Like the commenting on purging DHHS from the budget while neglecting spousal and child abuse. Seems to me liking it to keep it silent and in the family.
People just don't see the child abuse or live their own personal lives with blinders on. It is an amazingly brisk example if their daughters had been raped, were with child, and committed suicide without consoling from DHHS would they want it more or just ignore it and bury it? I think the broad examples here provide the truth if polled how people would truly vote. Don't bring up the child abuse, ignore the battered women, and keep it "within" the family.
As we did in 2007 had to tell you that we stomped you again! No team is ever the favorite; what Coach Mynahan used to tell us is true; no matter what you think; every game will be your hardest game. When Brady said that and when he started getting socked around the fight literally was gone.
O'Keefe knows that LePage is bringing in a more moderate base after his disrespectful and profane attitude. As a supporter of LePage this is no big surprise. After the mural and other disrespects and finally learning that hard lesson of respect or you get nothing; O'Keefe wants to frame him as the problem.
Better to let them die as opposed to letting them live because that heartbreak does not resonate with you? You speak of payments she speaks of a life not in taxes but a life not for the general animosity to attack a system at such an immature level. This seems largely to be a vocal point for misdirected anger at the system by questioning it. At the root of the letter is that her mother died and you claim it as insurance and generosity at the end of a gun. That was a life lost because they did not have coverage but you signify it in such a way as that it is at the barrel of a gun. So, then remove the funds and have the elderly or disabled dying so that you can satisfy yourself? Yes, that makes perfect sense and markers in you've never really lost someone close to you; as someone with high functioning autism having lost others who hit close to home it makes me sad to realize that your writing conveys the personality that you'll never really care. It makes me sad to think that as an Aspie I have more empathy then a neuro-typical who care more about their investments and hedge-funds and less about others to limit federal funding and allow people to die. Why not say what you truly have been wanting to say; not at the barrel of a gun, just that you do not care about anyone except for yourself? That is generosity at the point of your gun; then you decided yourself on a term of speaking who lives or who dies due to your limits. I think we see the real problem here is that Max lives in a world that does not allow him to phrase how he truthfully feels about human lives in general as aside from his own.
joeziehmer's Comments
Nice
Like the commenting on purging DHHS from the budget while neglecting spousal and child abuse. Seems to me liking it to keep it silent and in the family.
Wow
People just don't see the child abuse or live their own personal lives with blinders on. It is an amazingly brisk example if their daughters had been raped, were with child, and committed suicide without consoling from DHHS would they want it more or just ignore it and bury it? I think the broad examples here provide the truth if polled how people would truly vote. Don't bring up the child abuse, ignore the battered women, and keep it "within" the family.
Did It
As we did in 2007 had to tell you that we stomped you again! No team is ever the favorite; what Coach Mynahan used to tell us is true; no matter what you think; every game will be your hardest game. When Brady said that and when he started getting socked around the fight literally was gone.
Moderation
O'Keefe knows that LePage is bringing in a more moderate base after his disrespectful and profane attitude. As a supporter of LePage this is no big surprise. After the mural and other disrespects and finally learning that hard lesson of respect or you get nothing; O'Keefe wants to frame him as the problem.
Better to
Better to let them die as opposed to letting them live because that heartbreak does not resonate with you? You speak of payments she speaks of a life not in taxes but a life not for the general animosity to attack a system at such an immature level. This seems largely to be a vocal point for misdirected anger at the system by questioning it. At the root of the letter is that her mother died and you claim it as insurance and generosity at the end of a gun. That was a life lost because they did not have coverage but you signify it in such a way as that it is at the barrel of a gun. So, then remove the funds and have the elderly or disabled dying so that you can satisfy yourself? Yes, that makes perfect sense and markers in you've never really lost someone close to you; as someone with high functioning autism having lost others who hit close to home it makes me sad to realize that your writing conveys the personality that you'll never really care. It makes me sad to think that as an Aspie I have more empathy then a neuro-typical who care more about their investments and hedge-funds and less about others to limit federal funding and allow people to die. Why not say what you truly have been wanting to say; not at the barrel of a gun, just that you do not care about anyone except for yourself? That is generosity at the point of your gun; then you decided yourself on a term of speaking who lives or who dies due to your limits. I think we see the real problem here is that Max lives in a world that does not allow him to phrase how he truthfully feels about human lives in general as aside from his own.