Abuse that has led to the deaths of several Maine children is driving legislation that would create a new Cabinet-level department in state government with the sole task of protecting children from suffering and neglect.

Sen. Bill Diamond: “I guarantee that when the next child is murdered or dies … because of neglect or abuse we all, of course, will feel terrible and pledge to fix the problem. Because that’s what we do.”

The legislation, sponsored by Sen. Bill Diamond, D-Windham, would remove the Office of Children and Family Services from the Department of Health and Human Services and establish a new state department with a commissioner nominated by the governor and confirmed by the state Senate.

Diamond’s proposal is one of several bills that the Health and Human Services Committee has considered this week aimed at improving the handling of child protection.

In testimony before the committee Tuesday, Diamond pointed to the abuse deaths of at least five children, dating to the killing of 5-year-old Logan Marr in 2001.

Marr was found dead after she had been duct-taped to a high chair and left in the basement of her foster mother’s home, Diamond noted.

He also cited the more recent slayings of Kendall Chick and Marissa Kennedy. The deaths of Chick, 4, in 2017 and Kennedy, 10, a year later, shocked and saddened the state while again exposing flaws in Maine’s system for protecting children, Diamond said.


“I guarantee that when the next child is murdered or dies, God forbid that happening, because of neglect or abuse we all, of course, will feel terrible and pledge to fix the problem. Because that’s what we do,” Diamond said.

Following Chick’s death it was revealed child welfare officials had closed her case just 10 months earlier. A review of documents after Kennedy’s death revealed child welfare officials were aware of concerns for her safety, yet failed to act.

“I attended all three of those trials and their sentencing hearings as well,” Diamond said. “What became painfully obvious throughout the trials were the failures of the very agencies that were supposed to protect these children and instead failed them, resulting in their deaths.”

Diamond said the tragic deaths could have been avoided, but they resulted from a failure of the structure of state government rather than of any one state worker or official.

“The (Office of Children and Family Services) needs to rise to the level of an independent agency separate from DHHS,” Diamond said. “Simply put, the department is so large and complex and has so many serious challenges that it cannot properly oversee the many needs of the OCFS, at least to the level required to fully protect children in their care.”

DHHS filed written testimony opposing the bill in a letter by Todd Landry, director of the department’s Office of Child and Family Services.


“While the structure this bill proposes would likely bring more attention to the vital activities related to child and family services, the costs and drawbacks outweigh any benefits that might be derived from this change,” Landry wrote.

He said the bill doesn’t take into account the complexity of redirecting funding streams for child-related programs, nor would it incorporate other state programs that support children into the proposed new department.

Some committee members appeared skeptical about peeling apart DHHS.

“I really appreciate the fact that you want to address the problem,” Sen. Joe Baldacci, D-Bangor, told Diamond. “I’m just not sure the bill is the way to go.”

Baldacci asked if Diamond would be open to a commission to review and propose changes to DHHS.

“I would welcome anything,” Diamond said. “Anything you can do.”


But others who testified in support of the bill said the state needs a department focused solely on child welfare and safety.

“Maine’s children’s systems are fragmented,” said Nancy Cronin, the executive director of the Maine Developmental Disability Council.

“Creating a new department where children are central would and could mean improved coordination and that (fewer) children would get overcomplicated services,” Cronin said. “Having a children’s department, a Cabinet-level children’s department, might be the best opportunity to really focus on kids and have somebody look at kids from an overall systemic point of view and stop some of the sad things that are happening.”

Christine Alberi, the state’s child welfare ombudsman, offered testimony neither for nor against the bill. Alberi’s office is an independent agency with access to child protection records to help resolve concerns and complaints involving Child Protective Services.

“In general, the ombudsman’s office is in favor of any additional resources and help that can be directed towards child welfare,” Alberi said.

She noted that the children involved with state services make up a small portion of all the children in Maine.

“But they deserve a larger share of our attention,” Alberi said. “Any child that enters state custody deserves the best that we can offer for every moment that we care for that child.”

Diamond’s bill will be the subject of future committee work sessions in the weeks ahead.

On Monday, the committee worked on a series of bills also aimed at better protecting children, including measures that would set up an early intervention and prevention program within DHHS and improve communication between entities that protect children. The committee has yet to vote on whether to recommend passage of those measures.

Only subscribers are eligible to post comments. Please subscribe or login first for digital access. Here’s why.

Use the form below to reset your password. When you've submitted your account email, we will send an email with a reset code.