Something else to consider... Who pays for maintaining and repairing these laptops if they are dropped, have liquid spilled on them or when they need to be reformatted when viruses are downloaded via questionable sites being accessed? I'm all for giving the kids the proper tools to help them learn more effectively, however all these scenarios should have been thought out with correct solutions that do not invade taxpayer's wallets.
In your original post you attack Gingrich, Romney and Bush, and that's fair. You defend Obama and while I've got issues with him I'll let that slide. However, no where do I see anything in your post that comes close to my point of view. I don't care if you disagree with me. Just be honest about it. Why don't you try comprehending other views yourself. I've met you more than halfway.
And I apologize, Dan. On this site I was able to retrieve the link. The info contained within it referenced Sen John Kerry's efforts to skirt MA tax laws by registering his yacht in RI thus saving appx. a half millon $ in taxes. He eventually paid the tax amid mounting pressure. And Charlie Wrangle was referenced as well. The story was courtesy of CBS news. My point is there are cheats on both sides of the aisle, a fact that is undeniable. I don't mind republicans being called out for similar transgressions, however liberals are living in a dream world believing their heroes are void of guilt when they are called out. Play it straight and you become more believable.
I was taken aback when I saw the destruction of both cars. One would expect to see devastation like this on outer Rte 4 or some other state road with a 55 mph speed limit, not on Minot Ave. in a 30 mph zone. It's amazing there were survivors of this crash.
Hats off to Betsy Smith who is in charge of Equality Maine for her efforts in coordinating volunteers around the state who secured 105,000 signatures to get this question back on the ballot. She's a winner for sure and worked her butt off to get this done. Like I told her earlier this year, it's a shame this has to go to the voters at all. It should have always been a foregone conclusion that gay marriage should have been legal all along. I will certainly vote for gay marriage, however that kind of feels like I'm granting permission and I feel that's condesending to the gay community. I know it's the right thing to do. I just want to let them know they should never have been put through such an emotional vise to achieve a right in which the burden laid before them was such they should never had to shoulder. Love will conquer hate. It always does.
While I disagree with most of what this writer is saying, I have to disagree with you on your assessment of Bin Ladens death last year. Although symbolic in nature it came about ten years too late. Bin Laden became a shell of what he once was. He was pathetic and cowardly hiding all these years. There were no new attacks on our land and this adm. And the previous adm. should take credit for that. I'm glad we finally got him, however given the catastrophic damage he created upon and the many lives lost I didn't find myself celebrating too much.
No one's twisting your arm to follow this story. And unlike yourself, there are many people who are following this story and who genuinely care about this child's well being. Lighten up.
Questioning the integrity of a reporter and her work ethic. Questioning whether she's being paid off to be an organization's stooge? Over the line! Of course if Tice's article pointed out misgivings of the Republican party you'd be tripping over yourself to complement how good of an investigative reporter she is. Expressing opinions of content is what we do here, however, what you are implying goes well beyond the boundaries of good taste.
Dan, thanks for yet another eye opening discussion. I enjoy the banter and friendly sparring, sorta like Snoopy versus the Red Baron. And I like playing the part of Snoopy. He is, after all the good guy. Enjoy the day.
I don't need to attack you. You self destruct yourself with what you put out there. What I actually find interesting is how you constantly spin text around so you can portray yourself the victim. It's obvious that's your M.O. when the conversation isn't going your way. Again, Dan...I don't need to attack you. You do a fine enough job of that on yourself.
To quote..."To give them legitimacy is contrary to journalistic ethics." Your words, Dan. Spin it any way you want, but you own this quote, and it's very plain to see the intent behind it.
Charging a news publication of a lack of journalistic ethics and, in turn, questioning a reporter's integrity are serious claims. Three questions for you... 1) Do you actually believe this reporter and her editors allowed this story to run without properly investigating the source and verifying the information? 2) If your answer to the first question is "no" then are you prepared to back your accusations up with facts with legitimate sources? 3) Finally, if this newspaper is so unreliable in its information then why spend so much time on this website? Wouldn't you be more comfortable cruising websites such as MSNBC, Democracy Now! or the Daily Kos?, or do you bask in the glow of constant confrontation? Expressing opinions is one thing. Accusing a news organization of mishandling stories by a lack of follow up seems over the line to me.
My bad...The line should have read "consider other viewpoints." not express. And I do watch FOX News, the actual news portions, not the O'Reillys and Hannitys of the world. Those guys are more concerned with their own gold viewer membership dollar tallies than actual issues. So, you want to open doors...I do watch FOX News. Does that make me a bigot, Dan?
My bad...The line should have read "consider other viewpoints." not express. And I do watch FOX News, the actual news portions, not the O'Reillys and Hannitys of the world. Those guys are more concerned with their own gold viewer membership dollar tallies than actual issues. So, you want to open doors...I do watch FOX News. Does that make me a bigot, Dan?
Ben, your idea would work fine in another time...Your time, my time, but not in this time. The younger generation is far different today than when I was in my teens. Social media in the 70's was trying to place a phone call on a party line of three other phone customers. It's much more than spreading the word, though. It's a different mindset today. In this age there is greater technology, better paying jobs for the younger generation and parents who seem more lax in their delegation of authority. But the biggest difference is the lack of fear that exists today. When I attended driver's ed class we had to watch some intensely graphic auto accident films. And they did their job by scaring us enough to respect what we were learning. The kids of today laugh at those films. Their is a definite lack of respect that revolves around today's kids. And I don't mean that in an unkind way. The criticism is actually meant for the parents of these kids for being lax in their urgency to deliver the proper messages to today's kids. For example, quite a few parents have said teens drinking at parties is o.k. if there is adult supervision. WHAT??? You kidding me? And then I read some fool on these blogs writing the drinking age of 21 is only a number and there would be no difference if the drinking age was lowered to eighteen. Brilliant. What a concept. Might as well give better exposure to the pre teens as well. Only a matter of time before they start to binge, right? What's the difference? I've heard this quote from somewhere and it's so true, "We have met the enemy, and it is us".
Sounds like you could use a blast of that "Higher Power". So you're sick of the Timmy Tebow and his faith? That's your bag, but what's with the singling out of Fox News? EVERY news media and channel have reported on the Tebow story. Why you so intimidated by FOX News? If you're so darned uppity correct and secure about your positions then FOX News shouldn't be of any issue to you at all. As for Tebow, give your suspicious mind a rest. Tebow's done far more good in this world than you or I have.
Reading the last paragraph in the story Morrison pegged you to a tee, Dan. Since you seem to believe you are of a superior intellect than those already serving each city might I suggest you throw your hat in the ring and run for city council in your district. If elected, you'll finally have a fitting platform for all your ideas. Of course, the trick to getting elected is you'd need to talk to people, not down to them. You'd need to listen without shouting above their voices. Can you do all of that? Or do you prefer to just bluster about an acid tounge that can be as bitter as a northwest wind in the dead of January? In my travels I visit a number of towns...Portland, Brunswick, Saco, etc...They're all decent places, however they're not my kind of towns. Lewiston/Auburn is because it's my hometown, my old stomping grounds and I've always felt a deep sense of pride when I think or talk about them. And Morrison is correct. The area is full of genuine points of interest, festivals and eateries. It's also full of good people. Deep down Dan, I believe you're one of them. You have a passion for issues and civil matters that should be commended despite if others agree or disagree with your views. Too bad you choose to be negative and surly all the time, unless of course you prefer it that way. There's no way I could.
Kudos to the employees for their quick action. This could have been a lot worse. And I thought smokers were restricted from smoking within a certain area of the building. I know at a medical building on RTE 1 in Scarborough smokers have to walk all the way to the sidewalk to smoke, and that's a good 1,000 ft from the building.
Maybe you're right, Dan. And how would a 22 year old male better his chances on impressing a 16 year old girl? Or an 18 year old girl? Guys tried getting girls at parties drunk for that reason back in my day. I'm sure that practice hasn't changed very much today.
I expect an apology from you, Frank for the namecalling. There are better ways to get your point across. I suggest you discover them. Second of all, my question to you was very fair to ask. Why do you want to give this girl a pass on jail time if she's convicted? Being a girl doesn't give her immunity to serve a proper punishment. If the driver had been a young man I don't believe anyone would show him mercy, including yourself. One other thing... The last name is COTE. Either spell my name correctly or don't engage me in conversation.
Teens, and actually the younger generation do believe they are invincible and so clever they can pull the wool over older adults eyes. We all have either seen that or experienced it. And a lot of we forty and fifty somethings wete no different back in our day. I had to bury several of my friends due to their stupidity. And Al, I know you want tougher laws but there are laws on the books now and any new laws, like existing laws will be ignored as well due to the reasons I mentioned. Beside that, there was a 22 year old in the car as well who also showed a complete lack of responsibility. And since this accident two more young people have been killed in accidents on Maine roads. We can take away their cars but that won't solve the problem. They manage to find other ways. A big part of the problem is the 16-19 year olds hang with the twenty-somethings. The teens think the young adults are cool and those young adults prey on the minds and vulnerabilities of the teens. Why else would a 22 year old guy hang out in a car with a 16 yr old girl? If laws need to be addressed I'd start with laws pertaining to furnishing the booze, (or other substances), by both adults who throw these parties and stores that sell alcohol. Massachusettes only allows alcohol to be sold at specialty agent stores where employees are well trained. I question the training these chain conveinence stores provide their employees. Plus, given that those employees make squat for dough it's quite possible they'll take 10 bucks to look the other way.
Dan, I understand your outrage of the situation. However there is due process that must be followed and that includes a comprehensive investigation. And Ron, Al and everyone posting on this story have all made excellent points. It's going to take time and a lot of questions to be asked and answered to sort it all out. One question that surely will be explored is who was putting on this underage drinking party. Seems to me that person, or people need to be held accountable for this tragedy as well. And to all the victim's families go my deepest sympathies.
That's quite a slanted rant you just jettisoned from your poisoned keyboard. But your entire text proves every point I made to you. Thanks for that and have a most interesting day.
In the past year I have signed the petition to allow gay marriage to be legal and have defended the likes of Paul LePage and Mike Michaud within these blogs in reference to what they stand for. But I don't need to defend my voting record or ideals to you, or anyone else because of the fact I am an independent voter. And we independents are villafied by the left and right because you can't control the our thought process with your slants and rants. And I find that quite humorous, frankly. So I will agree to disagree with you and I thank you for the dialouge.
The great work you guys do, without fanfare along with the excellent job the S/J did in getting the word out made this Christmas all the much better. And it got me to thinking...It's been a few years since I last helped out with a holiday meal at Hope Haven. I'd like to offer my services again if I may. Thank you for everything you guys do. Like the sign on the wall of your building says..."Of having compassion, thus making a difference."
Aaaannnnnd, I reject everything about it on one premise; The people we elect into office and the issues we either vote for or against are decided by the independent voters who actually pay attention to reality rather than the hard core beliefs of the left or right. I think the most insane thing a voter can do is to cast votes along strict party lines, no matter who is running. And I say that because when voters do this they have no care at all in hearing what the other side is saying. Hard core left and right wingers don't have open and objective minds. The proof of that is laid out all over these blogs many times over. And when a leftie or righty is hit between the eyes with the truth, their comeback is to throw rocks, (see Dan Breton). And I get this type of behavior has been present for years. Still, that doesn't make it right even if you believe it does. That's why independents, like myself don't feel the need to constantly partake in mudslinging. That doesn't mean it makes us superior, only wise because we do listen to both sides, and it's always more beneficial to be a listener than an antagonist.
Before I begin this I will tell you I do call it a Christmas tree. That being said, what does it matter what my neighbor or my boss or anyone else calls it? They all have a right to call it what they wish just as you and I do. Religion is a very personal thing. Some people embrace it, some discard it and others either don't know or don't care what they think of it. And you know what? Everyone of those people are correct because they all practice what they believe in. A true Christian would respect that. Also, a true Christian would be secure enough in the their faith to not let something like this bother them. Also, think of the enviromentalists as well who don't call it a Christmas, or Holiday tree. They call it a dead tree and you know what, when it comes to the absolute truth, they nailed it.
Take the politics, the insinuations, the snappy little returned insults and all the hate out of this story and bring it up to a level of clarity and undeniable truth and ask this question... What does race, religion or nationality matter when it comes to putting a smile on a child's face while making his or her day great. Maybe you can answer that question by simply volunteering your time to help pass out toys to ALL the kids next Christmas and see them smiling yourself. If you ask me, that gesture would be a Christian thing to do that the One you worship would whole-heartedly approve of.
Shades of George Bush's "Mission accomplished" statement in your assessment of the current health care situation, Jonathan. Although I believe affordable health care should be a priority for all Americans, I see Obama's plan as a complete and disaterously expensive joke. More than two thousand pages of dialouge most everyone that voted on did not understand. The plan was shoved down our throats in record time so the Dems could railroad the general public before the midterms eroded their power. This plan, like the dollars spent on two wars, will choke our economy. Yes, we do need a good health care plan...this plan is not it.
I don't believe the pick up of discarded Christmas trees qualifies as an essential service. I visit a number of public works garages during the course of a given week and I notice many of the workers are constantly maintaining existing equipment, a fair amount of which is outdated. This is due to budget constraints which prevent them from updating the equipment they use. The budget constraints are due to the general public's perception that the department doesn't need their funding to increase any to compensate rising costs for parts and worker salaries. Some of the prices for the parts they need have jumped as much as 30% over the last fiscal year. So where is the line drawn to prioritize how the money in the budget is spent? No one wants their taxes to increase so public works departments are forced to operate on the same amount of funds despite rises in costs for raw materials, parts and, dare I say, raises for employees. Something's gotta give. So haul your tree out of your house and bring it to your local transfer station and be done with it. Or better yet, buy a fake tree and you won't have this problem at all, and you'll be saving a tree to boot.
Kind of funny how these things work themselves out. I read and hear about how some people want smaller government and look to government agencies, such as public works, to be thrifty and to make do with the funds they have allocated. Well, here's a perfect example of a government agency trying to save money by trimming back on a unneccessay service. But when that affects the rank and file complainers of bigger government they scream bloody murder. Hey John Q. Public, you reap what you sow.
Thank you for making us aware of the plight of those at Hope Haven and the people they help. Reading about this and helping has filled my heart with joy. Bless all of you at S/J, all the bloggers on this site, for though opinions may differ we'd still do the right thing to help out someone in need, and bless all those at Hope Haven, Good Shephard and all the other folks committed to making the lives of the less fortunate better. Most of all, bless all the children for they are the ones who suffer the most when the day gets dark. Let us all hope and make sure all their days are full of the light of hope and love. Happy Holidays to you all...
Dave.
Through the wilderness that would be the land of poison keyboards comes a person with a worthwhile and totally beneficial idea for those in need of help, and for those in need of a positive focus. Thanks for reminding me, Jason. I will be stopping in to make a donation and to basque in the glory of doing the right thing. I hope others take a break from this cyber daycare and do the same. And Merry Christmas to all.
Mr. Hart... Most folks voted for Mark Paradis because they didn't want MacDonald to win. If Paradis had won then the entire process would have started over fresh. That probably would have been for the best. However, questioning people about who they vote for and such...none of you business. It's not your place to ask. The election's over.
They have families and deal with the same issues the rest of us do. Why should they be punished because they're town employees? Most everyone I know have the Monday following Christmas off and many places are shutting down early Friday as well. Sorry for the "rest of those" who don't have that type of deal with your employer, however that doesn't give you an excuse to take it out on those that do.
Mr. Dawn, I respect your right to have an opinion on this, however, comparing Washington's dealings against the Mother Country with what the occupiers are protesting against doesn't compute. First off, Washington's battle involved freeing the colonists from England's rule, a much more complicated scenario compared to the occupier's desire to redistribute wealth. Is it the wish of occupiers to ignore the rules and disrespect authority in general? And correct me if I'm wrong but I don't recall George Washington demanding the powers that were to forgive his debts as the occupiers constantly do. And there liesthe true diffetence between the two. Washington's vision was to create a land where everyone had an equal chance to succeed at their own freewill. The occupiers are self promoters who are interested in success for those they choose. There's no question the system needs a shove, but it is the right system for us to live within. The real solution is in not tearing it down, but tweaking it in a way that loopholes that allow for cheating the system are removed. If that were the occupier's message then I'd support it, but it's not, for if it were they'd be camped out in front of the White House and on Capitol Hill where the initial decisions that led to this mess were made.
A better question to ask Mendros is, "Why do you and your backers disregard and not respect the voice of the people?" As a public servant he should put that priority at the top of his list instead of his own selfish wants. Rehashing old issues and ideas do nothing to help the community move forward. Revisiting an unpopular plan is a complete waste of resources and time. The land this building sits on is prime real estate and it's disheartening to believe civic leaders can't come up with more worthy ideas and plans for it. But overall I believe Mendros' actions and his timing so soon after we, as a populace decided the fate of a gaming facility in Lewiston is a slap in the face of all who had a say on it.
That is, until the morning I was coming down the exit 80 offramp onto 196 when, as I slowed for traffic was rear-ended by some teenaged girl who showed a great sense of surprise on her face and a cellphone in her hand as I spied her in my rearview mirror. It's time for this to become law.
Actually, Mrs. Paradis owes no one an explanation as to why she was at the poll yesterday. And I would never raise the question why. It's no one's business but her own and for people to openly speculate about her motives for doing so is crass and in extremely poor taste. People that are compelled to find out her reason(s) are also fishing for excuses to discredit her, otherwise, you have no reason to guess or ask. And I suspect those that do so also have way too much idle time on their hands.
Mr Landry seems to have forgotten what it took to help build the town he residesin. It took the hard work, sweat and sacrifice of people such as DiMillo, Merrill and Goding, as well as the insight of those like Gould to make a community work. In my line of work I converse with working men, and women each day. They turn wrenches, operate loaders and excavators and draw up blueprints. Some wear a full day's work on their person after only a few hours while some wear the grind of their careers in their thoughts and brains. It makes no matter as I always greet each one with a handshake as they are out there getting it done everyday, just like all the council people in Jay, Turner and every other town in this state. They all represent us and if Landry has a problem with asthetics then he indeed has a problem.
Within the shadows of this election, the claims made by MacDonald regarding the alledged doings of the Paradis camp, and the thin skin MacDonald apparently carries on his person, stood a lady of great strength and grace. Just days after losing her husband, Ronnie Paradis was at the polling station, greeting voters and smiling. She exemplifies the true meaning of how to lead, of how to shine in the face of darkness, of how to be giving of oneself while dealing with her own grief. Today, I celebrate her and the memory of her husband, not a man seething with tyranical rants who doesn't even have the decency to celebrate his own victory with any sense of humbleness or gratitude. To me, Ronnie is the true face of Lewiston, not the man who has now been elected
and has annoited himself "King".
I commend you Mr. Morgan for writing a thought provoking essay about the plight of immigrants who have made the Lewiston / Auburn area their homes. I especially agree with your last paragraph. While it may seem area residents who have lived here for years are being asked to carry an unwanted burden by embracing our newest residents that simply is not the case. What is being asked of them is to help the immigrants settle in and take root in the community, to aid in establishing them in business and social circles. We should not expect them to learn our language and customs on command, nor should we feel slighted and insulted if it takes time for them to do so. Above all, they should not be forced to change their customs if those customs are practiced within the laws of this state. I also drew comparisons between the immigrants of today and our French-Canadian immigrants of the past and though the economic landscape is vastly different today compared to days gone by the spirit of a new beginning is not. Like the past immigrants, those of today look to earn their keep. They are not, what I've heard some people allude to as "sponges". A number of immigrants have opened businesses on lower Lisbon St. How many of us have taken the time to visit these establishments? And how many of these new businesses have changed the landscape of downtown from empty, depressed storefronts to a bustling area of commerce, an area largely ignored by many as an eyesore in the past? Fact is, we should want them to succeed and we should help them in any way we can to do so, as opposed to taking a trip to Walmart so we can support a business purely aimed at monopolizing their market with the help of slave labor in overseas factories. Our new residents are trying. They are making an honest effort to succeed here through ingenuity and hard work. Kind of hard to see that though when many of us choose to ignore them, isn't it?
I received an alert from SJ a little while ago with the news of Mark's passing. I'm in total shock. A damn good man died today and the one thing I can say is I am a better person having known Mark. He never had an unkind word to say about anyone, nor did he ever display any emotion that had even a hint of pessimism or doubt attached to it. He treated all with respect and was a man of integrity. He always held his head up with pride and had every reason to do so. Rest In Peace, my friend. God Bless You and your family.
Mike, you are so completely off your rocker if you think Mr. Paradis disclosed the fact he has cancer in order to attract the sympathy vote. What a shallow and mean spirited thought. If you weren't going to vote for him in the first place then why bother with this post? And to assume voters are blind enough to alter or reaffirm their vote in light of this news is a insult to every voter casting a ballot in this race. I can't vote since I live out of town, otherwise Paradis would get my vote for the reasons I stated in my previous post, in other words, a vote he would have earned.
I had to drive in several different towns, including Auburn, during the storm Mr. Emery is speaking of. There was little difference in the quality of road maint. from town to town. It's like Jason said, warmer temps were predicted and the town garages may have felt in light of the forecast to reserve man hours and equipment. I don't believe it has anything to do with poor planning or incompetence on the part of A.P.W.
I've known Mark for several years and have done business with him. He is a very caring individual who cares deeply about folks he deals with on a daily basis. He's a good man and I was saddened to learn he now has to battle this disease. But Mark is a tough individual as well full of constant optimism. He's not one to back down from adversity. I'll be shaking his hand soon, but until then I indeed wish for Mark the best...always the best.
I had the pleasure of meeting and conversing with Mr. Paradis around ten years ago and he and his wife were two of the nicest people I've met in my life. Back in the day I thanked him for his sacrifice and service. This piece gives me the opportunity to do so again. Thank you, Mr. Paradis for your help in preserving our freedoms and your contributions to make the world we live in a better place.
I've always believed in the city of Lewiston and its citizens, from the hard working mill workers of the past to the residents of today, some from foreign lands, looking to make this community a better place. Though I'm still some way from retirement and currently live out of town I can see myself relocating back to Lewiston in the future as I approach retirement. But it's one of those deals where I can plan what I'd want to do in the next ten years and when that time comes I'm a completely different situation that I'd thought I'd be. The proof in that is I look back ten years ago and think at that time where I'd be in ten years and the result, though very good, was not what I imagined. I know Lewiston is an old town with a blue collar past and a less than respectful reputation from those that aren't educated or are just plain ignorant, but she's a good town and it's full of good people. I think the ranking is fitting and is indeed a shot in the arm for our psyche.
I was nineteen when I went to college, in a time when taking home $200.00 a week was considered a good wage. I needed student loans to help fund my education. When presented with the paperwork I needed to sign I made sure I read all term and conditions and asked questions if I needed clarification. When I signed I was totally aware it was my responsibility to follow the terms I legally agreed to and to take full ownership of my actions. The responsibility that comes with taking out a student loan is no different than buying something with a credit card or taking out loans for cars, a house or other tangible items received immedoately upon agreeing to purchase. The education earned from the monies borrowed is up to the student to maintain, just like a car, boat or other items purchased on credit. It's the student's responsibility to choose the correct major that will lead to a rewarding career. The fact that a lot of students default on student loans has little to do with today's job market and economic climate. It has more to do with an indifference in attitude and poor decision making. Defaulters just don't seem to get their action into partaking into acquiring a student loan is a legal and binding act and the lack of accountability is purely on them, not the government and certainly not the taxpayer. At the age of eighteen we are granted the right to vote, and what comes with that right is responsibility. As a student, you have a right to a good education. In both cases your decisions affect your future. And in both cases it is you that needs to take accountability for your decisions.
I hope Mr. Lopez is ok and they find the woman who did this. As part of her punishment she should not only be responsible for any medical bills this young man may have from this act, she should also pay out of her pocket for whatever Mr. Lopez was shopping for as well. And she should be banned from all Walmarts for life.
However, I prefer to sleep in, have a nice relaxing morning after a day of cooking and entertaining. I did venture out later in the day and scored a couple of great deals on items I had my eye on. The bonus was there were no lines where I was and I capped it off with a lovely dinner out with Mrs. Cote. And the sunset was stunning. See, Black Friday doesn't have to be full of mayhem after all.
What a great contest. I get a kick out of those commercials. So original. I actually have a friend in the Portland area who is a spitting image of Johnathan Goldsmith, the Don Equis pitchman, the man who once had an awkward moment...just to see how it feels. I told my friend of his resembalance to the actor and he said he gets that all the time. He says he likes the part where he's sitting at a table surrounded by beautidul women. Lots of ency in his voice when that's brought up. And what a great slogan, "Stay thirsty my friends." Classic.
Let's move on. It's time for the reps in Augusta to turn their attention toward legislation that is actually important to the people in their districts. This voter I.D. bill does not qualify as such. The powers that be need to put more effort and sweat into doing their actual jobs they were elected to perform, such as attracting new business, keeping existing businesses strong and viable and doing all they can so that our kids will choose to stake a claim for themselves here in Maine instead of venturing toward greener pastures in other states instead of wasting time and resources on this steaming pile of waste.
I was disappointed in Mayor Gilbert's reaction to losing the casino in Lewiston. I had met him earlier this year at an event and we actually had quite a lengthy discussion about the city and its possibilities. He was optimistic Lewiston would be a thriving town again, with no mention of building a casino. All in all, a good talk and a good guy in my impression. I guess that's why I was so surprised and let down by Gilbert's reaction to the loss. A leader is supposed to put his best face on at all times. Leaders are also responsible for having contigency plans in place in the event their original plan swirls in the bowl. Sad to say, Mayor Gilbert offered neither election night. He offered no optimistic "plan B" and the face he chose to wear was that of a spoiled child being told "no". Not a flattering image to convey upon his exit from office.
And to expand on your last point...Given the Gilbert and Mendros reactions, that of spoiled boys who expected this to pass, how can anyone wjth an ounce of integrity expect to take the notions and ideas of two gentlemen, who are supposed to carry a professional, public image at all times, seriously moving forward? I guess this was to be Gilbert's coup-de-gras and he went "all in" to use a gambling term. Still that's no excuse for poor sportsmanship. Gilbert is one of the faces of Lewiston. Gilbert acted like a crybaby upon hearing the result of the election. I think he and Mendros should take out a full page ad in the Sun Journal and apologize for their rktten behavior and silly comments.
Yeah, Al. I feel badly about that. Only one thing to do... You live in Norway, I live in West Minot. We'll meet in the middle and I'll treat you to a beer.
You missed :) My mistake. I received an e-mail notification that you had commented on my original post. After I posted a second time I noticed on the blog your comment was directed @ another David. My bad. However, cut me a little slack since these android keypads are murder.
First of all, typing a comment on an android keypad at six in the morning without my glasses on and with less than a cup of coffee in my system presents a bit of a challenge, so pardon me if I do not apologize for typos I commit and I'll ignore your O.C.D. behavior about your penchant for correcting people who make harmless mistakes, rudely. Regarding the rest of your text, it is what it is...Conservatives diislike liberals and libetals dislike conservatives. These blogs are a cyber daycare for political beliefs and neither one is any better or worse than the other. There are multitudes of instances when one side attacks the otherfor deeper reasons other than content of material. It's a personal pissing contest made for those who feel the need to make others feel inferior.If you don't like what I have to say then disagree with it, or just ignore it and I'm fine with that all day long. Pointing out someone's grammatical errors is sorta like making fun of someone who stutters when they talk. Do you also do that, Al? Wouldn't be very P.C. of you if you did, would it?
Whether question #1 passed or not, no one's right to vote would be supressed by the outcome. I voted yes on it because of questionable ads from the other side, not because of possible voter supression so can the hyperbole.And regarding the rest of your text; You seem to have every conservative in your crosshair. That tells me your no better than those you speak of bent on "destroying" Obama. We'd all be better off if both sides weren't so damn selfish in their views. But that's for another post.
Seems taking a leak on a fire hydrant should be left for the hooligans of the land and not glamourized by someone professing to practice Chrisianity. But, then again, we have to consider the source, don't we?
I commend the Penn. St. board of trustees for doing the right thing by firing Paterno and Spanier effective immediately. I applaud the trustees for standing on the school's charter beliefs. To dats, and according to WEEI radio in Boston, twenty victims have now stepped forward, and knowing Jerry Sandusky's foundation for boys was created back in 1977 I'm afraid many more victims will also come to light in the following days and weeks. Paterno is the face of Penn. St., no question. Howevet, despite his stature and place in history he needs to own up to some form of culpability. He announced his retirement earlier in the day effective at the end of the season. Had he been allowed to carry forth with that plan his presence would have made a mockery of the investigation process since, in his retirement statement, he said he wished he had better hindsight and had done more with the information provided him. This inveztigation will take time. It will be painful for everyone involved, but it must be thurough. Nobody knows how this will all end, but at least the school trustees have commenced the investigation process off on the proper foot.
And for the record, that "agree" on your post is mine. I always choose to agree or disagree with subject matter, not with the make up of an individual. Perhaps I'm old fashioned but I have always believed labeling people sucks because when one's busy labeling another, they're not listening. Thanks for your insight, Ron. And, by the way, nice beret. I own a couple of them myself. Have a most excellent day.
I'm not fishing for gold stars and compliments. I have been following this story since it broke and it disgusts me. This isn't some story with political slants that we normally spar over, or agree with. Have you read the grand jury report? If you have then you'd understand my anger over why I felt compelled to submit my last post.If you have not then please take the time to read it. I'd post it here but I haven't figured out how to do that on an android phone. This will end up being a much bigger story than even the media covering it realizes it will be.
I'd like to know who disagreed with what I had to say on this subject and why. I can't believe anyone with a sembalance of logic would find my statement to be false.
And it's this type of reaction that leads me to believe the voters got this one right. I voted no on it because it's simply too much too soon. The Oxford casino isn't even finished yet and here were not one, but two questions on the ballot seeking to open more casinos in the state. I'd like to see how the Oxford casino does for a year or two before I entertain thoughts of constructing another. Plus, the logistics of building one in downtown Lewiston are terrible. There is no easy access to the designated location and the general landscape that surrounds the area is much more conducive to stailber bussiness. And do you really want to build a casino in an area where twice a year there are thousands of kids enjoying what are supposed to be family festivals? There are alternatives to building a casino and if civic leaders weren't so short-sighted throwing their collective eggs in one basket instead of being pro-active and employing a little foresight and cleverness then they wouldn't have the need to throw hissy fits. Amd the last I checked, Gov. LePage had one vote to cast, like myself and everyone else who voted. Mayor Gilbert's comments were childish and out of bounds. Civic leaders of Lewiston... Come up with ideas the whole community can embrace. And stay away from flash-in-the-pan ideas. They are only band-aids to cover wounds to big to heal.
I read the grand jury report. It's sickening. The fact this went on for decades is mind boggling. The fact Sandusky was witnessed in a shower on the campus sexually assulting a young boy and said witness turned and ran like a coward is unthinkable. And how much sordid will this story become when more victims step forward? How sad will we be when we here victim's stories of abuse and how their lives have played out in the wake of that abuse. And what of the victims we won't hear from? Victims who possibly committed suicide out of feelings of shame they had no right to be burdened with? Victims who were so messed up they turned to crime, and possibly committed acts of sexual abuse themselves. Everyone who knew of this still connected with Penn St., including Paterno, need to step down, today, right now. As for Sandusky, give him his fair trial and of convicted, lock him up, throw away the key and let him fend for himself among his own kind.
Actually, I didn't direct my opinion at Terry's post. I read it and I don't usually comment on posts I consider outlandish and blatantly incorrect. My comment is aimed at the perception conservatives have about the role of government in their lives. Heating assistance is a neccessity in a lot of lives here in Maine and elsewhere, and is a form of government control since the funds for it are provided by taxpayer dollars. My point is where is the line drawn between government inclusion and intrusion in our lives? Conservatives bark at government if, for instance, they enact a law that is perceived to infringe upon the rights of the public, yet government is villified if they tell us funding for programs such as this one is going to be cut. We cry out for less taxation, however when this is the result then we cry foul. Then the argument turns toward fraud among recipients of aid, weeding out the cheaters. How do we determine who needs it and who doesn't? If someone has concrete evidence of fraud it is their obligation to report it. How often does that happen? Does government have enough funding to weed the cheats out? I understand the concept of less government and, fact is, government's role in our lives is to administer public policy and affairs. I don't understand conservative's Jekyll and Hyde view as to what government's role should be. Legislating laws and policy is not tailor-made, it's off the rack. In situatuions such as this we DO need government to be there for us, whether the "intrusion" is welcome or not.
One thing that hasn't been brought up here... Conservatives are for less government intrusion, am I right? No entitlement programs and such? In reality, and according to these stated principles, isn't this decision by the Obama adm. to cut back on heating assistance dollars a move toward that concept? I mean, you can't have it both ways, can you?
I think the shopping comparison is unique and correct. If you were on the same side of the argument you may very well agree with that view as well. I also believe the bullying angle is vauge at best. I feel the left does most of the bullying within the confines of this issue with their claims of unpatriotism against people not in agreement with their view. Again, the abscence of same day registration does not, in any manner, impede upon one's right to vote. No hardship is created and no one willing to cast their ballot is denied in doing so. The motives of the left are clear...Preserve same day registration to secure the voting base the left knows agrees with their platform. I still don't know how I'll be voting on this issue. I don't care for the right's claims of preventing voter fraud. To me, that is bogus. However, the left's arguments for same day have been bogus as well. Maybe a little honesty from either side would convince me how I'll vote on it.
I wonder how college students feel about being stereotyped as procrastinators, which is a polite word for slackers. As Mark pointed out that second paragraph in this text leaves a lot to be desired. If an individual's view on voting is one of high priority then that voter will be pro-active with how they approach an upcoming election, which includes becoming familiar with state election laws. This columnist's description of an average college student of being a procrastionator lends belief they are passive. College students are very active in political issues and if they care enough about their passion to vote then they will adhere to existing laws on how to vote. That's how it's done in forty-one other states. It's not a hardship or hassle to pre-register, just do the deed and be done with it.
Control is the big deal, from both sides. When it comes to the political arena, control is always the focal point. This whole argument has put into light just how deceitful both parties are. It's always been about control, and both parties' ability to spin the issues to garner that control.
As a resident and taxpayer of the town of Minot I am voting no, again. The increases asked for don't measure up to the benefits discussed and, speaking from a selfish standpoint, I find the monetary breakdown between the three towns involved to be quite unfair. The budget committee needs to sharpen their pencils a bit more.
Why do registered voters with a profound liberal bias want to keep same day registration? To protect voter rights? Garbage answer. An unregistered person may, at their own leisure walk into a city hall or town office during business hours and simply register. Stories of inconvienence are simply just that, stories. Better yet, fables. Since that reason is shot down what is the left's motivation here? I agree the right's motive is to protect their voter demographics since same day registrants tend to vote left of center. Bottom line is the reasoning is similar for each side. I don't need the right polluting the discussion with claims of possible voter fraud with same day registration. It's not like this is some third world country. Then again, the left is full of it as well given their claims I mentioned earlier. I'm registered and I don't care how this goes since I'm undeclared. Stop with the smokescreens and be honest about your motives because the people in the middle see right through the distortions both sides represent and, frankly, the views from both sides stink.
Since I'm a registered voter it's implied this question has no bearing upon my standing. However, if I were an unregistered voter, I can simply walk into my town office and register with no fuss. Any unregistered voter may do so on any day the town office they reside in is open. No rights have been taken away and that argument is completely false. My question is why this question concerns currently registered voters? Better yet, why does the lack of same day registration irritate only the left? Wrapping your true motives in false reasoning is hypocriscy at it's finest. It casts the left in the same, distorted light as the right wingers in their efforts to eliminate same day registration. Their motives revolve around voter fraud, which is a ridiculous reason. It's all about both side desiring to control the polls.
Hey Heidi, how is someone's right to vote being denied to someone when said someone doesn't keep up with election rules and guidelines? As much as filling out the paperwork to register, if you can't figure that one out then I'd be surprised you'd be privy to the issues being voted on or knowledgable of the candidates running for office. People that are already registered to vote don't really care about those not registered except when it comes to party affiliation. The right is convinced same day registration is detrimental to their cause and the southpaws fear not having same day hurts their chances to move their candidates and issues into place. So spare us who actually vote with undistorted viewpoints your concern for the unregistered voter, or the integrity of the voting process because your motives are far more selfish than what you claim. The one thing I take comfort in is moderates like myself outnumber the far left and far right combined. And it is those two group's ideals that present the biggest concern come election time.
My first question to you, Dan is this...Who is, or are, my clan? You have no clue what you are talking about regarding my political views or how I vote. As far as the implication of violence goes, I didn't read that into Mike's post. I gathered he merely was saying the occupiers were occupying the wrong patch of real estate. It was your post that opened the door to the violent connotation. And I REALLY wish you were right regarding my bank account. Unfortunately, I'm not among the "uber-wealthy" as you claim. I get up, go to work each day, spend within, and most times, below my means, (Hey, how bout that? Economic discipline!), and the last I checked my bank account there were no extra zeros following the crooked numbers. Oh, and one last thing...I received an e-mail notification from you commenting on someone else's remark. No harm I guess but it seems you were really riled up to notice you clicked on the wrong person. As Warren Zevon so eloquently put it ; "An excitable boy they all said."
Dan, are you implying the occupy crowd is capable of violence? I thought in your alledged moderate mind this was a group only interested in the justification of wealth through redistribution? You make it sound as if this motley crew would overrun the White House. Is that the message you are sending?
I heard a couple of "occupiers" lamenting about how they feel their student loans should be forgiven. That leads me to believe they want hand outs and entitlements. Is that the real motive behind this occupation? I went to college and took out student loans to help pay for my education. Now I work for a living having used my education and training the way I always believed it should be implemented. A friend of mine sent his kid to college where he partied for a couple of semesters, flunked out and now is a part of the occupy Boston crowd. And that clown dares to fault others who used their education and knowhow properly, interviewed for desired positions and secured their careers by putting in the time and sweat for years? I find it insulting that some fool wasted an opportunity to utilize an education and the dollars it takes for that education simply to blow it and then expect taxpayers that connected the right dots to pay for their idiocy. No one should feel ashamed for making a good fortune through dedication to their craft.
Great letter and a great attitude to have. Sounds like you have a lot of people and things in your life that make you happy. More power to you, mate and best wishes for future good health.
I'm not about to let you bait me into your quagmire of political abyss, that desolate place where political arguments are never likely to be solved. And those arguments fester due to attitudes such as yours. That is, an attitude that refuses to listen to any alternative viewpoint presented. Anyhow, I've spoken my peace and I agree to disagree with you. Have a nice day, Dan.
Again Dan, the content of my last post involves a national chain company and its manager's decision to close a select number of stores throughout the United States, including three here in Maine. It has nothing to do with Paul LePage. Nor would Libby Mitchell or Eliot Cutler have anything to do with it if they held the office of governor. Your comment seems to be borne from a larger picture you want to display and in this context that picture doesn't fit. The bottom line is Lowe's didn't bring their "A" game to the show in the areas affected. Those store's lack of performance have nothing to do with government, for if that was the factor then shouldn't we blame Obama since these closures occured on a nationwide scale?
Okay, Daniel. No namecalling and no insults coming from my keyboard. Fact is our Governor, nor his policies have nothing to do with a corporate decision from a national chain to close a number of stores nationwide. You need to prove to me LePage had anything to do with Lowe's decision to close some stores in Maine.
In some ways Lowe's is better than Home Depot. Lowe's is certainly a fancier looking store. I've been told by a couple of people that work at the Auburn Lowe's the store's schematics are designed to attract the female consumer, and though that may sound a bit sexist it does bear some truth. The main difference between the two stores, and the reason Lowe's is getting buried by Home Depot is because Home Depot is the store of choice for building, plumbing and heating contractors. They all get deeper discounts through Home Depot because Home Depot moves much more product volume than Lowe's. So esentially Lowe's is relegated to being merely an fancy, oversized hardware store. I have also had negative experiences returning items to Lowe's. And the attendants at Home Depot do possess more product knowledge and general know-how than Lowe's Employees. And the extra sharpness of Lowe's setup versus Home Depot's no frills look comes at a price, a price which is passed on to your purchase at Lowe's.
I will assume most everyone with an opinion on this subject is cirrently registered to vote legally in this state. Count me among those that are registered as well. That being said, how does this issue affect anyone already registered to vote? I don't get the urgency displayed on the subject other than each side plugging their political agendas. I don't care if John Q. Public pre registers or registers on the day of an election. It doesn't affect me at all. I'm more concerned about who and what's on the ballot than the manner in which the population registers. And if you're not registered then get out from behind your keyboard or put your smartphone in your pocket and go register. If you have the time to complain and rant about it then you also have the time to register. And please, save the "it takes the right to vote from voters that haven't registered" argument. That gripe is the biggest load of steaming waste I've heard on the subject.
I'm sure most are aware there are only eight states and the District of Columbia that allow same day voter registration. Two other states, Connecticut and Rhode Island do allow same day registration only for Presidential elections. Then there's North Dakota's quirky standing that doesn't require voter registration at all. Among the states that do not allow it are New York, Massachusetts, California and Vermont. Not exactly the hubs of the conservative mindset. Last November this state elected a conservative individual Governor despite having same day voter registration in place. I don't understand why the left is so up in arms about maintaining same day registration since it didn't help your cause any in 2010. At the same time I don't understand why the right wants to do away with it other than to keep their numbers up in Augusta's chambers. After all, the 2010 elections proved they could win with same day registration in place. And I reject the conservative viewpoint that voter fraud exists within the parameters of the same day registration environment. The way I view it this issue has become a double paradox, if there is such a thing. This issue is a classic example of what happens when hordes of people get too wrapped up in their politics. When that happens the blinders are welded to those folk's mindsets and alternate opinions are denounced and cast aside like a fruit cake at Christmas. I don't get worked up over this issue because it's not worth getting worked up over. I don't believe allowing or prohibiting same day voter registration has much of an effect on the final results. To me, recent elections have proven that.
That's what this fight amounts to. Here's a company choosing to set up business in a smaller town, and in the process, create jobs and the locals are fighting it. Why? Traffic considerations? Added competition to another store down the road? Hannaford has built stores in towns like Gray and Waterboro and I've never heard complaints about upsetting the "harmonious conformity" of the surrounding area. What a crock of crap. If you don't want Hannaford to build in Turner then be honest about why you feel that way.
Negligence (The definition by the law's standard) ; The failure to exercise that degree of care that, in the circumstances, the law requires for the protection of other persons of those interests of other persons that may be injuriously affected by the want of such care ; The failure to exercise the care that a reasonably prudent person would exercise in like circumstances. Drinking and driving is a negligent act. You want to split hairs about it then you can do that on someone else's time. I've witnessed the death of friends at the hands of a drunk and my outrage is alive and well and those instances still leave me angry to this day. As an officer of the law I do appreciate the work you had to perform under, what I'm sure were, grisly conditions. But one doesn't have to be an ex cop or a retired vet to understand what carnage and tragedy is. I've seen enough of it for a lifetime.
The difference between losing our service personnel in wartime and citizens losing their lives in road accidents in which alcohol or drug use is involved as the cause is this...When we lose a soldier, a sailor, a Marine or an airman, (or airwoman), we indeed honor their service and pay our respects because, through the media their story is told, as it should be. We lower our American and state flags in their honor and we shed a tear and respect their sacrifice. But we, as a populace, have no control over their fate. Our government assigns them to do a job that is dangerous and sometimes results in tragedy and all we can do is hope and pray they make it through safely. As a father of a daughter who has been deployed to Iraq three times I can say with confidence I do understand and pay attention. However, there is little outrage when a man, woman or child becomes a victim of someone's negligence when they drive intoxicated. It is obscene that 15-20,000 people become a part of someone's statistical matrix in this manner. And I find it even more outrageous that someone can spew out percentages like candy and then exclaim to us we shouldn't be outraged still at the carnage still happening on the roadways? The last I checked, 65% of 15,000 is 9,750. How is someone not outraged at the fact so many people continue to lose their live each year in this manner? Unlike the loss of our service personnel, the deaths of these accidents could have been prevented, every single one of them. That is the outrage. In all these instances some fool decided to have a few, get lit, run the roads in their car and end someone's life...It doesn't comfort me to know that the fatality rate has been reduced by 35%. Are we that desensitized to the condition? It's an outrage if we are.
You rant like a spoiled seven year old. No one on this site takes you seriously. Why don't you take a couple of hundred anger management classes and wash your brain out with soap. And I wish Judy could add an "ignore" button to the kudo lineup.
Whenever I have moved from one address to another there were always two things I put at the top of my to do list...Stop in at the Post Office to make out a change of address form and visit the town hall or city building to register to vote. Rather basic steps to me. I don't care who you are or what you do for work, no one is that busy not to get those things done upon moving.
If I was in ESPN's shoes I'd have fired him as well. But as decisions like this are made by corporate America to protect their image, I wonder how it is Madonna is scheduled to perform during the next Super Bowl despite her comparison of John McCain to Adolphe Hitler? I'd like to think the National Football League would show the same zero tolerance.
Fact is, Mr. Williams opinion is protected under the first amendment of the constitution. He has every right to express it. Sorta like someone calling the Governor of the State of Maine "Taliban Paul" repeatedly?
From what I read the mayoral candidates are utilizing the same old talking points...Create jobs, develop the downtown area, etc...Then all five fall back on the casino idea and that's not the solution. However, I do find candidate Hill's vision of showcasing the city as a whole and using that to move forward. A great example is the revitalization of the Bates Mill area where not too long ago it was a depressing maze of decrepit brick buildings and old parking lots overgrown with weeds pushing through the cracks in the pavement. These days we are fortunate to have attracted businesses and eateries to set up shop in the newly renovated buildings. That section of town looks fantastic. But I don't believe adding a casino to the mix will enhance the area the way these candidates believe it will. I would like to see development near exit 80 of the turnpike. There are many opportunities to make a positive statement there. I also disagree with candidate MacDonald about his stance on the immigrants that now call Lewiston their home. A number of them have tried making a go at establishing a business, but how successful does anyone think they can be if we as a community cast aside their efforts and question the legitimacy of their intentions? The Somalians residents of today, like the French-Canadian residents of years ago immigrated her for a chance to live their lives in a place with boundless opportunity. We need to give them that opportunity. There are solutions to the welfare situation as well. Institute a program whereas welfare recipients are required to partake in x amount of hours a week of community service. And I'm not talking about picking trash up in the park, but rather to place them in postions where they can be of some real benefit, and in turn, instill in them a sense of purpose and belonging. Meaningful tasks they can hang their hats on and say at the end of the day they made a positive difference. None of this happens until it is realized that each and every person, from all walks of life have purpose and value. So, in retrospect, the challenge is not in how we rebuild this city, but rather, how do we rebuild the mindsets of the residents of this city?
IF this was an isolated incident and this business was indeed unaware of the faulty equipment then they should step forward on their own before scuttlebutt from their town spreads their name out there. IF this was deliberate then I agree their name should be published. In that instance they would have betrayed the trust of those who gave them their business. That's sin # 1 in the real world.
Roger, who are you to dictate how someone should spend their money? How do you know what this family's needs are? And how condescending of you to even think you have a right to dress this family down for anything. Telling someone who works from home to "get off their lazy bum"??? Your whole post is mean spirited and insulting, especially your last sentence ; "My mom was a single mom of 3 and we never lived on Horton St." So are you saying everyone living on Horton St. is a malcontent? That living on that street causes a person's social status to be null and void? That decent people living in that neighborhood are undeserving of the same protections and services residents on the "right side of town" enjoy and take for granted? Don't judge a person, period. You have no clue what their total situation is like. Don't humor the rest of us to believe you have the answers because clearly you don't.
You know, Pamela, I grew up on the streets of Lewiston back in the seventies. Good times back then. We had our own group that didn't do much to get in trouble besides ringing doorbells and running or climbing the fence to get into the pool in Kennedy park at night. The residents were folks who worked the mills, as well as the older residents of French-Canadian heritage. It was a working class neighborhood and it was a time I treasure to this day. No reason why it can't be that way again. I've been following the stories of how some people want to turn the Bates Mill #5 into a casino. I'd rather see the city, and a few business leaders with a few ounces of vision turn that building, and area into a huge neighborhood market center where people from all walks of life and cultures can converse, do business and establish themselves as leaders of their community. The mindsets of people that have cast aside and thrown away their pride of their town needs to change before positive results can be achieved. This town doesn't need a casino. But it does need to eliminate the riff-raff that's escalated within the city limits. Community leaders need to instill that sense of pride back into people that have become pessimistic of future growth, and a sense of hope for those looking for leadership and clarity. Pessimists will scoff at all I'm saying, not because they believe it's a silly notion, but because to them it's too damn hard to imagine things can change for the better. It is a challenge and it would be tough to accomplish, but we need to look hard and long at our values, our sense of pride and our heritage and have the unyielding understanding that all the effort needed to accomplish this transformation would be worth it a thousand fold. No matter what, Lewiston is my hometown and I am, and will always be proud to say that.
No question Fox News is biased. Then again, the same can be said for NBC as well. I used to watch NBC news faithfully in the days of Tom Brokaw. I thought he was terrific and their news division was first rate. And I do like Brian Williams, but the content and direction of their organization has changed over the years. There is a certain slant to it, although subtle. Fox's slant is more like a 90 degree turn. They make it obvious what their views are. Truth is, everyone has an agenda. Those who think differently are in denial.
Claire, your second sentence in your post raises a good question...Why do people living in this area, trying to do the right things be chastised by other people as to where they live? It's almost as if the naysayers are blaming this family for their choice of residency. Why shouldn't these people feel they deserve the same safety in their neighborhood as others claim they have in different parts of town. And Robin, why don't you let everyone in on your little secret about how one can move to a different and better neighborhood with no money, alledgedly. It's disappointing how some people stereotype individuals out to be something they are not simply by noting the neighborhood they live in. Disappointing and shameful.
First off, let's give John and Pamela Bannon a lot of credit for their concern and well being for their daughter, and for speaking up to the public about their concerns. Second, swinging a rent payment along with paying bills and raising kids in this economy is no small feat on its own. Factor in saving enough cash for a deposit on a new apartment, which is usually one month's rent at least, and the prospect of making a change in residency can be quite a challenge. I get dismayed by people on the outside judging other's circumstances. Instead of judging why don't you offer suggestions to help? Sometimes people in the Bannon's position feel there is no hope because we criticize their decisions when we have no right to. The end result is a sense of desolation and hopelessness. It doesn't have to be that way at all. Make some phone calls. Check out the Maine housing website and don't let gloom and doom navigate you to a path you need not have to choose. Don't be afraid to think outside the box.
Francona had few options coming out of his bullpen he could depend on to bail out his underachieving starters. Look at the names...Jenks, Wheeler, Albers, Morales and toward the end, Bard. As a manager, who would you trust in the 5th, 6th or 7th to keep a game close or to protect a lead? The only two pitchers Francona could depend on out of the pen were Aceves and Papelbon. Francona had to play the hand dealt to him and he received no help from Epstein to strengthen that staff. Carrying Wakefield through the season is getting old, too. And the moves that were made? Eric Bedard? Theo signed him coming off an injury and a horrible performance, plus Bedard despises pitching in a big market such as Boston. Lackey? he's a joke. Francona had to pitch him to justify the terrible contract Theo signed him to. Lester? He fell in love with his cutter and nibbled. He didn't throw his fastball nearly enough. And the thing is, if Papelbon gets just one more strike, and if Dan Johnson of the Rays lives up to his .106 BA and strikes out instead of hitting that game tying home run against the Yankees then none of us are even talking about all of this, are we?
In between the 2-10 start and the 7-20 September this team had the best record in baseball much of the year. Actually, Tito was one more strike from Papelbon and one less Dan Johnson home run from managing his team in Arlington tonight. Add those two snapshots of what didn't happen into reality and this discussion isn't even being brought up. The problem is Francona protected his players too long and they let him down. Francona is the best manager this franchise has ever known and letting him go would be absolutelt stupid.
How's this Tito's fault? He was one strike and a Dan Johnson out from managing his team tonight in Arlington. For all the work this guy has done for eight years and the way he protected his players the finger pointing should be directed at them for pooping their pants as they did. The players are veterans making millions of $$$. What's Tito supposed to do? Pitch the ball and swing the bat, too?
I don't believe Mrs. Beliveau would neglect mentioning the airline if she was privy to that information. Therefore, the corporate aspect of these events, if there is any, would escape her. Sometimes people will perform acts of kindness, such as these, with no expectation of reward or noteriety, but would gladly accept a simple "thank you". Count me as a member of that crowd.
In the town I live in the town hall is open on Thursdays from 2:00PM to 7:00PM to accomodate daytime workers. Not sure about other towns but at least here we do have that helpful option.
Dan, I am constantly on the road, mostly in southern Maine and you would be shocked at some of the things I witness while driving. If I see a car in front of me weaving I automatically believe a cell phone is being used in some capacity. As I pass the driver in question I am usually proved correct. Banning all cell phone usage while driving is a good idea whose time has come. Now if we can only stop the fools who apply make up, are reading the newspaper or are wolfing down their 3,000 calorie delicacy from the local drive thru while driving then we will have made even more progress.
Walnut St. was my old neighborhood back in the mid 70's. I'll drive down there occasionally and I marvel about how the area has changed so much. Back in the day it the old neighborhood was filled with blue collar families, the parents working in the local mills and kids like me hanging out in Kennedy Park or scrounging for quarters to play the pinball machine at Mamarosa's. There was a lot of pride in the residents of that neighborhood back then. Good work ethics and not much in the way of trouble. It's hard to believe that neighborhood has decayed to what it has become. Very sad indeed.
A few days ago a young girl in Massachusetts was sitting on her porch waiting for a taxi when a group of teens were walking by with a pit bull in tow, Do I have to even say what happened next. The dog got loose, attacked the girl and she was left with gaping puncture wounds to her mid section. Not to mention the fear she felt and the nightmares she'll have to endure for who knows how long. A person's got to be mighty dense to believe that particular breed of dog is not aggresive without provocation.
According to the Domestic Violence Resource Center an estimated 6,000,000 women and 3,000,000 men are victims of domestic violence here in the U.S. Those numbers are staggering. I consider that grotesque and an epidemic. At what point do you consider it an epidemic? 20,000,000? 40,000,000? And your "assessment" that existing penalties are sufficent is complete garbage. Penalties that exist today are slaps on the wrist because many first offenders repeat the crime. And they repeat because they knowingly understand the punishment is not all that hard to weather. If the offenders aren't drunk on substances that turn them into the creeps that lash out then they are drunk on the power of domination and the need to assert their authority in any manner they see fit. Unless you've been a victim or know a victim of domestic violence you cannot comprehend the havoc it can wrought or the permanent damage, physically, mentally or spiritually it creates. And how many times does an initial case develop into something far worse? Cavilier attitudes toward the subject, such as yours, exacerbate the perception that it's not as big a deal as it's being made out to be. Mr. Lacombe's letter is spot on. The perps are cowards and mandatory sentences should be in the books to deter would be offenders. It is an epidemic, pal. Anyone who disagrees insults the victims of these crimes.
Bless him for his heart is in the right place. But this latest idea stinks. C'mon. We've seen this movie before. Lots of promise and tease and non factoring results. I actually expected him to roll out a plan I could be encouraged by and get behind. When he unveiled this wreck of a plan I lost whatever faith I had left that this man may have some positive answers. Why do politicians believe the more money you throw at a problem the more it will help the situation? It doesn't work. So how do we fix the mess? Both sides need to start playing nice with each other for starters. That involves swallowing a lot of pride and checking multiple egos at the door. And that has as much of a chance of happening as does this latest plan from Obama to work.
She's a real creampuff. Whoever buys it will yodel till dawn. Sit out on the deck at night and watch the stars twinkie. And four and a half baths? Finding a place to relieve yourself is easy as pie. Yep, this baby takes the cake. I'd buy it if I had the dough, but I'm just a po'boy. It's true the interior looks cheesy, but that pink paint is actually icing. Well, whoever buys it I'm sure the upside will be huge.
Since when should anyone expect to be paid for doing the right thing? Why should cash be needed to coax the truth out of an individual? Seems we are a society of souls looking for, and expecting incentives at every turn, and frankly, I think it stinks.
Democrats don't want Americans performing these functions. Hell, they want Americans to stay on the entitlement bonanza. These jobs are earmarked for illegal aliens with the Democrats promise of Shangri-La and the American dream, all the while pandering for votes. So one one side are Republicans, who are slugs, and on the other side we have the Democrats, who are immoral. Either way the political pie is sliced, the filling has spoiled.
Dan...Cmon. Are you for real? Are you in charge of comic relief? Up to now I figured you were just another liberal that has permanent blinders attached to your mind. However this display completely erodes any credibility any of your comments may have a chance to hold. Let go of the anger and live a little for a change. Oh, and compassion is a nice thing to show on occasion as well.
So if I decide to overload one of my circuits and that condition starts an electrical fire, does that mean I can sue C.M.P. for damages even though I fully knew my actions created that condition and was not the responsibility of the power source? It's common knowledge it's not safe to run a generator in an enclosed environment within the confines of a livable structure. It's as common as the knowledge we have about the safety of wearing seat belts. If I choose to not wear mine and I get hurt in an accident, does that allow me to sue Nissan? Of course not. And the saddest part of this story is media outlets constantly broadcast reports regarding the proper use of generators and many people ignore the reports. There are also operating manuals that expicitly outline the dangers of improper use of these machines, usually several times through the text. If a consumer chooses to ignore the warnings and tragedy strikes then how can anyone be at fault but the victim? C.M.P. had nothing to do with these tragic deaths. They do not control the weather. They do not control the freewill and decision making of individuals. They provided ample warnings before the storm hit that there would be prolonged power outages. At the onset of the outages C.M.P. said the outages would take several days to repair. Seems pretty clear cut to me. Why doesn't it seem the same way to critics?
Claire, I present to you the "Written Word Gold Star of the Day." Dynamite letter. Right to the point and 100% spot on. Thanks for sharing. Best read of the day.
Maybe if both parties would learn how not to be so polarizing then, perhaps your wish would come true. As an undeclared voter I find it disheartening the two sides can't get along. And talk show pundits exacerbate the condition. We elect these people to display integrity and leadership. That's hard to deliver when neither side shows no interest in reaching across the aisle. As voters, we have the right to criticize since we all pay their salaries. Show us it's about working for the all the people and not about the power and then the mood will soften. Lead by example and prove to all of us Washimgton isn't a glorified daycare.
We were warned several days before this storm to prepare fot it. And I heard the comments such as, "Ah this storm will be no big deal." C.M.P. told us to be prepared for extended outages. They were right and, apparently, this wasn't just another storm. I know a lot of people that work for C.M.P. All good people. Do you think they're out there twiddling their thumbs? It's the people who didn't prepare that are the angriest, and I don't feel sorry for them one bit. Belly-aching on a blog won't make the situation better. For the record, we do not have power yet. We prepared for that and we're actually enjoying a few days without the technological comforts that rule our lives. It's your cgoice to wallow in your swill as you wish. To me, that's a sad way of handling this situation.
Gov. LePage is doing what a leader is supposed to do during a difficulty such as weathering a bad storm. This is not a waste and anyone who believes it is misses the point. This is about supporting those he serves and he is doing so by seeing for himself the havoc created by this storm. Several months ago President Obama toured Joplin, MO. after the catastophic tornado that struck their town. I saw his reaction on news reports. He was genuinelyshaken and shocked by the mass destruction he saw. His words were very emotional and sincere. He offered comfort to victims and was adament in his promise to help those folks back on their feet. He showed he cared. That is what LePage isdoing today. No campaigning, no photo ops. Let's give the man credit for doing the right thing. That shouldn't be that difficult to do.
Gee Larry, you said a mouthful. I'm glad you said it with your mouth and not mine. Let's just say I disagree with 95% of what you're saying. I'll agree with Obama's approval rating being low. We all expect that, however he doesn't have an enviable job right now, does he? I don't agree with some of Obama's programs or decisions, but to cast him as a constitution hating person is plain wrong. I'd love to see his programs work for the benefit of all he serves. And how does one justify accusing someone of hatred when the accuser does so by spewing hate themselves? Do we really want the man to fail? What does that say about us if we do?
Actually, GOV. Paul LePage is doing what any other gov. should do in a situation such as preparing for a hurricane's arrival. Anyone who jumps up and down making stupid political statements under these conditions exposes themselves as completely lacking in credibility and common sense.
Great point, Tom. And here's another thought... How many olympic atheletes have had their medals stripped from them due to positive drug tests or other infractions? Where's the integrity of the games go when cheating becomes a focal point. And couldn't other major sports, such as major league baseball, the NFL, etc...have an argument about how their names are used by the general public for backyard weekend activities as well? This whole argument by the olympic committee is absolutely stupid.
Regardless of which side of the road you choose to stand on the basic fact is Snowe is right. And I get she's a republican and she votes along party lines the majority of the time, however, she also reaches across to the other side more so than she's given credit for. That's how compromise begins.
Way to go, and you did it the right way. Just put them down and walk away from them. It's been four years for me and it was tough but the benefits of quitting are miles above any pleasure received from the habit. Hope your wife can conquer the habit again. Stay happy.
I travel to Scarborough each workday and I log many miles per week on the turnpike. The Maine State Police do an excellent job patrolling that road and enforcing the speed limits. I sometimes see as many as seven or eight vehicles pulled over by troopers at a time within a one mile stretch. The State Police have developed a reputation for being tough on offenders thus they have condition over time the regulars that travel this highway daily. I usually go about five mph over the limit and when I get passed it's usually by someone going just a couple of mph faster than me. The exceptions are almost always out of state drivers who don't know any better. So I thank all the Troopers who patrol the pike for not only are they providing a safer environment for me to travel on, but also for my family as well, and yours too as well.
This episode is a perfect example of how government can muddy up the political waters for the rest of us. How about a clear and simple solution... Repeal the law that denies same day voter registation, put the question on this November's ballot and let the voters decide once and for all. It seems way too much time and energy is being spent on this issue as it is. I don't care what Webster, Summers or anyone else has to say about this, and I don't care to see any proof one way or another. Put the question on the ballot, vote on it, live with the result and be done with it once and for all.
Actually, Republicans gained power in the last election with same day registration intact. Whether we have it or not makes no difference because what sways all elections is the moderate vote. The far left is too loony and the far right is too screwey for those in the middle to pay attention to. But both sides clamor for their views to be echoed by the people who are elected. This issue is sort of a battlefield to either secure the liberal vote or an attempt to deny access to vote. Either way, both sides have portrayed themselves to be the "victim" although their motives are selfish. It's hard for me to believe either side actually cares about the plight of the voter. It's all about the votes themselves. Always has been amd always will be.
According to an MSNBC link (www.msnbc.msn.com/id/28141995/ns/u), there were only two Republican politicians convicted of differing corruption crimes; Bill Thompson who I believed served as Mayor of Chicago back in the twentys and early thirties, and former Gov. George Ryan. However, the article lists a slew of Democrats, like Otto Kerner Jr., Daniel Rostenkowski, Dan Walker and various individuals within the Daley adm. And of course, Mr. Ron (doesn't my hair look fabulous)Blog-hard. According to the article I read it is the Democrats that have trashed Illinois politics for decades by a wide margin.
My guess, George is the answers you are looking for may be obtained simply by opening up the Koran and actually reading it. It's too easy to fall into the trap known as "heresay." When Jim Bouton wrote his first book, "Ball Four" which spoke of his life and time playing major league baseball in the 1960's many players of that era panned it
and some went as far as calling Boutin a "communist" for writing of experiences which were considered taboo at that time, such as how contracts were negotiated and how some players actually participated in activies such as drinking and casual sex whiile on the road. The book was pure genius and an excellent read but when asked what parts of the book offended the naysayers the most their reply was, "Well, I actually didn't read it.".
I'm going to assume that you hold a valid Maine's drivers license, Robin. Therefore I'd like to believe you understand the existing laws concerning pedestrians walking within crosswalks. They, without question, have the right of way. The only possible way fault would be shifted upon the pedestrian is if he intentionally walked in front of the moving vehicle. As for the boy, you seem to assume it was his fault despite the fact there is no information contained within this story that details what happened. And you dare say adults and children, (pedestrians I assume although your statement is quite vauge), have no respect for local drivers. I don't know what you're seeing but from my vantage point it's clearly the other way around.
Given the responses here my opinion is you folks don't like this idea simply because LePage suggested it, not because of the separation of church and state argument. After all, your collective points could be made without the hatred contained within your own words. I'm not saying your core beliefs are wrong but it makes your comments look hypocritical when you combat your perceived views of how LePage spreads his "hatred" around by slinging your own brand of hatred. So, in effect, you're no better than he is. One other thing... Given your stance on the subject matter, shouldn't we also chastise President Obama anytime he asks us to "Pray for the victims" of natural disasters and such? And if not then how is that different from what LePage is asking?
No matter where the fault may lie there is an obvious disconnect between the council and thr city manager. Perhaps I'm not qualified to state an opinion since I no longer reside in Auburn, but I was a resident a few years back and one of the reasons we moved was due to problems that existed within city government. The bickering, snide remarks and constant confusion are inexcusible and a poor example of how a city government is supposed to work. There are two qualities a city councilor and a city manager need to possess to succeed in their posts ; Commitment to the community and its citizens and integrity. The good people of Auburn need to ask themselves if they feel they are being short changed. It seems they are from both corners and that's a real shame.
What a great attitude to have ; "Taking care of our own.", "Teach them about birth control." etc...I'd be downright ashamed of myself if I put my name to those comments pertaining to this story. The feeling I get is since we as a nation has a support system through our government than all is taken care of in the midst of a national disaster. Really? What happened in the days following the landfall of Hurricane Katrina? That support system failed in a nation that's supposed to be the greatest nation on earth. This is a country that is so far behind the times that dealing with a catastrphe such as widespread famine is overwhelming to a government that hope for these people is dim at best. And Mr. Hubbard I will call you out in particular...What kind of help do you need? If you are someone that deserves to be helped all you have to do is ask for it and you would be directed to the right people that will assist you. However, if you're just one of those types that expect something for nothing, or free food or whatever, then take a trek to your local McD's and slam a couple of dollar McDoubles down your throat. When we were attacked on 9/11 do you honestly believe it was "Americans" only that searched through the rubble and buried the dead among the grieving? No way. The entire civilized world came to us and pledged their help doing whetever was asked of them. The world is one big community, I firmly believe that and those that don't want to be a part of it are those that deserve to be cast aside. What if another earthquake strikes a country like Haiti? Or a tsunami hits the Phillipines? You going to turn your back because you "Gave enough already"? Is it too inconveinent for any of you if a natural disaster strikes an impovershed nation and you're asked to GIVE? Will that cause you to limit your Netflix orders for the next month? Being fat, dumb and happy may be your tonic for life as you see it. Personally, if I had that attitude I couldn't look people in the eye.
In order to control the obesity problem the culture must be changed. For example, drive by a McD's around any mealtime and note how deep the dtive yhru lane is with people waiting to slam a couple of Big Macs down their throats. Oh and don't forget the fries. And that is only one of many choices out there for fast and fattening food. In the time wasted waiting in that line a person could choose to whip up a quick salad at home before they leave for the day. However, throuygh laziness folks cast adide the healthy option for a handful of cholestorol. We are living in a society of instant gratification woth minimal effort. We can choose to do the right thing, but that's to hard. Yeah, it would be so easy to just put down the fork, but
it's easier still to pick up the phone and order takeout.
Either this lady hets a bill, or worse, gets scammed. I heard of a fly by night roofing contractor using the same ploy and was successful in scamming victims by submitting an outrageous labor bill that more than covered time and materials used. They promise the product for free and not the service. I'm sure this lady did not enter under some type of written agreement which complicates the situation further. Lesson number one... Nothing is FREE.
On any day when city and town halls are open for business anyone living in, and / or attending college In that given locale may register to vote. It's a process that is simple to complete just as it is to register your car or conducting other business one may have that requires permits and such. Nobody is denying the right to register to vote to anyone. That being said, I do agree with the notion of placing this question on a referendum ballot for one reason ; It is an issue that the voters of Maine should decide on and not the government. Also, I am curious to see the proof Mr. Webster is speaking of which he possesses. He opened that door in this article and he needs to explain his motives as well. But I do believe Democrats have but one motive to continue same day registration and that is to merely enhance their voter base. As with the Republicans it's all about the power, not the people responsible for giving them that power. And that's how it has always been, and probably always will be.
"Corpsman Up." What a moving tribute. I'm not ashamed to admit my eyes welled up reading it. Hell, I'd question my own heart and soul if I hadn't. I've always given faithfully to the Wounded Veterans of America but I never fail to thank a person in uniform any chance I have, including my step-daughter who is a platoon sargent at Fort Hood and has three tours in Iraq in her rearview mirror. I wish I had the chance to thank Mr. Bryant. However I want to thank you, Ron for not only posting this tribute, but also for your dedication, time and sacrifice that you gave of yourself. Thank you, sir.
Citizens of Auburn...You have a high school that is grossly outdated and in need of attention. This "surplus" money would be more wisely used if it was allocated toward a new Edward Little high school. The school dept. could still purchase an X amount of ipads for each school for general studies and training. Buying one for each kid is downright idiotic. The infrastructure of the high school is of much more of a urgent need. Ipads for each 5 year old is not a "need."
Citizens of Auburn...You have a high school that is grossly outdated and in need of attention. This "surplus" money would be more wisely used if it was allocated toward a new Edward Little high school. The school dept. could still purchase an X amount of ipads for each school for general studies and training. Buying one for each kid is downright idiotic. The infrastructure of the high school is of much more of a urgent need. Ipads for each 5 year old is not a "need."
Perhaps Mr. Reed you missed the fact that this person who wiped out his family was about to stand trial for holding them at gunpoint last year. He was ordered to surrender all firearms to the authorities and to stay away from his family. This was not a typical domestic violence situation, and even if it was, how many of those end tragically? And one more thing; If you or your family had been held against your will at gunpoint wouldn't you see to it that the person responsible was being watched closely by those we pay to protect us?
You are absolutely correct. Law enforcement let this lady and her kids down. And another thing; Why did the first officer on the scene stay outside when he heard shots fired. Ok, he didn't have backup but knowing the situation and the people involved he's gotta go in.
The first section I turn to in the Sunday paper is "Talk of the Town". Great insight and humor with the right kind of sarcasm that smacks us upside our collective thought processes. Mark is a true gem of a journalist in every sense of the word. He makes us, or better yet, dares us to think and that is what makes Mask such a unique and genuine talent. Besides that, he's so spot on with his observations. He makes us think, he makes us laugh and he makes my Sunday mornings what they should be...laid back and fun. Enjoy his work to the fullest for we are fortunate he writes for our paper.
It's not what you said but how you said it Mr. Rimi. After all it's not as if you're sparring with someone over some political ideology. With that you further lose points on the "respect-o-meter. Unless being an angry man is your mea culpa of course.
I think anyone using the word "tard" to describe someone while making their point is classless and hateful. I'm disappointed the editors at this newspaper have chosen to allow that comment to stand. As for the writer, you should be ashamed of yourself and issue an apology.
Seems to me the problems that exist in this state today have nothing to do with murals being erected or removed. Nor does it have to do with the left or right. It has to do with a lack of continuity among those we elect and send to Augusta, and a disconnect between them and the residents of this state that sent them there. For thirty plus years I heard folks complaining about state government and how it is so ineffective. So in this past election cycle the power shifted and then one of the first things on the agenda was whether or not we should proclaim the whoopie pie as the state dessert. My reaction to that was ????? Whether I voted for the candidate that wins their office or not I tend to cut them some slack at the onset of their term. I'm not a slave to any particular political ideology or a certain capital letter in front of someone's name. I know a lot of people who are wrapped up in their politics, both left and right, and there is virtually no reasoning with them, nor is their room for compromise. It doesn't matter who's in charge if that kind of mentality exists within the walls of the capital.
I pity any person who chooses to personally attack another individual for stating his or her opinion. How small of a mind you must have and how pathetic your little tirades against others have become, Mr. Breton. You continue to prove to the rest of us that when you don't have a sensible reply to another's view, you simply throw rocks.
Exxon-Mobil made a profit of $10.65 billion dollars in the first quarter of 2011. Then they practically apologized for that despite the $4.00 a gallon + price at the pumps. They paint themselves out to be the scapegoats but that's a bunch of horse droppings because they've been doing this all along. And I understand speculators have a lot to do with the prices but it seems we've driven down this road way too much, and we are almost on empty.
Gov. LePage is who he is and nobody has the right to change how he thinks or speaks. The man, like everyone of us, has freewill to be the person he chooses and asking someone th change their personality is wrong. I accept who he is and how he speaks. I've heard some who did not vote for him belittling his speech and grammar and making references to his heritage and background. These people were supposedly of higher intelligence. Yeah, right. Someone once said, "You can't teach common sense." For decades common sense was absent in Augusta and we are now paying for the mistakes of those transgressions, including the contracting of this labor mural that we as residents of this state were never asked whether it should be put up in the first place, nor were many of us aware it even existed. And though it's true he is not the first governor to inherit the problems we have faced all along, the fact is these problems have been compounded by wasteful and entitlement programs for years. No one else before LePage had the guts to take them on out of fear of losing votes. LePage has the guts to do so. Let the man do his job.
Recent Comments
Great letter, Al
Something else to consider... Who pays for maintaining and repairing these laptops if they are dropped, have liquid spilled on them or when they need to be reformatted when viruses are downloaded via questionable sites being accessed? I'm all for giving the kids the proper tools to help them learn more effectively, however all these scenarios should have been thought out with correct solutions that do not invade taxpayer's wallets.
What's stranger Dan is this...
In your original post you attack Gingrich, Romney and Bush, and that's fair. You defend Obama and while I've got issues with him I'll let that slide. However, no where do I see anything in your post that comes close to my point of view. I don't care if you disagree with me. Just be honest about it. Why don't you try comprehending other views yourself. I've met you more than halfway.
Thanks Jason
And I apologize, Dan. On this site I was able to retrieve the link. The info contained within it referenced Sen John Kerry's efforts to skirt MA tax laws by registering his yacht in RI thus saving appx. a half millon $ in taxes. He eventually paid the tax amid mounting pressure. And Charlie Wrangle was referenced as well. The story was courtesy of CBS news. My point is there are cheats on both sides of the aisle, a fact that is undeniable. I don't mind republicans being called out for similar transgressions, however liberals are living in a dream world believing their heroes are void of guilt when they are called out. Play it straight and you become more believable.
Sorry teacher. The dog ate my homework
Worked fine for me, and I'm sure it did for you. Denial is such a jagged little pill to swallow.
My best buddy Dan...
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_http://taxprof.typepad.com/taxprof_bl...
It's only fair to throw the rubbish over both sides of the fence, dont'cha think?
Shocking
I was taken aback when I saw the destruction of both cars. One would expect to see devastation like this on outer Rte 4 or some other state road with a 55 mph speed limit, not on Minot Ave. in a 30 mph zone. It's amazing there were survivors of this crash.
First of all...
Hats off to Betsy Smith who is in charge of Equality Maine for her efforts in coordinating volunteers around the state who secured 105,000 signatures to get this question back on the ballot. She's a winner for sure and worked her butt off to get this done. Like I told her earlier this year, it's a shame this has to go to the voters at all. It should have always been a foregone conclusion that gay marriage should have been legal all along. I will certainly vote for gay marriage, however that kind of feels like I'm granting permission and I feel that's condesending to the gay community. I know it's the right thing to do. I just want to let them know they should never have been put through such an emotional vise to achieve a right in which the burden laid before them was such they should never had to shoulder. Love will conquer hate. It always does.
John...
While I disagree with most of what this writer is saying, I have to disagree with you on your assessment of Bin Ladens death last year. Although symbolic in nature it came about ten years too late. Bin Laden became a shell of what he once was. He was pathetic and cowardly hiding all these years. There were no new attacks on our land and this adm. And the previous adm. should take credit for that. I'm glad we finally got him, however given the catastrophic damage he created upon and the many lives lost I didn't find myself celebrating too much.
Dan...
No one's twisting your arm to follow this story. And unlike yourself, there are many people who are following this story and who genuinely care about this child's well being. Lighten up.
There you go again, Dan...
Questioning the integrity of a reporter and her work ethic. Questioning whether she's being paid off to be an organization's stooge? Over the line! Of course if Tice's article pointed out misgivings of the Republican party you'd be tripping over yourself to complement how good of an investigative reporter she is. Expressing opinions of content is what we do here, however, what you are implying goes well beyond the boundaries of good taste.
Dan...
I could not agree with you more. Two wrongs do not make a right, otherwise where does it all end?
In closing...
Dan, thanks for yet another eye opening discussion. I enjoy the banter and friendly sparring, sorta like Snoopy versus the Red Baron. And I like playing the part of Snoopy. He is, after all the good guy. Enjoy the day.
Dan...
I don't need to attack you. You self destruct yourself with what you put out there. What I actually find interesting is how you constantly spin text around so you can portray yourself the victim. It's obvious that's your M.O. when the conversation isn't going your way. Again, Dan...I don't need to attack you. You do a fine enough job of that on yourself.
I am not putting words in your mouth, Dan
To quote..."To give them legitimacy is contrary to journalistic ethics." Your words, Dan. Spin it any way you want, but you own this quote, and it's very plain to see the intent behind it.
Dan
Charging a news publication of a lack of journalistic ethics and, in turn, questioning a reporter's integrity are serious claims. Three questions for you... 1) Do you actually believe this reporter and her editors allowed this story to run without properly investigating the source and verifying the information? 2) If your answer to the first question is "no" then are you prepared to back your accusations up with facts with legitimate sources? 3) Finally, if this newspaper is so unreliable in its information then why spend so much time on this website? Wouldn't you be more comfortable cruising websites such as MSNBC, Democracy Now! or the Daily Kos?, or do you bask in the glow of constant confrontation? Expressing opinions is one thing. Accusing a news organization of mishandling stories by a lack of follow up seems over the line to me.
OOOOPS!
My bad...The line should have read "consider other viewpoints." not express. And I do watch FOX News, the actual news portions, not the O'Reillys and Hannitys of the world. Those guys are more concerned with their own gold viewer membership dollar tallies than actual issues. So, you want to open doors...I do watch FOX News. Does that make me a bigot, Dan?
OOOOPS!
My bad...The line should have read "consider other viewpoints." not express. And I do watch FOX News, the actual news portions, not the O'Reillys and Hannitys of the world. Those guys are more concerned with their own gold viewer membership dollar tallies than actual issues. So, you want to open doors...I do watch FOX News. Does that make me a bigot, Dan?
Then your philosophy is failing you Mr. Breton
Because in all your posts you have shown you are capable of expressing only one viewpoint.
The culture's changed...a lot
Ben, your idea would work fine in another time...Your time, my time, but not in this time. The younger generation is far different today than when I was in my teens. Social media in the 70's was trying to place a phone call on a party line of three other phone customers. It's much more than spreading the word, though. It's a different mindset today. In this age there is greater technology, better paying jobs for the younger generation and parents who seem more lax in their delegation of authority. But the biggest difference is the lack of fear that exists today. When I attended driver's ed class we had to watch some intensely graphic auto accident films. And they did their job by scaring us enough to respect what we were learning. The kids of today laugh at those films. Their is a definite lack of respect that revolves around today's kids. And I don't mean that in an unkind way. The criticism is actually meant for the parents of these kids for being lax in their urgency to deliver the proper messages to today's kids. For example, quite a few parents have said teens drinking at parties is o.k. if there is adult supervision. WHAT??? You kidding me? And then I read some fool on these blogs writing the drinking age of 21 is only a number and there would be no difference if the drinking age was lowered to eighteen. Brilliant. What a concept. Might as well give better exposure to the pre teens as well. Only a matter of time before they start to binge, right? What's the difference? I've heard this quote from somewhere and it's so true, "We have met the enemy, and it is us".
Ernest...
I hear crickets...I don't think your question will be answered anytime soon.
Hey Dan...
Sounds like you could use a blast of that "Higher Power". So you're sick of the Timmy Tebow and his faith? That's your bag, but what's with the singling out of Fox News? EVERY news media and channel have reported on the Tebow story. Why you so intimidated by FOX News? If you're so darned uppity correct and secure about your positions then FOX News shouldn't be of any issue to you at all. As for Tebow, give your suspicious mind a rest. Tebow's done far more good in this world than you or I have.
Must of had you in mind
Reading the last paragraph in the story Morrison pegged you to a tee, Dan. Since you seem to believe you are of a superior intellect than those already serving each city might I suggest you throw your hat in the ring and run for city council in your district. If elected, you'll finally have a fitting platform for all your ideas. Of course, the trick to getting elected is you'd need to talk to people, not down to them. You'd need to listen without shouting above their voices. Can you do all of that? Or do you prefer to just bluster about an acid tounge that can be as bitter as a northwest wind in the dead of January? In my travels I visit a number of towns...Portland, Brunswick, Saco, etc...They're all decent places, however they're not my kind of towns. Lewiston/Auburn is because it's my hometown, my old stomping grounds and I've always felt a deep sense of pride when I think or talk about them. And Morrison is correct. The area is full of genuine points of interest, festivals and eateries. It's also full of good people. Deep down Dan, I believe you're one of them. You have a passion for issues and civil matters that should be commended despite if others agree or disagree with your views. Too bad you choose to be negative and surly all the time, unless of course you prefer it that way. There's no way I could.
Wow!
Kudos to the employees for their quick action. This could have been a lot worse. And I thought smokers were restricted from smoking within a certain area of the building. I know at a medical building on RTE 1 in Scarborough smokers have to walk all the way to the sidewalk to smoke, and that's a good 1,000 ft from the building.
Er...sex, maybe???
Maybe you're right, Dan. And how would a 22 year old male better his chances on impressing a 16 year old girl? Or an 18 year old girl? Guys tried getting girls at parties drunk for that reason back in my day. I'm sure that practice hasn't changed very much today.
First of all
I expect an apology from you, Frank for the namecalling. There are better ways to get your point across. I suggest you discover them. Second of all, my question to you was very fair to ask. Why do you want to give this girl a pass on jail time if she's convicted? Being a girl doesn't give her immunity to serve a proper punishment. If the driver had been a young man I don't believe anyone would show him mercy, including yourself. One other thing... The last name is COTE. Either spell my name correctly or don't engage me in conversation.
Frank...
Would your sentiments change if the driver was an eighteen year old boy?
Mike stated it well
Teens, and actually the younger generation do believe they are invincible and so clever they can pull the wool over older adults eyes. We all have either seen that or experienced it. And a lot of we forty and fifty somethings wete no different back in our day. I had to bury several of my friends due to their stupidity. And Al, I know you want tougher laws but there are laws on the books now and any new laws, like existing laws will be ignored as well due to the reasons I mentioned. Beside that, there was a 22 year old in the car as well who also showed a complete lack of responsibility. And since this accident two more young people have been killed in accidents on Maine roads. We can take away their cars but that won't solve the problem. They manage to find other ways. A big part of the problem is the 16-19 year olds hang with the twenty-somethings. The teens think the young adults are cool and those young adults prey on the minds and vulnerabilities of the teens. Why else would a 22 year old guy hang out in a car with a 16 yr old girl? If laws need to be addressed I'd start with laws pertaining to furnishing the booze, (or other substances), by both adults who throw these parties and stores that sell alcohol. Massachusettes only allows alcohol to be sold at specialty agent stores where employees are well trained. I question the training these chain conveinence stores provide their employees. Plus, given that those employees make squat for dough it's quite possible they'll take 10 bucks to look the other way.
Due process
Dan, I understand your outrage of the situation. However there is due process that must be followed and that includes a comprehensive investigation. And Ron, Al and everyone posting on this story have all made excellent points. It's going to take time and a lot of questions to be asked and answered to sort it all out. One question that surely will be explored is who was putting on this underage drinking party. Seems to me that person, or people need to be held accountable for this tragedy as well. And to all the victim's families go my deepest sympathies.
Wow, Mike!
That's quite a slanted rant you just jettisoned from your poisoned keyboard. But your entire text proves every point I made to you. Thanks for that and have a most interesting day.
I don't hide behind a thing, Mike
In the past year I have signed the petition to allow gay marriage to be legal and have defended the likes of Paul LePage and Mike Michaud within these blogs in reference to what they stand for. But I don't need to defend my voting record or ideals to you, or anyone else because of the fact I am an independent voter. And we independents are villafied by the left and right because you can't control the our thought process with your slants and rants. And I find that quite humorous, frankly. So I will agree to disagree with you and I thank you for the dialouge.
It was awesome, Beverly!
The great work you guys do, without fanfare along with the excellent job the S/J did in getting the word out made this Christmas all the much better. And it got me to thinking...It's been a few years since I last helped out with a holiday meal at Hope Haven. I'd like to offer my services again if I may. Thank you for everything you guys do. Like the sign on the wall of your building says..."Of having compassion, thus making a difference."
Nice try, Mr. Breton
But you know and I know only you need answer that question.
Mike, I read your post...
Aaaannnnnd, I reject everything about it on one premise; The people we elect into office and the issues we either vote for or against are decided by the independent voters who actually pay attention to reality rather than the hard core beliefs of the left or right. I think the most insane thing a voter can do is to cast votes along strict party lines, no matter who is running. And I say that because when voters do this they have no care at all in hearing what the other side is saying. Hard core left and right wingers don't have open and objective minds. The proof of that is laid out all over these blogs many times over. And when a leftie or righty is hit between the eyes with the truth, their comeback is to throw rocks, (see Dan Breton). And I get this type of behavior has been present for years. Still, that doesn't make it right even if you believe it does. That's why independents, like myself don't feel the need to constantly partake in mudslinging. That doesn't mean it makes us superior, only wise because we do listen to both sides, and it's always more beneficial to be a listener than an antagonist.
Real expert analysis
I expect a comment like that from our resident cyber problem child. But Al, my drinking buddy, c'mon man. You're much classier than that.
Does it really matter?
Before I begin this I will tell you I do call it a Christmas tree. That being said, what does it matter what my neighbor or my boss or anyone else calls it? They all have a right to call it what they wish just as you and I do. Religion is a very personal thing. Some people embrace it, some discard it and others either don't know or don't care what they think of it. And you know what? Everyone of those people are correct because they all practice what they believe in. A true Christian would respect that. Also, a true Christian would be secure enough in the their faith to not let something like this bother them. Also, think of the enviromentalists as well who don't call it a Christmas, or Holiday tree. They call it a dead tree and you know what, when it comes to the absolute truth, they nailed it.
Strip it down to bare metal
Take the politics, the insinuations, the snappy little returned insults and all the hate out of this story and bring it up to a level of clarity and undeniable truth and ask this question... What does race, religion or nationality matter when it comes to putting a smile on a child's face while making his or her day great. Maybe you can answer that question by simply volunteering your time to help pass out toys to ALL the kids next Christmas and see them smiling yourself. If you ask me, that gesture would be a Christian thing to do that the One you worship would whole-heartedly approve of.
Actually....
MacDonald is dressed as a ventriloquist. All he's missing from his outfit is you sitting on his lap, Dan.
"Done and working"?
Shades of George Bush's "Mission accomplished" statement in your assessment of the current health care situation, Jonathan. Although I believe affordable health care should be a priority for all Americans, I see Obama's plan as a complete and disaterously expensive joke. More than two thousand pages of dialouge most everyone that voted on did not understand. The plan was shoved down our throats in record time so the Dems could railroad the general public before the midterms eroded their power. This plan, like the dollars spent on two wars, will choke our economy. Yes, we do need a good health care plan...this plan is not it.
Happy New Year, Al
Remember, I still owe you a tall frosty 20 oz. (You're an expensive date).
"President of the United STATE, Dan?
An honest typo on your part or a deeper, subliminal message?
Describe what "non essential" means
I don't believe the pick up of discarded Christmas trees qualifies as an essential service. I visit a number of public works garages during the course of a given week and I notice many of the workers are constantly maintaining existing equipment, a fair amount of which is outdated. This is due to budget constraints which prevent them from updating the equipment they use. The budget constraints are due to the general public's perception that the department doesn't need their funding to increase any to compensate rising costs for parts and worker salaries. Some of the prices for the parts they need have jumped as much as 30% over the last fiscal year. So where is the line drawn to prioritize how the money in the budget is spent? No one wants their taxes to increase so public works departments are forced to operate on the same amount of funds despite rises in costs for raw materials, parts and, dare I say, raises for employees. Something's gotta give. So haul your tree out of your house and bring it to your local transfer station and be done with it. Or better yet, buy a fake tree and you won't have this problem at all, and you'll be saving a tree to boot.
Can't have it both ways
Kind of funny how these things work themselves out. I read and hear about how some people want smaller government and look to government agencies, such as public works, to be thrifty and to make do with the funds they have allocated. Well, here's a perfect example of a government agency trying to save money by trimming back on a unneccessay service. But when that affects the rank and file complainers of bigger government they scream bloody murder. Hey John Q. Public, you reap what you sow.
Thank you to all @ the S/J
Thank you for making us aware of the plight of those at Hope Haven and the people they help. Reading about this and helping has filled my heart with joy. Bless all of you at S/J, all the bloggers on this site, for though opinions may differ we'd still do the right thing to help out someone in need, and bless all those at Hope Haven, Good Shephard and all the other folks committed to making the lives of the less fortunate better. Most of all, bless all the children for they are the ones who suffer the most when the day gets dark. Let us all hope and make sure all their days are full of the light of hope and love. Happy Holidays to you all...
Dave.
YEEEAAAAAHHHHHHHH!
Aaaannnnnnnd... I'm going down again today!
Right on, Jason!
Through the wilderness that would be the land of poison keyboards comes a person with a worthwhile and totally beneficial idea for those in need of help, and for those in need of a positive focus. Thanks for reminding me, Jason. I will be stopping in to make a donation and to basque in the glory of doing the right thing. I hope others take a break from this cyber daycare and do the same. And Merry Christmas to all.
No right to question
Mr. Hart... Most folks voted for Mark Paradis because they didn't want MacDonald to win. If Paradis had won then the entire process would have started over fresh. That probably would have been for the best. However, questioning people about who they vote for and such...none of you business. It's not your place to ask. The election's over.
Angels among us
Can't get enough of these types of stories. To quote Mahatma Gandhi ; "Be the change you want to see in the world."
Town employees are people, too
They have families and deal with the same issues the rest of us do. Why should they be punished because they're town employees? Most everyone I know have the Monday following Christmas off and many places are shutting down early Friday as well. Sorry for the "rest of those" who don't have that type of deal with your employer, however that doesn't give you an excuse to take it out on those that do.
I second that, Ron
Good riddance to rotting rubbish.
Big differences between Gen. Washington and the occupiers
Mr. Dawn, I respect your right to have an opinion on this, however, comparing Washington's dealings against the Mother Country with what the occupiers are protesting against doesn't compute. First off, Washington's battle involved freeing the colonists from England's rule, a much more complicated scenario compared to the occupier's desire to redistribute wealth. Is it the wish of occupiers to ignore the rules and disrespect authority in general? And correct me if I'm wrong but I don't recall George Washington demanding the powers that were to forgive his debts as the occupiers constantly do. And there liesthe true diffetence between the two. Washington's vision was to create a land where everyone had an equal chance to succeed at their own freewill. The occupiers are self promoters who are interested in success for those they choose. There's no question the system needs a shove, but it is the right system for us to live within. The real solution is in not tearing it down, but tweaking it in a way that loopholes that allow for cheating the system are removed. If that were the occupier's message then I'd support it, but it's not, for if it were they'd be camped out in front of the White House and on Capitol Hill where the initial decisions that led to this mess were made.
Not again
A better question to ask Mendros is, "Why do you and your backers disregard and not respect the voice of the people?" As a public servant he should put that priority at the top of his list instead of his own selfish wants. Rehashing old issues and ideas do nothing to help the community move forward. Revisiting an unpopular plan is a complete waste of resources and time. The land this building sits on is prime real estate and it's disheartening to believe civic leaders can't come up with more worthy ideas and plans for it. But overall I believe Mendros' actions and his timing so soon after we, as a populace decided the fate of a gaming facility in Lewiston is a slap in the face of all who had a say on it.
I had mixed feelings, too...
That is, until the morning I was coming down the exit 80 offramp onto 196 when, as I slowed for traffic was rear-ended by some teenaged girl who showed a great sense of surprise on her face and a cellphone in her hand as I spied her in my rearview mirror. It's time for this to become law.
No explanation needed
Actually, Mrs. Paradis owes no one an explanation as to why she was at the poll yesterday. And I would never raise the question why. It's no one's business but her own and for people to openly speculate about her motives for doing so is crass and in extremely poor taste. People that are compelled to find out her reason(s) are also fishing for excuses to discredit her, otherwise, you have no reason to guess or ask. And I suspect those that do so also have way too much idle time on their hands.
The backbone of a community
Mr Landry seems to have forgotten what it took to help build the town he residesin. It took the hard work, sweat and sacrifice of people such as DiMillo, Merrill and Goding, as well as the insight of those like Gould to make a community work. In my line of work I converse with working men, and women each day. They turn wrenches, operate loaders and excavators and draw up blueprints. Some wear a full day's work on their person after only a few hours while some wear the grind of their careers in their thoughts and brains. It makes no matter as I always greet each one with a handshake as they are out there getting it done everyday, just like all the council people in Jay, Turner and every other town in this state. They all represent us and if Landry has a problem with asthetics then he indeed has a problem.
Worth mentioning
Within the shadows of this election, the claims made by MacDonald regarding the alledged doings of the Paradis camp, and the thin skin MacDonald apparently carries on his person, stood a lady of great strength and grace. Just days after losing her husband, Ronnie Paradis was at the polling station, greeting voters and smiling. She exemplifies the true meaning of how to lead, of how to shine in the face of darkness, of how to be giving of oneself while dealing with her own grief. Today, I celebrate her and the memory of her husband, not a man seething with tyranical rants who doesn't even have the decency to celebrate his own victory with any sense of humbleness or gratitude. To me, Ronnie is the true face of Lewiston, not the man who has now been elected
and has annoited himself "King".
Good letter
I commend you Mr. Morgan for writing a thought provoking essay about the plight of immigrants who have made the Lewiston / Auburn area their homes. I especially agree with your last paragraph. While it may seem area residents who have lived here for years are being asked to carry an unwanted burden by embracing our newest residents that simply is not the case. What is being asked of them is to help the immigrants settle in and take root in the community, to aid in establishing them in business and social circles. We should not expect them to learn our language and customs on command, nor should we feel slighted and insulted if it takes time for them to do so. Above all, they should not be forced to change their customs if those customs are practiced within the laws of this state. I also drew comparisons between the immigrants of today and our French-Canadian immigrants of the past and though the economic landscape is vastly different today compared to days gone by the spirit of a new beginning is not. Like the past immigrants, those of today look to earn their keep. They are not, what I've heard some people allude to as "sponges". A number of immigrants have opened businesses on lower Lisbon St. How many of us have taken the time to visit these establishments? And how many of these new businesses have changed the landscape of downtown from empty, depressed storefronts to a bustling area of commerce, an area largely ignored by many as an eyesore in the past? Fact is, we should want them to succeed and we should help them in any way we can to do so, as opposed to taking a trip to Walmart so we can support a business purely aimed at monopolizing their market with the help of slave labor in overseas factories. Our new residents are trying. They are making an honest effort to succeed here through ingenuity and hard work. Kind of hard to see that though when many of us choose to ignore them, isn't it?
Heavy heart
I received an alert from SJ a little while ago with the news of Mark's passing. I'm in total shock. A damn good man died today and the one thing I can say is I am a better person having known Mark. He never had an unkind word to say about anyone, nor did he ever display any emotion that had even a hint of pessimism or doubt attached to it. He treated all with respect and was a man of integrity. He always held his head up with pride and had every reason to do so. Rest In Peace, my friend. God Bless You and your family.
Are you kidding???!!!
Mike, you are so completely off your rocker if you think Mr. Paradis disclosed the fact he has cancer in order to attract the sympathy vote. What a shallow and mean spirited thought. If you weren't going to vote for him in the first place then why bother with this post? And to assume voters are blind enough to alter or reaffirm their vote in light of this news is a insult to every voter casting a ballot in this race. I can't vote since I live out of town, otherwise Paradis would get my vote for the reasons I stated in my previous post, in other words, a vote he would have earned.
Conditions in other towns
I had to drive in several different towns, including Auburn, during the storm Mr. Emery is speaking of. There was little difference in the quality of road maint. from town to town. It's like Jason said, warmer temps were predicted and the town garages may have felt in light of the forecast to reserve man hours and equipment. I don't believe it has anything to do with poor planning or incompetence on the part of A.P.W.
Keep the faith, Mark
I've known Mark for several years and have done business with him. He is a very caring individual who cares deeply about folks he deals with on a daily basis. He's a good man and I was saddened to learn he now has to battle this disease. But Mark is a tough individual as well full of constant optimism. He's not one to back down from adversity. I'll be shaking his hand soon, but until then I indeed wish for Mark the best...always the best.
A Class Act
I had the pleasure of meeting and conversing with Mr. Paradis around ten years ago and he and his wife were two of the nicest people I've met in my life. Back in the day I thanked him for his sacrifice and service. This piece gives me the opportunity to do so again. Thank you, Mr. Paradis for your help in preserving our freedoms and your contributions to make the world we live in a better place.
An amazing opportunity
I've always believed in the city of Lewiston and its citizens, from the hard working mill workers of the past to the residents of today, some from foreign lands, looking to make this community a better place. Though I'm still some way from retirement and currently live out of town I can see myself relocating back to Lewiston in the future as I approach retirement. But it's one of those deals where I can plan what I'd want to do in the next ten years and when that time comes I'm a completely different situation that I'd thought I'd be. The proof in that is I look back ten years ago and think at that time where I'd be in ten years and the result, though very good, was not what I imagined. I know Lewiston is an old town with a blue collar past and a less than respectful reputation from those that aren't educated or are just plain ignorant, but she's a good town and it's full of good people. I think the ranking is fitting and is indeed a shot in the arm for our psyche.
It doesn't add up, Megan
I was nineteen when I went to college, in a time when taking home $200.00 a week was considered a good wage. I needed student loans to help fund my education. When presented with the paperwork I needed to sign I made sure I read all term and conditions and asked questions if I needed clarification. When I signed I was totally aware it was my responsibility to follow the terms I legally agreed to and to take full ownership of my actions. The responsibility that comes with taking out a student loan is no different than buying something with a credit card or taking out loans for cars, a house or other tangible items received immedoately upon agreeing to purchase. The education earned from the monies borrowed is up to the student to maintain, just like a car, boat or other items purchased on credit. It's the student's responsibility to choose the correct major that will lead to a rewarding career. The fact that a lot of students default on student loans has little to do with today's job market and economic climate. It has more to do with an indifference in attitude and poor decision making. Defaulters just don't seem to get their action into partaking into acquiring a student loan is a legal and binding act and the lack of accountability is purely on them, not the government and certainly not the taxpayer. At the age of eighteen we are granted the right to vote, and what comes with that right is responsibility. As a student, you have a right to a good education. In both cases your decisions affect your future. And in both cases it is you that needs to take accountability for your decisions.
No excuse for this
I hope Mr. Lopez is ok and they find the woman who did this. As part of her punishment she should not only be responsible for any medical bills this young man may have from this act, she should also pay out of her pocket for whatever Mr. Lopez was shopping for as well. And she should be banned from all Walmarts for life.
Sounds like good deals
However, I prefer to sleep in, have a nice relaxing morning after a day of cooking and entertaining. I did venture out later in the day and scored a couple of great deals on items I had my eye on. The bonus was there were no lines where I was and I capped it off with a lovely dinner out with Mrs. Cote. And the sunset was stunning. See, Black Friday doesn't have to be full of mayhem after all.
AWESOME!!!
What a great contest. I get a kick out of those commercials. So original. I actually have a friend in the Portland area who is a spitting image of Johnathan Goldsmith, the Don Equis pitchman, the man who once had an awkward moment...just to see how it feels. I told my friend of his resembalance to the actor and he said he gets that all the time. He says he likes the part where he's sitting at a table surrounded by beautidul women. Lots of ency in his voice when that's brought up. And what a great slogan, "Stay thirsty my friends." Classic.
Not neccessary
Let's move on. It's time for the reps in Augusta to turn their attention toward legislation that is actually important to the people in their districts. This voter I.D. bill does not qualify as such. The powers that be need to put more effort and sweat into doing their actual jobs they were elected to perform, such as attracting new business, keeping existing businesses strong and viable and doing all they can so that our kids will choose to stake a claim for themselves here in Maine instead of venturing toward greener pastures in other states instead of wasting time and resources on this steaming pile of waste.
Acting like a child
I was disappointed in Mayor Gilbert's reaction to losing the casino in Lewiston. I had met him earlier this year at an event and we actually had quite a lengthy discussion about the city and its possibilities. He was optimistic Lewiston would be a thriving town again, with no mention of building a casino. All in all, a good talk and a good guy in my impression. I guess that's why I was so surprised and let down by Gilbert's reaction to the loss. A leader is supposed to put his best face on at all times. Leaders are also responsible for having contigency plans in place in the event their original plan swirls in the bowl. Sad to say, Mayor Gilbert offered neither election night. He offered no optimistic "plan B" and the face he chose to wear was that of a spoiled child being told "no". Not a flattering image to convey upon his exit from office.
You got it right, Gary
And to expand on your last point...Given the Gilbert and Mendros reactions, that of spoiled boys who expected this to pass, how can anyone wjth an ounce of integrity expect to take the notions and ideas of two gentlemen, who are supposed to carry a professional, public image at all times, seriously moving forward? I guess this was to be Gilbert's coup-de-gras and he went "all in" to use a gambling term. Still that's no excuse for poor sportsmanship. Gilbert is one of the faces of Lewiston. Gilbert acted like a crybaby upon hearing the result of the election. I think he and Mendros should take out a full page ad in the Sun Journal and apologize for their rktten behavior and silly comments.
Congrats to the new parents
And, thankfully for Mom little Azalea didn't weigh in at 11 pounds 11 ounces.
The proper solution...
Yeah, Al. I feel badly about that. Only one thing to do... You live in Norway, I live in West Minot. We'll meet in the middle and I'll treat you to a beer.
Lol
You missed :) My mistake. I received an e-mail notification that you had commented on my original post. After I posted a second time I noticed on the blog your comment was directed @ another David. My bad. However, cut me a little slack since these android keypads are murder.
What are you talking about, Al?
First of all, typing a comment on an android keypad at six in the morning without my glasses on and with less than a cup of coffee in my system presents a bit of a challenge, so pardon me if I do not apologize for typos I commit and I'll ignore your O.C.D. behavior about your penchant for correcting people who make harmless mistakes, rudely. Regarding the rest of your text, it is what it is...Conservatives diislike liberals and libetals dislike conservatives. These blogs are a cyber daycare for political beliefs and neither one is any better or worse than the other. There are multitudes of instances when one side attacks the otherfor deeper reasons other than content of material. It's a personal pissing contest made for those who feel the need to make others feel inferior.If you don't like what I have to say then disagree with it, or just ignore it and I'm fine with that all day long. Pointing out someone's grammatical errors is sorta like making fun of someone who stutters when they talk. Do you also do that, Al? Wouldn't be very P.C. of you if you did, would it?
Thank You
A cyber handshake and a thank you on this Veteran's Day, Ron. Thanks for your sacrifies and your leadership of honor. Enjoy your day.
With all due respect
Whether question #1 passed or not, no one's right to vote would be supressed by the outcome. I voted yes on it because of questionable ads from the other side, not because of possible voter supression so can the hyperbole.And regarding the rest of your text; You seem to have every conservative in your crosshair. That tells me your no better than those you speak of bent on "destroying" Obama. We'd all be better off if both sides weren't so damn selfish in their views. But that's for another post.
Agreed Jeannette
Seems taking a leak on a fire hydrant should be left for the hooligans of the land and not glamourized by someone professing to practice Chrisianity. But, then again, we have to consider the source, don't we?
Nothing to add
Good piece, Rex. Very good, in fact.
Correct response
I commend the Penn. St. board of trustees for doing the right thing by firing Paterno and Spanier effective immediately. I applaud the trustees for standing on the school's charter beliefs. To dats, and according to WEEI radio in Boston, twenty victims have now stepped forward, and knowing Jerry Sandusky's foundation for boys was created back in 1977 I'm afraid many more victims will also come to light in the following days and weeks. Paterno is the face of Penn. St., no question. Howevet, despite his stature and place in history he needs to own up to some form of culpability. He announced his retirement earlier in the day effective at the end of the season. Had he been allowed to carry forth with that plan his presence would have made a mockery of the investigation process since, in his retirement statement, he said he wished he had better hindsight and had done more with the information provided him. This inveztigation will take time. It will be painful for everyone involved, but it must be thurough. Nobody knows how this will all end, but at least the school trustees have commenced the investigation process off on the proper foot.
Understood, Ron
And for the record, that "agree" on your post is mine. I always choose to agree or disagree with subject matter, not with the make up of an individual. Perhaps I'm old fashioned but I have always believed labeling people sucks because when one's busy labeling another, they're not listening. Thanks for your insight, Ron. And, by the way, nice beret. I own a couple of them myself. Have a most excellent day.
Ron
I'm not fishing for gold stars and compliments. I have been following this story since it broke and it disgusts me. This isn't some story with political slants that we normally spar over, or agree with. Have you read the grand jury report? If you have then you'd understand my anger over why I felt compelled to submit my last post.If you have not then please take the time to read it. I'd post it here but I haven't figured out how to do that on an android phone. This will end up being a much bigger story than even the media covering it realizes it will be.
A disagreement to my original post???
I'd like to know who disagreed with what I had to say on this subject and why. I can't believe anyone with a sembalance of logic would find my statement to be false.
Real professional reaction
And it's this type of reaction that leads me to believe the voters got this one right. I voted no on it because it's simply too much too soon. The Oxford casino isn't even finished yet and here were not one, but two questions on the ballot seeking to open more casinos in the state. I'd like to see how the Oxford casino does for a year or two before I entertain thoughts of constructing another. Plus, the logistics of building one in downtown Lewiston are terrible. There is no easy access to the designated location and the general landscape that surrounds the area is much more conducive to stailber bussiness. And do you really want to build a casino in an area where twice a year there are thousands of kids enjoying what are supposed to be family festivals? There are alternatives to building a casino and if civic leaders weren't so short-sighted throwing their collective eggs in one basket instead of being pro-active and employing a little foresight and cleverness then they wouldn't have the need to throw hissy fits. Amd the last I checked, Gov. LePage had one vote to cast, like myself and everyone else who voted. Mayor Gilbert's comments were childish and out of bounds. Civic leaders of Lewiston... Come up with ideas the whole community can embrace. And stay away from flash-in-the-pan ideas. They are only band-aids to cover wounds to big to heal.
Sick to my stomach
I read the grand jury report. It's sickening. The fact this went on for decades is mind boggling. The fact Sandusky was witnessed in a shower on the campus sexually assulting a young boy and said witness turned and ran like a coward is unthinkable. And how much sordid will this story become when more victims step forward? How sad will we be when we here victim's stories of abuse and how their lives have played out in the wake of that abuse. And what of the victims we won't hear from? Victims who possibly committed suicide out of feelings of shame they had no right to be burdened with? Victims who were so messed up they turned to crime, and possibly committed acts of sexual abuse themselves. Everyone who knew of this still connected with Penn St., including Paterno, need to step down, today, right now. As for Sandusky, give him his fair trial and of convicted, lock him up, throw away the key and let him fend for himself among his own kind.
Understood, Mark
Actually, I didn't direct my opinion at Terry's post. I read it and I don't usually comment on posts I consider outlandish and blatantly incorrect. My comment is aimed at the perception conservatives have about the role of government in their lives. Heating assistance is a neccessity in a lot of lives here in Maine and elsewhere, and is a form of government control since the funds for it are provided by taxpayer dollars. My point is where is the line drawn between government inclusion and intrusion in our lives? Conservatives bark at government if, for instance, they enact a law that is perceived to infringe upon the rights of the public, yet government is villified if they tell us funding for programs such as this one is going to be cut. We cry out for less taxation, however when this is the result then we cry foul. Then the argument turns toward fraud among recipients of aid, weeding out the cheaters. How do we determine who needs it and who doesn't? If someone has concrete evidence of fraud it is their obligation to report it. How often does that happen? Does government have enough funding to weed the cheats out? I understand the concept of less government and, fact is, government's role in our lives is to administer public policy and affairs. I don't understand conservative's Jekyll and Hyde view as to what government's role should be. Legislating laws and policy is not tailor-made, it's off the rack. In situatuions such as this we DO need government to be there for us, whether the "intrusion" is welcome or not.
Just another two cents worth.
One thing that hasn't been brought up here... Conservatives are for less government intrusion, am I right? No entitlement programs and such? In reality, and according to these stated principles, isn't this decision by the Obama adm. to cut back on heating assistance dollars a move toward that concept? I mean, you can't have it both ways, can you?
I disagree, Claire
I think the shopping comparison is unique and correct. If you were on the same side of the argument you may very well agree with that view as well. I also believe the bullying angle is vauge at best. I feel the left does most of the bullying within the confines of this issue with their claims of unpatriotism against people not in agreement with their view. Again, the abscence of same day registration does not, in any manner, impede upon one's right to vote. No hardship is created and no one willing to cast their ballot is denied in doing so. The motives of the left are clear...Preserve same day registration to secure the voting base the left knows agrees with their platform. I still don't know how I'll be voting on this issue. I don't care for the right's claims of preventing voter fraud. To me, that is bogus. However, the left's arguments for same day have been bogus as well. Maybe a little honesty from either side would convince me how I'll vote on it.
The whole editorial is weak
I wonder how college students feel about being stereotyped as procrastinators, which is a polite word for slackers. As Mark pointed out that second paragraph in this text leaves a lot to be desired. If an individual's view on voting is one of high priority then that voter will be pro-active with how they approach an upcoming election, which includes becoming familiar with state election laws. This columnist's description of an average college student of being a procrastionator lends belief they are passive. College students are very active in political issues and if they care enough about their passion to vote then they will adhere to existing laws on how to vote. That's how it's done in forty-one other states. It's not a hardship or hassle to pre-register, just do the deed and be done with it.
What's the big deal?
Control is the big deal, from both sides. When it comes to the political arena, control is always the focal point. This whole argument has put into light just how deceitful both parties are. It's always been about control, and both parties' ability to spin the issues to garner that control.
Echoing the message
As a resident and taxpayer of the town of Minot I am voting no, again. The increases asked for don't measure up to the benefits discussed and, speaking from a selfish standpoint, I find the monetary breakdown between the three towns involved to be quite unfair. The budget committee needs to sharpen their pencils a bit more.
Here's a better question
Why do registered voters with a profound liberal bias want to keep same day registration? To protect voter rights? Garbage answer. An unregistered person may, at their own leisure walk into a city hall or town office during business hours and simply register. Stories of inconvienence are simply just that, stories. Better yet, fables. Since that reason is shot down what is the left's motivation here? I agree the right's motive is to protect their voter demographics since same day registrants tend to vote left of center. Bottom line is the reasoning is similar for each side. I don't need the right polluting the discussion with claims of possible voter fraud with same day registration. It's not like this is some third world country. Then again, the left is full of it as well given their claims I mentioned earlier. I'm registered and I don't care how this goes since I'm undeclared. Stop with the smokescreens and be honest about your motives because the people in the middle see right through the distortions both sides represent and, frankly, the views from both sides stink.
Undisclosed motives
Since I'm a registered voter it's implied this question has no bearing upon my standing. However, if I were an unregistered voter, I can simply walk into my town office and register with no fuss. Any unregistered voter may do so on any day the town office they reside in is open. No rights have been taken away and that argument is completely false. My question is why this question concerns currently registered voters? Better yet, why does the lack of same day registration irritate only the left? Wrapping your true motives in false reasoning is hypocriscy at it's finest. It casts the left in the same, distorted light as the right wingers in their efforts to eliminate same day registration. Their motives revolve around voter fraud, which is a ridiculous reason. It's all about both side desiring to control the polls.
Melodramatic
Hey Heidi, how is someone's right to vote being denied to someone when said someone doesn't keep up with election rules and guidelines? As much as filling out the paperwork to register, if you can't figure that one out then I'd be surprised you'd be privy to the issues being voted on or knowledgable of the candidates running for office. People that are already registered to vote don't really care about those not registered except when it comes to party affiliation. The right is convinced same day registration is detrimental to their cause and the southpaws fear not having same day hurts their chances to move their candidates and issues into place. So spare us who actually vote with undistorted viewpoints your concern for the unregistered voter, or the integrity of the voting process because your motives are far more selfish than what you claim. The one thing I take comfort in is moderates like myself outnumber the far left and far right combined. And it is those two group's ideals that present the biggest concern come election time.
Muddying the political waters...A Breton specialty
My first question to you, Dan is this...Who is, or are, my clan? You have no clue what you are talking about regarding my political views or how I vote. As far as the implication of violence goes, I didn't read that into Mike's post. I gathered he merely was saying the occupiers were occupying the wrong patch of real estate. It was your post that opened the door to the violent connotation. And I REALLY wish you were right regarding my bank account. Unfortunately, I'm not among the "uber-wealthy" as you claim. I get up, go to work each day, spend within, and most times, below my means, (Hey, how bout that? Economic discipline!), and the last I checked my bank account there were no extra zeros following the crooked numbers. Oh, and one last thing...I received an e-mail notification from you commenting on someone else's remark. No harm I guess but it seems you were really riled up to notice you clicked on the wrong person. As Warren Zevon so eloquently put it ; "An excitable boy they all said."
Dan, Dan, Dan...
http://arstechnica.com/media/news/2009/12/what-exactly-does-comcast-alre...
You gotta check these things before you let your fingers fly on that keyboard, mate.
And your message is?
Dan, are you implying the occupy crowd is capable of violence? I thought in your alledged moderate mind this was a group only interested in the justification of wealth through redistribution? You make it sound as if this motley crew would overrun the White House. Is that the message you are sending?
Something to chew on...
I heard a couple of "occupiers" lamenting about how they feel their student loans should be forgiven. That leads me to believe they want hand outs and entitlements. Is that the real motive behind this occupation? I went to college and took out student loans to help pay for my education. Now I work for a living having used my education and training the way I always believed it should be implemented. A friend of mine sent his kid to college where he partied for a couple of semesters, flunked out and now is a part of the occupy Boston crowd. And that clown dares to fault others who used their education and knowhow properly, interviewed for desired positions and secured their careers by putting in the time and sweat for years? I find it insulting that some fool wasted an opportunity to utilize an education and the dollars it takes for that education simply to blow it and then expect taxpayers that connected the right dots to pay for their idiocy. No one should feel ashamed for making a good fortune through dedication to their craft.
Thanks Pete for the shot in the arm
Great letter and a great attitude to have. Sounds like you have a lot of people and things in your life that make you happy. More power to you, mate and best wishes for future good health.
Nice try, Dan
I'm not about to let you bait me into your quagmire of political abyss, that desolate place where political arguments are never likely to be solved. And those arguments fester due to attitudes such as yours. That is, an attitude that refuses to listen to any alternative viewpoint presented. Anyhow, I've spoken my peace and I agree to disagree with you. Have a nice day, Dan.
Reset
Again Dan, the content of my last post involves a national chain company and its manager's decision to close a select number of stores throughout the United States, including three here in Maine. It has nothing to do with Paul LePage. Nor would Libby Mitchell or Eliot Cutler have anything to do with it if they held the office of governor. Your comment seems to be borne from a larger picture you want to display and in this context that picture doesn't fit. The bottom line is Lowe's didn't bring their "A" game to the show in the areas affected. Those store's lack of performance have nothing to do with government, for if that was the factor then shouldn't we blame Obama since these closures occured on a nationwide scale?
For your viewing pleasure Daniel
http://cnsnews.com/news/article/geithner-taxes-small-business-must-rise-...
Enjoy!!!
The world according to one Daniel Breton
Okay, Daniel. No namecalling and no insults coming from my keyboard. Fact is our Governor, nor his policies have nothing to do with a corporate decision from a national chain to close a number of stores nationwide. You need to prove to me LePage had anything to do with Lowe's decision to close some stores in Maine.
Lowe's vs. Home Depot
In some ways Lowe's is better than Home Depot. Lowe's is certainly a fancier looking store. I've been told by a couple of people that work at the Auburn Lowe's the store's schematics are designed to attract the female consumer, and though that may sound a bit sexist it does bear some truth. The main difference between the two stores, and the reason Lowe's is getting buried by Home Depot is because Home Depot is the store of choice for building, plumbing and heating contractors. They all get deeper discounts through Home Depot because Home Depot moves much more product volume than Lowe's. So esentially Lowe's is relegated to being merely an fancy, oversized hardware store. I have also had negative experiences returning items to Lowe's. And the attendants at Home Depot do possess more product knowledge and general know-how than Lowe's Employees. And the extra sharpness of Lowe's setup versus Home Depot's no frills look comes at a price, a price which is passed on to your purchase at Lowe's.
What is the effect?
I will assume most everyone with an opinion on this subject is cirrently registered to vote legally in this state. Count me among those that are registered as well. That being said, how does this issue affect anyone already registered to vote? I don't get the urgency displayed on the subject other than each side plugging their political agendas. I don't care if John Q. Public pre registers or registers on the day of an election. It doesn't affect me at all. I'm more concerned about who and what's on the ballot than the manner in which the population registers. And if you're not registered then get out from behind your keyboard or put your smartphone in your pocket and go register. If you have the time to complain and rant about it then you also have the time to register. And please, save the "it takes the right to vote from voters that haven't registered" argument. That gripe is the biggest load of steaming waste I've heard on the subject.
The numbers...
I'm sure most are aware there are only eight states and the District of Columbia that allow same day voter registration. Two other states, Connecticut and Rhode Island do allow same day registration only for Presidential elections. Then there's North Dakota's quirky standing that doesn't require voter registration at all. Among the states that do not allow it are New York, Massachusetts, California and Vermont. Not exactly the hubs of the conservative mindset. Last November this state elected a conservative individual Governor despite having same day voter registration in place. I don't understand why the left is so up in arms about maintaining same day registration since it didn't help your cause any in 2010. At the same time I don't understand why the right wants to do away with it other than to keep their numbers up in Augusta's chambers. After all, the 2010 elections proved they could win with same day registration in place. And I reject the conservative viewpoint that voter fraud exists within the parameters of the same day registration environment. The way I view it this issue has become a double paradox, if there is such a thing. This issue is a classic example of what happens when hordes of people get too wrapped up in their politics. When that happens the blinders are welded to those folk's mindsets and alternate opinions are denounced and cast aside like a fruit cake at Christmas. I don't get worked up over this issue because it's not worth getting worked up over. I don't believe allowing or prohibiting same day voter registration has much of an effect on the final results. To me, recent elections have proven that.
"Not in my town"
That's what this fight amounts to. Here's a company choosing to set up business in a smaller town, and in the process, create jobs and the locals are fighting it. Why? Traffic considerations? Added competition to another store down the road? Hannaford has built stores in towns like Gray and Waterboro and I've never heard complaints about upsetting the "harmonious conformity" of the surrounding area. What a crock of crap. If you don't want Hannaford to build in Turner then be honest about why you feel that way.
Ron ;
Negligence (The definition by the law's standard) ; The failure to exercise that degree of care that, in the circumstances, the law requires for the protection of other persons of those interests of other persons that may be injuriously affected by the want of such care ; The failure to exercise the care that a reasonably prudent person would exercise in like circumstances. Drinking and driving is a negligent act. You want to split hairs about it then you can do that on someone else's time. I've witnessed the death of friends at the hands of a drunk and my outrage is alive and well and those instances still leave me angry to this day. As an officer of the law I do appreciate the work you had to perform under, what I'm sure were, grisly conditions. But one doesn't have to be an ex cop or a retired vet to understand what carnage and tragedy is. I've seen enough of it for a lifetime.
Here's the reason it is an outrage
The difference between losing our service personnel in wartime and citizens losing their lives in road accidents in which alcohol or drug use is involved as the cause is this...When we lose a soldier, a sailor, a Marine or an airman, (or airwoman), we indeed honor their service and pay our respects because, through the media their story is told, as it should be. We lower our American and state flags in their honor and we shed a tear and respect their sacrifice. But we, as a populace, have no control over their fate. Our government assigns them to do a job that is dangerous and sometimes results in tragedy and all we can do is hope and pray they make it through safely. As a father of a daughter who has been deployed to Iraq three times I can say with confidence I do understand and pay attention. However, there is little outrage when a man, woman or child becomes a victim of someone's negligence when they drive intoxicated. It is obscene that 15-20,000 people become a part of someone's statistical matrix in this manner. And I find it even more outrageous that someone can spew out percentages like candy and then exclaim to us we shouldn't be outraged still at the carnage still happening on the roadways? The last I checked, 65% of 15,000 is 9,750. How is someone not outraged at the fact so many people continue to lose their live each year in this manner? Unlike the loss of our service personnel, the deaths of these accidents could have been prevented, every single one of them. That is the outrage. In all these instances some fool decided to have a few, get lit, run the roads in their car and end someone's life...It doesn't comfort me to know that the fatality rate has been reduced by 35%. Are we that desensitized to the condition? It's an outrage if we are.
Grow up, Dan
You rant like a spoiled seven year old. No one on this site takes you seriously. Why don't you take a couple of hundred anger management classes and wash your brain out with soap. And I wish Judy could add an "ignore" button to the kudo lineup.
The practice of being civil minded
Whenever I have moved from one address to another there were always two things I put at the top of my to do list...Stop in at the Post Office to make out a change of address form and visit the town hall or city building to register to vote. Rather basic steps to me. I don't care who you are or what you do for work, no one is that busy not to get those things done upon moving.
Very true, Dan
If I was in ESPN's shoes I'd have fired him as well. But as decisions like this are made by corporate America to protect their image, I wonder how it is Madonna is scheduled to perform during the next Super Bowl despite her comparison of John McCain to Adolphe Hitler? I'd like to think the National Football League would show the same zero tolerance.
Doesn't matter what the intent was
Fact is, Mr. Williams opinion is protected under the first amendment of the constitution. He has every right to express it. Sorta like someone calling the Governor of the State of Maine "Taliban Paul" repeatedly?
The future of Lewiston
From what I read the mayoral candidates are utilizing the same old talking points...Create jobs, develop the downtown area, etc...Then all five fall back on the casino idea and that's not the solution. However, I do find candidate Hill's vision of showcasing the city as a whole and using that to move forward. A great example is the revitalization of the Bates Mill area where not too long ago it was a depressing maze of decrepit brick buildings and old parking lots overgrown with weeds pushing through the cracks in the pavement. These days we are fortunate to have attracted businesses and eateries to set up shop in the newly renovated buildings. That section of town looks fantastic. But I don't believe adding a casino to the mix will enhance the area the way these candidates believe it will. I would like to see development near exit 80 of the turnpike. There are many opportunities to make a positive statement there. I also disagree with candidate MacDonald about his stance on the immigrants that now call Lewiston their home. A number of them have tried making a go at establishing a business, but how successful does anyone think they can be if we as a community cast aside their efforts and question the legitimacy of their intentions? The Somalians residents of today, like the French-Canadian residents of years ago immigrated her for a chance to live their lives in a place with boundless opportunity. We need to give them that opportunity. There are solutions to the welfare situation as well. Institute a program whereas welfare recipients are required to partake in x amount of hours a week of community service. And I'm not talking about picking trash up in the park, but rather to place them in postions where they can be of some real benefit, and in turn, instill in them a sense of purpose and belonging. Meaningful tasks they can hang their hats on and say at the end of the day they made a positive difference. None of this happens until it is realized that each and every person, from all walks of life have purpose and value. So, in retrospect, the challenge is not in how we rebuild this city, but rather, how do we rebuild the mindsets of the residents of this city?
That business should step forward on their own
IF this was an isolated incident and this business was indeed unaware of the faulty equipment then they should step forward on their own before scuttlebutt from their town spreads their name out there. IF this was deliberate then I agree their name should be published. In that instance they would have betrayed the trust of those who gave them their business. That's sin # 1 in the real world.
What are you talking about???
Roger, who are you to dictate how someone should spend their money? How do you know what this family's needs are? And how condescending of you to even think you have a right to dress this family down for anything. Telling someone who works from home to "get off their lazy bum"??? Your whole post is mean spirited and insulting, especially your last sentence ; "My mom was a single mom of 3 and we never lived on Horton St." So are you saying everyone living on Horton St. is a malcontent? That living on that street causes a person's social status to be null and void? That decent people living in that neighborhood are undeserving of the same protections and services residents on the "right side of town" enjoy and take for granted? Don't judge a person, period. You have no clue what their total situation is like. Don't humor the rest of us to believe you have the answers because clearly you don't.
Sticking up for my hometown and for those who call it home
You know, Pamela, I grew up on the streets of Lewiston back in the seventies. Good times back then. We had our own group that didn't do much to get in trouble besides ringing doorbells and running or climbing the fence to get into the pool in Kennedy park at night. The residents were folks who worked the mills, as well as the older residents of French-Canadian heritage. It was a working class neighborhood and it was a time I treasure to this day. No reason why it can't be that way again. I've been following the stories of how some people want to turn the Bates Mill #5 into a casino. I'd rather see the city, and a few business leaders with a few ounces of vision turn that building, and area into a huge neighborhood market center where people from all walks of life and cultures can converse, do business and establish themselves as leaders of their community. The mindsets of people that have cast aside and thrown away their pride of their town needs to change before positive results can be achieved. This town doesn't need a casino. But it does need to eliminate the riff-raff that's escalated within the city limits. Community leaders need to instill that sense of pride back into people that have become pessimistic of future growth, and a sense of hope for those looking for leadership and clarity. Pessimists will scoff at all I'm saying, not because they believe it's a silly notion, but because to them it's too damn hard to imagine things can change for the better. It is a challenge and it would be tough to accomplish, but we need to look hard and long at our values, our sense of pride and our heritage and have the unyielding understanding that all the effort needed to accomplish this transformation would be worth it a thousand fold. No matter what, Lewiston is my hometown and I am, and will always be proud to say that.
The view's the same on both sides of the fence
No question Fox News is biased. Then again, the same can be said for NBC as well. I used to watch NBC news faithfully in the days of Tom Brokaw. I thought he was terrific and their news division was first rate. And I do like Brian Williams, but the content and direction of their organization has changed over the years. There is a certain slant to it, although subtle. Fox's slant is more like a 90 degree turn. They make it obvious what their views are. Truth is, everyone has an agenda. Those who think differently are in denial.
Another good point
Claire, your second sentence in your post raises a good question...Why do people living in this area, trying to do the right things be chastised by other people as to where they live? It's almost as if the naysayers are blaming this family for their choice of residency. Why shouldn't these people feel they deserve the same safety in their neighborhood as others claim they have in different parts of town. And Robin, why don't you let everyone in on your little secret about how one can move to a different and better neighborhood with no money, alledgedly. It's disappointing how some people stereotype individuals out to be something they are not simply by noting the neighborhood they live in. Disappointing and shameful.
Wait a minute...
First off, let's give John and Pamela Bannon a lot of credit for their concern and well being for their daughter, and for speaking up to the public about their concerns. Second, swinging a rent payment along with paying bills and raising kids in this economy is no small feat on its own. Factor in saving enough cash for a deposit on a new apartment, which is usually one month's rent at least, and the prospect of making a change in residency can be quite a challenge. I get dismayed by people on the outside judging other's circumstances. Instead of judging why don't you offer suggestions to help? Sometimes people in the Bannon's position feel there is no hope because we criticize their decisions when we have no right to. The end result is a sense of desolation and hopelessness. It doesn't have to be that way at all. Make some phone calls. Check out the Maine housing website and don't let gloom and doom navigate you to a path you need not have to choose. Don't be afraid to think outside the box.
Lack of trust
Francona had few options coming out of his bullpen he could depend on to bail out his underachieving starters. Look at the names...Jenks, Wheeler, Albers, Morales and toward the end, Bard. As a manager, who would you trust in the 5th, 6th or 7th to keep a game close or to protect a lead? The only two pitchers Francona could depend on out of the pen were Aceves and Papelbon. Francona had to play the hand dealt to him and he received no help from Epstein to strengthen that staff. Carrying Wakefield through the season is getting old, too. And the moves that were made? Eric Bedard? Theo signed him coming off an injury and a horrible performance, plus Bedard despises pitching in a big market such as Boston. Lackey? he's a joke. Francona had to pitch him to justify the terrible contract Theo signed him to. Lester? He fell in love with his cutter and nibbled. He didn't throw his fastball nearly enough. And the thing is, if Papelbon gets just one more strike, and if Dan Johnson of the Rays lives up to his .106 BA and strikes out instead of hitting that game tying home run against the Yankees then none of us are even talking about all of this, are we?
Have people forgotten?
In between the 2-10 start and the 7-20 September this team had the best record in baseball much of the year. Actually, Tito was one more strike from Papelbon and one less Dan Johnson home run from managing his team in Arlington tonight. Add those two snapshots of what didn't happen into reality and this discussion isn't even being brought up. The problem is Francona protected his players too long and they let him down. Francona is the best manager this franchise has ever known and letting him go would be absolutelt stupid.
What???
How's this Tito's fault? He was one strike and a Dan Johnson out from managing his team tonight in Arlington. For all the work this guy has done for eight years and the way he protected his players the finger pointing should be directed at them for pooping their pants as they did. The players are veterans making millions of $$$. What's Tito supposed to do? Pitch the ball and swing the bat, too?
Face value
I don't believe Mrs. Beliveau would neglect mentioning the airline if she was privy to that information. Therefore, the corporate aspect of these events, if there is any, would escape her. Sometimes people will perform acts of kindness, such as these, with no expectation of reward or noteriety, but would gladly accept a simple "thank you". Count me as a member of that crowd.
Responding to Samuel's point
In the town I live in the town hall is open on Thursdays from 2:00PM to 7:00PM to accomodate daytime workers. Not sure about other towns but at least here we do have that helpful option.
Stupidity on the roadways
Dan, I am constantly on the road, mostly in southern Maine and you would be shocked at some of the things I witness while driving. If I see a car in front of me weaving I automatically believe a cell phone is being used in some capacity. As I pass the driver in question I am usually proved correct. Banning all cell phone usage while driving is a good idea whose time has come. Now if we can only stop the fools who apply make up, are reading the newspaper or are wolfing down their 3,000 calorie delicacy from the local drive thru while driving then we will have made even more progress.
Changing times
Walnut St. was my old neighborhood back in the mid 70's. I'll drive down there occasionally and I marvel about how the area has changed so much. Back in the day it the old neighborhood was filled with blue collar families, the parents working in the local mills and kids like me hanging out in Kennedy Park or scrounging for quarters to play the pinball machine at Mamarosa's. There was a lot of pride in the residents of that neighborhood back then. Good work ethics and not much in the way of trouble. It's hard to believe that neighborhood has decayed to what it has become. Very sad indeed.
Yet another case
A few days ago a young girl in Massachusetts was sitting on her porch waiting for a taxi when a group of teens were walking by with a pit bull in tow, Do I have to even say what happened next. The dog got loose, attacked the girl and she was left with gaping puncture wounds to her mid section. Not to mention the fear she felt and the nightmares she'll have to endure for who knows how long. A person's got to be mighty dense to believe that particular breed of dog is not aggresive without provocation.
Time to move on, Charlie
The result is in...Was there ever a doubt?
Wrong, Jason
According to the Domestic Violence Resource Center an estimated 6,000,000 women and 3,000,000 men are victims of domestic violence here in the U.S. Those numbers are staggering. I consider that grotesque and an epidemic. At what point do you consider it an epidemic? 20,000,000? 40,000,000? And your "assessment" that existing penalties are sufficent is complete garbage. Penalties that exist today are slaps on the wrist because many first offenders repeat the crime. And they repeat because they knowingly understand the punishment is not all that hard to weather. If the offenders aren't drunk on substances that turn them into the creeps that lash out then they are drunk on the power of domination and the need to assert their authority in any manner they see fit. Unless you've been a victim or know a victim of domestic violence you cannot comprehend the havoc it can wrought or the permanent damage, physically, mentally or spiritually it creates. And how many times does an initial case develop into something far worse? Cavilier attitudes toward the subject, such as yours, exacerbate the perception that it's not as big a deal as it's being made out to be. Mr. Lacombe's letter is spot on. The perps are cowards and mandatory sentences should be in the books to deter would be offenders. It is an epidemic, pal. Anyone who disagrees insults the victims of these crimes.
Obama swings and misses...again
Bless him for his heart is in the right place. But this latest idea stinks. C'mon. We've seen this movie before. Lots of promise and tease and non factoring results. I actually expected him to roll out a plan I could be encouraged by and get behind. When he unveiled this wreck of a plan I lost whatever faith I had left that this man may have some positive answers. Why do politicians believe the more money you throw at a problem the more it will help the situation? It doesn't work. So how do we fix the mess? Both sides need to start playing nice with each other for starters. That involves swallowing a lot of pride and checking multiple egos at the door. And that has as much of a chance of happening as does this latest plan from Obama to work.
HO HO! Whatta SWEET house!
She's a real creampuff. Whoever buys it will yodel till dawn. Sit out on the deck at night and watch the stars twinkie. And four and a half baths? Finding a place to relieve yourself is easy as pie. Yep, this baby takes the cake. I'd buy it if I had the dough, but I'm just a po'boy. It's true the interior looks cheesy, but that pink paint is actually icing. Well, whoever buys it I'm sure the upside will be huge.
Why a reward?
Since when should anyone expect to be paid for doing the right thing? Why should cash be needed to coax the truth out of an individual? Seems we are a society of souls looking for, and expecting incentives at every turn, and frankly, I think it stinks.
Cleaning toilets? Flipping burgers?
Democrats don't want Americans performing these functions. Hell, they want Americans to stay on the entitlement bonanza. These jobs are earmarked for illegal aliens with the Democrats promise of Shangri-La and the American dream, all the while pandering for votes. So one one side are Republicans, who are slugs, and on the other side we have the Democrats, who are immoral. Either way the political pie is sliced, the filling has spoiled.
Can we put a govenor on Dan's keyboard?
Dan...Cmon. Are you for real? Are you in charge of comic relief? Up to now I figured you were just another liberal that has permanent blinders attached to your mind. However this display completely erodes any credibility any of your comments may have a chance to hold. Let go of the anger and live a little for a change. Oh, and compassion is a nice thing to show on occasion as well.
Where's your logic?
So if I decide to overload one of my circuits and that condition starts an electrical fire, does that mean I can sue C.M.P. for damages even though I fully knew my actions created that condition and was not the responsibility of the power source? It's common knowledge it's not safe to run a generator in an enclosed environment within the confines of a livable structure. It's as common as the knowledge we have about the safety of wearing seat belts. If I choose to not wear mine and I get hurt in an accident, does that allow me to sue Nissan? Of course not. And the saddest part of this story is media outlets constantly broadcast reports regarding the proper use of generators and many people ignore the reports. There are also operating manuals that expicitly outline the dangers of improper use of these machines, usually several times through the text. If a consumer chooses to ignore the warnings and tragedy strikes then how can anyone be at fault but the victim? C.M.P. had nothing to do with these tragic deaths. They do not control the weather. They do not control the freewill and decision making of individuals. They provided ample warnings before the storm hit that there would be prolonged power outages. At the onset of the outages C.M.P. said the outages would take several days to repair. Seems pretty clear cut to me. Why doesn't it seem the same way to critics?
Well said
Claire, I present to you the "Written Word Gold Star of the Day." Dynamite letter. Right to the point and 100% spot on. Thanks for sharing. Best read of the day.
Lead by example
Maybe if both parties would learn how not to be so polarizing then, perhaps your wish would come true. As an undeclared voter I find it disheartening the two sides can't get along. And talk show pundits exacerbate the condition. We elect these people to display integrity and leadership. That's hard to deliver when neither side shows no interest in reaching across the aisle. As voters, we have the right to criticize since we all pay their salaries. Show us it's about working for the all the people and not about the power and then the mood will soften. Lead by example and prove to all of us Washimgton isn't a glorified daycare.
Really, Dan?
We were warned several days before this storm to prepare fot it. And I heard the comments such as, "Ah this storm will be no big deal." C.M.P. told us to be prepared for extended outages. They were right and, apparently, this wasn't just another storm. I know a lot of people that work for C.M.P. All good people. Do you think they're out there twiddling their thumbs? It's the people who didn't prepare that are the angriest, and I don't feel sorry for them one bit. Belly-aching on a blog won't make the situation better. For the record, we do not have power yet. We prepared for that and we're actually enjoying a few days without the technological comforts that rule our lives. It's your cgoice to wallow in your swill as you wish. To me, that's a sad way of handling this situation.
Thanks, but no thanks.
Your opinion has been noted, Dan.
The correct response
Gov. LePage is doing what a leader is supposed to do during a difficulty such as weathering a bad storm. This is not a waste and anyone who believes it is misses the point. This is about supporting those he serves and he is doing so by seeing for himself the havoc created by this storm. Several months ago President Obama toured Joplin, MO. after the catastophic tornado that struck their town. I saw his reaction on news reports. He was genuinelyshaken and shocked by the mass destruction he saw. His words were very emotional and sincere. He offered comfort to victims and was adament in his promise to help those folks back on their feet. He showed he cared. That is what LePage isdoing today. No campaigning, no photo ops. Let's give the man credit for doing the right thing. That shouldn't be that difficult to do.
WOW!!!
Gee Larry, you said a mouthful. I'm glad you said it with your mouth and not mine. Let's just say I disagree with 95% of what you're saying. I'll agree with Obama's approval rating being low. We all expect that, however he doesn't have an enviable job right now, does he? I don't agree with some of Obama's programs or decisions, but to cast him as a constitution hating person is plain wrong. I'd love to see his programs work for the benefit of all he serves. And how does one justify accusing someone of hatred when the accuser does so by spewing hate themselves? Do we really want the man to fail? What does that say about us if we do?
MORONS!!!
Not only did they put themselves in danger, they also put their resuers in danger as well. Fools!
No credibility
Actually, GOV. Paul LePage is doing what any other gov. should do in a situation such as preparing for a hurricane's arrival. Anyone who jumps up and down making stupid political statements under these conditions exposes themselves as completely lacking in credibility and common sense.
Gold medal for Tom's post
Great point, Tom. And here's another thought... How many olympic atheletes have had their medals stripped from them due to positive drug tests or other infractions? Where's the integrity of the games go when cheating becomes a focal point. And couldn't other major sports, such as major league baseball, the NFL, etc...have an argument about how their names are used by the general public for backyard weekend activities as well? This whole argument by the olympic committee is absolutely stupid.
Agree or disagree
Regardless of which side of the road you choose to stand on the basic fact is Snowe is right. And I get she's a republican and she votes along party lines the majority of the time, however, she also reaches across to the other side more so than she's given credit for. That's how compromise begins.
Congrats, Al
Way to go, and you did it the right way. Just put them down and walk away from them. It's been four years for me and it was tough but the benefits of quitting are miles above any pleasure received from the habit. Hope your wife can conquer the habit again. Stay happy.
Give credit where credit is due
I travel to Scarborough each workday and I log many miles per week on the turnpike. The Maine State Police do an excellent job patrolling that road and enforcing the speed limits. I sometimes see as many as seven or eight vehicles pulled over by troopers at a time within a one mile stretch. The State Police have developed a reputation for being tough on offenders thus they have condition over time the regulars that travel this highway daily. I usually go about five mph over the limit and when I get passed it's usually by someone going just a couple of mph faster than me. The exceptions are almost always out of state drivers who don't know any better. So I thank all the Troopers who patrol the pike for not only are they providing a safer environment for me to travel on, but also for my family as well, and yours too as well.
A foolproof solution
This episode is a perfect example of how government can muddy up the political waters for the rest of us. How about a clear and simple solution... Repeal the law that denies same day voter registation, put the question on this November's ballot and let the voters decide once and for all. It seems way too much time and energy is being spent on this issue as it is. I don't care what Webster, Summers or anyone else has to say about this, and I don't care to see any proof one way or another. Put the question on the ballot, vote on it, live with the result and be done with it once and for all.
Way overblown
Actually, Republicans gained power in the last election with same day registration intact. Whether we have it or not makes no difference because what sways all elections is the moderate vote. The far left is too loony and the far right is too screwey for those in the middle to pay attention to. But both sides clamor for their views to be echoed by the people who are elected. This issue is sort of a battlefield to either secure the liberal vote or an attempt to deny access to vote. Either way, both sides have portrayed themselves to be the "victim" although their motives are selfish. It's hard for me to believe either side actually cares about the plight of the voter. It's all about the votes themselves. Always has been amd always will be.
Illinois politics
According to an MSNBC link (www.msnbc.msn.com/id/28141995/ns/u), there were only two Republican politicians convicted of differing corruption crimes; Bill Thompson who I believed served as Mayor of Chicago back in the twentys and early thirties, and former Gov. George Ryan. However, the article lists a slew of Democrats, like Otto Kerner Jr., Daniel Rostenkowski, Dan Walker and various individuals within the Daley adm. And of course, Mr. Ron (doesn't my hair look fabulous)Blog-hard. According to the article I read it is the Democrats that have trashed Illinois politics for decades by a wide margin.
Research provides all the answers
My guess, George is the answers you are looking for may be obtained simply by opening up the Koran and actually reading it. It's too easy to fall into the trap known as "heresay." When Jim Bouton wrote his first book, "Ball Four" which spoke of his life and time playing major league baseball in the 1960's many players of that era panned it
and some went as far as calling Boutin a "communist" for writing of experiences which were considered taboo at that time, such as how contracts were negotiated and how some players actually participated in activies such as drinking and casual sex whiile on the road. The book was pure genius and an excellent read but when asked what parts of the book offended the naysayers the most their reply was, "Well, I actually didn't read it.".
Two flavors
That kool-aid comes in two flavors these days...Liberal AND Conservative.
Say What???
I'm going to assume that you hold a valid Maine's drivers license, Robin. Therefore I'd like to believe you understand the existing laws concerning pedestrians walking within crosswalks. They, without question, have the right of way. The only possible way fault would be shifted upon the pedestrian is if he intentionally walked in front of the moving vehicle. As for the boy, you seem to assume it was his fault despite the fact there is no information contained within this story that details what happened. And you dare say adults and children, (pedestrians I assume although your statement is quite vauge), have no respect for local drivers. I don't know what you're seeing but from my vantage point it's clearly the other way around.
Double standard?
Given the responses here my opinion is you folks don't like this idea simply because LePage suggested it, not because of the separation of church and state argument. After all, your collective points could be made without the hatred contained within your own words. I'm not saying your core beliefs are wrong but it makes your comments look hypocritical when you combat your perceived views of how LePage spreads his "hatred" around by slinging your own brand of hatred. So, in effect, you're no better than he is. One other thing... Given your stance on the subject matter, shouldn't we also chastise President Obama anytime he asks us to "Pray for the victims" of natural disasters and such? And if not then how is that different from what LePage is asking?
A tough situation
No matter where the fault may lie there is an obvious disconnect between the council and thr city manager. Perhaps I'm not qualified to state an opinion since I no longer reside in Auburn, but I was a resident a few years back and one of the reasons we moved was due to problems that existed within city government. The bickering, snide remarks and constant confusion are inexcusible and a poor example of how a city government is supposed to work. There are two qualities a city councilor and a city manager need to possess to succeed in their posts ; Commitment to the community and its citizens and integrity. The good people of Auburn need to ask themselves if they feel they are being short changed. It seems they are from both corners and that's a real shame.
Oh yeah...Look out for numero uno
What a great attitude to have ; "Taking care of our own.", "Teach them about birth control." etc...I'd be downright ashamed of myself if I put my name to those comments pertaining to this story. The feeling I get is since we as a nation has a support system through our government than all is taken care of in the midst of a national disaster. Really? What happened in the days following the landfall of Hurricane Katrina? That support system failed in a nation that's supposed to be the greatest nation on earth. This is a country that is so far behind the times that dealing with a catastrphe such as widespread famine is overwhelming to a government that hope for these people is dim at best. And Mr. Hubbard I will call you out in particular...What kind of help do you need? If you are someone that deserves to be helped all you have to do is ask for it and you would be directed to the right people that will assist you. However, if you're just one of those types that expect something for nothing, or free food or whatever, then take a trek to your local McD's and slam a couple of dollar McDoubles down your throat. When we were attacked on 9/11 do you honestly believe it was "Americans" only that searched through the rubble and buried the dead among the grieving? No way. The entire civilized world came to us and pledged their help doing whetever was asked of them. The world is one big community, I firmly believe that and those that don't want to be a part of it are those that deserve to be cast aside. What if another earthquake strikes a country like Haiti? Or a tsunami hits the Phillipines? You going to turn your back because you "Gave enough already"? Is it too inconveinent for any of you if a natural disaster strikes an impovershed nation and you're asked to GIVE? Will that cause you to limit your Netflix orders for the next month? Being fat, dumb and happy may be your tonic for life as you see it. Personally, if I had that attitude I couldn't look people in the eye.
It's not that simple Mark
In order to control the obesity problem the culture must be changed. For example, drive by a McD's around any mealtime and note how deep the dtive yhru lane is with people waiting to slam a couple of Big Macs down their throats. Oh and don't forget the fries. And that is only one of many choices out there for fast and fattening food. In the time wasted waiting in that line a person could choose to whip up a quick salad at home before they leave for the day. However, throuygh laziness folks cast adide the healthy option for a handful of cholestorol. We are living in a society of instant gratification woth minimal effort. We can choose to do the right thing, but that's to hard. Yeah, it would be so easy to just put down the fork, but
it's easier still to pick up the phone and order takeout.
I agree Bob
Either this lady hets a bill, or worse, gets scammed. I heard of a fly by night roofing contractor using the same ploy and was successful in scamming victims by submitting an outrageous labor bill that more than covered time and materials used. They promise the product for free and not the service. I'm sure this lady did not enter under some type of written agreement which complicates the situation further. Lesson number one... Nothing is FREE.
Who is being restricted from voting?
On any day when city and town halls are open for business anyone living in, and / or attending college In that given locale may register to vote. It's a process that is simple to complete just as it is to register your car or conducting other business one may have that requires permits and such. Nobody is denying the right to register to vote to anyone. That being said, I do agree with the notion of placing this question on a referendum ballot for one reason ; It is an issue that the voters of Maine should decide on and not the government. Also, I am curious to see the proof Mr. Webster is speaking of which he possesses. He opened that door in this article and he needs to explain his motives as well. But I do believe Democrats have but one motive to continue same day registration and that is to merely enhance their voter base. As with the Republicans it's all about the power, not the people responsible for giving them that power. And that's how it has always been, and probably always will be.
Thank you Ronnie
"Corpsman Up." What a moving tribute. I'm not ashamed to admit my eyes welled up reading it. Hell, I'd question my own heart and soul if I hadn't. I've always given faithfully to the Wounded Veterans of America but I never fail to thank a person in uniform any chance I have, including my step-daughter who is a platoon sargent at Fort Hood and has three tours in Iraq in her rearview mirror. I wish I had the chance to thank Mr. Bryant. However I want to thank you, Ron for not only posting this tribute, but also for your dedication, time and sacrifice that you gave of yourself. Thank you, sir.
More pressing needs
Citizens of Auburn...You have a high school that is grossly outdated and in need of attention. This "surplus" money would be more wisely used if it was allocated toward a new Edward Little high school. The school dept. could still purchase an X amount of ipads for each school for general studies and training. Buying one for each kid is downright idiotic. The infrastructure of the high school is of much more of a urgent need. Ipads for each 5 year old is not a "need."
More pressing needs
Citizens of Auburn...You have a high school that is grossly outdated and in need of attention. This "surplus" money would be more wisely used if it was allocated toward a new Edward Little high school. The school dept. could still purchase an X amount of ipads for each school for general studies and training. Buying one for each kid is downright idiotic. The infrastructure of the high school is of much more of a urgent need. Ipads for each 5 year old is not a "need."
Good reason to pay special attention
Perhaps Mr. Reed you missed the fact that this person who wiped out his family was about to stand trial for holding them at gunpoint last year. He was ordered to surrender all firearms to the authorities and to stay away from his family. This was not a typical domestic violence situation, and even if it was, how many of those end tragically? And one more thing; If you or your family had been held against your will at gunpoint wouldn't you see to it that the person responsible was being watched closely by those we pay to protect us?
Spot on, Dan
You are absolutely correct. Law enforcement let this lady and her kids down. And another thing; Why did the first officer on the scene stay outside when he heard shots fired. Ok, he didn't have backup but knowing the situation and the people involved he's gotta go in.
LaFlamme is a realist
The first section I turn to in the Sunday paper is "Talk of the Town". Great insight and humor with the right kind of sarcasm that smacks us upside our collective thought processes. Mark is a true gem of a journalist in every sense of the word. He makes us, or better yet, dares us to think and that is what makes Mask such a unique and genuine talent. Besides that, he's so spot on with his observations. He makes us think, he makes us laugh and he makes my Sunday mornings what they should be...laid back and fun. Enjoy his work to the fullest for we are fortunate he writes for our paper.
Better ways to make your point
It's not what you said but how you said it Mr. Rimi. After all it's not as if you're sparring with someone over some political ideology. With that you further lose points on the "respect-o-meter. Unless being an angry man is your mea culpa of course.
Hey Steve
Tell you what...Save your apologies. Those are even more worthless than your comments.
Poor choice of words
I think anyone using the word "tard" to describe someone while making their point is classless and hateful. I'm disappointed the editors at this newspaper have chosen to allow that comment to stand. As for the writer, you should be ashamed of yourself and issue an apology.
The root of the problem
Seems to me the problems that exist in this state today have nothing to do with murals being erected or removed. Nor does it have to do with the left or right. It has to do with a lack of continuity among those we elect and send to Augusta, and a disconnect between them and the residents of this state that sent them there. For thirty plus years I heard folks complaining about state government and how it is so ineffective. So in this past election cycle the power shifted and then one of the first things on the agenda was whether or not we should proclaim the whoopie pie as the state dessert. My reaction to that was ????? Whether I voted for the candidate that wins their office or not I tend to cut them some slack at the onset of their term. I'm not a slave to any particular political ideology or a certain capital letter in front of someone's name. I know a lot of people who are wrapped up in their politics, both left and right, and there is virtually no reasoning with them, nor is their room for compromise. It doesn't matter who's in charge if that kind of mentality exists within the walls of the capital.
When all else fails...
I pity any person who chooses to personally attack another individual for stating his or her opinion. How small of a mind you must have and how pathetic your little tirades against others have become, Mr. Breton. You continue to prove to the rest of us that when you don't have a sensible reply to another's view, you simply throw rocks.
Almost on empty
Exxon-Mobil made a profit of $10.65 billion dollars in the first quarter of 2011. Then they practically apologized for that despite the $4.00 a gallon + price at the pumps. They paint themselves out to be the scapegoats but that's a bunch of horse droppings because they've been doing this all along. And I understand speculators have a lot to do with the prices but it seems we've driven down this road way too much, and we are almost on empty.
No adjustments are needed
Gov. LePage is who he is and nobody has the right to change how he thinks or speaks. The man, like everyone of us, has freewill to be the person he chooses and asking someone th change their personality is wrong. I accept who he is and how he speaks. I've heard some who did not vote for him belittling his speech and grammar and making references to his heritage and background. These people were supposedly of higher intelligence. Yeah, right. Someone once said, "You can't teach common sense." For decades common sense was absent in Augusta and we are now paying for the mistakes of those transgressions, including the contracting of this labor mural that we as residents of this state were never asked whether it should be put up in the first place, nor were many of us aware it even existed. And though it's true he is not the first governor to inherit the problems we have faced all along, the fact is these problems have been compounded by wasteful and entitlement programs for years. No one else before LePage had the guts to take them on out of fear of losing votes. LePage has the guts to do so. Let the man do his job.