1 min read

If the Palesky tax cap passes, say state and local officials, there will be drastic and catastrophic results. Threats of fees and curtailed services are issued.

Here in Lewiston, unless something is done, we will undoubtedly continue to build parking garages and pretty fountains, install glass facades, take over unprofitable buildings and businesses, plan on boulevards and townhouses for decrepit areas of the city, relocate businesses to take over their properties, guarantee fiscally questionable loans and offer enormous tax breaks and services to new businesses.

Why do I hear nothing of curbing special projects while retaining necessary services?

What about implementing policies requiring tax-free institutions to pay for services received?

What about changing welfare requirements and limitations to better resemble those of other states?

For years, there has been an outcry from taxpayers regarding over-inflated real estate taxes. Yet, not one plan except Ms. Palesky’s has been offered.

Is it perfect? No way! But it does spell out how taxes will be assessed, how they will be kept under control, and it treats all citizens equitably.

I intend to vote for it.

When politicians decide to treat us in a responsible manner, I would be willing to consider change. But not until those who decide on property assessment and tax rates, and how budgeting should be done, are put on a short and sturdy chain.

Helen Incze, Lewiston

Comments are no longer available on this story