You do your job well. I do not believe I have seen a more blatant case of sensationalism in more than a dog’s year.
Excuse the poor humor, but honestly, I am flabbergasted at how negligently the story of “the beast” has been covered. Despite the fact that the animal was obviously a blue or black chow chow that had spent a considerable amount of time living feral, and there were no out-of-the-ordinary features within that breed and circumstance, you persist in perpetuating the fairy tale.
Why not tell the story of a real evil: the apathy this society has concerning the responsibility to domestic animals?
The real mystery is where is the owner of that animal, and why did he or she so grossly neglect that animal’s needs?
When you realize that every aspect of that animal’s life and behavior can be attributed to a person’s actions, then you can see that what really matters and should be remembered is that animal need not have suffered and died, and possibly caused other animals to do the same, if only someone had acted more human and less like a beast.
Heatherangel Libby, Wales
Send questions/comments to the editors.
Success. Please wait for the page to reload. If the page does not reload within 5 seconds, please refresh the page.
Enter your email and password to access comments.
Hi, to comment on stories you must . This profile is in addition to your subscription and website login.
Already have a commenting profile? .
Invalid username/password.
Please check your email to confirm and complete your registration.
Only subscribers are eligible to post comments. Please subscribe or login first for digital access. Here’s why.
Use the form below to reset your password. When you've submitted your account email, we will send an email with a reset code.