AUGUSTA — Members of Maine’s congressional delegation are seeking more information about a plan to restructure the Army National Guard that could send Maine’s 133rd Engineer Battalion to Pennsylvania, officials said Thursday.

The proposal would essentially remove the 500-person battalion that has roots in the state dating back to the early 1800s in an effort to save money by consolidating Army Guard units nationwide. An infantry unit would move to Maine to take its place. There are currently 167 members of the 133rd deployed in Afghanistan working to downsize and consolidate the bases there as the United States prepares to withdraw its remaining military forces from the country.

If the restructuring proposal goes forward, the 133rd would be moved to Pennsylvania sometime between 2017 and 2019, said Willy Ritch, spokesman for Democratic Rep. Chellie Pingree.

“Nothing is set in stone,” Sgt. 1st Class Pete Morrison, spokesman for the Maine National Guard, said Thursday.

Information about the plan surfaced when Maine Army National Guard Col. Jack Mosher briefed some members of Maine’s congressional leadership in Washington, D.C., on Tuesday. The briefing apparently did not include Gov. Paul LePage, commander-in-chief of the Maine National Guard, who called the Portland Press Herald Wednesday to ask about the source of its story.

Maj. Michael Steinbuchel, spokesman for the Maine Army National Guard, referred all questions about the proposal to Peter Steele, LePage’s spokesman, who did not respond to repeated requests for information on Thursday.


Ritch said he and other congressional staffers listened in on the Washington briefing by conference call from Maine and that other individual briefings were given to U.S. Sen. Angus King and other Maine leaders.

U.S. Rep. Mike Michaud, a Democrat who is running for governor, is learning all he can about the proposal, Dan Rafter, Michaud’s spokesman, said in a Thursday email.

“The congressman is in the process of getting more information about the proposal and its impact, and he’ll discuss it with Brig. Gen. [James] Campbell once he is stateside,” Rafter said. “Rep. Michaud’s top priorities are the men and women who serve in the Guard, and ensuring that the force in the state remains capable of quickly and effectively responding to a variety of situations.”

Campbell, adjutant general for the Maine National Guard, is overseas and an email sent to him Thursday was not immediately returned.

Much of the federal restructuring plan is based on post-war economics, according to a Congressional Research Service report release in late February by the Federation of American Scientists titled “Army Drawdown and Restructuring: Background and Issues for Congress.”

“They tell us there will be a number of units in both Pennsylvania and Texas that will be reorganized and five new light infantry brigades constituted. One unit would be in Maine,” Pingree’s spokesman said. “The guard has told us that members of the 133rd could be retrained for the new infantry unit.”


Ritch said Pingree is concerned because the change to an infantry unit would likely mean fewer opportunities for women. “Twice as many jobs are off limits to women in an infantry unit,” Ritch said. “They would essentially be left out in the cold. There would be limited opportunities for them in an infantry brigade.”

The change would affect guard personnel from all over the state. The 133rd is made up of soldiers from the 136th Engineering Company in Skowhegan and Lewiston, 185th Engineering Support Company from Caribou, 251st Engineering Company SAPPER of Norway, the Forward Support Company in Portland, Headquarters Support Company, the 262nd Engineering Company based in Belfast and Westbrook, and the 1035th Survey and Design Team of Gardiner.

The Maine soldiers currently deployed overseas are part of the Headquarters Company, Forward Support Company and the 1035th, Steinbuchel has said.

Morrison said Maine’s 133rd is the oldest unit in the state and has a distinguished reputation.

The engineering unit is available to respond to natural disasters and completes community outreach projects every year, Ritch said.

U.S. Sens. Susan Collins and Angus King issued a joint statement Thursday saying they would be looking into the matter.

“We fully recognize the extraordinary service of Maine’s 133rd Engineer Battalion and the important role the Army National Guard plays both here at home and abroad,” the joint email statement said. “Should the Maine Army National Guard Bureau outline a plan to exchange the 133rd Engineer Battalion for an Infantry Battalion, we would carefully review the details.”

Shortly after news about the proposed change was released, Mainers started to call their congressional leaders.

“We’ve heard from a number of constituents already who object to this plan,” Ritch said. “Congresswoman Pingree is concerned about this and she does want to learn more, [but] she’s going into this with skepticism.”

Only subscribers are eligible to post comments. Please subscribe or login first for digital access. Here’s why.

Use the form below to reset your password. When you've submitted your account email, we will send an email with a reset code.