
Posted By:Tired at November 22, 2008 2:15 PM (Suggest Removal)
RB, you're quite right, Special Ed is quite different at the High School level than the elementary level. I applaud the great work you do. My point was directed more to grade school kids, where I maintain, special ed is horrible for everyone. The high school special ed is much better. And, let's not forget, proper education doesn't matter in this environment. The kids don't matter. All that matters is the bottom line, and if a few kids fall through the cracks because of that, well then it sucks to be them. Too bad it really means that MOST kids are falling through gaping holes.

| Add your comments
Posted By:Tired at November 22, 2008 2:19 PM (Suggest Removal)
Ron, it's too bad that elected officials like Ron Potvin and Lane Feldman don't see it that way. They advocate cutting programs like RETC, yet want to keep "neighborhood schools" like East Auburn and Walton open. For people who were supposedly elected to maintain fiscal responsibility, they are certainly short-sighted and put their own interests ahead of the community they were elected to serve.

| Add your comments
Posted By:ConcernedCommunityMember at November 22, 2008 3:23 PM (Suggest Removal)
Ron, Not all of us live in an urban community. I happen to live in a rural community and remember well the days when I rode 1 hour on the bus to get to school. What I am saying, and should have stated more clearly - IF a whole school can't be shut down - the buses still have the same route for fewer kids; the school still has to be heated and lunch program provided and administrative oversee. So - if you close a RURAL elementary school - be sure that it truly is fiscally responsible and not a knee jerk reaction.

| Add your comments
Posted By:gunslinger at November 22, 2008 6:14 PM (Suggest Removal)
I beg to differ about the extra curricular events, especially sports and performing arts. I can only speak from my own experience, but I learned more from sports and theater that I use today, than any classroom learning. Teamwork, leadership, and basic human interaction skills. I don't need to know who signed the Magna Carta, but I use diplomacy every day. Using the Presidents as (arguably) the most succesful people in the US, in the modern (1950-present) era, all were high school athletes, and most were college athletes. Cut the administration end of the school!

| Add your comments
Posted By:Butch at November 22, 2008 7:00 PM (Suggest Removal)
Tired...what the heck. You have no idea what you are talking about. I happen to have a child with special needs...CP to be exact. She was in the special ed class in kindergarden but then was main streamed into the regular first grade class and now she is in 2nd grade. She is at grade level in all subjects and just because she has special needs does not mean that she does not want to learn. She has got a great attitude and works very hard in school and at home with all the homework she has. There is an ed tech in her class but she's there, not only for my daughter, but for another student who had autism...and doing quite well I might add. So Tired, get your head out of your a$$ and have a little respect for the kids who, of no fault of their own, were born with disabilitis and who try, often times, harder than the kids without disabilities.

| Add your comments
Posted By:ROCKO at November 22, 2008 8:20 PM (Suggest Removal)
How many principals in the lewiston system @ how much money a dozen teachers could be saved if you cut those over payed under worked jobs and how about the superintendents pay?? A little excessive Id say ! Lets start there instead of with the teachers then lets cut sports, and all non academic activities,how about going back to the 3 Rs there is plenty of FAT to trim if they really want to !!!!

| Add your comments
Posted By:Miss at November 22, 2008 8:26 PM (Suggest Removal)
Odd, isn't it, that the downhill slide of America's rank among the world's countries began around the same time politicians and other educational "leaders" decided heterogenous grouping was a fantastic idea...? If a student is capable of doing the academic work, then no disability should keep them from being placed in the most challenging academic setting. However, the idea that all students can learn at the same rate and level is the most ridiculous, harmful idea to ever come out of public education. Differentiation - while a plausible theory on paper, is impractical at best. European and Asian school systems - which are currently kicking the educational butts of America - follow a philosophy in which students must prove their capabilities in certain areas before they are allowed to further pursue such a career. If a student doesn't make the cut, that student is encouraged to pursue a different path. We used to do that in this country - and we were the ones who led the world in innovation, not Japan, India and China. I may be able to speak 3 languages, but I will forever pay a mechanic to repair my car. There is nothing wrong with either of us. My mechanic may not have the same linguistic fluency as I do, but I certainly do not possess the mechanical fluency of my mechanic - any more than my mechanic or myself could perhaps perform open heart surgery. Each individual is "smart" in his/her own way - stop forcing teachers, students and schools into educational mandates that churn out cookie cutter programs so everyone can be "the same."

| Add your comments
Advertisement
CMHVI Echo Lab Earns National Accreditation
ICAEL accreditation is the mark of quality for echocardiography services, so we are pleased to have earned this distinction. It demonstrates that we are providing a high quality service to our patients, said CMHVI Executive Director Susan Horton.
read more >>
Brooke S. Ritvo, M.D.
a cardiologist who specializes in electrophysiology, has been appointed to the Central Maine Medical Center Medical Staff. She is practicing with Central Maine Heart Associates, a clinical department of CMMC.
read more >>
Central Maine Obstetrics-Gynecology
is the first Midwifery Service in Maine and only the second in New England to be recognized by the American College of Nurse-Midwives with its Golden “With Women for a Lifetime” Commendation.
read more >>
CMMC Chest Pain Center Gains New Accreditation
The Central Maine Medical Center Chest Pain Center has been granted advanced accreditation by the Society of Chest Pain Centers.
read more >>
Medicare Program
Central Maine Medical Center and SeniorsPlus will offer individual counseling for seniors who want to review their Medicare drug coverage for 2009.
read more >>
Contents of this site © 2009 Sun Journal
| Forgot Password |Blog Policy | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Advertise With Us | Contact Us | About Us | Faq's | Help |