In a letter on April 12 about “terrorism” by Klaus Kuck of Lewiston, a number of questionable claims were made. Kuck claimed use of the phrase “war on terror” prevents people from “thinking clearly,” but asserts the horrific 9/11 attacks ushered in a new era. He was correct about that. After 9/11 the Bush administration began promoting fear for political gain while hiding behind jingoistic statements.

Brave American troops protect freedom and should never be asked to fight a war based on lies and Republican politics.

While Bush worried about resurrecting the dinosaur “Star Wars” missile system, a handful of extremists launched tragic suicide attacks. To equate 9/11 with Pearl Harbor, as Kuck did, not only strains credibility, but insults the intelligence of Americans. There was no country that attacked the United States on 9/11, nor was there a massive, global Islamist scheme behind the tragedy.

The war in Iraq has nothing to do with “fighting terrorism,” and is not a rallying point for the “jihad against the West,” as Kuck claimed. The Kurds and Shia in Iraq have not signed on to serve Al-Qaida. Bush has as much admitted Iraq was a war for oil.

The “war on terror” is about using fear for Republican political gain. If the United States is in a real fight for its existence, why did Bush urge people to “go shopping” after 9/11? Where are the tax increases? Where is the military draft?

Also, where is Osama bin Laden?

Mark Tardif, Waterville


Only subscribers are eligible to post comments. Please subscribe or to participate in the conversation. Here’s why.

Use the form below to reset your password. When you've submitted your account email, we will send an email with a reset code.