Get off the NBA’s back, all you people who want sports to be the children’s literature of your lost youth.

Somehow, because the Houston Rockets capitulated to their Chinese business partners, the league is now supposed to be a gutless violator of human rights? You better start with General Electric, first.

Or Kentucky Fried Chicken. Or how about Walmart?

It’s more than a little ludicrous for everyone from Ted Cruz to Beto O’Rourke to suddenly hand the NBA and the Rockets the tab for American toadying to authoritarians in Beijing.

If they want to draw that line in the sand, they can draw it with any one of their favorite dozen American corporations, only that wouldn’t be so politically convenient, would it?

It’s easier to hurl righteous outrage and umbrage at a large target like Houston Rockets star James Harden, who on Monday apologized to China for hurt feelings at the behest of his bosses.

“We love China,” he said.

It’s far more pat and satisfying to go all in at Rockets management for making general manager Daryl Morey apologize for his tweet over the weekend in support of pro-democracy protesters in Hong Kong.

“I did not intend my tweet to cause any offense to Rockets fans and friends of mine in China,” he said in a statement.

And boy, isn’t it an easy viral sound clip to accuse the entire NBA of “blatant prioritization of profits over human rights,” like O’Rourke did, and call it an embarrassment, simply because the league called the incident “regrettable” and tried to patch things up with its Chinese counterparts?

You want to be angry at the NBA for cowering in the face of China’s authoritarian regime? You want to accuse NBA Commissioner Adam Silver of supporting a murderous dictatorship simply to further business interests in China? Fine. Good for you.

But understand the NBA is only imitating that smooth move patented by dozens of other fine, flag-waving American corporations in their dealings with China. A half dozen American corporate sponsors set the template a decade ago at the Beijing Olympics, when they colluded in the silencing of U.S. athletes and were far more directly complicit in a host of human rights violations.

Remember what champs VISA and General Electric were when the Chinese refused to grant entry to American athlete Joey Cheek, because he had been too audible of an activist against abuses in Darfur?

And how about the courageous support Coca-Cola gave to Chinese dissidents, when Beijing authorities cracked down on them in advance of those Games?

Never forget the standup position Johnson & Johnson took when Stephen Spielberg quit as artistic director of the opening and closing ceremonies because Beijing not only failed to honor a single one of the reform promises it had made in procuring the right to host the Games, but actually went on a terroristic bender against its own citizens, destroying whole neighborhoods, enlisting slave labor and throwing anyone who didn’t like it into a camp?

Ford Motors. GM. Starbucks. Papa Johns. All of them do massive business with China. Abercrombie and Fitch. Boeing, Proctor and Gamble. Start with them. All of them have long known what the conditions and equations are for doing business in the China market.

Australian journalist Geremie Barme, who has covered China for many years, sums it up in a phrase, “contentious friendship.”

“To be a friend of China, the foreigner is often expected to stomach unpalatable situations, and keep silent in the face of egregious behavior,” he has written. “A friend of China might enjoy the privilege of offering the occasional word of caution in private; in the public arena he or she is expected to have the good sense and courtesy to be ‘objective.’ That is to toe the line, whatever that happens to be. The concept of ‘friendship’ thus degenerates into little more than an effective tool for emotional blackmail and enforced complicity.”

Throughout the Beijing Olympics, American companies remained steadfastly silent. So did IOC president Jacques Rogge.

When Rogge finally did open his mouth to protest someone’s conduct, it wasn’t anyone in China’s leaderships. The man he decided to pick was Jamaican sprinter Usain Bolt, for his bad manners in celebrating too boldly. The outrage at the NBA is more than a little remindful of that.

Yes, the NBA has made a mutually beneficial commercial accommodation with China. There are 800 million Chinese viewers of the league, according to Time, and a 30-year media partnership.

You have a problem with that, or consider it gutless? Then you have a problem with literally hundreds of American companies.

« Previous

Gleyber Torres leads Yankees to sweep of Twins

Next »

Adam Silver: NBA personnel are free to comment on China