By mainexile, unverified — Thu, 04/01/2010 - 07:41
For once, Mr. Pitts makes a clear, lucid argument with which I cannot find fault. And in response, I will change my account to list my real name (even though it is available by clicking on my nom del plume). I now challenge all contributors to this forum to do the same and show the audience that you are proud and accountable for the posts you create.
By mainexile, unverified — Thu, 04/01/2010 - 07:25
Tell me, Veritas, what is boorish about a group that seeks to limit government spending and, by extension, government taxation? Troglodyte, indeed? The only aspect of that word that applies is hole-dwelling...in that the fiscal hole in which I dwell was created by the uncontrolled and unnecessary spending practices of the federal and state governments since the beginning of the 20th century.
By mainexile, unverified — Wed, 03/31/2010 - 05:56
Mr. Sirotta's explanation of progressivism vs. liberalism is analogous to asking a condemned man whether he wants a firing squad or a slow-acting poison. One may be quicker and, ultimately, less painful than the other, but the end result is the same: death. Just as the "P" vs. "L" argument yields in the same results: higher taxes and lower quality of life.
How about this: For ten years, let's try reducing taxes on SMALL businesses to allow the true economic engine of America the opportunity to expand their enterprises, hire more employees (which in turn results in more income tax revenue), and stimulate the creative spirit for which this country is known. At the same time, let's limit current year spending to only what was generated in tax revenue for the prior fiscal year thereby essentially enacting a balanced budget. And if that means making across-the-board spending cuts, so be it - no sacred cows (defense, welfare, earmarks, etc.). And for god's sake, stop raiding Social Security and pay back the IOU's taken over the past decades.
By mainexile, unverified — Sun, 03/28/2010 - 08:51
There is a website, www.pollingreport.com/health.htm, that provides the latest data on the sentiments of americans about health care reform. Look for yourself and decide how the country feels about this issue.
By mainexile, unverified — Fri, 03/26/2010 - 05:41
deimos, while your post is a very well-written analogy of the current healthcare debacle (and one that will certainly draw the usual derogatory comments from the usual liberal/progressive/socialist denizens of this forum), you did not write it. It would be hypocritical of me to stand silent when you fail to give proper credit to the original author but excoriate the lefties when they do the same thing. Therefore, putting aside the excellent, thinly-veiled denouncement of the monstrous health care legislation, I must take issue with your illegitimate use of another's original work without giving proper acknowledgement to the creator. Please edit your post to cite the source.
mainexile's Comments
Valid Points
For once, Mr. Pitts makes a clear, lucid argument with which I cannot find fault. And in response, I will change my account to list my real name (even though it is available by clicking on my nom del plume). I now challenge all contributors to this forum to do the same and show the audience that you are proud and accountable for the posts you create.
Troglodyte?
Tell me, Veritas, what is boorish about a group that seeks to limit government spending and, by extension, government taxation? Troglodyte, indeed? The only aspect of that word that applies is hole-dwelling...in that the fiscal hole in which I dwell was created by the uncontrolled and unnecessary spending practices of the federal and state governments since the beginning of the 20th century.
Choose your poison?
Mr. Sirotta's explanation of progressivism vs. liberalism is analogous to asking a condemned man whether he wants a firing squad or a slow-acting poison. One may be quicker and, ultimately, less painful than the other, but the end result is the same: death. Just as the "P" vs. "L" argument yields in the same results: higher taxes and lower quality of life.
How about this: For ten years, let's try reducing taxes on SMALL businesses to allow the true economic engine of America the opportunity to expand their enterprises, hire more employees (which in turn results in more income tax revenue), and stimulate the creative spirit for which this country is known. At the same time, let's limit current year spending to only what was generated in tax revenue for the prior fiscal year thereby essentially enacting a balanced budget. And if that means making across-the-board spending cuts, so be it - no sacred cows (defense, welfare, earmarks, etc.). And for god's sake, stop raiding Social Security and pay back the IOU's taken over the past decades.
Take a look
There is a website, www.pollingreport.com/health.htm, that provides the latest data on the sentiments of americans about health care reform. Look for yourself and decide how the country feels about this issue.
Give credit to the author
deimos, while your post is a very well-written analogy of the current healthcare debacle (and one that will certainly draw the usual derogatory comments from the usual liberal/progressive/socialist denizens of this forum), you did not write it. It would be hypocritical of me to stand silent when you fail to give proper credit to the original author but excoriate the lefties when they do the same thing. Therefore, putting aside the excellent, thinly-veiled denouncement of the monstrous health care legislation, I must take issue with your illegitimate use of another's original work without giving proper acknowledgement to the creator. Please edit your post to cite the source.