On June 8, voters will vote on Question 1, which requires the state government to fund education costs at 55 percent and special education costs at 100 percent.

This proposal is irresponsible in five ways:

1. There is no guarantee property taxes will be reduced.

2. There is no control over the demands of education. The Legislature has tried to catch up to 55 percent of education’s demands from a 42 to 44 percent position, which is like chasing a ghost.

The state has increased education funding in each of the last five years. Adding $37 million in 1999, $32 million in 2000, $39 million in 2001, $37 million in 2002 and $13 million in 2003.

3. Paying 100 percent of special education costs is an open door to a liberal interpretation of which students need special education. There is no control on this.

4. Suddenly thrusting this on the state government, instead of allowing a gradual buildup to 55 percent, will disrupt many existing programs, raise taxes or both.

5. The four pages of statutory language with this question call for 2 percent to be deducted from the total to reward communities that have shown efficiencies in local government and 2 percent for efficiencies in education administration. Who determines this and how are not mentioned.

My property taxes are a burden too, but this is not the way to reduce that burden. Please vote no on Question 1. Allow the Legislature to use this as a message to adopt a graduated, equitable formula.

Rep. Thomas F. Shields, M.D., Auburn

Copy the Story Link