SOUTH ROYALTON, Vt. (AP) – Activists say they are not satisfied with the civil union law, which they described at a Vermont Law School conference last week as second-class matrimony.

At the daylong meeting titled “Got Marriage?” lawyers, activists, legislators and legal scholars said the state’s 2000 civil unions law didn’t go far enough.

“We’ve got work left to do,” said Beth Robinson, a Middlebury lawyer who successfully argued the Baker case before the Vermont Supreme Court that set the stage for Vermont’s civil union law.

Michael Mello, a professor at the law school and the author of the new book, “Legalizing Gay Marriage,” said the civil unions route is the “separate but equal” approach to gay marriage rights. Mello said civil unions wouldn’t pass civil rights muster.

An amendment to the U.S. Constitution, which would essentially ban gay marriage or civil unions, would never be endorsed by the U.S. Senate, conference participants agreed. But the companion movement, with individual states adopting “Defense of Marriage Acts,” is a dangerous attack on gay rights, panelists said. The measure, which is on the ballot in several key states this November, could bring large numbers of fundamentalist Christians to the polls, affecting the outcome of the presidential race in close states like Oregon.

Vermont Attorney General William Sorrell, who delivered the keynote address, said a U.S. constitutional amendment would “absolutely overrule” Vermont’s Baker decision.

Sorrell said he has a bridge he’d like to sell to anyone who thinks otherwise, “and the price is really right.”

“No way does our civil union law survive,” he said.

Fifty years ago, he said, “states’ rights” was a code word for racism. Now, he said, federalism is used to restrict individual civil rights and to “bully the states,” said Sorrell, who is the head of the National Association of Attorneys General.

Sorrell said progress has been slow on gay rights, but he said that the federal government would eventually ban discrimination in employment and public accommodations, based on sexual orientation.

An amendment banning same-sex marriage, he said, “is a thinly veiled attack on our independent courts and our independent judges.”

Sorrell said he places a good deal of faith in his children’s generation, who accept gay rights as a given.

“‘They’re people just like everyone else,”‘ he quoted his children as lecturing him, while telling the audience that his kids were not “Birkenstock liberals,” but mainstream teenagers watching reality television.

The session, the first of the new academic year, was the 10th annual conference on sexual orientation and the law. It was sponsored and presented by the Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual and Transgender Alliance of Vermont Law School.

AP-ES-09-12-04 0927EDT



Only subscribers are eligible to post comments. Please subscribe or to participate in the conversation. Here’s why.

Use the form below to reset your password. When you've submitted your account email, we will send an email with a reset code.