On the single issue of slavery, Abraham Lincoln said, “A house divided against itself cannot stand.”
It took a civil war and a magnanimous president to reunite the nation.
Due to the increasing polarization and the inability to compromise strongly held views on a wide range of contentious issues — abortion, guns, immigration, voting rights, civil rights and religious rights, exacerbated by a free press that creates more heat than light, coupled with weak politicians who act like weather vanes rather than lighthouses — we have become a nation adrift.
Who will be our Abraham Lincoln? Who could imagine that a nation, united in agreement that 9/11 was an attack on our nation, could in a few short years see a violent mob determined to halt the certification of a lawful election by storming our seat of governance, an act that some consider just a patriotic protest that got out of hand.
Just a “tourist visit.” No big deal. Let’s move on.
Each one of us needs to answer two questions: Should we cancel our national motto, E pluribus unum (“Out of many, one”)? Should we change our Pledge of Allegiance to address the Divided States of America?
George Howitt, Lewiston
Send questions/comments to the editors.
Success. Please wait for the page to reload. If the page does not reload within 5 seconds, please refresh the page.
Enter your email and password to access comments.
Hi, to comment on stories you must . This profile is in addition to your subscription and website login.
Already have a commenting profile? .
Invalid username/password.
Please check your email to confirm and complete your registration.
Only subscribers are eligible to post comments. Please subscribe or login first for digital access. Here’s why.
Use the form below to reset your password. When you've submitted your account email, we will send an email with a reset code.